Connect with us
https://yoursportsnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/call-to-1.png

NIL

House vs. NCAA lawsuit

Published

on

House vs. NCAA lawsuit

The college sports economic revolution, which began more than a decade ago with Ed O’Bannon’s lawsuit over what became known as name, image and likeness (NIL), reaches its guillotine moment Monday in an Oakland courtroom.

Judge Claudia Wilken of the Northern District of California, who ruled on the O’Bannon case, will oversee the settlement terms of a class action, antitrust lawsuit that has been winding through the courts for five years.

If approved, the House vs. NCAA settlement will effectively dismantle the longstanding policy of amateurism and transfer billions of dollars from the schools to the athletes.

The settlement will provide back pay for former athletes who did not receive NIL compensation and create a revenue-sharing arrangement for current and future athletes.

It will expand scholarship opportunities, create an enforcement mechanism for third-party NIL payments and, above all, provide clarity for a broken industry.

Here’s what you need to know.

Who is House?

The named plaintiff in the case is Grant House, a former Arizona State swimmer who took the NCAA to court in 2020. But his lawsuit is actually the combination of three cases against the NCAA consolidated into one with the goal of securing financial compensation for past, present and future athletes based on their NIL.

Unlike the NIL system that took effect in the summer of 2021 and allows athletes to receive third-party compensation for endorsement and promotional endeavors, House creates a direct revenue-sharing relationship between the athletes and their schools.

Who are the defendants?

The NCAA and the power conference – the ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, SEC and Pac-12 – are the named defendants. The case was filed before the Pac-12 lost 10 schools in the summer of 2023, but it remains a legal entity and very much involved in the case.

How does the settlement work?

Fearing a loss in court that would have been catastrophic financially, the NCAA and the Power Five conference agreed to a deal last spring.

The damages portion allocates billions in NIL payments to athletes who are no longer eligible, while the injunctive portion creates a revenue-sharing model expected to be implemented this summer.

The settlement also creates more scholarships across dozens of NCAA sports and allows the major conferences to create an enforcement arm for third-party NIL payments.

How will the damages portion be paid?

The NCAA plans to pay approximately $2.7 billion to athletes who competed between 2016-24 but were barred from receiving compensation for the use of their NIL.

The amount will be paid over 10 years, with the NCAA withholding portions of the annual distributions it makes to the schools and instead sending that cash to the plaintiffs.

How will the injunctive portion work?

Approximately 22 percent of each school’s annual revenue from ticket sales, media rights deals and sponsorships will be set aside for the athletes. In 2025-26, that equates to a salary cap of roughly $20.5 million.

Members of the ACC, Big 12, Big Ten and SEC are expected to max out. (If they don’t, recruiting could suffer.) Schools in the Group of Five — and those that do not play major college football — will come in well under the cap.

In the Power Four, approximately 75 percent of the total (or $15 million) will be pegged for football; men’s basketball rosters will receive roughly 20 percent; the rest will go to athletes in the Olympic sports.

Does House impact roster sizes?

Perhaps the most overlooked aspect of the settlement is the expansion of scholarships and reduction in walk-on opportunities.

Let’s explain using football.

In the past, teams were allowed 85 scholarships but could have another 20 or 30 players on the roster as walk-ons. Under the House settlement, rosters are capped at 105, but every player could be placed on scholarship if the school chooses. Some sports will experience a drastic reduction in the number of roster spots.

What does this mean for NIL?

The settlement is designed to eliminate the so-called fake NIL currently used by collectives to lure transfers and high school recruits (i.e., pay-for-play). In theory, it will be replaced by the pure form of NIL, in which athletes are compensated for endorsement and promotional opportunities.

The NCAA has been unable to enforce pure NIL. But the House settlement allows the power conferences to construct an oversight body that’s independent of the NCAA. The CEO is expected to have an investigatory background.

Deloitte, the global auditing and consulting giant, will review NIL deals to determine their legitimacy.

Will the settlement be approved Monday?

In past cases, Wilken has refrained from ruling from the bench. However, she could signal an intent to approve, then render a final decision in a few weeks.

Outright rejection of the settlement would surprise many in college sports. A slew of objectors have expressed concerns, but none of the issues raised are considered substantive to the case itself.

The hearing could last most of the day and will unfold in a packed courtroom.

What’s next?

If Wilken approves the settlement, the revenue sharing era likely will begin on July 1. That won’t end the chaos — this is college sports, after all.

It remains unclear whether the settlement will stand up in court to a Title IX challenge, because football and men’s basketball players will receive the vast majority of revenue.

It does not account for the various state laws that govern NIL.

Also, college athletes aren’t unionized, which means the House settlement was not collectively bargained and, ultimately, might not be enforceable.

This isn’t the end for the college sports revolution, by any means. But it’s a step toward ending the chaos.

NIL

10 most-expensive buyouts of the 2025 college football coaching carousel

Published

on


Brother, can you spare $200 million? Apparently, ten top college football programs could (collectively) in 2025, as the sum total of the 10 highest buyouts paid in the college football coaching cycle added up to that figure. It’s worth recalling that these teams paid over $200 million to NOT be coached by ten decidedly unpopular and now former head coaches. Of course, some of these buyouts are subject to mitigation, which will reduce the ultimate amount. Others might be settled (including one listed that already was settled).

Here is a rundown of the ten highest-dollar buyouts being endured in the 2025 college football coaching roundup.

10. Brent Pry (Virginia Tech, $6 million)

Pry was ditched after an 0-3 start to the 2025 season, which left him at 16-24 in his Virginia Tech tenure. On the bright side, Pry’s $6 million buyout was relatively affordable, freeing Tech to make a splash with its next coaching hire… about whom we have more to say.

9. James Franklin (Penn State, $9 million)

One guy who comes out of the coaching shifts smelling like a rose is Franklin. Franklin was owed somewhere between $47 million and $54 million by Penn State, which would have placed him likely second on this list. He negotiated a much lower buyout figure, moved on to his next job, and freed Penn State to secure another viable head coach.

8. Sam Pittman (Arkansas, $9.8 million)

Pittman was 32-34 at Arkansas and was given the boot. He’s still very much in the realm of (relatively) affordable buyouts and hiring Memphis’ Ryan Silverfield shouldn’t break the bank for the Hogs.

7. Justin Wilcox (California, $10.9 million)

Wilcox was 48-55 at Cal and never won over eight games in a season at the school. Oregon coordinator Tosh Lupoi is the new Bears boss.

6. Mike Gundy (Oklahoma State, $15 million)

The decline of Gundy has been one of the more surprising dips in college football. He was 170-90 at Oklahoma State, finished in the top ten in 2021, and won 10 games in 2023. But he’s out and North Texas’s Eric Morris got the nod for the job.

5. Hugh Freeze (Auburn, $15.8 million)

On the other hand, Freeze’s departure was incredibly predictable. In three seasons at Auburn, he was 15-19 and failed to post a winning season. Freeze’s contract reportedly included no mitigation clause, so the Tigers are on the hook regardless of where and when Freeze finds his next coaching role.

4. Billy Napier (Florida, $21 million)

Napier seemed to have survived a rough season at Florida after a late rally last year led to an 8-5 finish. But after a brutal early 2025, he was cut loose with a career 22-23 mark. Even his hefty buyout did not stock Florida from reportedly offering Lane Kiffin $13 million per year to coach the Gators before Florida ended up going after Tulane’s Jon Sumrall as their consolation prize.

3. Jonathan Smith (Michigan State, $33.5 million)

In actual gameplay, Smith was 9-15 in two seasons. Five of the wins were vacated by the NCAA, but even giving him the full benefit of 24 games, a buyout of over $1.3 million per actual game coached is something. To say nothing of nearly $4 million per game won (or over $8 million per NCAA-credited win).

2. Mark Stoops (Kentucky, $38 million)

Formerly the longest-tenured coach in the SEC, Stoops was sent packing after two straight non-bowl seasons. His 72 wins (actually 82 before some NCAA retrospective tinkering) is a Kentucky record. His willingness to allow the University to space out the $38 million instead of paying it in full in 60 days was indicated as a positive part of Kentucky’s ability to make a quick transition to Oregon offensive coordinator Will Stein.

1. Brian Kelly (LSU, $54 million)

Unlike the stories of James Franklin and Mark Stoops, it doesn’t sound like Kelly has gone quietly into the night. After initial disagreements, Kelly filed suit to try to claim every cent of the $54 million he contends that LSU is contractually obligated to pay him. The university seemingly backed down by admitting that his firing was without cause. Kelly was 34-14 at LSU, which certainly threw caution to the wind despite the massive buyout with a huge contract for new coach Lane Kiffin.





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Texas Tech beats BYU for Big 12 title, likely CFP 1st-round bye

Published

on


ARLINGTON, Texas — Texas Tech’s all-in bet just paid off.

After an offseason of big dreams and bigger spending, the No. 4 Red Raiders secured their first Big 12 championship in program history Saturday with a 34-7 rout of No. 11 BYU.

It was another dominant display from a 12-1 squad, unlike any seen in Lubbock, one that fuels even more confidence about a deep College Football Playoff run.

After the confetti fell inside AT&T Stadium and coach Joey McGuire hoisted a trophy he had been chasing for four years, he fought back tears as he embraced billionaire board chair Cody Campbell, general manager James Blanchard, athletic director Kirby Hocutt and the many stakeholders who helped set up this program for a historic season.

Together, they ended decades of frustration for a Texas Tech football program that hadn’t won an outright conference title since 1955. When the Red Raiders built their trophy room as part of their $242 million new training facility, they reserved a space for a Big 12 trophy.

In place of hardware, a small block rested on the trophy stand with one word printed on it: “BELIEVE.”

For McGuire, the tears started in the final minutes against BYU, but he said they’ll be flowing again when he returns to Texas Tech’s football building Saturday night and walks past that block.

“That’s when it’s really going to hit me,” McGuire said. “And then, we’ll move it to another space so we can go get another trophy.”

Texas Tech assembled what can now be called one of the greatest transfer portal classes of this evolving era of NIL and transfers in college football, a group of 22 incoming transfers that yielded 11 players who started in the Big 12 title game, four first-team All-Big 12 performers and a projected first-round draft pick in pass rusher David Bailey.

Blanchard believed from the beginning that the Big 12 was not equipped to compete with what the Red Raiders had assembled. The results of that ambitious roster-building experiment: Every Texas Tech victory has been by more than 21 points.

“Mission accomplished,” Blanchard told ESPN. “It’s proof of concept. We’ve got an opportunity to go win a national championship, and I like our chances.”

Texas Tech’s more than $25 million investment for its 2025 roster, blending proven returning starters with high-profile newcomers, created boom-or-bust stakes and a seasonlong narrative — that the Red Raiders were desperately trying to buy their way to the top.

Even after defeating BYU on Saturday, Texas Tech players were asked to respond to the perception that they had built “the best team money could buy.” Linebacker Jacob Rodriguez, a returning senior and the Big 12’s Defensive Player of the Year, was happy to answer that one.

“If we are going to buy a team,” Rodriguez replied, “why not be the best?”

Campbell offered no apologies as he watched Red Raiders coaches and players celebrate Saturday.

“I’m just so proud,” Campbell told ESPN. “The credit goes to the guys who are actually in the arena. These men love each other. They played so hard, so tough. I’m just so proud of this staff, I’m so proud of the university and the alignment we have, all the support we’ve gotten from so many people. It’s been a team effort, the whole effort, the whole way.

“We all came together and had a singular mission, a singular focus, and we got it done. This is something we’ve been waiting on a long time at Texas Tech.”

They got it done with a Red Raiders defense that, as it has this season, made BYU’s offense fight for every yard.

The Cougars opened the game with a well-scripted, 14-play, 90-yard touchdown drive that took nearly seven minutes. They mustered just 110 yards on 45 plays the rest of the day and turned it over four times in the second half, including two interceptions by Tech linebacker Ben Roberts.

“I think we can play with anybody in the country,” Campbell said.

The championship victory should guarantee a top-four seed for Texas Tech and a first-round bye in the College Football Playoff. McGuire said the three-week break ahead will be much needed for his team to recover and prepare for its first playoff run.

“We’re football banged-up,” McGuire said. “If you let us get healthy, I really believe we’ve got another gear.”

Quarterback Behren Morton has been playing with a hairline fracture in his fibula that forced him to miss two games, including the Red Raiders’ lone loss to Arizona State. Morton told ESPN he’s feeling “about 70 percent” healthy and is looking forward to more recovery time.

The quarterback and his coach privately agreed in June that they would win a Big 12 championship this year. And when they did, they planned to walk off the field at AT&T Stadium together.

Before Morton grabbed the game ball, threw his arm around his coach and headed to a locker room filled with celebration and cigar smoke, the senior offered a prideful grin.

“There were a lot of people saying preseason that Texas Tech better do it,” Morton said. “Well, guess what? We did it.”



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Georgia targets $390K from Damon Wilson II in landmark NIL dispute

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The University of Georgia Athletic Association is taking legal action against one of the football team’s former star pass rushers. 

Georgia is asking for damages totaling $390,000 after defensive end Damon Wilson II elected to transfer to Missouri after the 2024 season. 

The department cited an NIL buyout clause in Wilson’s contract and requested that a judge compel the defensive end to enter arbitration to reach a settlement. The clause in Wilson’s former agreement effectively acts as a buyout fee for terminating early.

Damon Wilson II celebrates during a game

Missouri Tigers defensive end Damon Wilson II celebrates after recovering a fumble during the second half against the Alabama Crimson Tide at Faurot Field at Memorial Stadium Oct. 11, 2025, in Columbia, Mo.  (Jay Biggerstaff/Imagn Images)

Wilson was recently served a court summons, legal records show.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM

After recording 3.5 sacks during his freshman and sophomore seasons at UGA, Wilson inked a new deal with Georgia’s Classic City Collective. In January, just two weeks after landing the new contract, Wilson made the switch to Missouri.

Wilson had nine sacks in his first regular season with the Tigers.

A view of Georgia Bulldogs helmets

Georgia Bulldogs helmets on the bench during the Georgia spring game at Sanford Stadium in Athens, Ga., April 12, 2025. (Dale Zanine/Imagn Images)

The formation of collectives has become more common at schools across the nation. Many collectives include liquidated damages clauses in their agreements with players to try to protect financial investments in athletes and discourage transfers.

Wilson reportedly received payouts totaling $30,000 under the terms of his latest deal with Georgia before he left Athens, Georgia. The athletic association argues Wilson owed the $390,000 sum within 30 days of his departure.

CONFERENCE CHAMPIONSHIP GAME PICKS, PREVIEW: WHAT TO EXPECT IN INDIANA-OSU, MORE

“When the University of Georgia Athletic Association enters binding agreements with student-athletes, we honor our commitments and expect student-athletes to do the same,” Georgia spokesperson Steven Drummond said in a statement to ESPN.

Wilson could not be reached directly for comment. Missouri-based attorneys Bogdan Susan and Jeff Jensen are representing Wilson. Susan argued that Wilson’s career decisions were never motivated by money.

Damon Wilson II looks on during a game

Damon Wilson II (8) of the Missouri Tigers against the Mississippi State Bulldogs at Faurot Field at Memorial Stadium in Columbia, Mo., Nov. 15, 2025. (Jeff Le/Getty Images)

“After all the facts come out, people will be shocked at how the University of Georgia treated a student-athlete,” Susan said in a statement.  “It has never been about the money for Damon. He just wants to play the game he loves and pursue his dream of playing in the NFL.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Georgia’s move marks one of the first times a school has publicly sought NIL damages from a former athlete over an alleged breach of contract. The dispute sets the table for potentially setting a precedent on whether liquidated damages clauses will act as an effective, defensible replacement for more traditional buyout fees.

However, it should be noted that Arkansas’ NIL collective did retain the services of an attorney to try to enforce a buyout clause in quarterback Madden Iamaleava’s deal. Iamaleava spent his freshman season with UCLA. Wide receiver Dazmin James also left Arkansas, prompting his former school to file a complaint.

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Sources: Baylor finalizing hire of Doug McNamee as new AD

Published

on


Baylor is finalizing the hire of Doug McNamee as its new athletic director, sources told ESPN’s Pete Thamel on Saturday, confirming a report.

McNamee, the president of Field and Stream, worked at Baylor from 2012 to 2018, ultimately as the Baylor senior associate AD, before departing to be the president at Magnolia, the Waco lifestyle brand run by Baylor alums Joanna and Chip Gaines. He joined Field and Stream in 2022.

McNamee replaces Mack Rhoades, who had been athletic director at Baylor since 2016 but stepped down for personal reasons.

Baylor president Linda Livingstone told ESPN recently that a new AD’s task would be to tackle the pressures of funding NIL and revenue sharing in college athletics.

“We have to really work with our donors to step up. We have to work with sponsorships, we have to work on companies that will walk beside us for NIL sponsorships,” Livingstone said. “That’s going to be a really big focus for a new athletic director. … That’s what many, many institutions are looking at right now. How do we supplement and grow financial support for athletics in a way that’s different than we’ve done it in the past that doesn’t put as much burden on our institutions?”

One of McNamee’s first jobs will be to help right the ship in football under coach Dave Aranda, whom Livingstone retained despite Baylor fans’ growing dissatisfaction.

In 2021, Baylor went 12-2 and won a Big 12 championship, but since then, the Bears have gone 22-28 over four seasons.

News of Baylor’s decision was first reported by SicEm365.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Georgia taking Missouri DE Damon Wilson II to court in NIL contract dispute

Published

on


Updated Dec. 6, 2025, 12:47 p.m. ET



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Predicting the College Football Playoff after Texas Tech beats BYU for the Big 12 title

Published

on


Defense wins championships, they say. That was true of Texas Tech, whose dominant unit overwhelmed BYU behind two key takeaways to win the Big 12 Championship Game and book the Red Raiders a first-round bye in the College Football Playoff.

Ben Roberts intercepted Bear Bachmeier twice, and the Texas Tech offense turned both into points to finally pull away from BYU and win its first-ever conference championship.

With the win, they’ll present a decisive case to the selection committee to stay within the top-four, especially given one of either No. 1 Ohio State or No. 2 Indiana will have to lose the Big Ten championship later today.

Where do things stand in the latest bracket projection? Let’s project what 12 teams will make the College Football Playoff, as of Texas Tech’s big win on Saturday.

Predicting the College Football Playoff bracket

Predicting the College Football Playoff bracket after Texas Tech wins Big 12 championship

Brett Davis-Imagn Images

Subject to change pending other Championship Week results

1. Ohio State. We project the Buckeyes will stay perfect by narrowly defeating Indiana to win the Big Ten championship and secure the top overall seed in the playoff.

2. Georgia. Our current expectation is that the Bulldogs will avenge their regular season loss to Alabama and win their second-straight SEC championship.

3. Texas Tech. One of college football’s best defenses left no doubt as to its reputation after swarming BYU to win the Big 12 championship, securing a first-round bye.

4. Indiana. Although we think the Hoosiers will lose the Big Ten title game, it won’t be by much, and they have the overall resume to stay within the top four.

5. Oregon. The one-loss Ducks will stay in the top-five, parked behind the Indiana squad that gave them that defeat earlier this season.

6. Ole Miss. The committee signaled that Lane Kiffin’s exit hasn’t affected the Rebels so far, so it’s likely they’ll stay at 6 when the final bracket is unveiled.

7. Texas A&M. That loss to Texas in the finale deprived the Aggies of a shot at the SEC championship, but the rest of their combined achievements should ensure they won’t have fallen far enough to not host a game in the first round.

8. Oklahoma. One of the nation’s toughest defenses put the Sooners back in playoff contention with a late-season push, but we’ll see how well John Mateer and this offense is able to navigate once the postseason starts.

9. Notre Dame. We expect Alabama loses the SEC championship, allowing the Irish room to move up by one spot.

10. Alabama. Here is where we could see some controversy. There’s a chance the committee keeps the Tide in the bracket if they lose close against Georgia, especially after the selectors jumped Bama over the Irish in the last poll, signaling real confidence in them, win or lose.

But watch for Miami, which will move up in the rankings after BYU’s loss, and there’s a very good case that the Hurricanes deserve it more. Miami would have one fewer loss than Alabama, and that head-to-head win over Notre Dame, too. What do we think? If Georgia beats Alabama, Miami deserves it. The committee may think otherwise, using whatever argument they pick that day.

11. Virginia. James Madison fans are rooting against the Hoos in the ACC championship, because if Virginia loses to Duke, that could pave the way for the selectors to add a second Group of Five team, with JMU ready to take advantage. We still think Virginia beats Duke, though.

12. Tulane. A dominant defensive performance allowed the Green Wave to take out North Texas and win the American championship, and likely entrench their position as the highest-ranked Group of Five team.

What the College Football Playoff bracket would look like

12 Tulane at 5 Oregon
Winner plays 4 Indiana

11 Virginia at 6 Ole Miss
Winner plays 3 Texas Tech

10 Alabama at 7 Texas A&M
Winner plays 2 Georgia

9 Notre Dame at 8 Oklahoma
Winner plays 1 Ohio State

More college football from SI: Top 25 Rankings | Schedule | Teams

Follow College Football HQ: Bookmark | Rankings | Picks



Link

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending