Connect with us
https://yoursportsnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/call-to-1.png

NIL

‘I Don’t See Them Stopping Me’

© Eric Canha-Imagn Images Audio By Carbonatix Thomas Castellanos is determined to prove his doubters wrong this fall following a transfer to Florida State. The starting quarterback continues to poke the bear that is Alabama. The Seminoles will host the Crimson Tide in Week 1 of the 2025 college football season. Castellanos is confident in […]

Published

on


Thomas Castellanos throws a pass for Boston College

© Eric Canha-Imagn Images

Carbonatix Pre-Player Loader

Audio By Carbonatix

Thomas Castellanos is determined to prove his doubters wrong this fall following a transfer to Florida State. The starting quarterback continues to poke the bear that is Alabama.

The Seminoles will host the Crimson Tide in Week 1 of the 2025 college football season. Castellanos is confident in his ability to take down his future foe.

The passer started his career at Central Florida before moving into the ACC with Boston College. There, he threw for more than 3,600 yards to go along with 33 touchdowns.

Despite the production, he was benched in his final season with the Eagles. That demotion led to a second transfer within the conference.

That move seems to have proven quite lucrative given his activity on social media. The passer’s been spotted travelling the world this offseason while also flaunting his NIL wealth.

Most recently, he showed off a new tint on his Mercedes-Benz GLE53.

Castellanos’s NIL value sits around $500K according to On3 Sports’ valuation. It ranks fifth on the FSU roster. He’s looking to show that he’s worth the investment by helping his new school rebound from a 2-10 campaign.

He’s been handed the keys to the offense by head coach Mike Norvell. Castellanos says he’s not only playing for himself, but for the opportunity to “save jobs” on the coaching staff.

“I’m playing for coaches who are fathers and who have homes and families here,” he said in an interview with Pete Nakos of On3 Sports. “I’m trying to save jobs and win.”

Within that interview was a direct shot at Alabama, his first opponent as a Seminole. He doesn’t believe the Crimson Tide will present a worth adversary with Nick Saban no longer at the helm.

“They don’t have Nick Saban to save them,” he stated. “I just don’t see them stopping me.”

Alabama did struggle at times with dual threat quarterbacks last year. That was evident in a close win vs. South Carolina, as well as surprising losses to Vanderbilt and Tennessee. Still, it was a defensive bunch that ranked 10th in the nation, allowing just 17.4 points per game.

Thomas Castellanos is out for revenge.

His motivation likely stems from his rejection at Boston College. It might also have something to do with his being overlooked as a high school recruit.

Castellanos was rated as a three-star prospect in the class of 2022. The signal caller played his high school ball in the heart of SEC Country for Ware County in Waycross, Georgia.

He picked up offers from schools like Florida State and Kansas in the recruiting process according to his 247 Sports profile but was not given an opportunity by SEC schools.

Alabama was the class of the conference under Nick Saban. It took a step back in Year 1 with Kalen DeBoer. Castellanos believes he can capitalize.

This isn’t the first bit of shade the quarterback’s thrown in reference to that matchup with the Crimson Tide. Earlier this offseason, he was heard ripping ESPN for not putting the opener in primetime. In a now-deleted post on X, he wrote, “LOL, no primetime is crazy but bet.” The game will kick off at 3:30 PM.

Thomas Castellanos believes both he and his team are being overlooked following a disastrous 2024 campaign. He’s taken it upon himself to right the ship. That starts with Game 1 against Alabama.

Castellanos is motivated to prove the doubters wrong. He’s not lacking confidence ahead of his first season with the Seminoles. We’ll see if his words come back to bite in Week 1.





Link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NIL

Nick Saban’s response to latest twist in NIL should surprise no one

President Donald Trump inserted himself into the chaos of college athletics and NIL. He signed an executive order that banned third-party payments to athletes without “fair-market” contracts. Legendary broadcaster Tim Brando has already praised the new executive order, but now also from arguably college football’s greatest coach, Nick Saban, who has been desperate for this […]

Published

on


President Donald Trump inserted himself into the chaos of college athletics and NIL. He signed an executive order that banned third-party payments to athletes without “fair-market” contracts. Legendary broadcaster Tim Brando has already praised the new executive order, but now also from arguably college football’s greatest coach, Nick Saban, who has been desperate for this sort of reform for a long time.

It’s not surprising to see Saban support this new executive order from the President, as he’s been one of the strongest advocates of keeping the educational aspect of college athletics as the primary focus.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

July 28, 2025 – Bulldawg Illustrated

Jump To Top of Page The Pitch That Wins: “Get Paid Now, Get Rich Later” In the high-stakes world of college athletics, the University of Georgia is selling more than just a scholarship. Its pitch: “Get paid now, get rich later.” Behind the slogan lies a deliberate, long-game NIL strategy that blends smart financial allocation, culture-driven recruiting and athlete […]

Published

on


Jump To Top of Page

The Pitch That Wins: “Get Paid Now, Get Rich Later”

In the high-stakes world of college athletics, the University of Georgia is selling more than just a scholarship. Its pitch: “Get paid now, get rich later.” Behind the slogan lies a deliberate, long-game NIL strategy that blends smart financial allocation, culture-driven recruiting and athlete branding infrastructure.

In June 2025, Georgia Athletics teamed with Learfield Impact to launch an independent, full-service NIL agency, integrated with Georgia Bulldogs Sports Marketing. The partnership provides UGA athletes with an elite toolkit for building brands, securing endorsements, and accessing long-term income—all while remaining aligned with University systems and collective oversight.

This move builds on the Classic City Collective, a pioneering organization that helped define the University of Georgia’s NIL ecosystem. Georgia chose to keep its own collective active—unlike many peer institutions that are winding theirs down—signaling an intentional focus on “above-the-cap” compensation via legitimate marketing and licensing deals beyond the NCAA’s standard revenue-share cap of $20.5 million per year.

Head coach Kirby Smart has made Georgia’s NIL philosophy uncompromisingly clear: pay what athletes are worth—but don’t overpay, especially for early-career players. He emphasizes relationships over transactions, favoring loyalty and program fit above big short-term payouts.

Inside fan forums, supporters describe UGA’s NIL approach as consistently investing in players already in the program, rather than splurging on portal or transfer athletes or “mercenaries.” One standard analysis: “While other teams are blowing much of their NIL by signing mercenaries off the Portal, UGA is spending to keep the guys they’ve invested in via development.” That strategy aligns with the revenue-sharing cap environment: rather than maxing out a few megadeals, Georgia spreads its NIL dollars across multiple athletes, reinforcing depth, culture, and long-term value.

Georgia understands that player turnover is costly.

Recent NIL resources have been invested in retaining stars who might otherwise leave via the transfer portal. For example, when rumors swirled about player departures, UGA reportedly provided incentives to keep key contributors on the roster. That approach preserves continuity, fosters trust, and builds a team identity, contrasting with programs that chase immediate success by purchasing experienced portal talent.

During SEC Media Days, Smart acknowledged Georgia occasionally loses out on recruits due to smaller NIL packages. One high-profile case: five-star in-state defensive lineman Justus Terry chose Texas over Georgia, citing a bigger NIL offer. Yet Smart sees this as evidence—not weakness—that Georgia’s emphasis on development and suit-fit trumps transactional offers.

Despite such losses, Georgia has signed four straight top-4 recruiting classes, including the No. 1 class in 2024 and No. 2 in 2025, and leads the chase for 2026. That track record suggests the message—relationships over transactions—resonates with players of character who see UGA as a path to pro success beyond immediate NIL dollars.

With new NCAA regulations capping revenue-share at $20.5 million and banning overly big NIL contracts that resemble pay-for-play (contracts above $600 trigger scrutiny), many schools are winding down their collectives. However, Georgia is bucking that trend, doubling down on above-cap deals through brand licensure and sponsorship, rather than performance-based payouts.

On July 24, 2025, a federal executive order was signed banning third-party, booster-sourced NIL payments used as recruiting inducements, while allowing fair-market endorsement deals. That national guardrail underscores why Georgia’s carefully structured model, rooted in transparency and legitimate marketing, may be more resilient moving forward.

This multi-layered strategy serves several goals: Athlete brand building via professional marketing support. Draft prep and exposure, making players pro-ready with strong off-field platforms. Roster stability, via investments in loyalty. Competitive depth is achieved by deploying NIL across multiple players, rather than relying on a few stars. Institutional alignment, giving Georgia complete oversight and brand integration, not leaving NIL to boosters or third parties.

The payoff is both on-field dominance—back-to-back national titles—and off-field value, as Bulldogs build long-term partnerships that outlast eligibility.

Georgia’s pitch is clear: if you buy into the culture and development model—if you stay loyal and work off and on the field—today’s NIL earnings are just the start. Tomorrow brings bigger returns: professional contracts, long-term endorsement deals, and life after UGA success.

In this context, “Get Paid Now” means athletes are compensated in market-value deals early in their careers. But “Get Rich Later” reflects Georgia’s belief that successful development, exposure, national championships, and personal branding ultimately deliver far more than one-time megadeals.

UGA’s NIL strategy is not about knee-jerk, big-money deals. It is a purposeful, multi-layered plan blending institutional infrastructure, athlete support, cultural alignment, recruitment messaging, and brand partnerships. They’re selling something bigger than endorsement checks—a sustainable blueprint for success: win today, build tomorrow.

Georgia’s pitch wins by offering athletes a clear path: earn immediate NIL, but invest in development, identity, and loyalty, and you’ll “get rich later.”

Jump To Today’s Discussion Thread



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

TABLE

Jul 28 (Reuters)- Koei Tecmo Holdings Co., Ltd. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (in billions of yen unless specified) 3 months ended 3 months ended Year to Jun 30, 2025 Jun 30, 2024 Mar 31, 2026 LATEST YEAR-AGO LATEST RESULTS RESULTS FORECAST Sales 14.80 17.61 92.00 (-15.9 pct) (-3.8 pct) (+10.6 pct) Operating 3.57 5.72 31.00 (-37.5 pct) (-23.8 pct) […]

Published

on

Jul 28 (Reuters)- Koei Tecmo Holdings Co., Ltd. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (in billions of yen unless specified) 3 months ended 3 months ended Year to Jun 30, 2025 Jun 30, 2024 Mar 31, 2026 LATEST YEAR-AGO LATEST RESULTS RESULTS FORECAST Sales 14.80 17.61 92.00 (-15.9 pct) (-3.8 pct) (+10.6 pct) Operating 3.57 5.72 31.00 (-37.5 pct) (-23.8 pct) (-3.5 pct) Recurring 8.77 18.70 37.00 (-53.1 pct) (+27.3 pct) (-26.0 pct) Net 6.07 13.64 27.00 (-55.5 pct) (+29.2 pct) (-28.2 pct) EPS 19.23 yen 43.18 yen 85.49 yen EPS Diluted 19.20 yen 40.50 yen Ann Div 60.00 yen 43.00 yen -Q2 div NIL NIL -Q4 div 60.00 yen 43.00 yen NOTE – Koei Tecmo Holdings Co., Ltd.. To see Company Overview page, click reuters://REALTIME/verb=CompanyData/ric=3635.T

Continue Reading

NIL

Daily Dawg Thread

Jump To Top of Page The Pitch That Wins: “Get Paid Now, Get Rich Later” In the high-stakes world of college athletics, the University of Georgia is selling more than just a scholarship. Its pitch: “Get paid now, get rich later.” Behind the slogan lies a deliberate, long-game NIL strategy that blends smart financial allocation, culture-driven recruiting and athlete […]

Published

on

Daily Dawg Thread

Jump To Top of Page

The Pitch That Wins: “Get Paid Now, Get Rich Later”

In the high-stakes world of college athletics, the University of Georgia is selling more than just a scholarship. Its pitch: “Get paid now, get rich later.” Behind the slogan lies a deliberate, long-game NIL strategy that blends smart financial allocation, culture-driven recruiting and athlete branding infrastructure.

In June 2025, Georgia Athletics teamed with Learfield Impact to launch an independent, full-service NIL agency, integrated with Georgia Bulldogs Sports Marketing. The partnership provides UGA athletes with an elite toolkit for building brands, securing endorsements, and accessing long-term income—all while remaining aligned with University systems and collective oversight.

This move builds on the Classic City Collective, a pioneering organization that helped define the University of Georgia’s NIL ecosystem. Georgia chose to keep its own collective active—unlike many peer institutions that are winding theirs down—signaling an intentional focus on “above-the-cap” compensation via legitimate marketing and licensing deals beyond the NCAA’s standard revenue-share cap of $20.5 million per year.

Head coach Kirby Smart has made Georgia’s NIL philosophy uncompromisingly clear: pay what athletes are worth—but don’t overpay, especially for early-career players. He emphasizes relationships over transactions, favoring loyalty and program fit above big short-term payouts.

Inside fan forums, supporters describe UGA’s NIL approach as consistently investing in players already in the program, rather than splurging on portal or transfer athletes or “mercenaries.” One standard analysis: “While other teams are blowing much of their NIL by signing mercenaries off the Portal, UGA is spending to keep the guys they’ve invested in via development.” That strategy aligns with the revenue-sharing cap environment: rather than maxing out a few megadeals, Georgia spreads its NIL dollars across multiple athletes, reinforcing depth, culture, and long-term value.

Georgia understands that player turnover is costly.

Recent NIL resources have been invested in retaining stars who might otherwise leave via the transfer portal. For example, when rumors swirled about player departures, UGA reportedly provided incentives to keep key contributors on the roster. That approach preserves continuity, fosters trust, and builds a team identity, contrasting with programs that chase immediate success by purchasing experienced portal talent.

During SEC Media Days, Smart acknowledged Georgia occasionally loses out on recruits due to smaller NIL packages. One high-profile case: five-star in-state defensive lineman Justus Terry chose Texas over Georgia, citing a bigger NIL offer. Yet Smart sees this as evidence—not weakness—that Georgia’s emphasis on development and suit-fit trumps transactional offers.

Despite such losses, Georgia has signed four straight top-4 recruiting classes, including the No. 1 class in 2024 and No. 2 in 2025, and leads the chase for 2026. That track record suggests the message—relationships over transactions—resonates with players of character who see UGA as a path to pro success beyond immediate NIL dollars.

With new NCAA regulations capping revenue-share at $20.5 million and banning overly big NIL contracts that resemble pay-for-play (contracts above $600 trigger scrutiny), many schools are winding down their collectives. However, Georgia is bucking that trend, doubling down on above-cap deals through brand licensure and sponsorship, rather than performance-based payouts.

On July 24, 2025, a federal executive order was signed banning third-party, booster-sourced NIL payments used as recruiting inducements, while allowing fair-market endorsement deals. That national guardrail underscores why Georgia’s carefully structured model, rooted in transparency and legitimate marketing, may be more resilient moving forward.

This multi-layered strategy serves several goals: Athlete brand building via professional marketing support. Draft prep and exposure, making players pro-ready with strong off-field platforms. Roster stability, via investments in loyalty. Competitive depth is achieved by deploying NIL across multiple players, rather than relying on a few stars. Institutional alignment, giving Georgia complete oversight and brand integration, not leaving NIL to boosters or third parties.

The payoff is both on-field dominance—back-to-back national titles—and off-field value, as Bulldogs build long-term partnerships that outlast eligibility.

Georgia’s pitch is clear: if you buy into the culture and development model—if you stay loyal and work off and on the field—today’s NIL earnings are just the start. Tomorrow brings bigger returns: professional contracts, long-term endorsement deals, and life after UGA success.

In this context, “Get Paid Now” means athletes are compensated in market-value deals early in their careers. But “Get Rich Later” reflects Georgia’s belief that successful development, exposure, national championships, and personal branding ultimately deliver far more than one-time megadeals.

UGA’s NIL strategy is not about knee-jerk, big-money deals. It is a purposeful, multi-layered plan blending institutional infrastructure, athlete support, cultural alignment, recruitment messaging, and brand partnerships. They’re selling something bigger than endorsement checks—a sustainable blueprint for success: win today, build tomorrow.

Georgia’s pitch wins by offering athletes a clear path: earn immediate NIL, but invest in development, identity, and loyalty, and you’ll “get rich later.”

Jump To Today’s Discussion Thread

Continue Reading

NIL

Crypto Sponsorships in Sports

Cryptocurrency firms invest aggressively in sports, locking up stadium deals, jerseys and athlete sponsorship. But are the agreements sustainable partnerships or hype-seeking in a volatile sector? Cryptocurrency’s spread in the world of sports has really not been easy to avoid. Blockchain enterprises emblazoned across teams’ uniforms, stadium naming rights sponsored by crypto and the connection […]

Published

on

Crypto Sponsorships in Sports

Cryptocurrency firms invest aggressively in sports, locking up stadium deals, jerseys and athlete sponsorship. But are the agreements sustainable partnerships or hype-seeking in a volatile sector?

Cryptocurrency’s spread in the world of sports has really not been easy to avoid. Blockchain enterprises emblazoned across teams’ uniforms, stadium naming rights sponsored by crypto and the connection between sports entertainment and virtual currency have become more overt. However, as the degree of trust in the sector ebbs and flows, the eyes are now only on whether the arrangements constitute long-term investment planning or short-term marketing stunts.

While sponsorships have really given crypto sites widespread coverage, online market volatility remains a wildcard. The Bitcoin price live at high-profile events frequently reflects popular interest boosts, illustrating the extent to which fan sentiment tracks headlines in financial news.

A Surge in Crypto Branding Across Major Leagues

From Formula 1 to European football, the crypto branding boom has changed the sponsorship landscape of professional sports. Multi-million-dollar contracts have placed crypto exchanges, wallet platforms and NFT startups center stage among global audiences.

In the Premier League, Serie A, UFC and NBA, blockchain-backed firms have struck high-profile deals for shirt sponsorships, virtual fan tokens and sports star endorsements. The aim is real-time access to active audiences, often geographically dispersed and tech-savvy. As the value of bitcoin live usually trends in real-time sports events on social media, crypto visibility in stadiums and broadcasts keeps pace with real-time audience engagement.

Nonetheless, not all of these collaborations have gone smoothly. Certain clubs and leagues have suspended or withdrawn from crypto agreements due to concerns of volatility, unclear deliverables or adverse fan reception. These contradictions have raised questions concerning the long-term sustainability of crypto-sports convergence.

Stadium Naming Rights

Arguably, the most daring uses of crypto’s presence in sports have come through stadium naming rights agreements. In various markets, blockchain companies have made multi-decade deals worth hundreds of millions of dollars to create a permanent presence in the sports space.

These deals, while sensational, are at the mercy of the market. Some deals have had to be renegotiated or terminated prematurely due to declining valuations, leadership changes or increased local regulation. Due to the allure of mainstream acceptability, these disappointments demonstrate a potential disconnection between crypto’s future potential longevity and practical application.

However, in some instances, naming agreements have continued to make headlines, as logos are used in broadcasts and products internationally. The latest price of bitcoin at premier game times has often become a subject of discussion, confirming the presence of the digital economy in today’s fan culture, even as the fate of the collaborations remains unpredictable.

Athlete Endorsements and Performance-Based Deals

Sponsorships of individual sports have also been another significant crypto playbook move. Universal football, tennis, basketball and combat sport deals have brought crypto branding directly to millions of Twitter fans and television audiences.

These sponsorships vary from advertising campaigns to more experimental deals in which the athletes are paid in virtual currencies or endorse individual NFTs. The short-term marketing reach cannot be denied, but the long-term brand effect relies greatly upon mutual trust, market sentiment and reception among the people.

These athlete endorsements of blockchain products now have reputational risk to manage. Should the market fall or platforms fail to deliver the touted utility, they can count on backlash. Nonetheless, some athletes have rising crypto activity when the Bitcoin live price happens in conjunction with favorable publicity, which makes the connection between financial education and athletic prowess more overt.

Mixed Signals from the Global Community

Reception among fans of crypto sponsorships has varied. Virtual currencies are viewed as a badge of financial emancipation and innovation in some sectors. In others, mistrust persists due to past controversies, regulatory fears or misunderstandings of the protocol itself.

Clubs implementing fan tokens, for example, have cited resistance when the purported gains, like casting club decisions via vote or receiving exclusive content, fail to meet expectations. Fans are usually open to the idea if the communication and implementation are transparent. But unforeseen token price swings or sponsorship volatility can breed mistrust.

Bitcoin price often becomes the gauge of common sentiment, particularly if the swings occur around major sporting events. The ever-present tension between risk and innovation continues to define the future of crypto entities in the sporting landscape.

What’s Next for Crypto in Sports?

The future of sports crypto sponsorships has wide-ranging potential. Market forces, technological breakthroughs and regulatory clarity will all decide the longevity of the deals. The initial crypto branding boom has generated awareness, but the future stage may be subject to enduring utility, clarity and flexibility.

Newer applications are beginning to materialize, including blockchain-based ticket systems, virtual collectibles and smart contract merchandise licenses. These usages foreshadow a more integrally embedded use of crypto beyond the simplest of logos and taglines.

Whether the cost of bitcoin rises or falls, the sports-decentralized finance experiment has already left its mark. The real challenge, however, lies in transitioning from hype to impact—the fact that the connection between the two universes represents something more than a temporary trend.

The post Crypto Sponsorships in Sports appeared first on Stadium Rant.

Continue Reading

NIL

5 Reasons President Donald Trump’s “Save College Sports’ Order Will Backfire

By passing legislation via Congress, US President Donald Trump has issued a “Save College Sports” executive order. As with most topics in which Trump weighs in, a storm of commentary, both pro and anti, has erupted. Here are a few potential snags in this order. Dive into Try out PFSN’s FREE college football playoff predictor, […]

Published

on


By passing legislation via Congress, US President Donald Trump has issued a “Save College Sports” executive order. As with most topics in which Trump weighs in, a storm of commentary, both pro and anti, has erupted. Here are a few potential snags in this order.

PFSN College Football Playoff Predictor
Dive into Try out PFSN’s FREE college football playoff predictor, where you can simulate every 2025-26 NFL season game and see who wins the National Championship!

5 Reasons President Donald Trump’s College Sports Order Will Backfire

Ed O'Bannon (middle) was a significant NCAA pioneer. (Photo Credit: IMAGN)
Ed O’Bannon (center) was a pioneer in the NIL arena with his suit against the NCAA, but the executive order from President Trump may ban such action. (Photo Credit: IMAGN)

1. Legal scholars indicate that the order could be vulnerable to overruling

President Trump has been aggressive in his use of executive orders, in which the President sets a government policy in the absence of any explicit legislative statement. However, executive orders in general are subject to being overturned by courts, which could render the order, in whole or in part, invalid. The uncertainty of the order will be a potential problem.

2. Trump’s decree that athletes can receive only “fair market value” from a third party is nearly unenforceable

The executive order purports to limit player compensation from third parties to only “fair market value” for services provided. In the realm of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL), trying to establish a fair market value is near impossible. All the deals will be different from one another, and an unenforceable standard might be the only thing worse than no standard.

Additionally, the order doesn’t say exactly who will determine “fair market value.” Would it be the NCAA, the applicable federal court, or President Trump himself? Stay tuned, because without any mechanism of policing, a standard is hard to justify.

3. Protections on nonrevenue scholarships are unwieldy at best

Given the Trump administration’s prior stance on Title IX, a stated protection on nonrevenue scholarships will be unwieldy for college programs to handle. Is requiring schools to maintain nonrevenue scholarship levels a de facto limitation on their NIL money spent on football and basketball?

How will alums of major football schools react when there’s not enough NIL money to fund top recruits in football and all of those nonrevenue scholarships in less popular sports?

4. Limitations on athletes as employees could push courts in the alternative direction

One of the major issues now is whether college athletes should be classified as employees. In light of the time requirement and the control over athletes’ schedules, a credible argument has been raised that athletes are employees.

However, the Trump order says otherwise, and with the pendulum swinging in favor of an employee determination, President Trump’s order may ultimately cause a court to hasten to a contrary finding.

5. NCAA lawsuit protection seems unlikely to stand

To be clear, NIL changes have been made only because of litigation from former athletes. The Trump order indicates that the NCAA will be protected against suits from former athletes. That could be significant in issues like extra seasons of eligibility, whether transfer requirements sideline athletes, and more in the contours of athlete protection. Given the interconnection of the NCAA and athletes, a ban on litigation seems unlikely to stick.

College Sports Network has you covered with the latest news, analysis, insights, and trending stories in footballbasketball, and more!



Link

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending