College Sports

Jessica Remm of Alfred University Named to 2025 CSC Softball Division III Academic All-America Team

Softball | 6/17/2025 12:02:42 PM Story Links 2025 College Sports Communicators Softball Academic All-America Teams Junior outfielder Jessica Remm of Alfred University was named to the 2025 College Sports Communicators (CSC) Academic All-America® Softball NCAA Division III Team, which recognizes the nation’s top student-athletes […]

Published

2 months ago

June 17, 2025

Your Sports Nation

Softball | 6/17/2025 12:02:42 PM

Junior outfielder Jessica Remm of Alfred University was named to the 2025 College Sports Communicators (CSC) Academic All-America® Softball NCAA Division III Team, which recognizes the nation’s top student-athletes for their combined performances on the field and in the classroom. Remm was a first team selection.

The 2025 Academic Academic All-America® Softball Teams, selected by College Sports Communicators, recognize the nation’s top student-athletes for their combined performances on the field and in the classroom. The CSC Academic All-America® program separately recognizes honorees in four divisions — NCAA Division I, NCAA Division II, NCAA Division III and NAIA. In order to be eligible for both All-District and All-American consideration, student-athletes must be at least a sophomore academically, hold a 3.30 cumulative GPA or above and be a starter or important reserve for their respective teams.

Remm, who has a 3.93 grade-point average as an poltical science major capped off an incredible season in 2025. Remm earned Division III All-America honors as a second team selection this season as well as the 2025 Empire 8 Defensive Player of the Year and earned All-E8 first team honors.

Remm had a standout season, finishing the regular season and Empire 8 Championships with a perfect, 1.000 fielding percentage. She was named the Empire 8 Co-Player of the Week twice and Saxon of the Week five times. At the end of the regular season, Remm broke the single season record for RBI at SUNY Poly with her 55^th and continued to add to it to where she broke the Empire 8 record, held by Laura Remia of Ithaca College in 2001 with 63 RBI, recording her 65^th on Saturday afternoon to help the Saxons go undefeated in the Empire 8 Championship Tournament with a win over St. John Fisher University. Her game-winning home run also clinched her the AU and Empire 8 record for single season runs scored, surpassing Thompson and her record of 56 runs scored in 2015. Remm then added two more RBI in the NCAA Regional Tournament held at Christopher Newport University with a two-run home run against Regional Champion, Randolph-Macon. Remm finished the season with a .462 batting average, recording 67 hits, one shy of the AU school record

The Division II and III CSC Academic All-America® programs are partially financially supported by the NCAA Division II and III national governance structures to assist CSC with handling the awards fulfillment aspects for the 2024-25 Divisions II and III Academic All-America® programs. The NAIA CSC Academic All-America® program is partially financially supported through the NAIA national office member.

ABOUT THE EMPIRE 8 CONFERENCE

The members of the Empire 8 Conference are committed first and foremost to the pursuit of academic excellence and the league is regarded as an outstanding NCAA Division III conference. The membership has distinguished itself among its peer group for its quality institutions, spirited and sportsmanlike competition, outstanding services and highly ethical policies and practices. Its commitment to serve the educational needs of its student-athletes is the hallmark of the E8. For more on the Empire 8 visit www.empire8.com.

EMPIRE 8 SOCIAL MEDIA

YouTube – Facebook – Twitter – Instagram

Link

College Sports

Conferences can ask for reviews for game misconduct penalties in men’s and women’s ice hockey

Story Links An NCAA Men’s and Women’s Ice Hockey Rules Committee proposal to extend a review option to game misconduct penalties was approved Wednesday for the 2025-26 season. Last season, a conference was able to request a review by the NCAA secretary-rules editor and national coordinator of officials for possible adjustment. This […]

Published

14 minutes ago

August 13, 2025

Your Sports Nation

An NCAA Men’s and Women’s Ice Hockey Rules Committee proposal to extend a review option to game misconduct penalties was approved Wednesday for the 2025-26 season.

Last season, a conference was able to request a review by the NCAA secretary-rules editor and national coordinator of officials for possible adjustment. This process was used rarely, but in those instances, it was successful and corrected a handful of decisions. Committee members think this should extend to the game misconduct penalties, which have a progressive component and essentially the same rationale of fairness to the student-athlete.

The NCAA Playing Rules Oversight Panel approved the change today.

PROP approved three other ice hockey proposals for the 2025-26 season:

Face mask penalty

Adjustments to the face mask rule’s penalty structure include:

A minor penalty for intentionally placing the hand on the mask and pushing the face mask of an opponent.

A minor penalty for moving an open hand back and forth across an opponent’s face mask (previously a major penalty).

Major penalty and either a game misconduct or game disqualification at the referee’s discretion for a player grasping and pulling or twisting to control an opponent’s face mask.

Major penalty review options

When the on-ice officials are planning to enforce a major penalty, a replay review must be conducted in games that have instant replay. The panel approved adjusting the rule regarding video reviews of major penalties. After the review, on-ice officials will have three options:

Confirm a major penalty.

Reduce the major penalty to a minor penalty.

Remove the penalty completely, if warranted by the video review.

Teams are not permitted to challenge the result of the review.

High-sticking the puck

The panel approved clarifying the rule on high-sticking the puck by separating the scoring of a goal (puck may not be played higher than 4 feet, which is the height of the crossbar) and all other plays (puck may not be played higher than above a player’s shoulder, which is defined as that player’s normal standing height). This is an adjustment from last season, when the rule did not include the “player’s normal standing height.”

Link

College Sports

Rahsul Faison Drops Merch Shading NCAA Amid Eligibility Battle

© Jamie Sabau-Imagn Images Audio By Carbonatix Rahsul Faison’s playing status for the 2025 college football season remains uncertain. The transfer running back does not know if he’ll be on the field for the first game. The NCAA has yet to make a decision amid an ongoing eligibility review for the coming year. He’s now […]

Published

1 hour ago

August 13, 2025

Your Sports Nation

Rahsul Faison runs the ball for Utah State

Audio By Carbonatix

Rahsul Faison’s playing status for the 2025 college football season remains uncertain. The transfer running back does not know if he’ll be on the field for the first game.

The NCAA has yet to make a decision amid an ongoing eligibility review for the coming year. He’s now dropped new merch targeted at the association in hopes of getting his case decided.

Faison is expected to be the Gamecocks‘ starting tailback if available. Right now, that’s a big “if.”

South Carolina is 18 days out from its season opener against Virginia Tech in Atlanta. Despite beginning the transfer process in January, his situation drags on.

Rahsul Faison is in transfer portal purgatory.

The running back left Utah State after two seasons to move into the SEC. In 2024, he ran for more than 1,100 yards while scoring eight touchdowns.

South Carolina lost starting rusher Rocket Sanders after the ’24 campaign. Faison was expected to fill the void.

He officially transferred to the school January. Since, he’s been given the run-around by the NCAA.

The running back is entering his 7th season.

Rahsul Faison’s college path has been atypical. He initially signed with Marshall in 2019 where he was given a grayshirt (delayed enrollment).

He later moved onto Lackawanna College in 2020 where he did not play football, and then to Snow Junior College where he sat out his first season.

It wasn’t until his second year at Snow, and his third year removed from Marshall, that he saw the field for the first time as a college player.

Rahsul Faison timeline

2019: Marshall – grayshirt
2020: Lackawanna – did not play
2021: Snow – no game action
2022: Snow
2023: Utah State
2024: Utah State

In 2023, he signed with Utah State. Now, he’s at his fifth school in seven years.

The Gamecocks are hoping Faison is granted a fourth season of action as his five-year NCAA window has passed. They have submitted the paperwork, but have yet to receive an answer.

Rahsul Faison is speaking out.

The situation has been frustrating all around for the Gamecocks, who are less than three weeks away from the season opener. The NCAA has not given them an answer.

Shane Beamer called the association out in the spring as it handcuffed his ability to effectively manage his roster. With no response on Faison’s status, South Carolina chose not to add a running back in the spring transfer portal window.

Should, Faison eventually be ruled ineligible, that could prove costly.

The running back, who has since lawyered up, has been actively using the hashtag #FreeSul on social media in hopes of forcing the NCAA’s hand. He’s now taken it a step further with new merchandise.

It remains to be seen if the merchandise drop will impact his case. The NCAA continues to move slowly in its decision making.

South Carolina hopes that Faison is available for Week 1 against Virginia Tech. They’ll be on the lookout for an answer one way or the other in the coming days.

Link

College Sports

What’s the next ‘arms race’ in college sports? Finding ways to legally exceed new rev-share cap

Tennessee athletic director Danny White faced a decision this year: Remain with apparel partner Nike or move to a new brand, adidas. He considered plenty of factors in the decision, such as quality of the gear and overall financial terms. But one, perhaps, stood above the rest: How much name, image and likeness (NIL) support […]

Published

2 hours ago

August 13, 2025

Your Sports Nation

Tennessee athletic director Danny White faced a decision this year: Remain with apparel partner Nike or move to a new brand, adidas.

He considered plenty of factors in the decision, such as quality of the gear and overall financial terms. But one, perhaps, stood above the rest: How much name, image and likeness (NIL) support would an apparel company give to Tennessee’s athletes?

“NIL was right up there,” White told Yahoo Sports in a recent interview. “We are in a very competitive space. It was at the forefront of my mind.”

Tennessee announced on Wednesday a return to adidas, a brand the university used during a 20-year run that ended in 2014. The brand and school struck a 10-year contract that is “one of the biggest apparel deals in the history of college sports,” according to White, likely putting its value at at least $10 million annually in product and cash.

At the heart of the deal is expected to also be one of the most lucrative NIL components in the history of collegiate apparel deals, described by one of the company’s vice presidents as “establishing a new standard for investment in NIL.”

In short, the players will get a piece of the $100 million-plus pie — in a significant way, too, and, for some of them, immediately.

Adidas says it is already working to strike individual deals with Tennessee athletes during this school year — months before the new apparel contract starts next July. Once the partnership begins, the company will offer what it calls “unprecedented NIL opportunities” for UT athletes across all 20 sports.

“The arms race was originally about facilities,” said Chris McGuire, adidas vice president of sports marketing, North America. “Now it’s gone to rev-share and NIL. We want to make sure we provide opportunities to our partners that are competitive in the marketplace so they’ll have competitive teams on the field.”

Tennessee’s apparel partnership is the latest weapon in the new recruiting battlefield: Finding creative ways to legally exceed the revenue-share cap by providing athletes with legitimate third-party endorsement and commercial deals.

‘This is the first one’

The adidas deal won’t be the last apparel contract structured in this way, experts believe. Several power programs remain in negotiations with apparel partners as their current contracts come to an end, including LSU, Penn State and USC. In fact, more than 20 power conference programs have apparel deals set to expire in 2026 and 2027.

McGuire acknowledges that this “model,” if it works as intended, will be used elsewhere. “This is the first one,” he said.

There are plenty more weapons, so to speak, that schools are using to increase the value of their rosters, including multimedia rights partners, various corporate sponsors and even reinvented booster collectives — all supplying some level of above-the-cap athlete compensation. The revenue-share cap this year (July 2025-June 2026) is $20.5 million, the max each school can distribute to their athletes. But schools are able to facilitate for their athletes individual third-party endorsement and commercial deals that, if approved through the new College Sports Commission enforcement process, are not included in the cap number.

This has created a new recruiting landscape where many schools, at first reliant on their collectives to drive athlete compensation, are now shifting to what they believe are more legitimate entities whose athlete deals can more easily gain the approval of the College Sports Commission.

There’s a brewing bidding war unfolding among multimedia rights and apparel companies jockeying to offer the best NIL-centric contracts to gain university partnerships.

Many schools are employing multimedia rights (MMR) partners and marketing agencies — perhaps those that once operated as collectives — to use corporate sponsors to direct their distribution to athletes instead of to the school, says Tommy Gray, CEO of Altius, a company that provides dozens of schools with consultation and strategic planning.

“For example, some are going to their corporate sponsors and saying 20% of your spend must be deployed in an athlete marketing fund so we can distribute it to our athletes,” Gray told Yahoo Sports in the spring. “It may be impermissible to commit that money to athletes in writing, but that doesn’t mean you can’t tell athletes that if they do these things, you are confident they will get X amount of dollars. There are a lot of ways to do it if you want to push the envelope.”

Apparel companies fill a similar void in a similar way, except they would directly strike deals with athletes. There’s no middle man necessary. Despite being deemed an “affiliated entity” of a school — this designation heightens the enforcement arm’s standard — would adidas, Nike or Under Armour, all longtime legitimate national brands, really see their athlete deals rejected?

What about Learfield, JMI and Playfly Sports? They are longtime school multimedia rights partners with the capability to facilitate deals with athletes among any of their thousands of corporate businesses and brands.

“There are a lot of places where the MMR partner, directly or indirectly, is supplying millions to athletes,” Gray says. “Who gets to tell Learfield it’s not OK to give $5 million a year to athletes? Who gets to go in and say, ‘That’s not permissible.’”

Paia LaPalombara, a former Ohio State athletic administrator who joined last year the Indiana law firm Church Church Hittle + Antrim, says partnering with an MMR or apparel brand is likely the best way for schools to “exceed the cap without falling under that fair market value” standard.

Will new deals pass muster?

Multimedia rights partners are already paying schools millions in licensing agreements to sell their intellectual property, such as marks, logos, etc. Corporate sponsors want both — the marks plus the athletes — for the most lucrative NIL deals, says Craig Sloan, the CEO of Playfly Sports.

“The one that’s going to be tested the most is a student-athlete appearing in uniform in a campaign. What is that value?” Sloan said. “We do have evidence that shows the use of IP will enhance a brand’s perception with consumers. The data supports the idea that if you’re going to come in and sponsor our Auburn program, it makes sense to do it with a student-athlete.”

Sloan says Playfly doesn’t guarantee schools a certain amount of NIL for their athletes, but, moreso, “shares a vision” with schools on a “need number” for NIL.

Learfield is approaching it in a similar fashion. CEO Cole Gahagan says the company struck athlete brand deals of more than $135 million last fiscal year.

“Now that salary caps have been in place, there is increased pressure to find more opportunities to create more events for athletes,” Gahagan said. “When we have dedicated resources on the ground on campus — sales people dedicated to NIL, NIL activation coordinator and NIL content producer — we see the greatest and most NIL deal-making output at our properties.”

Learfield has recently announced new NIL-related partnerships with several power programs, including Texas, Georgia and Oklahoma — all deals billed as a way to “unlock new revenue-generating opportunities” for athletes. These collaborations will operate independently from the university as marketing and NIL agencies to connect athletes with corporate sponsors to “earn income beyond traditional revenue-sharing models,” according to one of the releases.

Playfly, meanwhile, struck a 15-year, $515 million deal with Texas A&M earlier this summer, believed to be one of the most lucrative multimedia rights contracts in the history of college athletics and one that offers NIL components.

Kentucky announced a similar move just this week, resigning with multimedia partner JMI in a deal where the company will create an “in-house NIL collective” to help facilitate athlete brand deals and ensure each passes through the new enforcement process.

“How quickly will collectives start to fade away or become less important? Because the sustainable model is athletes inking opportunities for producing content, activations, likeness in campaigns,” Sloan said. “It’s pretty clear it’s not going to be a collective and booster giving someone a bunch of money.”

But collectives received a sort-of lifeline last month, when a legal threat from attorneys forced the College Sports Commission to re-evaluate guidance that would have prohibited most booster-collective deals with athletes.

The enforcement arm is determining the legitimacy of third-party deals based mostly on two standards. NIL deals have to meet the standard of (1) having a “valid business purpose” and (2) falling within a compensation range created by Deloitte. The first of those — involving the prohibition of many collective deals — fell victim to the legal challenge, opening a path for collectives to continue to operate in a similar way, but not exactly the same, as they previously did.

The second standard — range of compensation — serves as the CSC’s backstop, at least until it is challenged legally as well. Deloitte created “the range of compensation” through an algorithm using fair-market value analysis, comparing similar types of NIL deals struck between an athlete and the third party. It factors in a player’s social media following, athletic performance, the school’s marketplace and location, etc.

Will the CSC really deny athlete deals from big brands and apparel companies?

“At the end of the day,” said Sloan, “a person not on campus, not in our communities is going to have a difficult time setting our market rate.”

Link

College Sports

2025-202 Fantasy Hockey Top 100 players overall: Rankings of the best players to target in your drafts

Isaiah J. Downing / USA TODAY Sports With the beginning of NHL training camps about a month away, mock draft season is upon us. While the cream of the crop will likely remain unchanged, there could be some alterations in the rankings as players report to their teams for the start of the 2025-26 campaign. […]

Published

2 hours ago

August 13, 2025

Your Sports Nation

Isaiah J. Downing / USA TODAY Sports

With the beginning of NHL training camps about a month away, mock draft season is upon us. While the cream of the crop will likely remain unchanged, there could be some alterations in the rankings as players report to their teams for the start of the 2025-26 campaign.

At forward, the “Big Four” of Nathan MacKinnon, Connor McDavid, Nikita Kucherov and Leon Draisaitl could be as interchangeable as it gets. MacKinnon leads the league in even-strength points (170) and shots on goal (725) over the last two seasons, while Kucherov has earned the Art Ross Trophy in back-to-back years. Meanwhile, McDavid has reached the 100-point mark in five straight campaigns, and Draisaitl has achieved that feat in four consecutive seasons. Fantasy managers can’t go wrong with any of them as the cornerstone building block of any roster.

On defense, Cale Makar remains the safest bet to be selected in the first round. He has the most goals (51), power-play goals (19), points (182), power-play points (74) and shorthanded points (seven) among blueliners over the last two seasons. However, Quinn Hughes, Evan Bouchard, Rasmus Dahlin, Victor Hedman and Zach Werenski are all superb options to anchor the fantasy squad of any manager.

Between the pipes, Connor Hellebuyck has been a consistent workhorse. He has made at least 60 starts in four straight seasons. He has won the Vezina Trophy in back-to-back years while topping all netminders in wins (84) and shutouts (13) over that span. Fantasy managers could reach higher for him on draft day than the rest of his peers. However, fading puck stoppers until the later rounds has become a popular strategy due to the unpredictability of the position. Still, landing some stability in the crease will be a priority in other leagues. Andrei Vasilevskiy, Jake Oettinger and Sergei Bobrovsky are solid options if Hellebuyck is off the board.

Top 100

Nathan MacKinnon, C, Colorado Avalanche
Connor McDavid, C, Edmonton Oilers
Nikita Kucherov, RW, Tampa Bay Lightning
Leon Draisaitl, C, Edmonton Oilers – – You can make a compelling case to select any of MacKinnon, McDavid, Kucherov or Draisaitl at No. 1 overall. While McDavid used to be a lock, it’s no longer a cut-and-dried decision. There could be some jumbling between the four, but fantasy managers will be getting a cornerstone piece regardless of the choice.
Cale Makar, D, Colorado Avalanche
David Pastrnak, RW, Boston Bruins
Kirill Kaprizov, LW, Minnesota Wild – – His outstanding 2024-25 performance was cut short by a lower-body injury. His offensive talent should keep him in the first round of fantasy drafts for another year.
Mikko Rantanen, RW, Dallas Stars
Auston Matthews, C, Toronto Maple Leafs – – While he has more than enough scoring talent and play-driving ability to be fine without Marner on his wing, Matthews battled an injury issue last season. It’s unclear if the problem will be completely behind him when the 2025-26 campaign begins.
Kyle Connor, LW, Winnipeg Jets
Mitch Marner, RW, Vegas Golden Knights
Brady Tkachuk, LW, Ottawa Senators
Sidney Crosby, C, Pittsburgh Penguins – – The 38-year-old veteran has topped 90 points in three consecutive seasons and hasn’t shown any signs of slowing down.
Jack Eichel, C, Vegas Golden Knights
Jack Hughes, C, New Jersey Devils – – He has been limited to 62 appearances in back-to-back seasons, making him a significant injury risk despite his offensive talent.
Connor Hellebuyck, G, Winnipeg Jets
Quinn Hughes, D, Vancouver Canucks
Artemi Panarin, LW, New York Rangers
William Nylander, RW, Toronto Maple Leafs
Brayden Point, C, Tampa Bay Lightning
Evan Bouchard, D, Edmonton Oilers
Sam Reinhart, RW, Florida Panthers
Clayton Keller, LW, Utah Mammoth
Rasmus Dahlin, D, Buffalo Sabres – – He has established himself as a multi-category monster while piling up points, shots, hits and blocks over the last four seasons.
Jesper Bratt, RW, New Jersey Devils
Andrei Vasilevskiy, G, Tampa Bay Lightning
J.T. Miller, C, New York Rangers
Filip Forsberg, LW, Nashville Predators
Nick Suzuki, C, Montreal Canadiens
Brandon Hagel, LW, Tampa Bay Lightning
Matthew Tkachuk, RW, Florida Panthers – – He played through a torn adductor and a sports hernia during the playoffs. If he undergoes surgery, he could be out for the first three months of the season. His draft stock could change dramatically depending on what path he takes in his recovery.
Jason Robertson, LW, Dallas Stars
Jake Guentzel, LW, Tampa Bay Lightning
Mark Scheifele, C, Winnipeg Jets
Victor Hedman, D, Tampa Bay Lightning
Jake Oettinger, G, Dallas Stars
Lucas Raymond, RW, Detroit Red Wings
Zach Werenski, D, Columbus Blue Jackets – – He exploded offensively in 2024-25 because he finally stayed healthy, but his past injury woes make him a high-risk, high-reward option.
Tim Stutzle, C, Ottawa Senators
Tage Thompson, RW, Buffalo Sabres
Alex Ovechkin, LW, Washington Capitals
Sergei Bobrovsky G, Florida Panthers
Sebastian Aho, C, Carolina Hurricanes
Adrian Kempe, RW, Los Angeles Kings
Martin Necas, RW, Colorado Avalanche
Aleksander Barkov, C, Florida Panthers
Mackenzie Blackwood, G, Colorado Avalanche
Travis Konecny, RW, Philadelphia Flyers
Matt Boldy, RW, Minnesota Wild
Adam Fox, D, New York Rangers
Robert Thomas, C, St. Louis Blues
Igor Shesterkin, G, New York Rangers – – He faced the most shots in the league and struggled behind a team that nosedived in 2024-25. However, he does have bounce-back appeal and could outperform this ranking.
Wyatt Johnston, C, Dallas Stars
Josh Morrissey, D, Winnipeg Jets
Alex DeBrincat, LW, Detroit Red Wings
Kirill Marchenko, RW, Columbus Blue Jackets
Lane Hutson, D, Montreal Canadiens – – He racked up points and blocks en route to winning the Calder Trophy in 2024-25. His fantasy value would take another significant step if he shoots the puck more often.
John Tavares, C, Toronto Maple Leafs
Cole Caufield, RW, Montreal Canadiens
Dylan Larkin, C, Detroit Red Wings
Roope Hintz, C, Dallas Stars
Jordan Kyrou, RW, St. Louis Blues
Nico Hischier, C, New Jersey Devils
Seth Jarvis, RW, Carolina Hurricanes
Darcy Kuemper, G, Los Angeles Kings
Nazem Kadri, C, Calgary Flames
Connor Bedard, C, Chicago Blackhawks
Roman Josi, D, Nashville Predators – – His concussion and diagnosis with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome last season make him an unpredictable fantasy defender for 2025-26. If he returns to form, he would be a steal for potential fantasy managers.
Filip Gustavsson, G, Minnesota Wild
Jake Sanderson, D, Ottawa Senators
Dylan Holloway, LW, St. Louis Blues
Matvei Michkov, LW, Philadelphia Flyers – – He finished the 2024-25 season with six goals and 16 points in 12 games. The 20-year-old forward could find another gear after topping the 60-point mark in his rookie campaign.
Alex Tuch, RW, Buffalo Sabres
Macklin Celebrini, C, San Jose Sharks
Gabriel Landeskog, LW, Colorado Avalanche – – He is a wild card for the 2025-26 campaign. He returned to action in the 2025 postseason after multiple knee surgeries and possesses considerable fantasy value if he can remain a healthy contributor in Colorado’s talented top six.
Andrei Svechnikov, LW, Carolina Hurricanes
Matthew Knies, LW, Toronto Maple Leafs
Nikolaj Ehlers, LW, Carolina Hurricanes
MacKenzie Weegar, D, Calgary Flames
Tom Wilson, RW, Washington Capitals
Dylan Guenther, RW, Utah Mammoth
Linus Ullmark, G, Ottawa Senators
JJ Peterka, LW, Utah Mammoth
Drake Batherson, RW, Ottawa Senators
Vincent Trocheck, C, New York Rangers
Logan Cooley, C, Utah Mammoth – – The 21-year-old improved in his sophomore season, scoring 25 goals and 65 points in 75 games. He has the potential to reach new heights on an improving team in the 2025-26 campaign.
Mark Stone, RW, Vegas Golden Knights
Mathew Barzal, C, New York Islanders
Timo Meier, RW, New Jersey Devils
Moritz Seider, D, Detroit Red Wings
Logan Thompson, G, Washington Capitals
Kevin Fiala, LW, Los Angeles Kings
Adin Hill, G, Vegas Golden Knights
Thomas Harley, D, Dallas Stars
Dustin Wolf, G, Calgary Flames
Carter Verhaeghe, LW, Florida Panthers – – His career-low 8.3 shooting percentage should improve, giving him plenty of rebound upside in the upcoming campaign.
Jacob Markstrom, G, New Jersey Devils
Dylan Strome, C, Washington Capitals
Anthony Stolarz, G, Toronto Maple Leafs
Elias Pettersson, C, Vancouver Canucks – – He has plenty of bounce-back appeal following an injury-plagued 2024-25 campaign.

Link

College Sports

The college football season is here. Which matchups are must-watch? | State

State AlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWashington D.C.West VirginiaWisconsinWyomingPuerto RicoUS Virgin IslandsArmed Forces AmericasArmed Forces PacificArmed Forces EuropeNorthern Mariana IslandsMarshall IslandsAmerican SamoaFederated States of MicronesiaGuamPalauAlberta, CanadaBritish Columbia, CanadaManitoba, CanadaNew Brunswick, CanadaNewfoundland, CanadaNova Scotia, CanadaNorthwest Territories, CanadaNunavut, CanadaOntario, CanadaPrince Edward Island, CanadaQuebec, CanadaSaskatchewan, CanadaYukon Territory, Canada Zip Code Country United States of […]

Published

2 hours ago

August 13, 2025

Your Sports Nation

State

Zip Code

Country

Link

College Sports

Amaral Named to United Soccer Coaches Division I Men's Forwards to Watch List

PROVIDENCE, R.I. – Brown men’s soccer junior forward Lorenzo Amaral has been named to the United Soccer Coaches 2025 NCAA Division I Forwards to Watch List, as announced by the organization on Tuesday. The lists are compiled and released by the Division I All-America Committees to promote college soccer leading up to the official start date […]

Published

2 hours ago

August 13, 2025

Your Sports Nation

Amaral Named to United Soccer Coaches Division I Men's Forwards to Watch List

PROVIDENCE, R.I. – Brown men’s soccer junior forward Lorenzo Amaral has been named to the United Soccer Coaches 2025 NCAA Division I Forwards to Watch List, as announced by the organization on Tuesday.

The lists are compiled and released by the Division I All-America Committees to promote college soccer leading up to the official start date for the regular season later this month. The lists include United Soccer Coaches All-Americans and All-Region players from 2024 who are scheduled to return for the 2025 season.

Amaral collected multiple accolades throughout the 2024 season. He was named First Team All-Ivy, CSC Academic All-District, TopDrawerSoccer’s Player of the Week (Sept. 24), and Ivy League Offensive Player of the Week (Nov. 4). Amaral played in 14 games, making 12 starts for the Bears. He led the team in scoring, posting eight goals and six assists.

BROWN UNIVERSITY SPORTS FOUNDATION
The Brown University Sports Foundation (BUSF) is the lifeblood of the athletics program, and exists to enhance the student-athlete experience through philanthropic support from alumni, parents, fans and friends. A gift through the Sports Foundation makes an immediate impact on today’s Brown Bears and helps them to be their best in the classroom, in competition and most importantly in the community. To learn more about supporting the Bears, please click here.

FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL
For the latest on Brown Athletics, please follow

@BrownU_Bears on Twitter, @BrownU_Bears on Instagram, like BrownUBears on Facebook and subscribe to the BrownAthletics YouTube channel.