Motorsports
Judge warns 23XI and FRM “you can’t have your cake and eat it too”
23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports faced off with NASCAR on Friday in the latest war of words as this tense legal battle continues. It was Judge Paul Victor Niemeyer, Judge Steven Agee, and Judge Stephanie Thacker listening to oral arguments in the United States Court of Appeals located in Richmond, Virginia. This appeal centers […]

23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports faced off with NASCAR on Friday in the latest war of words as this tense legal battle continues. It was Judge Paul Victor Niemeyer, Judge Steven Agee, and Judge Stephanie Thacker listening to oral arguments in the United States Court of Appeals located in Richmond, Virginia.
This appeal centers around NASCAR trying to overturn the preliminary injunction, which was granted to 23XI and FRM in December of 2024, allowing them to race as chartered teams without being held to the release (ability to sue NASCAR) in the 2025 Charter Agreement. They have called out the agreement for including these conditions, claiming they qualify as antitrust violations when grouped in with other factors.
It was NASCAR’s lead attorney, Christopher Yates, and the lead attorney for the teams, Jeffrey Kessler, taking turns arguing their case.
NASCAR takes the floor
Yates was up first, explaining how there is nothing stopping the teams from competing even if the injunction was reversed, which would strip 23XI and FRM of their court-won charters mid-season.
“They were offered a contract, they rejected the contract,” declared Yates. He continued, saying that there is “no contractual relationship between the parties. Yet, the district court’s injunction orders a contract, therefore upending the status quo.”
He also hit back at the assertion that NASCAR operates as an unlawful monopoly, citing how charter negotiations went on for well over two years. “Monopolists don’t negotiate for two and a half years,” he said. He pointed out that teams never raised an issue regarding the release (the ability to sue) until after rejecting the offer. And it was this release that the district court cited as a reason to grant the injunction, considering it to be exclusionary conduct. He went as far as to claim that the district court misunderstood the situation and failed to follow precedent when granting it.
The judges — primarily Judge Niemeyer — asked several clarifying questions of NASCAR during this time. Yates’ strongest point was as follows: You can’t ask to be bound to something you’re simultaneously contending violates the antitrust laws.” He also asserted that the only motivation here was that the teams wanted to get more money out of the sanctioning body.

NASCAR Commissioner Steve Phelps
Photo by: Chris Graythen – Getty Images
Team attorney spars with judges
Kessler didn’t get far into his opening comments before Judge Niemeyer interjected, saying he failed to understand the point he was trying to make. “If you don’t want the contract, you don’t enter into it and you sue. Or if you want the contract, you enter into it, and you give up past releases. Our Omega (citing Costco v. Omega) observation is that you can’t have your cake and eat it too.”
Kessler immediately pushed back and things got a little contentious, but remained professional. While trying to make a point about irreparable harm, Judge Niemeyer interrupted again. “Stay away from the harm. Stay away from all that. Go to the antitrust theory. That’s my biggest problem. It’s the likelihood of success.”
The judge also pointed out that the release that 23XI/FRM are taking issue with is mutual so teams can’t sue NASCAR, but NASCAR can’t sue the teams either. “Is the inclusion of mutual releases in a contract anti-competitive in the sense (that) a monopolist can’t include it in their contracts?”
Kessler replied: “If the release was used to help maintain the monopoly position–“
Judge Niemeyer instantly pushed back. “Then you don’t enter into it. But you don’t sit there and say ‘I want in’ under that contract but ‘I want it modified to allow me to bring my antitrust claim’ … it’s a very difficult antitrust theory you have.”
That point was repeated often, but the reason the teams are even in this position is because they are desperately trying to hold on to their charters while taking this issue to trial. It’s a difficult balancing act.

Chase Elliott, Hendrick Motorsports Chevrolet, Austin Dillon, Richard Childress Racing Chevrolet, Bubba Wallace, 23XI Racing Toyota, Noah Gragson, Front Row Motorsports Ford
Photo by: Sean Gardner / Getty Images
A fight without precedent
The court argued that this Charter Agreement appears to be more “anti-lawsuit, not anti-competitive.” They again said that if you want to preserve your lawsuit, then simply do not enter the contract.
Another discussion centered around the unprecedented nature of all this, which was pointed out by Judge Thacker. In 135 years since the Sherman Antitrust Act was introduced, there hasn’t really been any case like this. Kessler conceded that it has never been approached in this way, but he did bring up a case involving Mitsubishi where a release was utilized to protect antitrust behavior.
But the judges continued their questioning, trying to connect the release to anti-competitive behavior. At one point, the court asks: “What relief do you want for your racing team? You want to be racing in that series, right?”
Kessler replies, “We could have done that, your honor, under their terms already. That was not the object of this release.”
Judge Niemeyer then quips, “You want to be a policeman, is that it?”

Front Row Motorsports hauler
Photo by: Chris Graythen – Getty Images
Kessler tried using an analogy of a monopolistic apple farmer who could harm apple consumers in the same way, aiming to simplify the argument. “The injury is that you’re getting too little,” said Kessler. “The relief that we want is to get damages for–“
But he was interrupted by the bench again. “They don’t sign the contract and sue, and get your relief. But the claim that you’re entitled to the contract without the release is really an Omega problem (you want to have your cake and eat it too).”
Kessler tried to make a case for irreparable harm, stating that “it is not economically viable to have to qualify each week.” According to Kessler, to run as open teams would be a massive financial hit, and could put their sponsor relationships and driver contracts in jeopardy. It could ultimately hurt their on-track performance as well while also losing out on the positive aspects of the Charter Agreement while their championship rivals still benefit from it.
What happens to SHR charters if the injunction is reversed?
Judge Agee tried to get things back on course, focusing on the issue at hand as the debate started drifting into the foundation of the lawsuit itself. “I can see that at trial and it will be a very interesting trial, yet to happen,” said Agee. “But the only thing we’re here on today is the preliminary injunction.”
Judge Niemeyer noted that the injunction is very narrow, only relying on the issue of the release and that the injunction has some “unappetizing things about it.”
Kessler brought up the Omega case again, claiming it doesn’t apply because the teams aren’t trying to invalidate the entire Charter Agreement. But perhaps his most interesting point was the ripple effect that would occur if they suddenly lost their charters.

Cole Custer, Haas Factory Team
Photo by: Jared C. Tilton/Getty Images
Kessler claimed overturning this mid-season won’t just harm them, but third parties like Stewart-Haas Racing. SHR sold a charter to 23XI and another charter to FRM before shutting down. All that remains is a one-car effort by Gene Haas under the Haas Factory Team. Kessler pointed this out, saying that you cannot simply give SHR the charters back as the organization doesn’t exist anymore.
“[SHR] no longer has any operation to run a team. So, if we gave him the teams back, he has no drivers, he has no pit crew, he has nothing in the middle of the NASCAR season. It would cause havoc to overturn this injunction in the middle of the season,” said Kessler. “If it just stays in effect until November, (then) we’re done and then we have a trial and either we win or lose.”
NASCAR rebuttal
Yates’ rebuttal denied that there were any anti-trust violations committed by NASCAR. He reiterated some earlier points about the fact that NASCAR isn’t preventing them from taking part in the racing series. However, he then focused on his own take regarding irreparable harm.
“NASCAR and the teams are being hurt every day this injunction stays in place,” explained Yates. “NASCAR is being hurt because it’s forced into a contractual relationship with a counter-party that it doesn’t want to be in a long-term contractual relationship with. Other teams are being hurt, (because without) the injunction, other teams would have gotten more money. Other chartered teams would have gotten more money, they would have gotten a bigger part of the charter pie.”
Judge Agee asked a competition-focused question about open spots and how many are available each week. Most weeks beyond the Daytona 500 rarely see a full field and Yates argued that teams at the level of 23XI and FRM would have no problem qualifying on pace alone.

Nascar Cup Series signage
Photo by: Chris Graythen – Getty Images
“Two-thirds of the season is left,” said Yates. “We urge this court to act quickly because NASCAR and other teams are being hurt.” He then repeated the ‘have your cake and eat it too’ phrase that came up several times throughout the hearing.
He also agreed with the judges, as did Kessler earlier, in regards to the need for mediation. But Yates didn’t seem hopeful, claiming that this is all about the terms of the 2025 Charter Agreement and that NASCAR is unwilling to change it. “We’re not gonna rewrite the charter contract,” said Yates.
A decision has yet to be made regarding the legitimacy of the injunction, but the clock is ticking as the NASCAR season rolls on in the background. You can listen to the entire hearing HERE.
In this article
Be the first to know and subscribe for real-time news email updates on these topics
Motorsports
Federal judges rule in favor of NASCAR in lawsuit filed by Jordan-owned 23XI and Front Row
“We remain confident in our case and committed to racing for the entirety of this season as we continue our fight to create a fair and just economic system for stock car racing that is free of anticompetitive, monopolistic conduct.” The two teams sued and asked for a temporary injunction that would recognize them as […]

“We remain confident in our case and committed to racing for the entirety of this season as we continue our fight to create a fair and just economic system for stock car racing that is free of anticompetitive, monopolistic conduct.”
The two teams sued and asked for a temporary injunction that would recognize them as chartered teams for this season. The antitrust case isn’t scheduled to be heard until December.
The teams said they needed the injunction because the current charter agreement prohibits them from suing NASCAR. 23XI also argued it would be harmed because Tyler Reddick’s contract would have made him a free agent if the team could not guarantee him a charter-protected car.
The original judge ruled that NASCAR’s charter agreement likely violated antitrust law in granting the injunction. But when they heard arguments last month, the three judges at the the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, Virginia, indicated they were skeptical of that decision.
The judges said in Thursday’s ruling they were not aware of any case that supports the lower court’s theory of antitrust law, so they vacated the injunction.
“In short, because we have found no support for the proposition that a business entity or person violates the antitrust laws by requiring a prospective participant to give a release for past conduct as a condition for doing business, we cannot conclude that the plaintiffs made a clear showing that they were likely to succeed on the merits of that theory,” the court said. “And without satisfaction of the likelihood-of-success element, the plaintiffs were not entitled to a preliminary injunction.”
The teams have 14 days to appeal to the full court. The injunction also has no bearings on the merits of the case, and the earliest NASCAR can treat the teams as unchartered — a charter guarantees their organizations a starting spot each week and prize money — is one week after the deadline to appeal, provided there is no pending appeal.
NASCAR has not said what it would do with the six charters held by the two organizations if they are returned to the sanctioning body. There are only 36 chartered cars for a 40-car field. If the teams do not appeal, the six entries would have to compete as “open” cars — which means they’d have to qualify on speed each week to make the race and they would receive a fraction of the money.
It’s not clear what would happen to Reddick’s contract. He goes to Michigan this weekend ranked sixth in the Cup Series standings. Both organizations are still seeking a win this season — Hamlin’s three victories are with Joe Gibbs Racing, the team he drives for.
Reddick is last year’s regular-season champion and competed for the Cup title last November.
___
AP auto racing: https://apnews.com/hub/auto-racing
Credit: AP
Credit: AP
Credit: AP
Credit: AP
Motorsports
Federal judges rule in favor of NASCAR in lawsuit filed by Jordan-owned 23XI and Front Row
CHARLOTTE, N.C. (AP) — A three-judge federal appellate panel ruled Thursday in favor of NASCAR in the antitrust lawsuit filed by two teams, one owned by Michael Jordan, and vacated an injunction that required 23XI and Front Row be recognized as chartered teams as their case snakes through the legal system. Both race teams sued […]

CHARLOTTE, N.C. (AP) — A three-judge federal appellate panel ruled Thursday in favor of NASCAR in the antitrust lawsuit filed by two teams, one owned by Michael Jordan, and vacated an injunction that required 23XI and Front Row be recognized as chartered teams as their case snakes through the legal system.
Both race teams sued NASCAR late last year after refusing to sign new agreements on charter renewals. The charter system is similar to franchises in other sports, but the charters are revocable by NASCAR and have expiration dates. 23XI, which is owned by Jordan and three-time Daytona 500 winner Denny Hamlin, allied with Front Row in suing NASCAR after 13 other organizations signed the renewals last September and those two organization refused.
“We are disappointed by today’s ruling by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals and are reviewing the decision to determine our next steps,” said Jeffery Kessler, attorney for 23XI and Front Row. “This ruling is based on a very narrow consideration of whether a release of claims in the charter agreements is anti-competitive and does not impact our chances of winning at trial scheduled for Dec. 1.
“We remain confident in our case and committed to racing for the entirety of this season as we continue our fight to create a fair and just economic system for stock car racing that is free of anticompetitive, monopolistic conduct.”
The two teams sued and asked for a temporary injunction that would recognize them as chartered teams for this season. The antitrust case isn’t scheduled to be heard until December.
The teams said they needed the injunction because the current charter agreement prohibits them from suing NASCAR. 23XI also argued it would be harmed because Tyler Reddick’s contract would have made him a free agent if the team could not guarantee him a charter-protected car.
The original judge ruled that NASCAR’s charter agreement likely violated antitrust law in granting the injunction. But when they heard arguments last month, the three judges at the the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, Virginia, indicated they were skeptical of that decision.
The judges said in Thursday’s ruling they were not aware of any case that supports the lower court’s theory of antitrust law, so they vacated the injunction.
“In short, because we have found no support for the proposition that a business entity or person violates the antitrust laws by requiring a prospective participant to give a release for past conduct as a condition for doing business, we cannot conclude that the plaintiffs made a clear showing that they were likely to succeed on the merits of that theory,” the court said. “And without satisfaction of the likelihood-of-success element, the plaintiffs were not entitled to a preliminary injunction.”
The teams have 14 days to appeal to the full court. The injunction also has no bearings on the merits of the case, and the earliest NASCAR can treat the teams as unchartered — a charter guarantees their organizations a starting spot each week and prize money — is one week after the deadline to appeal, provided there is no pending appeal.
NASCAR has not said what it would do with the six charters held by the two organizations if they are returned to the sanctioning body. There are only 36 chartered cars for a 40-car field. If the teams do not appeal, the six entries would have to compete as “open” cars — which means they’d have to qualify on speed each week to make the race and they would receive a fraction of the money.
It’s not clear what would happen to Reddick’s contract. He goes to Michigan this weekend ranked sixth in the Cup Series standings. Both organizations are still seeking a win this season — Hamlin’s three victories are with Joe Gibbs Racing, the team he drives for.
Reddick is last year’s regular-season champion and competed for the Cup title last November.
___
AP auto racing: https://apnews.com/hub/auto-racing
Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
Motorsports
Stewart Friesen Scores 50th Super DIRTcar Series Win
SELINSGROVE, PA – A historic night at Selinsgrove Speedway ended with Stewart Friesen reaching another Super DIRTcar Series milestone. In the Series’ first visit to the Pennsylvania track, the Niagara-On-The-Lake, ON driver led the final 58 laps to win Wednesday’s Snyder County Showdown, becoming the sixth driver in history to earn 50 Series victories. “This […]

SELINSGROVE, PA – A historic night at Selinsgrove Speedway ended with Stewart Friesen reaching another Super DIRTcar Series milestone. In the Series’ first visit to the Pennsylvania track, the Niagara-On-The-Lake, ON driver led the final 58 laps to win Wednesday’s Snyder County Showdown, becoming the sixth driver in history to earn 50 Series victories.
“This is my life,” Friesen said. “There’s so many great car owners over the years that gave me a shot, put me in their stuff, and took me down the road. I bounced around, and I was able to have really good people behind me. I finally got hooked up with Chris (Larsen) and the Halmar International group, and the last 10 years we’ve been rolling really good. It feels really special, and whenever we can come to Sprint Car country and get a big win, it’s even more special.”
Ryan Krachun, the SRI Performance and Stock Car Steel Pole Award winner, and Louden Reimert led the field to the green in the 75-lap Feature, with Reimert wrestling the lead away as they drove through Turns 1 and 2. Behind them, Friesen, who started fifth, stormed toward the front of the field on the inside, passing Justin Stone, Matt Sheppard, and Krachun to reach second by the end of Lap 1.
Friesen chased Reimert around Selinsgrove’s red clay surface until the race’s first caution flew on Lap 10 for Tim Sears Jr, which proved to be the race’s turning point. When the race resumed on Lap 12, contact between Sheppard and Ryan Godown sent the No. 9S into the outside wall, leading to both cars flipping down the front stretch. That started a chain reaction that led to more flips in Turn 1.
Eleven other cars were involved in the crash, including Sears, who collided with Sheppard and landed on his roof. Bob McGannon. Anthony Perrego, Jimmy Phelps, Todd Root, Darren Smith, Jack Lehner, Mike Mahaney, Matt Stangle, Marcus Dinkins, and Logan Watt were also involved.
Despite the wreck, all 13 drivers involved climbed out of their cars, and Phelps, Lehner, Stangle, Mahaney, and Dinkins rejoined the field.
Reimert continued his lead when the green came back out on Lap 13 but couldn’t pull away from Friesen, who gained momentum on the inside lane. That momentum carried Friesen to the inside of Reimert’s No. 58 car.
However, that momentum wasn’t enough for Friesen to take the lead, so he switched lanes. That change of pace was all he needed as Friesen powered around Reimert in Turn 2 to take the lead on Lap 18.
From there, Friesen went untouched in the final 58 laps despite several yellow flags in the final 20 laps to earn the $10,000 prize and his third Super DIRTcar Series win of 2025.
On those last few restarts, it was a familiar foe, Series points leader Alex Yankowski, who he had to hold off.
“He’s as aggressive as I am on these fast tracks,” Friesen said. “I just wanted to make sure I could enter (Turn 1) on the restarts hard enough. I kind of found a lane ripping the cushion above the cushion early, and then it finally cleaned up enough where I could enter with enough steam to throw a slider, and we were able to hold him at bay.”
The defending Billy Whittaker Cars 200 winner also became the first driver this season to earn a guaranteed starting spot at Super DIRT Week 53, a feat he accomplished for the second consecutive season.
“It’s something we think about all year long,” Friesen said. “It’s the biggest race of the year for a reason. We struggled there for a couple of years, got the first one there at Oswego in 2016, and struggled a little bit until last year to get a good balance. We got a good notebook now; we can fine-tune it a little bit. It’s definitely an exciting week for Modified racing, and we’re just thrilled to be part of it.”
Yankowski crossed the line second, earning back-to-back runner-up finishes and his fourth of 2025. The Covington Township, PA driver closed in on Friesen late in the race, but didn’t have enough momentum to catch the No. 44 before the checkered flag.
“Stew was just lights out,” Yankowski said. “When we got the lead down to a second, our lap times started to match, but when I was close to him, he would just creep away. He was flat-out the better race car tonight. Hats off to those guys.”
With another second-place finish, “Kid Rocket” extended his Series points lead for the second straight night to 24 points over Mat Williamson, who finished third. “Money Mat” drove into a podium position after starting 10th and avoiding the Lap 12 crash.
“I didn’t get to see much of it,” Williamson said. “I was on the inside lane, and I just went to the guardrail and slammed the brakes and tried to go through it slowly and get out of the chaos. Luckily, I didn’t get piledrived from behind and got through it safely. Our guys are really good at making sure we finish races. I feel like it’s going to be our strong suit this year.”
Alex Payne finished fourth, earning his third top five in the last four Series races, and Jimmy Phelps rounded out the top five, after starting 25th, and being involved in the Lap 12 crash.
Reimert, who ran second until he got a flat tire on Lap 40, finished 13th.
Motorsports
Court of Appeals Rules in Favor of NASCAR; Injunction Reversed
The U.S. Court of Appeals has ruled in NASCAR’s favor, after the sanctioning body made an appeal regarding the decision by the District Court to award a preliminary injunction to 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports last December. That injunction, which has permitted 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports to compete as Chartered Entries in […]

The U.S. Court of Appeals has ruled in NASCAR’s favor, after the sanctioning body made an appeal regarding the decision by the District Court to award a preliminary injunction to 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports last December.
That injunction, which has permitted 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports to compete as Chartered Entries in the NASCAR Cup Series, has been vacated, and now the team’s six collective charters are in limbo.
“We are disappointed by today’s ruling by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals and are reviewing the decision to determine our next steps,” said Jeffrey Kessler, lead attorney for 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports.
“This ruling is based on a very narrow consideration of whether a release of claims in the charter agreement is anti-competitive and does not impact our chances of winning at trial scheduled for December 1. We remain confident in our case and committed to racing for the entirety of this season as we continue to fight to create a fair and just economic system for stock car racing that is free of anticompetitive, monopolistic conduct.”
23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports will have a 14-day window to petition for a re-hearing or a hearing in front of all of the appeals judges. Should that route not be taken, the ruling would not be eligible to be enforced until seven days after that deadline.
That 14-day window shuts on June 19, with the seven-day period afterwards (should nothing be done) ending on June 26, meaning that both 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports could be without charters for the June 28 event at EchoPark Speedway.
23XI Racing fields the No. 23 for Bubba Wallace, No. 35 for Riley Herbst, and No. 45 for Tyler Reddick. Front Row Motorsports fields the No. 4 for Noah Gragson, the No. 34 for Todd Gilliland, and the No. 38 for Zane Smith.
In court documents filed on Thursday, after the decision was made by Circuit Judges Niemeyer, Agee, and Thacker, the judges made the following statement:
“In entering a preliminary injunction in this case, the district court held that the plaintiffs were likely to succeed on the merits of their antitrust action against [NASCAR and it’s CEO, James France], because NASCAR, as an alleged monopolist, required the plaintiffs, as a condition of doing business with them, to enter into a release for past conduct,” court documents read. “Because that theory of antitrust law is not supported by any case of which we are aware, we conclude that it was not a likely basis for success on the merits and vacate the injunction.”
The main holdup, though, in allowing this preliminary injunction to stand, comes from the fact that there was no case law cited to support the decision that was made by the original judge.
“The court supplied no case law to support that theory. Indeed, we have found no case to support it, and the defendants claim that there is none. Rather, the court only cited cases holding that it may violate public policy for an agreement to operate ‘as a prospective waiver of a party’s right to pursue statutory remedies for antitrust violations’.
“Finally, the fact that a release may violate public policy by being prospective does not make it anticompetitive, as required for a violation of the antitrust laws.”
As a final statement, the panel of three judges, said: “In short, because we have found no support for the proposition that a business entity or person violates the antitrust laws by requiring a prospective participant to give a release for past conduct as a condition for doing business, we cannot conclude that the plaintiffs made a clear showing that they were likely to succeed on the merits of that theory. And without satisfaction of the likelihood-of-success element, the plaintiffs were not entitled to a preliminary injunction.”
“We therefore conclude that the district court abused its discretion in entering the preliminary injunction that it did. This is all the more true in view of the heightened standard for issuing a mandatory preliminary injunction and because the one here requested two parties engage in a business that one party claims to be illegal.
Motorsports
Federal judges rule in favor of NASCAR in lawsuit filed by Jordan-owned 23XI and Front Row – Action News Jax
CHARLOTTE, N.C. — (AP) — A three-judge federal appellate panel ruled Thursday in favor of NASCAR in the antitrust lawsuit filed by two teams, one owned by Michael Jordan, and vacated an injunction that required 23XI and Front Row be recognized as chartered teams as their case snakes through the legal system. Both race teams […]

CHARLOTTE, N.C. — (AP) — A three-judge federal appellate panel ruled Thursday in favor of NASCAR in the antitrust lawsuit filed by two teams, one owned by Michael Jordan, and vacated an injunction that required 23XI and Front Row be recognized as chartered teams as their case snakes through the legal system.
Both race teams sued NASCAR late last year after refusing to sign new agreements on charter renewals. The charter system is similar to franchises in other sports, but the charters are revocable by NASCAR and have expiration dates. 23XI, which is owned by Jordan and three-time Daytona 500 winner Denny Hamlin, allied with Front Row in suing NASCAR after 13 other organizations signed the renewals last September and those two organization refused.
“We are disappointed by today’s ruling by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals and are reviewing the decision to determine our next steps,” said Jeffery Kessler, attorney for 23XI and Front Row. “This ruling is based on a very narrow consideration of whether a release of claims in the charter agreements is anti-competitive and does not impact our chances of winning at trial scheduled for Dec. 1.
“We remain confident in our case and committed to racing for the entirety of this season as we continue our fight to create a fair and just economic system for stock car racing that is free of anticompetitive, monopolistic conduct.”
The two teams sued and asked for a temporary injunction that would recognize them as chartered teams for this season. The antitrust case isn’t scheduled to be heard until December.
The teams said they needed the injunction because the current charter agreement prohibits them from suing NASCAR. 23XI also argued it would be harmed because Tyler Reddick’s contract would have made him a free agent if the team could not guarantee him a charter-protected car.
The original judge ruled that NASCAR’s charter agreement likely violated antitrust law in granting the injunction. But when they heard arguments last month, the three judges at the the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, Virginia, indicated they were skeptical of that decision.
The judges said in Thursday’s ruling they were not aware of any case that supports the lower court’s theory of antitrust law, so they vacated the injunction.
“In short, because we have found no support for the proposition that a business entity or person violates the antitrust laws by requiring a prospective participant to give a release for past conduct as a condition for doing business, we cannot conclude that the plaintiffs made a clear showing that they were likely to succeed on the merits of that theory,” the court said. “And without satisfaction of the likelihood-of-success element, the plaintiffs were not entitled to a preliminary injunction.”
The teams have 14 days to appeal to the full court. The injunction also has no bearings on the merits of the case, and the earliest NASCAR can treat the teams as unchartered — a charter guarantees their organizations a starting spot each week and prize money — is one week after the deadline to appeal, provided there is no pending appeal.
NASCAR has not said what it would do with the six charters held by the two organizations if they are returned to the sanctioning body. There are only 36 chartered cars for a 40-car field. If the teams do not appeal, the six entries would have to compete as “open” cars — which means they’d have to qualify on speed each week to make the race and they would receive a fraction of the money.
It’s not clear what would happen to Reddick’s contract. He goes to Michigan this weekend ranked sixth in the Cup Series standings. Both organizations are still seeking a win this season — Hamlin’s three victories are with Joe Gibbs Racing, the team he drives for.
Reddick is last year’s regular-season champion and competed for the Cup title last November.
___
AP auto racing: https://apnews.com/hub/auto-racing
Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
Motorsports
Toni Breidinger Revs Up NASCAR Truck Series with Coach Sponsorship Extravaganza
Buckle up, NASCAR fans, because the racing world is abuzz with the latest news from budding star Toni Breidinger! The young driver is making waves as she gears up to showcase her “self-expression” dream come true at Michigan International Speedway. Toni Breidinger, known for her impressive skills on the track, has unveiled Coach as the […]

Buckle up, NASCAR fans, because the racing world is abuzz with the latest news from budding star Toni Breidinger! The young driver is making waves as she gears up to showcase her “self-expression” dream come true at Michigan International Speedway.
Toni Breidinger, known for her impressive skills on the track, has unveiled Coach as the new primary sponsor for the #5 Tricon Garage Toyota. This exciting collaboration will see the luxury fashion house featured on the #5 Toyota Tundra in the upcoming race at Michigan International Speedway, with another appearance planned for Talladega in October.
Having soared through the ranks and impressively finishing fourth in the ARCA Menards standings last year, Breidinger is now fully committed to competing in the NASCAR Truck Series. Her partnership with Coach marks a significant milestone in her career, adding to her already impressive list of high-profile sponsors such as Victoria’s Secret, Raising Cane’s, Sunoco, and Celsius.
In a recent statement, Breidinger expressed her enthusiasm for working with Coach, stating, “Grateful to work with brands who embrace me and my self-expression.” The #5 Toyota Tundra will feature Coach’s signature black and white colors in a striking paint scheme that is sure to turn heads on the track.
Not one to shy away from a challenge, Breidinger has been transparent about the difficulties she faces in her rookie Truck Series campaign. With limited practice time and fierce competition, the young driver is navigating new tracks and honing her skills amidst seasoned opponents.
Fans can catch Breidinger in action at the NASCAR Truck race at Michigan International Speedway this Saturday, where she will be behind the wheel of the Coach-sponsored #5 Toyota. Stay tuned as this rising star continues to make her mark on the racing world with style and speed!
-
College Sports2 weeks ago
Portal Update – Basketball and Gymnastics Take Hits
-
College Sports2 weeks ago
Portal Update – Basketball and Gymnastics Take Hits
-
Professional Sports2 weeks ago
Jon Jones answers UFC retirement speculation as fans accuse champion of 'holding the belt …
-
Health3 weeks ago
BYU women's basketball guard injures ACL twice
-
NIL1 week ago
2025 NCAA Softball Tournament Bracket: Women’s College World Series bracket, schedule set
-
Youtube2 weeks ago
Xavier Legette taught Marty Smith his signature celly
-
High School Sports2 weeks ago
Today in the MHSAA
-
College Sports2 weeks ago
NCDC Commitment Profiles: Cyclones’ Martins Moving On to Saint Anselm College • USPHL
-
College Sports2 weeks ago
IU basketball recruiting
-
Motorsports2 weeks ago
Why IHOP Rode With Dale Earnhardt Jr. In Amazon NASCAR Debut