Connect with us
https://yoursportsnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/call-to-1.png

Sports

NCAA D1 Track And Field Championships 2025 Live Results And Schedule

Published

on


The 2025 NCAA Track and Field Championships culminate today in Eugene, Oregon, at Hayward Field. Fourteen national champions were crowned yesterday during a packed schedule of men’s finals, plus a number of women’s heptathlon events.

Thursday’s competition saw JaMeesia Ford of South Carolina deliver a standout performance. She qualified for the finals in all four of her events, notably clocking the eighth-fastest 100m dash in NCAA history at 10.87 seconds and a remarkable 21.98 seconds in the 200m.

The men’s track finals also delivered historic finishes on Friday, with Carli Makarawu in the 200m dash and Nathaniel Ezekiel in the 400m hurdles both etching their names into the NCAA record books.

Today’s action will focus on the women’s finals, bringing the championship weekend to a thrilling close. View the recap and results from Day One, Day Two, and Day Three of the NCAA Track and Field Championships to catch up on what you’ve missed so far.


NCAA D1 Track And Field Championships 2025 Schedule, Live Updates, Results

View the latest updates, results, and highlights below for the 2025 NCAA D1 Track and Field Championships. The most recent will be near the top of the page—if you’re looking for more general information about the event, you can find it near the bottom of the page.

Today’s schedule is filled with the remaining women’s finals.

Last update: 4:33 p.m. ET

Now Live: Women’s Discus Finals Results

We’re off and running with the first event of this last day of the 2025 NCAA Track and Field Championships.

Auburn’s Adrienne Adams and Virginia’s Estel Valeanu came out strong on their first attempts, throwing their season-best and personal best, respectively which put them at the top.

In the second round, Michaelle Valentin found success and took the top spot with a 191-8 until Adrienne Adams beat her with a 192-9.

As third attempts go around, Valentin hits an impressive 195-9 that drew the loudest applause from the crowd of the day so far. That was, until Adrienne Adams’ measurement came in at 198-8 for the top spot in flight one.

Flight 1 RESULTS

  1. Adrienne Adams (SR, Auburn) – 60.55m 198-8
  2. Michaelle Valentin (SR, FIU) – 59.67m 195-9
  3. Estel Valeanu (SR, Virginia) – 58.22m 191-0
  4. Ines Lopez (JR, Arizona State) – 57.36m 188-2
  5. Zoe Burleson (SR, Texas Tech) – 55.83m 183-2
  6. Milina Wepiwe (SO, Harvard) – 55.64m 182-6
  7. Donna Douglas (FR, Tennessee) – 54.90m 180-1
  8. Krishna Jayasankar Menon (JR, UNLV) –  52.99m 173-10
  9. Jamora Alves (JR, St. John’s) – 52.60m 172-7
  10. Paige Low (SR, Oklahoma) – 51.53m 169-0
  11. Gretchen Hoekstre (SR, BYU) – 50.46m 165-7
  12. Klaire Kovatch (JR, Colorado State) – X

They’ve announced the participants in flight two and will begin competition shortly with Kentucky’s Sofia Sluchaninova starting things off.

Top-ranked Jayden Ulrich immediately came out swinging with a huge first throw, 197-8, to put her in second overall behind Adams. Shelby Frank’s first attempt, 198-3, launched her into second just a few moments after Ulrich.

Flight 2 START LIST

  1. Sofia Sluchaninova (JR, Kansas) – 60.21m 197-6
  2. Jayden Ulrich (SR, Louisville) – 66.14m 217-0
  3. Taylor Kesner (JR, Wisconsin) – 57.83m 189-8
  4. Jade Whitfield (SR, Louisville) – 58.80m 192-11
  5. Shelby Frank (SR, Texas Tech) – 62.14m 203-10
  6. Caisa-Marie Lindfors (SR, California) – 61.52m 201-10
  7. Angeludi Asaah (JR, Penn) – 57.04m 187-2
  8. Princesse Hyman (FR, LSU) – 55.49m 182-0
  9. Cierra Jackson (SR, Fresno State) – 64.42m 211-4
  10. Amanda Ngandu-Ntumba (SR, Cincinnati) – 60.10m 197-2
  11. Aida Van Daalen (JR, Florida) – 65.45m 214-8
  12. Tamaiah Koonce (JR, Kansas State) – 55.99m 183-8

Breaking: Jordan Anthony Announced He’s Going Pro

In a post on Instagram, 100m winner Jordan Anthony announced he was going to be forgoing college to start his professional career.

How To Stream NCAA Track and Field Championships 2025

The 2025 NCAA Track and Field Championship is streaming live on ESPN+.

NCAA Track And Field Championships Start Lists On Saturday

Here are the women’s finals and women’s heptathlon event start lists for today. Each athlete’s season best is listed next to their name.

3:30 p.m. ET: Discus – Women 

Flight 1

  1. Ines Lopez (JR, Arizona State) – 57.56m 188-10
  2. Klaire Kovatch (JR, Colorado State) – 57.92m 190-0
  3. Zoe Burleson (SR, Texas Tech) – 59.49m 195-2
  4. Michaelle Valentin (SR, FIU) – 62.17m 203-11
  5. Donna Douglas (FR, Tennessee) – 58.78m 192-10
  6. Gretchen Hoekstre (SR, BYU) – 56.24m 184-6
  7. Adrienne Adams (SR, Auburn) – 57.30m 188-0
  8. Jamora Alves (JR, St. John’s) – 54.33m 178-3
  9. Estel Valeanu (SR, Virginia) – 57.28m 187-11
  10. Milina Wepiwe (SO, Harvard) – 59.75m 196-0
  11. Krishna Jayasankar Men (JR, UNLV) – 55.61m 182-5
  12. Paige Low (SR, Oklahoma) – 56.04m 183-10

Flight 2

  1. Sofia Sluchaninova (JR, Kansas) – 60.21m 197-6
  2. Jayden Ulrich (SR, Louisville) – 66.14m 217-0
  3. Taylor Kesner (JR, Wisconsin) – 57.83m 189-8
  4. Jade Whitfield (SR, Louisville) – 58.80m 192-11
  5. Shelby Frank (SR, Texas Tech) – 62.14m 203-10
  6. Caisa-Marie Lindfors (SR, California) – 61.52m 201-10
  7. Angeludi Asaah (JR, Penn) – 57.04m 187-2
  8. Princesse Hyman (FR, LSU) – 55.49m 182-0
  9. Cierra Jackson (SR, Fresno State) – 64.42m 211-4
  10. Amanda Ngandu-Ntumba (SR, Cincinnati) – 60.10m 197-2
  11. Aida Van Daalen (JR, Florida) – 65.45m 214-8
  12. Tamaiah Koonce (JR, Kansas State) – 55.99m 183-8

6:30 p.m. ET: Long Jump – Women’s Heptathlon 

Flight 1

  1. Melissa Wullschleger (FR, Illinois) – 5.76m
  2. Lucy Fellows (SO, Louisville) – 6.14m
  3. Sofia Cosculluela (FR, Washington) – 6.15m
  4. Alaina Brady (SR, Notre Dame) – 6.00m
  5. Maresa Hense (FR, Connecticut) – 5.92m
  6. Lucie Kienast (FR, Illinois) – 5.95m
  7. Clare McNamara (SR, Michigan) – 5.54m
  8. Claudine Raud-Gumiel (SR, Long Beach St.) – 6.03m
  9. Annie Molenhouse (JR, Oklahoma State) – 5.82m
  10. Maddie Pitts (JR, Penn State) – 5.99m
  11. Ella Spaulding (SO, Fresno State) – 5.79m
  12. Katelyn Adel (FR, Alabama) – 5.90m

Flight 2

  1. Jadin O’Brien (SR, Notre Dame) – 6.29m
  2. Destiny Masters (SR, Wichita State) – 6.07m
  3. Mia Lien (FR, UTSA) – 6.30m
  4. Izzy Goudros (SR, Harvard) – 6.20m
  5. Pippi Lotta Enok (JR, Oklahoma) – 6.65m
  6. Juliette Laracuente-Hueb (SO, Cincinnati) – 6.28m
  7. Jalen Elrod (SR, Purdue) – 6.12m
  8. Annika Williams (SR, Oregon) – 6.27m
  9. Sofia Iakushina (FR, Texas A&M) – 6.41m
  10. Kenli Nettles (SR, Ball State) – 6.01m
  11. Shelby Grover (SO, Kent State) – 6.04m
  12. Sydney Johnson (SR, UCLA) – 6.79m

7:45 p.m. ET: Javelin – Women’s Heptathlon 

Flight 1

  1. Izzy Goudros (SR, Harvard) – 39.07m
  2. Jadin O’Brien (SR, Notre Dame) – 43.54m
  3. Mia Lien (FR, UTSA) – 28.88m
  4. Katelyn Adel (FR, Alabama) – 36.45m
  5. Sofia Cosculluela (FR, Washington) – 44.79m
  6. Alaina Brady (SR, Notre Dame) – 41.22m
  7. Annika Williams (SR, Oregon) – 48.40m
  8. Maddie Pitts (JR, Penn State) – 30.75m
  9. Sofia Iakushina (FR, Texas A&M) – 43.07m
  10. Jalen Elrod (SR, Purdue) – 32.14m
  11. Claudine Raud-Gumiel (SR, Long Beach St.) – 33.11m
  12. Kenli Nettles (SR, Ball State) – 39.69m

Flight 2

  1. Annie Molenhouse (JR, Oklahoma State) – 37.32m
  2. Clare McNamara (SR, Michigan) – 51.54m
  3. Sydney Johnson (SR, UCLA) – 32.37m
  4. Destiny Masters (SR, Wichita State) – 47.46m
  5. Juliette Laracuente-Hueb (SO, Cincinnati) – 33.93m
  6. Lucie Kienast (FR, Illinois) – 40.04m
  7. Lucy Fellows (SO, Louisville) – 41.59m
  8. Maresa Hense (FR, Connecticut) – 39.30m
  9. Pippi Lotta Enok (JR, Oklahoma) – 51.80m
  10. Shelby Grover (SO, Kent State) – 39.96m
  11. Melissa Wullschleger (FR, Illinois) – 42.49m
  12. Ella Spaulding (SO, Fresno State) – 37.32m

8:30 p.m. ET: High Jump – Women

  1. Elena Kulichenko (SR, Georgia) – 1.89m 6-2¼
  2. Valentina Fakrogha (FR, UCLA) – 1.83m 6-0
  3. Zharia Taylor (JR, UC Irvine) – 1.81m 5-11¼
  4. Svenia Deconinck (JR, Kent State) – 1.79m 5-10½
  5. Amaya Ugarte (SR, Ohio State) – 1.82m 5-11½
  6. Rose Yeboah (SR, Illinois) – 1.91m 6-3¼
  7. Temitope Adeshina (SO, Texas Tech) – 1.97m 6-5½
  8. Maria Arboleda (FR, Iowa) – 1.88m 6-2
  9. Kristi Perez-Snyman (SR, Missouri) – 1.90m 6-2¾
  10. Jenna Rogers (SR, Nebraska) – 1.88m 6-2
  11. Carly Tarentino (SR, Virginia) – 1.80m 5-10¾
  12. Spirit Morgan (JR, N. Carolina A&T) – 1.85m 6-¾
  13. Alyssa Jones (JR, Stanford) – 1.84m 6-½
  14. Diamonasia Taylor (SO, Murray State) – 1.81m 5-11¼
  15. Celia Rifaterra (JR, Virginia) – 1.86m 6-1¼
  16. Ajia Hughes (JR, Southern Utah) – 1.83m 6-0
  17. Zahra Amos (SR, Buffalo) – 1.79m 5-10½
  18. Eva Baldursdottir (JR, Pittsburgh) – 1.82m 5-11½
  19. Miracle Ailes (SR, Alabama) – 1.82m 5-11½
  20. Kendall Ward (SO, Georgia Tech) – 1.79m 5-10½
  21. Claudina Diaz (SR, Missouri) – 1.85m 6-¾
  22. Alice Taylor (SO, Rice) – 1.82m 5-11½
  23. Cheyla Scott (JR, South Carolina) – 1.87m 6-1½
  24. Sharie Enoe (SO, Kansas State) – 1.88m 6-2

9:02 p.m. ET: 4x100m Relay – Women

  1. Howard
  2. Florida
  3. Texas
  4. TCU
  5. Florida State
  6. USC
  7. South Carolina
  8. Texas A&M
  9. LSU

9:10 p.m. ET: Triple Jump – Women 

Flight 1

  1. Shalom Olotu (SR, Kansas State) – 13.45m 44-1½
  2. Jada Joseph (SR, Brown) – 13.15m 43-1¾
  3. Ryann Porter (SR, Oregon) – 13.55m 44-5½
  4. Ashley Moore (SR, Oklahoma) – 13.48m 44-2¾
  5. Sharvari Parulekar (JR, Louisville) – 13.02m 42-8¾
  6. Cameran Gist (FR, South Carolina) – 13.07m 42-10¾
  7. Christina Warren (SR, Miami (Fla.)) – 13.35m 43-9¾
  8. Kayla Pinkard (JR, Florida State) – 13.01m 42-8¼
  9. Georgina Scoot (JR, Princeton) – 13.36m 43-10
  10. Katharina Graman (SO, San Jose St.) – 13.50m 44-3½
  11. Rachela Pace (SR, UTSA) – 13.46m 44-2
  12. Emilia Sjostrand (SR, San Jose St.) – 13.78m 45-2½

Flight 2

  1. Daniela Wamokpego (SO, Iowa) – 13.67m 44-10¼
  2. Shantae Foreman (JR, Clemson) – 14.01m 45-11¾
  3. Tamiah Washington (SO, Texas Tech) – 13.63m 44-8¾
  4. Agur Dwol (JR, Oklahoma) – 14.01m 45-11¾
  5. Sophie Galloway (JR, Kentucky) – 13.08m 42-11
  6. Winny Bii (JR, Texas A&M) – 14.01m 45-11¾
  7. Machaeda Linton (JR, LSU) – 13.25m 43-5¾
  8. Simone Johnson (SR, San Jose St.) – 13.63m 44-8¾
  9. Olivia Dowd (JR, N. Carolina A&T) – 13.22m 43-4½
  10. Victoria Gorlova (SR, Texas Tech) – 13.99m 45-10¾
  11. Asia Phillips (FR, Florida) – 13.33m 43-8¾
  12. Skylynn Townsend (FR, Georgia) – 13.50m 44-3½

9:11 p.m. ET: 1500m – Women 

  1. Mena Scatchard (SR, Princeton) – 4:08.34
  2. Kimberley May (SR, Providence) – 4:06.31
  3. Salma Elbadra (SO, South Carolina) – 4:05.85
  4. Mia Barnett (SR, Oregon) – 4:09.61
  5. Chloe Foerster (JR, Washington) – 4:05.75
  6. Margot Appleton (SR, Virginia) – 4:05.68
  7. Sophie O’Sullivan (SR, Washington) – 4:08.21
  8. Vera Sjoberg (JR, Boston U.) – 4:07.39
  9. Maggi Congdon (SR, Northern Arizona) – 4:05.73
  10. Silan Ayyildiz (JR, Oregon) – 4:06.61
  11. Lindsey Butler (SR, Virginia Tech) – 4:09.88
  12. Klaudia Kazimierska (SR, Oregon) – 4:06.53

9:24 p.m. ET: 3000m Steeplechase – Women

  1. Taylor Lovell (SO, BYU) – 9:37.97
  2. Shelby Jensen (SO, Utah State) – 9:38.01
  3. Debora Cherono (FR, Texas A&M) – 9:36.95
  4. Doris Lemngole (SO, Alabama) – 9:10.13
  5. Leah Jeruto (FR, Oklahoma) – 9:34.71
  6. Sarah Tait (SR, West Virginia) – 9:37.06
  7. Lexy Halladay-Lowry (SR, BYU) – 9:18.05
  8. Katelyn Stewart-Barnett (SR, Michigan State) – 9:36.96
  9. Karrie Baloga (SO, Northern Arizona) – 9:37.93
  10. Emily Paupore (SR, Central Michigan) – 9:43.24
  11. Angelina Napoleon (SO, NC State) – 9:27.85
  12. Maggie Liebich (SR, Washington) – 9:37.40

9:42 p.m. ET: 100m Hurdles – Women 

  1. Janela Spencer (JR, Ohio State) – 12.94
  2. Marcia Sey (JR, Howard) – 12.76
  3. Ana-Liese Torian (SO, Auburn) – 12.81
  4. Habiba Harris (FR, Florida) – 12.62
  5. Yanla Ndjip-Nymeck (SR, UCLA) – 12.71
  6. Aaliyah McCormick (JR, Oregon) – 12.74
  7. Jaiya Covington (JR, Texas A&M) – 12.77
  8. Akala Garrett (SO, Texas) – 12.75
  9. Oneka Wilson (JR, Clemson) – 12.94

9:52 p.m. ET: 100m – Women 

  1. Victoria Cameron (SO, Tarleton State) – 11.01
  2. Brianna Selby (FR, USC) – 11.01
  3. Samirah Moody (SR, USC) – 10.93
  4. Leah Bertrand (SR, Ohio State) – 10.91
  5. JaMeesia Ford (SO, South Carolina) – 10.87
  6. Anthaya Charlton (JR, Florida) – 10.87
  7. Tima Godbless (SO, LSU) – 10.91
  8. Dajaz Defrand (JR, USC) – 10.93
  9. Shenese Walker (JR, Florida State) – 10.98

10:02 p.m. ET: 400m – Women 

  1. Kaelyah Liburd (SO, Florida State) – 51.31
  2. Sami Oblad (SR, BYU) – 50.49
  3. Vimbayi Maisvorewa (SR, Auburn) – 50.25
  4. Rachel Joseph (JR, Iowa State) – 50.66
  5. Ella Onojuvwevwo (JR, LSU) – 50.31
  6. Aaliyah Butler (JR, Georgia) – 49.44
  7. Dejanea Oakley (JR, Georgia) – 50.18
  8. Rosey Effiong (SR, Arkansas) – 50.49
  9. Kaylyn Brown (SO, Arkansas) – 50.35

10:14 p.m. ET: 800m – Women 

  1. Victoria Bossong (SR, Harvard) – 1:59.48
  2. Smilla Kolbe (SR, North Florida) – 1:59.02
  3. Meghan Hunter (SR, BYU) – 1:58.95
  4. Roisin Willis (JR, Stanford) – 1:59.81
  5. Michaela Rose (SR, LSU) – 1:58.12
  6. Makayla Paige (JR, North Carolina) – 1:59.73
  7. Lauren Tolbert (JR, Duke) – 1:59.39
  8. Veronica Hargrave (FR, Indiana) – 2:00.51
  9. Laura Pellicoro (SR, Portland) – 2:01.07

10:27 p.m. ET: 400m Hurdles – Women 

  1. Tyra Wilson (SR, Florida State) – 55.39
  2. Braelyn Baker (FR, Duke) – 56.35
  3. Chloe Fair (JR, Harvard) – 55.85
  4. Alyria McBride (JR, Vanderbilt) – 55.65
  5. Michelle Smith (FR, Georgia) – 54.56
  6. Savannah Sutherland (SR, Michigan) – 53.46
  7. Akala Garrett (SO, Texas) – 53.73
  8. Sanaa Hebron (SO, Miami (Fla.)) – 55.21
  9. Amelliah Birdow (SO, TCU) – 55.96

10:37 p.m. ET: 200m – Women 

  1. Gabrielle Matthews (JR, Florida) – 22.59
  2. Samirah Moody (SR, USC) – 22.55
  3. Leah Bertrand (SR, Ohio State) – 22.54
  4. Kenondra Davis (JR, Texas) – 22.45
  5. Madison Whyte (SO, USC) – 22.16
  6. JaMeesia Ford (SO, South Carolina) – 21.98
  7. Jasmine Montgomery (JR, Texas A&M) – 22.17
  8. Dajaz Defrand (JR, USC) – 22.20
  9. Jayla Jamison (SR, South Carolina) – 22.54

10:43 p.m. ET: 800m – Women’s Heptathlon

  • Izzy Goudros (SR, Harvard)
  • Jadin O’Brien (SR, Notre Dame)
  • Mia Lien (FR, UTSA)
  • Katelyn Adel (FR, Alabama)
  • Sofia Cosculluela (FR, Washington)
  • Alaina Brady (SR, Notre Dame)
  • Annika Williams (SR, Oregon)
  • Maddie Pitts (JR, Penn State)
  • Sofia Iakushina (FR, Texas A&M)
  • Jalen Elrod (SR, Purdue)
  • Claudine Raud-Gumiel (SR, Long Beach St.)
  • Kenli Nettles (SR, Ball State)
  • Annie Molenhouse (JR, Oklahoma State)
  • Clare McNamara (SR, Michigan)
  • Sydney Johnson (SR, UCLA)
  • Destiny Masters (SR, Wichita State)
  • Juliette Laracuente-Hueb (SO, Cincinnati)
  • Lucie Kienast (FR, Illinois)
  • Lucy Fellows (SO, Louisville)
  • Maresa Hense (FR, Connecticut)
  • Pippi Lotta Enok (JR, Oklahoma)
  • Shelby Grover (SO, Kent State)
  • Melissa Wullschleger (FR, Illinois)
  • Ella Spaulding (SO, Fresno State) 

10:55 p.m. ET: 5000m – Women 

  1. Edna Chelulei (FR, Eastern Kentucky) – 15:30.56
  2. Jenna Hutchins (JR, BYU) – 15:16.95
  3. Julia David-Smith (JR, Washington) – 15:43.30
  4. Rachel Forsyth (FR, Michigan State) – 15:30.50
  5. Sadie Sigfstead (JR, Villanova) – 15:33.68
  6. Brenda Jepchirchir (FR, Auburn) – 15:33.50
  7. Isca Chelangat (FR, Oklahoma State) – 15:31.35
  8. Agnes McTighe (JR, Northern Arizona) – 15:44.82
  9. Alex Millard (JR, Providence) – 15:27.02
  10. Vera Sjoberg (JR, Boston U.) – 15:27.51
  11. Zofia Dudek (JR, Stanford) – 15:23.46
  12. Ava Mitchell (SO, Northern Arizona) – 15:31.41
  13. Maelle Porcher (JR, Iowa State) – 15:32.59
  14. Silvia Jelelgo (SO, Clemson) – 15:27.68
  15. Sophia Kennedy (SO, Stanford) – 15:11.12
  16. Chloe Scrimgeour (SR, Georgetown) – 15:05.40
  17. Pamela Kosgei (FR, New Mexico) – 14:52.45
  18. Florence Caron (JR, Penn State) – 15:27.05
  19. Amina Maatoug (SR, Washington) – 15:37.55
  20. Margot Appleton (SR, Virginia) – 15:25.19
  21. Grace Hartman (JR, NC State) – 14:58.11
  22. Paityn Noe (SO, Arkansas) – 15:28.04
  23. Samantha Bush (SR, NC State) – 15:28.10
  24. Marion Jepngetich (FR, New Mexico) – 15:22.80

11:21 p.m. ET: 4x400m Relay – Women

  1. UCLA
  2. Miami (Fla.)
  3. Iowa
  4. Duke
  5. South Carolina
  6. Arkansas
  7. Georgia
  8. USC
  9. Texas A&M

NFL Star WR Tyreek Hill Still Challenging World Champion Noah Lyles In Race

As Miami Dolphins wide receiver Tyreek Hill gets closer to the start of the 2025 NFL season, he still has one thing on his mind: a race with Noah Lyles, the reigning Olympic gold medalist in the 100m dash.

Tyreek Hill running a 10.15 100m 👀pic.twitter.com/5tHJByPrTR

— Travis Miller (@travismillerx13) June 14, 2025

Read the full article by Lindsey Plotkin.

What Schools Have Won The Most Titles At The NCAA Division I Outdoor Track And Field Championships?

The NCAA Division I Men’s Outdoor Track and Field Championships first was held in 1921. 

USC owns the most men’s titles with 25, while Arkansas is the only other program with 10 or more (10).

The NCAA Division I Women’s Outdoor Track and Field Championships first was held in 1982. 

LSU has won the most women’s titles with 14. The next-closest is Texas with five.

NCAA Division I Track And Field Championship Scoreboard

Men’s Scoreboard by School

  1. USC: 41
  2. Texas A&M: 41
  3. Arkansas: 40
  4. Auburn: 35
  5. New Mexico: 31
  6. Oklahoma: 30.5
  7. Minnesota: 25
  8. Ole Miss: 22
  9. Kentucky: 22
  10. Florida: 22
  11. Oklahoma State: 19
  12. BYU: 19
  13. Oregon: 19
  14. South Florida: 18
  15. Tennessee: 18
  16. Kansas: 16.5
  17. Texas Tech: 16
  18. North Carolina: 16
  19. Wisconsin: 15
  20. Houston: 15
  21. Baylor: 14
  22. Texas State: 14
  23. South Carolina: 13
  24. Miss State: 13
  25. Alabama: 13
  26. Virginia Tech: 13
  27. Louisville: 13
  28. LSU: 11.33
  29. Iowa: 11
  30. Washington: 10
  31. Kansas State: 10
  32. Miami (Fla.): 10
  33. Iowa State: 10
  34. Texas: 9
  35. Duke: 8.5
  36. Nebraska: 8.5
  37. California: 8
  38. Cal Poly: 8
  39. Furman: 8
  40. Arizona: 8
  41. UC Santa Barbara: 8
  42. Princeton: 7
  43. Arkansas State: 7
  44. Illinois: 6.5
  45. Georgia: 6.33
  46. Florida State: 6
  47. Arkansas-Pine Bluff: 6
  48. Missouri: 6
  49. Harvard: 6
  50. Villanova: 6
  51. Air Force: 5
  52. UCLA: 5
  53. CBU: 5
  54. Washington State: 4
  55. Virginia: 4
  56. Tarleton State: 4
  57. Wake Forest: 4
  58. DePaul: 3
  59. Northern Arizona: 3
  60. Portland: 3
  61. Bradley: 3
  62. NC State: 3
  63. Arizona State: 3
  64. Rutgers: 2.5
  65. Wyoming: 2
  66. UMass Lowell: 1
  67. Davidson: 1
  68. Cincinnati: 1
  69. Cornell: 1
  70. Montana State: 1
  71. ULM: 1
  72. Penn: 0.33

Women’s Scoreboard by School – 15 events remain

  1. Georgia: 26
  2. Illinois: 18.5
  3. Washington: 16
  4. Louisville: 15
  5. Notre Dame: 13
  6. Colorado State: 10
  7. New Mexico: 10
  8. Missouri: 10
  9. Stanford: 8
  10. Texas Tech: 8
  11. Texas: 8
  12. NC State: 8
  13. Rutgers: 8
  14. Oklahoma: 8
  15. Oregon: 7
  16. Baylor: 6.5
  17. South Dakota: 6.5
  18. Texas State: 6
  19. TCU: 6
  20. West Virginia: 6
  21. Wichita State: 6
  22. Oklahoma State: 5
  23. Penn State: 5
  24. Arkansas: 5
  25. Kansas: 4.5
  26. USC: 4
  27. Nebraska: 4
  28. California: 4
  29. Georgetown: 4
  30. Florida: 4
  31. LSU: 3
  32. Alabama: 3
  33. VCU: 3
  34. UCLA: 3
  35. Gonzaga: 2
  36. North Dakota: 2
  37. Rice: 2
  38. Utah Valley: 1
  39. Fresno State: 1
  40. Wisconsin: 1
  41. Tarleton State: 1
  42. Texas A&M: 1

NCAA Track And Field Championships Schedule On Saturday

Saturday, June 14

Track Events

  • 9:02 PM – 4x100m Relay, Final, Women
  • 9:11 PM – 1500m, Final, Women
  • 9:24 PM – 3000m Steeplechase, Final, Women
  • 9:42 PM – 100m Hurdles, Final, Women
  • 9:52 PM – 100m, Final, Women
  • 10:02 PM – 400m, Final, Women
  • 10:14 PM – 800m, Final, Women
  • 10:27 PM – 400m Hurdles, Final, Women
  • 10:37 PM – 200m, Final, Women
  • 10:55 PM – 5000m, Final, Women
  • 11:21 PM – 4x400m Relay, Final, Women

Field Events

  • 3:30 PM – Discus, Final, Women
  • 8:30 PM – High Jump, Final, Women
  • 9:10 PM – Triple Jump, Final, Women

Combined Events

  • 6:30 PM – Long Jump, Heptathlon, Women
  • 7:45 PM – Javelin, Heptathlon, Women
  • 10:43 – 800M, Heptathlon, Women

What Channel Is NCAA Track And Field On?

The NCAA D1 Track and Field Championships will be broadcast on ESPN and ESPN2 from June 11 to 14.

FloTrack Is The Streaming Home For Many Track And Field Meets Each Year

Don’t miss all the track and field season action streaming on FloTrack. Check out the FloTrack schedule for more events.

FloTrack Archived Footage

Video footage from each event will be archived and stored in a video library for FloTrack subscribers to watch for the duration of their subscriptions.

Join The Track & Field Conversation On Social





Link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sports

Big 12 Prepares for NCAA Volleyball Sweet 16

Published

on


Arizona State and Kansas advanced to the Regional Semifinal round of the 2025 NCAA Division I Women’s Volleyball Championship. This is the fifth time in the last seven years that the Big 12 has sent at least two programs to the Sweet 16 and the first time since 2022. Additionally, the Big 12 finished with eight wins in the first round, the most in Conference history, surpassing the previous high of six (2004, 2006, 2023).
 
No. 2 seed Arizona State defeated Coppin State and Utah State to make its fourth trip to the regional semifinals in program history, and the second time in the last three years. The Sun Devils improved to 28-3 on the year, the second-most wins in school history. This marks the first time in the NCAA era that Arizona State has finished the year undefeated at home and the second time in Arizona State history. The 2025 Big 12 Offensive Player of the Year, Noemie Glover, recorded 17 kills, the second-most for the Sun Devils behind only Bailey Miller (18 kills). Arizona State will next play No. 3 seed Creighton on Thursday, Dec. 11 at Noon CT/11 a.m. MST.
 
No. 4 seed Kansas will play in the Sweet 16 for the first time since 2021, and the fourth time in program history after two wins at Horejsi Family Volleyball Arena. The Jayhawks swept High Point (3-0) before taking down No. 5 seed Miami (3-1) behind seniors Rhian Swanson and Katie Dalton. Swanson increased her season total to 19 games with double-digit kills, while Dalton added 59 assists across the two matches. Kansas will play top-seeded Nebraska on Friday, Dec. 12 at 8:30 p.m. CT.
 





Link

Continue Reading

Sports

Players to watch at NCAA volleyball tournament’s Sweet 16

Published

on


The 2025 NCAA volleyball tournament is down to its final 16 teams. But countless pressing questions remain as the tournament makes its way to the final four in Kansas City. Can Nebraska, the No. 1 overall seed, finish undefeated and claim the program’s sixth national title? Can Pitt advance to its fifth straight final four appearance? Will SEC champion Kentucky return to the final four for the first time since winning its first national championship in 2020? Is a young Texas team ready to cash in ahead of schedule?

Here are the 10 (OK, 11) players who will have a major say in answering those questions and more.

Olivia Babcock, Pitt: If the volleyball gods could issue a warning for the NCAA tournament’s stretch run, it would read something like this: “Do not take your eyes off Olivia Babcock, or else…” Arguably the most dynamic player in the college game, the 6-foot-4 Babcock averages 5.9 points per set and 5.1 kills per set for a team that is looking to return to the final four for the fifth straight time. The ACC Player of the Year had more than 40 kills in two matches this season from her opposite hitter position. With springy legs and a powerful arm from the front row, back row and behind the service line, Babcock, the 2024 AVCA Player of the Year, is magic in motion. Look away at your own risk.

Ella Swindle, Texas: Surrounded by strangers at the start of the season, the Longhorns’ junior setter holds the key to the powerful Texas attack. The 6-foot-3 Swindle led Texas to the national title in 2023 but then played a backup role a year ago when Texas fell to Creighton in the regional semifinals. This year, she has 898 assists — mostly to hitters she had never played with before the season. Texas’ top three hitters are Pitt transfer Torrey Stafford (488 kills) and freshmen Cari Spears (338 kills) and Abby Vander Wal (268 kills), and Swindle has the offense hitting at a .316 clip, tied for third-best in the nation.

Rebekah Allick, Nebraska: The top-seeded Cornhuskers take the court with a pick-your-poison approach. Every attacker around Big Ten Player and Setter of the Year Bergen Reilly can terminate (see: Andi Jackson, Taylor Landfair, Harper Murray). Every defender on the court can dig (see: Laney Choboy, Olivia Mauch, Teraya Sigler). On volleyball’s balanced behemoth, Allick stands out for her passion. Make no mistake: Allick, a 6-foot-4 senior middle blocker, is having the best statistical season of her career, hitting .437 (eighth-best in the country but seven slots below fellow middle blocker Jackson) with 235 kills. But nothing fires up the No. 1 overall seed more than an Allick roar after a stuffed block or a kill on an opponent’s overpass. The Huskers will be tested. And when they are, they’ll turn to Allick for inspiration.

Brookeva DeHudson, Kentucky: Don’t google her. It’s impossible to pick one Kentucky superstar outside hitter over the other. Brooklyn DeLeye and Eva Hudson are both that good, so we merged them into one spot. DeLeye was the SEC Player of the Year in 2024. Hudson, in her first year with the Wildcats after transferring from Purdue, is the SEC Player of the Year in 2025. The 6-foot-2 DeLeye has 495 kills on the season and averages 4.7 per set. The 6-foot-1 Hudson has 482 kills and averages 4.6 per set. Slow down one? Maybe. Stop both? Nearly impossible. Together they are the most lethal pair of pin hitters in the tournament and the engine driving Kentucky toward a shot at a second national title.

Chloe Chicoine, Louisville: Now we come upon the rarest of all sightings in the latter half of the NCAA tournament: a 5-foot-10 outside hitter. Chicoine, a transfer-portal addition to the reigning national runners-up, brings her impressive vertical leap and feisty play from Purdue to Louisville. She comes into the regional semifinals with her arm blazing. Chicoine crushed a season-high 28 kills in a five-set win over Marquette in the second round. She leads the balanced Cardinals with 387 kills and is second in digs with 332.

Mimi Colyer, Wisconsin: Two words: Instant. Offense. The 6-foot-3 senior outside hitter and Oregon transfer was a unanimous all-Big Ten selection in her first season with the Badgers. How could she not be? Colyer averages 5.32 kills per set, tops among players remaining in the tournament, and hits .340. She spent her free time getting 220 digs and 67 blocks. With setter extraordinaire Charlie Fuerbringer healthy and back on the court, the Badgers bring an offense that can pose problems for anyone and everyone.

Averi Carlson, SMU: The 5-foot-11 setter started for two seasons at Baylor, then started at Texas, then led the U.S. U23 national team to gold at the Pan American Cup, and now she orchestrates a high-powered Mustangs attack. The ACC Setter of the Year runs an offense that hits .316, tied for third-best (with Texas) in the country. She has developed a quick and lethal connection with fellow transfer Malaya Jones (503 kills) from Colorado State. She also puts up a strong block, with 85 on the season.

Noemie Glover, Arizona State: Since transferring from Oregon before the season, the Sun Devils’ opposite hitter has had exactly one match in which she didn’t produce double-digit kills — but even in that match she hit .444. The 6-foot-2 Glover has 406 kills, 108 blocks and 80 digs. Fun fact: Her dad, La’Roi Glover, played 13 seasons in the NFL and was a six-time Pro Bowler.

Elia Rubin, Stanford: The senior and four-year Cardinal starter has become synonymous with Stanford volleyball over the past four seasons. She brings a host of awards — AVCA All-America, All-ACC, All-Pac 12 — and 1,607 career kills into the regional semifinals. This season, she leads the second-seeded Cardinal in kills (378) and aces (45) and is second in digs (296). About the only thing Rubin hasn’t done in her Stanford career is play in the final four.

Logan Lednicky, Texas A&M: The 6-foot-3 senior opposite hitter is as steady as they come. She has been killing it for the Aggies for four straight seasons, and she’s poised to go out with a bang in her final NCAA tournament run. Through her first two tournament games, she has 39 kills on a .429 percentage and is averaging 6.21 points per set. The AVCA Player of the Year semifinalist plays some mean defense too — she has 83 blocks and 275 digs this season, both second-most among the Aggies.



Link

Continue Reading

Sports

NIL’s marketing success proves the value of athletes as creators

Published

on


Brands have long turned to professional athletes for their star power in big-budget commercials, but recent shifts in name, image, and likeness (NIL) policy have pushed marketers to widen the talent pool.

On July 1, the House v. NCAA settlement took effect, allowing colleges to compensate athletes for their NIL usage. Marketers expect that these athletes, many of whom have built-in communities and an engaged digital fanbase, can help brands stand out in the influencer space.

  • Student athletes boast a social media engagement rate 3.7x higher than traditional influencers (5.6% compared to 1.9%), according to a June Opendorse report.

“College athletes bring a new edge by commanding hyper-loyal, local communities,” said Alison Bringé, CMO of Launchmetrics, “shaping culture on campuses and connecting with younger consumers with a level of authenticity traditional influencers can’t reach.”

Why college athletes resonate

NIL compensation has shown that sports influence functions like creator influence, as fans want more from their favorite players than just highlight reels. US sports fans look for personal life updates (31%) almost as much as game highlights (34%), according to an April YouGov survey.

“With jam-packed schedules, they don’t always fit the mold of the ‘always-on’ influencer, which makes the glimpses they share into their daily lives, routines, and preferences even more special and exciting to fans,” said Ajalin Williamson, strategy director at The Goat Agency in an October report.

Inside the sports creator economy

With the NIL settlement giving new opportunities to athletes and marketers, brands are reconsidering who is influential, recognizing that considering the full sports sphere can lead to more memorable work.

Cameo, an app where consumers buy personalized videos from celebrities, is recognizing the value of expanding athlete partnerships through a partnership with the Pro Athlete Community (PAC). The goal is to highlight how “brand deals have historically been limited to only the most prominent names,” according to a press release.

You no longer need to be in the big leagues to be a top sports creator. The Savannah Bananas, an exhibition baseball team that is known for their choreographed dances and social presence, has 11.1 million TikTok followers. The Yankees have 1.8 million, and The Mets only 801.7 thousand.



Link

Continue Reading

Sports

NCAA women’s volleyball players with famous NBA, NFL dads

Published

on


Dec. 10, 2025, 6:02 a.m. ET



Link

Continue Reading

Sports

2026 Nebraska volleyball reseating concerns some longtime fans

Published

on


Nebraska Athletics is increasing capacity inside the John Cook Arena for the 2026 Husker Volleyball season, but some fans say the reseating is a worrisome change.The arena, inside the Bob Devaney Sports Center, will go from 8,300 to 10,000 seats next year. It’s the first full reseating in the program’s history. Longtime ticket holders like Jim Bunch said their season-ticket spots will no longer be guaranteed under the reseating. “A lot of people in our section, that have now been dispersed, have been together for over well over 30 years,” Bunch said. “It’s really sad.”The Athletic Fund says the reseat will increase revenue for the program. Bunch said he worries that Nebraska Athletics is prioritizing profit over fans.”I understand the landscape of college athletics today, NIL, transfer portal, and now the revenue sharing. But you know, the feeling in Nebraska for me is we’re no longer fans, we’re consumers, and they’re trying to squeeze every nickel out of us that they can,” Bunch said. In a February interview with KETV Sports, UNL Athletic Director Troy Dannen said updates like this one are part of keeping up with the evolution of college athletics.”In this new era of college athletics, for moving into how we generate revenues, stadiums are the primary revenue generators that every institution that plays at this level have,” Dannen said.Bunch said the changes are already beginning, after the University announced the reseating would begin for the NCAA tournament. Bunch said many friends of his no longer could sit in their season-ticket spots.”If you’re a current season ticket holder, you will get a seat somewhere in the building. That has not been true,” Bunch said. The process is outlined on the Nebraska Athletic Fund website, where it lists that season ticket holders will get an assigned appointment time to select their seats, as well as the donation and priority seating costs. The contribution deadline is March 18, 2026, and ticket holders will be notified in April and May of their selection date and time.”We don’t know where we’re going to be for next season, and we’re hopeful that we’re going to be able to stay close to the action,” Bunch said.

Nebraska Athletics is increasing capacity inside the John Cook Arena for the 2026 Husker Volleyball season, but some fans say the reseating is a worrisome change.

The arena, inside the Bob Devaney Sports Center, will go from 8,300 to 10,000 seats next year. It’s the first full reseating in the program’s history. Longtime ticket holders like Jim Bunch said their season-ticket spots will no longer be guaranteed under the reseating.

“A lot of people in our section, that have now been dispersed, have been together for over well over 30 years,” Bunch said. “It’s really sad.”

The Athletic Fund says the reseat will increase revenue for the program. Bunch said he worries that Nebraska Athletics is prioritizing profit over fans.

“I understand the landscape of college athletics today, NIL, transfer portal, and now the revenue sharing. But you know, the feeling in Nebraska for me is we’re no longer fans, we’re consumers, and they’re trying to squeeze every nickel out of us that they can,” Bunch said.

In a February interview with KETV Sports, UNL Athletic Director Troy Dannen said updates like this one are part of keeping up with the evolution of college athletics.

“In this new era of college athletics, for moving into how we generate revenues, stadiums are the primary revenue generators that every institution that plays at this level have,” Dannen said.

Bunch said the changes are already beginning, after the University announced the reseating would begin for the NCAA tournament. Bunch said many friends of his no longer could sit in their season-ticket spots.

“If you’re a current season ticket holder, you will get a seat somewhere in the building. That has not been true,” Bunch said.

The process is outlined on the Nebraska Athletic Fund website, where it lists that season ticket holders will get an assigned appointment time to select their seats, as well as the donation and priority seating costs. The contribution deadline is March 18, 2026, and ticket holders will be notified in April and May of their selection date and time.

“We don’t know where we’re going to be for next season, and we’re hopeful that we’re going to be able to stay close to the action,” Bunch said.



Link

Continue Reading

Sports

Cal Poly indoor track and field sets school records in Reno – Times-Standard

Published

on


Cal Poly Humboldt women’s and men’s indoor track and field squads opened the 2025 season with a meet at the Silver State Invitational and Multis, hosted by the University of Nevada, Reno, this past weekend. The Jacks saw three NCAA provisional marks set, one by pole vaulter Michael Payan (16-8.75) and two on the women’s side, Cocome McKamey in the pentathlon (8th out of 22) and Isabel Perez-Zoghbi (2:10.70 seconds in the 800 meters). Two of those marks are likely enough to earn an invite to the national championships in March, according to Lumberjacks head coach Sarah Ingram.

The marks are set as an indication that the individual is in range to go to nationals, not a “golden ticket,” Ingram said. When the time comes for the university to declare athletes it wants to enter for the national championship, they are allowed with a provisional mark. However, there will still only be roughly the top 18 that qualify for the national meet out of those declared, which comes down to a ranked order list of each event. Payan’s mark, Ingram is reasonably confident, will be included, and comes after Payan took fifth place last year at nationals as a freshman, setting a new school record as “we’re expecting big things out of him this year,” said Ingram.

On the women’s side, Perez-Zoghbi has gone previously to nationals indoor in the 800m and outdoors twice for the 400m hurdles, the 800 currently being her focus. Ingram said her mark is probably strong enough to get her in, which Ingram said “is pretty exciting, and obviously both of these athletes are going to continue competing; we have a couple more weekends of indoor in February where they’ll be able to try to better those marks and get them as high as possible on that rankings. Our third athlete, Cocome McKamey, is one of our multi-event athletes indoors with the pentathlon. Her mark met the qualifying threshold, but based on previous years, we don’t expect that mark to be good enough to get in, but based on what we saw at her meet, she’ll be able to hit the marks needed at our next multi opportunity up in Spokane, Washington in February.”

Humboldt is going on its third season in indoor track and field, and “building out some depth in our record book,” according to Ingram. Eight new school records were set in Reno across the women’s and men’s events. Of the women, two freshman had an “outstanding” meet, said Ingram, with “really big personal bests in all their events.” Kelsi Lytle set a new school record in the 60m with a 7.85 seconds and also had p.r.’s in the 200m and 400m, while Caitlyn Dougherty established a school-best mark in the 200m and had personal records in the 200m, 400m (winning her heat at 58.32 secs), and 60m hurdles. She was also on the 4×400 team that set a new school record with Brielle Jimerson, McKamey, and Perez-Zoghbi.

“We’re really expecting a strong 4x400m relay in our next meet as well, and hoping we’ll be able to get a provisional qualifying mark in that event as well,” said Ingram.

Of the men, in addition to Payan’s new school mark, Dylan Ochoa also set a new mark in the 400m, running 49.12 seconds. Collin Friedman had a new long jump record and high jump as well to tie Gabe Bondurant and Alex Dillon in the latter at 1.90m. Joseph Gonzalez not only set a new school record in the shot put, he won the meet outright with a 15.89m, and Isaak Kasso won the 60m hurdles with a mark of 8.50 secs.

“We’ve got a big stretch here where we’re taking a break and not allowed to have official practices during winter break,” said Ingram. “We’re trying to make sure everybody passes their classes, does their finals and enjoys the holidays. And then we come back and start practicing again Jan. 12. Our first meet (of the new year) will be February 5th through 7th in Spokane. We’ll be bringing all event groups and that meet will also have a multi offered as well.”

Finally, she continued, “We had lots of really good stuff this weekend, we’re just really excited to be putting up such strong marks this early in the year, it helps the athletes stay motivated going into that long stretch of winter break with their goal-setting, their training, when they’re kind of on their own time. We’re excited for what this will mean not only for the finish of our indoor season come February and March, but springboarding us into that outdoor season for the whole rest of the spring semester.”



Link

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending