Connect with us

NIL

Nico and Madden Iamaleava transfers raise issue of whether NIL collectives will recoup payments | News, Sports, Jobs

FILE – Tennessee quarterback Nico Iamaleava (8) warms up before an NCAA college football game against Alabama, Saturday, Oct. 21, 2023, in Tuscaloosa, Ala. (AP Photo/Vasha Hunt, File) (AP) — The surprise transfers of brothers Nico and Madden Iamaleava have prompted fresh questions about contracts and name, image and likeness buyouts […]

Published

on



FILE – Tennessee quarterback Nico Iamaleava (8) warms up before an NCAA college football game against Alabama, Saturday, Oct. 21, 2023, in Tuscaloosa, Ala. (AP Photo/Vasha Hunt, File)

(AP) — The surprise transfers of brothers Nico and Madden Iamaleava have prompted fresh questions about contracts and name, image and likeness buyouts for athletes in a college sports landscape looking increasingly like the pros.

Nico Iamaleava, who led Tennessee to the College Football Playoff last season, walked away from a reported $2.4 million NIL contract to seek higher pay elsewhere. He joined UCLA on Sunday, reportedly for half the money though terms of any NIL deal were not released.

Arkansas freshman quarterback Madden Iamaleava entered the portal this week not long after spring practices wrapped up and will join his brother at UCLA, according to multiple media reports.

Arkansas athletic director Hunter Yurachek released a statement indicating he would support efforts by the Razorbacks’ NIL collective to enforce buyout clauses in athlete contracts. Iamaleava reportedly had a contract valued at $500,000 upon signing with Arkansas on Dec. 4, according to reports.

Arkansas Edge, the school’s collective, requires Iamaleava to repay 50% of their remaining contract value for leaving before the contract expires, according to reports. The Arkansas athletic department declined to comment and Arkansas Edge did not respond to messages.

Yurachek, in a post on X that did not name Iamaleava, wrote: “I have spoken with the leadership team at Arkansas Edge and expressed my support in their pursuit to enforce their rights under any agreement violated by our student-athletes moving forward. We appreciate Edge’s investment in our student-athletes and acknowledge the enforcement of these agreements is vital in our new world of college athletics.”

The latest cycle of transfers has seen a lot of chaos and accusations of tampering. Earlier this year, Wisconsin said it had “credible information” that Miami and Xavier Lucas made impermissible contact with each other before the former Badgers cornerback decided to transfer to his home-state school.

All this comes with final approval of the $2.8 billion NCAA antitrust settlement looming. The plan will clear the way for Division I schools to share up to $20.5 million each with their athletes annually but also assess NIL deals athletes sign with third parties.

The settlement would go into effect July 1, and athletes have been scrambling to renegotiate contracts or find better opportunities at new schools before deals valued at $600 or more must be approved through a clearinghouse that will be administered in part by financial giant Deloitte in a bid to establish fair market value.

Rich Stankewicz, the director of operations for the Happy Valley United collective backing Penn State athletics, said he thinks there is a time and place for NIL buyouts, citing a spring transfer departing before playing a snap as an example. He favors incentive-based contracts contingent on in-season academic and athletic performance.

“If more money is paid out in those time frames, that gives incentive for the player to stay and see those dollars from their contract, rather than potentially collecting up front and then deciding the grass is greener somewhere else three months later,” he told the Associated Press.

Russell White, president of The Collective Association, said buyout clauses have been baked into high-value NIL contracts for some time but that those clauses probably will become standard for all athletes going forward.

White said collectives have been mostly successful quietly coming to settlement terms with athletes who leave — which, according to New York-based employment attorney Dan Ain, is advantageous to both sides.

“Suing 19-year-old kids isn’t a great look,” Ain said.

Iamaleava, who is from Long Beach, California, initially pledged to UCLA last May. He made a signing-day flip from the Bruins to Arkansas and enrolled in January. He was the No. 3 quarterback in spring practice behind Taylen Green and KJ Jackson.

Some of the questions amid all the transferring and severed deals center on whether NIL deals are enforceable contracts with the NCAA settlement not yet approved.

Matthew Shepherd, an attorney and member of the Arkansas House of Representatives, co-sponsored the state’s NIL law. He said if Madden Iamaleava left on his own volition, the terms of the NIL deal would be subject to standard contract law.

Shepherd noted the NIL law was modified in 2023 to include a provision prohibiting a third party from offering NIL inducements to an athlete who already is enrolled at one of the state’s schools or who has entered into an enrollment contract. If that happened in Iamaleava’s case, Shepherd said, the school or third party such as an NIL collective could take legal action.

Missouri-based sports attorney Mit Winter said collectives could be hard-pressed to win court fights. If Madden Iamaleava’s contract would require him to pay back 50% of its remaining value, perhaps $200,000 in liquidated damages, Arkansas Edge would have to show why that is a reasonable estimate of damages.

Winter said if a court finds that amount to be more of a penalty than a reasonable estimate of damages, the buyout would be unenforceable.



Today’s breaking news and more in your inbox






Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NIL

Big Ten, SEC and … Ted Cruz: How Donald Trump’s college sports commission plan was abruptly halted

Days after gaining traction, President Donald Trump has paused the formation of a presidential commission on college athletics. The White House’s decision was made Wednesday morning after conversations with lawmakers, including U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), who suggested the commission’s work be sidelined as they seek co-sponsorship on Cruz’s long-developing bill to regulate college athletics, […]

Published

on


Days after gaining traction, President Donald Trump has paused the formation of a presidential commission on college athletics.

The White House’s decision was made Wednesday morning after conversations with lawmakers, including U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), who suggested the commission’s work be sidelined as they seek co-sponsorship on Cruz’s long-developing bill to regulate college athletics, sources told CBS Sports. The presidential commission could return within the next 90 days, though no promises from the White House have been made, sources said.

Confidence that the commission focused on regulating college sports would gain bipartisan support was waning, and the Big Ten and SEC, the two most powerful conferences in college athletics, opposed commission leader Cody Campbell’s notions behind the scenes, according to multiple sources familiar with the situation. One high-ranking official told CBS Sports this week their nightmare was seeing Campbell arm-in-arm with Trump and completely reversing the years of work that have gone into supporting a new era of college sports that is expected to soon allow universities to pay their athletes directly. The White House was also convinced to sideline the commission because of the full docket Trump faces: trade disputes, the Russia-Ukraine war and the economy.

White House halts Donald Trump’s plan for college sports commission amid ongoing legislation talks, per report

Carter Bahns

White House halts Donald Trump's plan for college sports commission amid ongoing legislation talks, per report

The presidential commission also faced opposition on the ground, sources told CBS Sports. Campbell’s public push to pool conferences’ media rights to help smaller leagues facing financial trouble was of great concern to the Big Ten and SEC, the two richest conferences in the country. Sources within those conferences believed Campbell’s primary goal was to prop up Texas Tech, his alma mater, the Big 12 and smaller Group of Five schools at the expense of what the Big Ten and SEC are trying to accomplish. The two richest and most powerful conferences had zero desire to see any of their hard-earned money be redirected to the New Mexicos and UTEPs of the world just because it might benefit the system. 

Campbell criticized the two conferences’ stranglehold on amateur athletics and their efforts in Washington, D.C., seeking legal protections that would mostly favor them and lead to smaller conferences crumbling under financial burden. The power conferences and the NCAA have spent millions on lobbying efforts in Capitol Hill over the last four years.

“The NCAA is broken, but handing the keys to a few fat cats is worse,” Campbell wrote in March. “America thrives on competition, not cozy cartels blessed by D.C.”

The seed for Trump’s presidential commission was planted May 1 when Trump visited the University of Alabama to speak at a commencement ceremony. It’s there he met with former Alabama coach Nick Saban, and the two discussed college athletics and the unwieldy world of NIL. Campbell, the chairman of Texas Tech’s board of regents, was put in charge of the commission and actively sought input from college leaders and was recently recruiting members to serve, including Saban. The legendary former Crimson Tide coach spoke several times with Campbell, and the two met in person to discuss a leadership role, sources said.

Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Alabama), who accompanied Trump on his visit to Alabama, recently expressed doubt to CBS Sports that a federal legislative solution would emerge, instead putting his hopes in what Campbell and Saban could accomplish together with a commission.

“I think Nick and Cody can get something done along with President Trump’s power,” Tuberville told CBS Sports last week. “You’re not going to get six votes in the Senate, so [Trump is] going to have to say, ‘Look, this is what we’re going to do.'”

Campbell, a former Texas Tech football player who’s earned his wealth in the energy industry, has been heavily involved in the NIL space since 2022, when he founded The Matador Club, Tech’s NIL collective. He also has ties to Trump and Cruz, who he has financially supported via donations and fundraising events.

Meanwhile, Saban publicly questioned whether a commission was needed at the behest of those who didn’t want to see the commission gain traction, according to sources. Multiple Power Four sources told CBS Sports this week that Saban publicly distancing himself from the commission was helpful in slowing any progress. 

“I know there’s been a lot of stuff out there about some commission or whatever. I don’t think we need a commission,” Saban said, according to Bama247. “I’ve said that before. I think we need — we know what the issues are, we just have to have people who are willing to move those and solve those and create some solutions for some of those issues. I’m all for being a consultant to anybody who would think that my experience would be beneficial to helping create some of those solutions.”

NCAA president Charlie Baker and ACC commissioner Jim Phillips voiced support for the commission last week. 

“The fact that there’s an interest on the executive side on this, I think it speaks to the fact that everybody is paying a lot of attention right now to what’s going on in college sports,” Baker said. “I’m up for anything that can help us get somewhere.”

Inside Donald Trump’s push to fix college sports: How it began and what we know going forward

John Talty

Inside Donald Trump's push to fix college sports: How it began and what we know going forward

The varying opinions among the conferences reflect the battle lines that have formed between the richest conferences — Big Ten and SEC — and those fighting to remain financially competitive — ACC and Big 12. One side had expressed hope for the commission, while the other was wary of motivations.

The NCAA and its major conferences have been seeking antitrust legal protection from the government for the last four years since NIL payments were legalized across the NCAA. Officials want universal laws to govern NIL after more than 30 states have adopted laws with varying regulations. Administrators also want to codify language in the expected settlement of the landmark House v. NCAA antitrust case, allowing schools to pay players millions of dollars at their discretion for the first time in history, starting July 1.

With the presidential commission on the back burner, the conferences’ efforts again turn to Cruz and his colleagues as they attempt to move forward with a bipartisan bill. Lawmakers have previously proposed more than a dozen bills over the last several years, but none have advanced to Congress after stalling in committees. Within the Big Ten and SEC, Cruz has been viewed as the best hope to get a federal solution that delivers what they most desire. 

Cruz said in January he hoped to pass a law to regulate the college athletics market in the current legislative session. Democratic senators Richard Blumenthal, Cory Booker and Jerry Moran are working on a bipartisan compromise with Cruz, ESPN reported in January. In March, Saban appeared alongside Cruz for a roundtable discussion on NIL at the Capitol. 

A request to Sen. Cruz’s office for comment on his role in the pausing of the commission was not immediately returned. 





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Akem’s Analysis – ranking Big Sky 2025 football strengths of schedule – Skyline Sports

In this week’s Akem’s Analysis, Samuel Akem talks about all the teams in the Big Sky Conference and  strength of schedule. He looks deeply into the previous top-5 teams from the conference last year (UC Davis, Idaho, Montana State, Montana, & NAU), or in other words, all the playoff teams. Also, analysis about Deloitte and […]

Published

on


In this week’s Akem’s Analysis, Samuel Akem talks about all the teams in the Big Sky Conference and  strength of schedule. He looks deeply into the previous top-5 teams from the conference last year (UC Davis, Idaho, Montana State, Montana, & NAU), or in other words, all the playoff teams. Also, analysis about Deloitte and the newly formed “NIL Clearinghouse”, which will serve as the new governing arm for NIL in college football.

0:00 – Intro 
3:55 – Toughest Strength of Schedules In The Big Sky 
29:00 – NIL, Clearing House, Deloitte, Collectives 
52:21 – 16-Team CFP Playoff Proposal 
1:01:10 – Final Thoughts 
1:02:37 – End 



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

JMU coaches keeping tighter lid on recruiting activity | James Madison University

James Madison was close to rounding out its 2025-26 roster and playing host to Ike Cornish and Justin McBride, a pair of former power conference players who were once four-star recruits ranked in the top 100 of their high school classes. A couple of weeks earlier, the JMU women had a pair of SMU transfers […]

Published

on


James Madison was close to rounding out its 2025-26 roster and playing host to Ike Cornish and Justin McBride, a pair of former power conference players who were once four-star recruits ranked in the top 100 of their high school classes.

A couple of weeks earlier, the JMU women had a pair of SMU transfers — Kylie Marshall and Bri McLeod — on campus.

McLeod was one of the top players out of Canada in high school while Marshall was a top-40 player in the United States according to ESPN.

In the old days — before the House settlement, plans for revenue sharing and other direct payments to players for their services — that was the kind of news that had a way of leaking.

Even if those players hadn’t chosen the Dukes, which all four did, their official campus visits were good publicity.

Even being associated with high-level recruits was good for JMU’s brand.

But in 2025, it’s the dawn of a new era even as Name, Image and Likeness (NIL) has been around for almost half of a decade.

Their interest in James Madison was a closely guarded secret.

The fact they’d even been to Harrisonburg wasn’t public knowledge until after they’d announced commitments to the Dukes.

“It’s a different world right now,” JMU men’s head coach Preston Spradlin said. “This stuff is so tricky now. Things have to be really tight.”

The concern that news of even mutual interest between player and school, particularly when it comes to proven and experienced transfers, is twofold.

When it hits social media that the Dukes received a visit from a player, it’s not uncommon for said player to almost immediately receive a call from another program asking what JMU is offering to set off another round of negotiations.

Secondarily, other players may wonder if there’s money to go around if it appears a team is close to landing a transfer recruit.

Spradlin said even being listed among several programs that have talked to a player can lead to assumptions the recruiting process is further along than it is.

“To be honest, if it’s tweeted out that this kid was on campus, it could screw us with the next kid,” Spradlin said. “It’s so different. That’s just where it’s at. These coaches and agents try to use that stuff against you. The moment a kid tweets out that he’s coming here, another school will sweep in and say what’s the deal that you’ve got there, and try to offer him more.”

The recruiting visits themselves have changed, too.

Players and their families used to spend two days on campus with the JMU coaching staff guiding tours, showing off the basketball facilities and making sure they enjoyed Harrisonburg’s best restaurants and hotels.

If possible, the Dukes might schedule the visit to coincide with a big event, such as the spring football game, where the recruit could see and be seen by the fanbase.

Since the opening of the Atlantic Union Bank Center in 2020, more often than not, players who took an official visit to JMU later committed.

Some of those elements of the visit still exist, for sure.

But some official visits now last 24 hours or less, with a significant percentage of that time spent in a meeting room negotiating what amounts to a salary.

“This is what the difference is now between two years ago,” JMU women’s head coach Sean O’Regan said. “You still have to get to that portion of the visit where you sit down at a table. We also have to tell them, ‘Hey, understand what’s happening with the current team.’ And that’s not just about playing time now. In the past, in theory anyway, maybe you come in and you believe you can beat out the returning starter or the Player of the Year for playing time. Now it’s money, and maybe it’s a contract. And on our end, it’s loyalty to the players choosing to come back here.”

The evaluation process in recruiting has become not only observing a player’s potential to help on the court but also figuring out if their priorities line up with what JMU has to offer.

O’Regan said that while the Dukes are competitive financially with programs they recruit against, if the first thing a player brings up is money, that more or less ends the recruitment process for the women’s staff.

Spradlin agreed that taking time to figure out if a payday was the top priority could slow down the recruiting process.

“I can tell you our super power as a staff has always been evaluating and building great relationships in the recruiting process,” Spradlin said. “Not that that’s not important. It’s still very important to us, but it’s not quite as important to every kid out there. The ones that are coming here, it’s still important. But it’s taking a little bit longer to weed through and find the ones that are prioritizing that because of the influx of money.”

But, the new challenges aren’t unique to JMU’s programs.

And in the end, both the men’s and women’s teams filled their needs and essentially set their rosters for next season before most of their Sun Belt Conference rivals.

Spradlin and O’Regan both said that while they are figuring out a new process, JMU still has advantages that should allow the Dukes to compete for conference championships each year.

“It’s not exclusive to us,” Spradlin said. “It’s not exclusive to men’s basketball. In recruiting, the things that were prioritized and important, those are still important. But they don’t rank at the top of the list for some kids. I’m not saying that for everybody. There are still kids who want to come here because JMU is an amazing degree, and they want to play for the best fans in the Sun Belt. They want to play for a championship coaching staff, but then again there’s other kids who that’s not quite as important for any more because they can get more money somewhere else.”



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Film Room

In this week’s Film Room, we break down newly reported detail on third-party NIL clearinghouse procedures. Actionable Information Regarding Clearinghouse Last week, Ross Dellenger of Yahoo! Sports reported on a memo detailing NIL clearinghouse information. Regarding the third-party NIL deal review process, the memo provided that:  Institutions will determine whether the payor (third party) is […]

Published

on

Film Room

In this week’s Film Room, we break down newly reported detail on third-party NIL clearinghouse procedures.

Actionable Information Regarding Clearinghouse

Last week, Ross Dellenger of Yahoo! Sports reported on a memo detailing NIL clearinghouse information. Regarding the third-party NIL deal review process, the memo provided that: 

  • Institutions will determine whether the payor (third party) is an Associated Entity/Individual
  • Submitted deals will be reviewed to determine whether they “legitimately advance business objectives”
  • A 12-point “Range of Compensation” analysis will be applied to deals to determine if “compensation aligns with similarly situated individuals in comparable deals”

The memo noted that the Range of Compensation uses “historical deal data as benchmarks” and its factors “include athletic performance, social media presence, local and institutional market size, and brand influence.” 

The clearinghouse will adjudicate submitted deals as (1) cleared, (2) not cleared, (3) in review or (4) information needed. For those deals “not cleared,” student-athlete options are to (i) renegotiate and submit, (ii) proceed at risk of eligibility consequences, (iii) cancel the deal or (iv) request neutral arbitration. Obviously, it would be best for all involved to avoid such consequences. 

What to Do? 

The settlement provides that third-party deals involving Associated Entities/Individuals may be analyzed for a valid business purpose—that placeholder is being filled by the clearinghouse. Deals that do not involve Associated Entities/Individuals are not subject to the same scrutiny. We’ve spoken at length on the major implications of this settlement construct in past editions of Film Room. 

Now with increased clarity on third-party NIL enforcement, institutions can do two things to best position themselves and reduce regulatory friction for their student-athletes: 

  1. Actively facilitate deals with non-Associated Entities/Individuals. Institutions have great access to businesses that value the promotional opportunities available through joint sponsorship deals involving both the institution and its student-athletes. Yesterday, NIL excellence meant funding the collective. Tomorrow, NIL excellence will be measured by an institution’s ability to strike these sophisticated arrangements.
  2. Dig into the Range of Compensation factors and ensure student-athletes and Associated Entities/Individuals are tracking so that deals subject to the clearinghouse are best positioned to meet standards. 

[View source.]

Continue Reading

NIL

Former Arkansas Hoops Star Will Get Jaw-Dropping NIL Deal For Transfer to Florida

A former Arkansas Razorbacks basketball star made huge headlines this week when he announced his transfer destination. Former high profile recruit and one of the highest rated players in the high school class of 2024, combo guard Boogie Fland, committed to the Razorbacks over offers from the Kentucky Wildcats and Alabama Crimson Tide. After a […]

Published

on


A former Arkansas Razorbacks basketball star made huge headlines this week when he announced his transfer destination.

Former high profile recruit and one of the highest rated players in the high school class of 2024, combo guard Boogie Fland, committed to the Razorbacks over offers from the Kentucky Wildcats and Alabama Crimson Tide.

After a year in Fayetteville, Fland found himself as one of the more highly sought after players in the transfer portal.

Staying within the SEC, the guard elected to join the defending national champion Florida Gators as the rich were able to get richer and give the champs another lethal weapon for next season.

What may be even more fascinating than a team who just won the national title landing one of the better players in the portal is how they got him there.

According to a report from Matt Norlander of CBS Sports, Fland is set to receive an NIL deal from the Gators which could be worth more than $2 million.

Originally entering the NBA draft, Fland elected to maintain his eligibility and enter the portal rather than going pro or returning to his previous school, and clearly that decision is paying off in a big way.

Fland vaulted up the On3 NIL valuation list with the reported deal, becoming the No. 25 highest paid player in all of college sports with a total estimated value of $2.1 million.

Not only does Fland move up the list of total athletes, the valuation also vaults him into the top-five of college basketball players overall.

During his freshman season at Arkansas, Fland averaged 13.5 points per game and more than three rebounds while missing a large chunk of the year due to an injury.

Now entering an even bigger national stage both on and off the court, Fland will be one of the most closely watched players in all of college basketball next season.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Kansas State Ignites NIL Bidding War For $4 Million Basketball Star

iStockphoto / © Stephen Brashear-Imagn Images // © William Purnell-Imagn Images Kansas State is reportedly in the mix for yet another high-profile and expensive college basketball transfer, PJ Haggerty. This comes just one year after the Wildcats spent an exuberant amount of money for a player who was ultimately labeled as a bust on a […]

Published

on


Kansas State Basketball NIL PJ Haggerty
iStockphoto / © Stephen Brashear-Imagn Images // © William Purnell-Imagn Images

Kansas State is reportedly in the mix for yet another high-profile and expensive college basketball transfer, PJ Haggerty. This comes just one year after the Wildcats spent an exuberant amount of money for a player who was ultimately labeled as a bust on a team that failed to make the NCAA Tournament.

Will history repeat itself? I don’t think so but we are going to find out!

Haggerty has yet to play more than one season of college basketball at the same school. The 6-foot-3 point guard played only six games during his freshman year at TCU, averaged 21.2 points per game at Tulsa as a sophomore and most recently averaged 21.7 points per game at Memphis. Here is where it gets interesting.

As things currently stand, PJ Haggerty is somewhere in between a professional career and a return to college for a fourth season. He declared for the NBA Draft and shined at the NBA Draft Combine but he is also in the transfer portal. The deadline to decide on his future is currently set for May 28.

Haggerty is going to make more money through NIL as a redshirt junior than he would as a rookie in the NBA. His price tag hovers between $1-4 million.

He was asking for $4,000,000 when he first entered the transfer portal. However, the payday continues to decrease as more and more suitors drop out of the race. It seemed as though N.C. State was the only program remaining at the beginning of May so the Wolfpack only had to bid against itself. Not anymore!

According to Hitmen Hoops, Kansas State “has emerged as a serious contender” and “has the momentum” because it is willing to offer more money than North Carolina State.

Is this going to be deja vu all over again? The Wildcats paid approximately $2 million for one year of Coleman Hawkins, which immediately looked like wasted money. Although Hawkins ultimately got better as the year went on, he could not lead his team to the postseason and dealt with horrible abuse and death threats from fans throughout the entire disappointing season.

PJ Haggerty could be next. He will make a lot more money than Hawkins at either school so it could be really rough for him if he ultimately chooses to play for Kansas State and does not perform up to his paycheck. Wildcats fans are not going to tolerate another year of NIL failure. I don’t expect that to happen but we’ll see!





Link

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending