Connect with us

NIL

NIL is changing college sports; for better or worse?

HUNT VALLEY, Md. (TNND) — It’s been nearly four years since the NCAA enacted a new policy allowing college athletes to profit from their name, image and likeness, and just a few weeks since a federal judge opened the door for college athletic departments to pay athletes directly. Much of the details are still being […]

Published

on


It’s been nearly four years since the NCAA enacted a new policy allowing college athletes to profit from their name, image and likeness, and just a few weeks since a federal judge opened the door for college athletic departments to pay athletes directly.

Much of the details are still being worked out in the courts. Key components like roster limits, scholarship limits and payment pools are still up in the air.

As is a governing body to oversee all of these new rules, since most current regulation is a patchwork of state laws, legal settlements and NCAA rules.

But, we are starting to see the impacts of college athletes getting paid – and what it means for the enterprise as a whole.

Depending on who you ask, the historical shift is: long overdue for athletes who’ve spent thousands of hours grinding for their craft; late to the party in terms of global sports; the official death certificate for amateurism and the “student” side of “student-athlete”; or, an inevitable reality that has to run wild before it gets reined in and regulated.

To the league itself, it’s a positive step.

When a judge granted preliminary approval for a framework for schools to pay athletes, NCAA President Charlie Baker said it would “help bring stability and sustainability to college athletics while delivering increased benefits to student athletes for years to come.”

The push for college athletes to get paid spans decades, with legal challenges and legislative efforts dating back to at least the early 2000s. Which is surprising, considering the NCAA has been a multi-million dollar industry for several decades, and a multi-billion dollar industry for about a decade.

That disparity is due to the idea of “amateurism,” a word many experts and analysts use when they cite concerns about completely commercializing college sports. That idea goes back more than a century, to 1800s England, where sports were only for the wealthy, and the working class didn’t want them to be able to pay their way to victory.

“I don’t want to say [amateurism] is going to die, but it will certainly be the commercial aspects that are going to permeate,” said David Hedlund, the chairman of the Division of Sport Management at St. John’s University. “I think we’re going to see and hear less and less about amateurism, and college sports are going to look more like professional sports, or a training ground for professional sports.”

The idea that sports are for enjoyment and the love of the game rather than money is a noble one. And players can love the game and make money off their talents at the same time.

But many experts say amateurism has long been dead; the NCAA was just, for whatever reason, the last organization behind the International Olympic Committee to let it die. It’s part of an effort to keep pace with the rest of the world. Overseas soccer and basketball players are spotted when they’re 12 to 14 years old, and go pro when they turn 18.

“We’re in a global marketplace,” said Matt Winkler, a professor and program director of sports analytics and management at American University. “We sort of have to keep up with the other nations if we want to strive and have those great moments in sports for our Olympic teams and our World Cup teams and so forth.”

Coaches have long been compensated, and universities have long profited off their sports teams.

“The money has always been there. It’s just a lot more front-facing now, I think, than it’s been in the past,” Hedlund said.

Some sports analysts say it was quite front-facing in this year’s NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament.

March Madness was devoid of any significant upsets or Cinderella teams. For the first time in five decades, every team that made it to the Sweet 16 came from a power conference, including all four No. 1 seeds and all but one No. 2 seed.

And, every team that made it to the Final Four was a No. 1 seed.

ESPN analyst Stephen Smith said NIL deals and the now no-limits transfer portal are to blame for why mid-major programs didn’t see much success, and top-tier schools prevailed.

“If there was no NIL, if there was no portal and you have the mid-majors go 0-6 in the second round, please, we ain’t sweating that,” Smith said. “But when you’re able to point to rules that have been implemented that ultimately shows itself to have inflicted upon the game itself, that’s dangerous.

“College basketball as we knew it – which, to me, is all about March Madness – will cease to exist. Because there’s no madness.”

Experts say there is a serious question mark about the current state of how much colleges can pay to entice players, and how many times players can be enticed enough to transfer.

But not all believe it has to be the death of March Madness or competition in college sports. After all, there’s still Division 2 and 3 universities.

Richard Paulsen, a sports economist and professor at the University of Michigan, said it’s hard to gauge the impact of NIL deals and the transfer portal on competition. Because while the top ten or so power schools may be able to offer the most money to the elite players, there’s still a lot of talent out there.

“The top schools have an advantage in getting the A-level talent, but some of the players that might have sat on the bench at a top school previously could be enticed away with NIL money coming from a second tier school,” Paulsen said. “So I think the impact on competitive balance is maybe a little bit less clear.”

Paulsen says, as a professor, he is worried about the impact NIL deals – particularly million-dollar ones – can have on the students themselves, some 18, 19, 20 years old. It raises the question, does a teenager or young adult need this much money?

Shedeur Sanders is 23 years old, and his NIL valuation at the University of Colorado was roughly $6.5 million. Granted, he’s the son of NFL Hall of Famer and head coach for Colorado Deion Sanders.

But, his 2024 stats were top five in completion percentage, passing touchdowns and yards. Several analysts had him as the top prospect in the 2025 NFL draft, but he slid down to the fifth round, shocking much of the sports world.

Various reports place blame on other reasons – maybe he took more sacks than he should have, maybe NFL executives see traits we can’t see, maybe he bombed interviews with the managers, maybe it had to do with his Hall of Famer dad. And he certainly wouldn’t be the first prospect to get picked later than expected and prove all the teams that passed over him wrong.

But, he’s also losing money by going pro. The iced out, custom “Legendary” chain he wore on Draft Day reportedly cost $1 million.

“It is at least worth noting that five years ago, he wouldn’t have had the online presence that he had, and that could have turned off some NFL teams,” Paulsen said. “Without being in the rooms, I don’t know if it did, but that is possible, and it’s not something that would have been possible even five years ago.”

It begs the question, is it even worth going pro for these top-tier college athletes with insane NIL deals?

In the NBA, new data shows it may not be. The league announced last week just 106 players declared early for the 2025 draft. It’s the fewest since 2015. The number typically hovers around 300.

The drop in early entrants could be lingering effects of the extra COVID year.

But, next year, ten schools will pay their rosters somewhere in the neighborhood of $10 million, including several million dollars per top player. That’s far more than the players would make if they were a second-round draft pick in the NBA.

Winkler said the combination of competitive rosters and the scope of these NIL deals has more to do with this drop in early declarations.

“These deals are getting so big that unless you’re going to be a first round draft choice, maybe if you’re going to be kind of a lottery pick or a top 10, 15 pick, it would be better for you to exhaust your eligibility on a major team, because you’re going to make more,” he said.

So, it might be financially advantageous for athletes to wait on the pros. Some announcers were even suggesting Sanders should go back to college if the NFL didn’t deem him ready for the show. (NCAA rules prohibit him from doing so anyway; he declared for the draft and signed with an agent).

But what about the fact that these players, who become millionaires, are still students?

Schools are working to provide resources for these athletes so they can get advice on what to do with their wealth, so that they don’t spend it irresponsibly. Which is not to assume all of them would; it goes without saying this money could greatly benefit an athlete who grew up in poverty and change the trajectory for his/her family.

But Paulsen says he worries about the “student” side of “student-athlete” when we start talking about millions upon millions of dollars and students transferring to whichever school offers them the most. Sometimes credits don’t transfer; sometimes players could feel pressure to fulfill their NIL commitments over their studies, when the stakes are that high.

At a young age, these players are under an unprecedented amount of pressure, from their coach, from their family, from their financial adviser, from social media, from broadcast exposure, from stakeholders, from the tens of millions of people who can now legally bet on them.

“Players should be able to leave bad situations, absolutely, and I certainly support players’ autonomy and chasing financial benefit from their athletic talents,” Paulsen said. “But if we’re going to call them student athletes, we should have some emphasis on the student part of that too. Some of these rules that are helping the athlete are hurting the student.”

One of those rules, he says, is the transfer portal. But in addition to harming the students’ academic careers, experts say this also takes a toll on teams and fans of those teams.

Take Nico Iamaleava for example. The star quarterback abruptly parted ways with Tennessee over an alleged compensation dispute with the school’s collective. He demanded an NIL readjustment to $4 million to keep playing for the Vols, and when they said no, he transferred to UCLA, though it’s unclear if they met his demands.

The exit shocked his teammates in Knoxville, with one of his receivers and defensive backs, Boo Carter, telling reporters, “He left his brothers behind.”

But the new pay-to-play system does also beg the question of school loyalty, not just for the players, but the fans too.

Paulsen says roster continuity, players spending all four years playing for one team, has been an endearing feature of sports like women’s college basketball, when you look at the legacies, for example, Caitlin Clark built at the University of Iowa, or Paige Bueckers at the University of Connecticut.

“I do think there’s definitely some extent to which all this player movement can have negative consequences,” he said.

But, some experts doubt fans of teams need to see the same or similar team year to year.

After all, this past NCAA Men’s March Madness Championship between Florida and Houston – the one ESPN’s Smith said featured no madness at all – scored 18.1 million viewers on CBS. That’s up 22% from last year’s championship, and the biggest audience since 2019.

The Final Four games, featuring all No. 1 seeds, ranked as the most-watched games in eight years.

In other words, so far, so good when it comes to college sports fandom.

One thing broadly agreed upon among experts is that competition must remain intact. The Florida-Houston matchup was a nailbiter.

“The biggest thing that would kill sports is if there is no competitive balance,” Hedlund said. “It is known when you have a really great team being a not-so-great team, if the great team probably will win, people don’t want to watch.”

People still appear to be watching. If they stop, one could assume the NCAA would change its course, or it’d be out of all its money too.

Plus, these experts expect regulation soon – possible measures like transfer restrictions, collectively bargained salary caps, conference realignment to avoid concentration, turning athletic departments into LLCs, putting degree completion into bylaws and evening out the number of roster spots, among other rules.

Experts say: be patient, wait for the legal fights to run their course, and wait for the brightest minds in sports – and Congress – to come up with a solution that pleases the players, teams, coaches, schools and fans.

“This is fundamental to the success of sports, so we just need to figure out what rules, what regulations, what governing bodies, how do we facilitate this?” Hedlund said. “We don’t want to ruin sports. That’s what’s at stake here.”

Winkler says it all comes down to the most “hardcore” stakeholders: fans and alumni. If the SEC and Big 10 just ganged up and created their own Premier League and college sports turned into checkbook sports, it could threaten that school pride.

“This year, we definitely saw cracks in the system,” Winkler said. “If the best athletes just go to the top, are [fans] rooting for an inferior product? Are they still going to have that affinity for their school, their team, their degrees, and people that are doing it? This is really going to test that.

“[Schools] have two key pressure points: keep getting a lot of money from TV so you can fund your athletic department, and keep alumni, fans and donors still feeling as engagedThere’s a lot to be worked out in the next several months and probably the next year to really get a boiler plate idea of what the rules and regulations need to be.”



Link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NIL

UK considering new athletics facility upgrades, announces Champions Blue board members

The UK Board of Trustees Athletics Committee has approved five new capital projects, three of which have to do with Kroger Field. During Thursday’s meeting, the board requested a $110 million internal loan, to be paid back with interest, from the university to the athletics department that will be used to enhance the fan experience […]

Published

on


The UK Board of Trustees Athletics Committee has approved five new capital projects, three of which have to do with Kroger Field.

During Thursday’s meeting, the board requested a $110 million internal loan, to be paid back with interest, from the university to the athletics department that will be used to enhance the fan experience and add future revenue. During this multi-year initiative, $15 million will go toward maintenance at Kroger Field, $13 million toward renovating suites and elevators inside the stadium, and $8 million toward a new luxury club space and accessible public wifi.

Another $5 million will be used to renovate UK’s softball and soccer complexes. The university is set to host the 2026 SEC Softball Tournament. The fifth project revolves around creating a “fan zone” on campus that would include entertainment options, restaurants, hotels, etc. That exact cost will not be known until a request for information is answered. An additional $31 million loan, which will also be paid back with interest, was approved to account for expected deficits.

“We are proposing a new strategic governance structure and operating model, unlike any in the country,” UK President Eli Capilouto said, per a press release. “The goal is to incentivize innovation. The idea is to remain a premier program by pushing us to examine creative ways to grow and generate the revenues necessary to support our success.”

Final approval from the full Board of Trustees is expected during Friday’s meeting.

According to a report from Jon Hale of the Herald Leader, “the money being loaned to the athletics department does not come from state-appropriated taxpayer funds or student fees.” The athletics department will begin to pay back these loans beginning in fiscal year 2028.

More on Champions Blue, LLC

Athletic director Mitch Barnhart and UK Athletics announced in April the creation of a holding company, Champions Blue LLC, which will restructure the athletics department governance to provide more financial flexibility following the approval of the House settlement earlier this month. Under the terms of the settlement, UK will have $20.5 million to use annually for revenue sharing with student athletes.

Over the next year, the UK athletics department will shift to Champions Blue, LLC.

As part of creating Champions Blue, experts from outside the university have been brought in to help lead the new board navigate a college sports world that now more resembles professional sports. The two outside members were announced on Thursday: Keeneland President/CEO Shannon Arvin and former Fanatics executive Chris Prindiville. Former Kentucky football tight end Jacob Tamme, now a financial advisor, will also be on the board. All three were confirmed as the board’s subject matter experts and will have term limits.

Additionally, four voting members, who will not have term limits, were also named to the board: UK president (currently Eli Capilouto), UK executive vice president of finance and administration (currently Eric Monday), UK vice president/chief strategy and growth officer (currently Rob Edwards), and senior advisor to the president (currently George Wright).

This seven-person Champions Blue board is set to meet every month over the following year. Barnhart and JMI president Paul Archey will serve as non-voting advisors.

[UK Board Considers More Than $100 Million in Investments in Future of UK Athletics]





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Eli Blair set for transition from high school to college baseball, or even pro ball

PANAMA CITY, Fla. (WJHG/WECP) -Eli Blair is one of several area players preparing to make the transition from high school to college ball. And for this particular lefty, perhaps a transition to beyond college ball. The recent Arnold graduate is getting set to head to the University of Florida in two weeks. Blair, along with […]

Published

on


PANAMA CITY, Fla. (WJHG/WECP) -Eli Blair is one of several area players preparing to make the transition from high school to college ball. And for this particular lefty, perhaps a transition to beyond college ball. The recent Arnold graduate is getting set to head to the University of Florida in two weeks. Blair, along with his teammate Cooper Moss, signing with the Gators a few months ago. He leaves Arnold with a four-year mark of 27-7 and a 1.83 earned run average. He struck out 258 hitters over 199 innings. And this past season was 8-2 helping the Marlins win 27 games, district and region titles and earn the program’s first trip to the State Finals.

“We made it to the Final Four,” Eli told me during a sit-down interview at Gavlak recently “we finally cracked that window open. We made it to Fort Myers; we had a great season. We had the most wins in the program history a single season. That’s been our goal since our freshman year all four years to get there and we finally did it. ” So, he leaves behind a program that’s much better now than it was before he arrived you could easily argue. What’s ahead, heading to Gainesville to check into his living quarters and begin focusing on school and Gator baseball. And the idea is to arrive well prepared for all that. “There’s been a checklist that me and Cooper have been having to do.” Blair says “There’s a Gator portal and a Gator link, which is kind of like BDS launchpad for Gators you know. And we’ve just been hitting that checklist stuff, doing all our stuff, getting all our transcripts in. And just the forms, the immunization forms and all of that. So we’ve been doing that. We work out with our trainer now, but when we get down there, I know they wanted us to shut down from the throwing for now. So we’re doing that. But we’ve just been hitting the gym hard getting ready for the workouts that they have planned down there for us. “

Two weeks after Blair and Moss arrive in Gainesville, the MLB draft begins. So depending on that, well he could wind up packing up and leaving Gainesville not long after he arrives. It depends on if and when he gets drafted, and what kind of signing bonus might be involved. “Yeah, it’s a really unique experience.” says Blair “You get to go to one of the best programs in the nation. And then you also have the opportunity to go play pro ball. So I mean we’ve talked with my agent and my parents and we’re just deciding on things. But you know we’ll have to see where I go you know? It’s just one of those things. NIL and the transfer portal, also, you can use that leverage also. NIL is a very big thing in college baseball and just college sports in all. So, we could expect for somebody like me or Cooper to get paid and use that leverage in the draft per se. ” And if the draft doesn’t pull him away, Eli says he’s very excited to be joining the Gators and pitching in the SEC, adding “it just means more”.

To stay up to date on all the latest news as it develops, follow WJHG on Facebook, Instagram and X (Twitter).

Have a news tip or see an error that needs correction? Email news@wjhg.com. Please include the article’s headline in your message.

Keep up with all the biggest headlines on the WJHG News app, and check out what’s happening outside using the WJHG Weather app.





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Ohio State AD Ross Bjork addresses NIL strategy for student-athletes

Ohio State announced on Monday that it’s launching a new strategic group that’s designed to support, streamline and enhance NIL opportunities for student-athletes. COLUMBUS, Ohio — Ohio State Athletics Director Ross Bjork discussed how the university will directly compensate student-athletes through revenue shares on Thursday. Bjork’s comments come after a federal judge approved the terms of […]

Published

on


Ohio State announced on Monday that it’s launching a new strategic group that’s designed to support, streamline and enhance NIL opportunities for student-athletes.

COLUMBUS, Ohio — Ohio State Athletics Director Ross Bjork discussed how the university will directly compensate student-athletes through revenue shares on Thursday.

Bjork’s comments come after a federal judge approved the terms of a $2.8 billion antitrust settlement last week, which will allow schools to directly pay players through licensing deals.

You can watch the briefing in the player below.

“The signing of the House settlement Friday by Judge Claudia Wilken will reshape collegiate athletics. Ohio State and schools around the country will now be permitted to directly compensate student-athletes through revenue sharing, which is actually institutional NIL rights,” Bjrok said in a statement.

During Thursday’s press conference, Bjork said the university is set to distribute $20.5 million of revenue-shared dollars that can be given to an athlete. $2.5 million of that will be toward scholarships. The remaining $18 million will be shared between four sports: football, men’s and women’s basketball and women’s volleyball. Bjork said the university will use metrics to determine how much money is distributed to each sport.

Bjork hopes more sports will be added in the future.

Bjork said he the university is committed to offering 36 intercollegiate sports and providing scholarships to all 36 programs.

Ohio State announced on Monday that it’s launching a new strategic group that’s designed to support, streamline and enhance Name, Image and Likeness opportunities for student-athletes.

The strategic group will be called the Buckeye Sports Group.

Ohio State says a key part of the settlement is the implementation of a Fair Mark Evaluation process and a “range of compensation” designed to establish standardized benchmarks for NIL deals across sports and institutions. The Buckeye Sports Group intends to serve as a centralized hub for NIL brand deal facilitation, corporate partnerships, student-athlete storytelling and NIL support.

The Buckeye Sports Group will have access to Learfield’s Compass NIL technology to facilitate deal transactions and gain insights into student-athlete interests.

The group will support Ohio State student-athletes with a focus on three areas: deal facilitation and management, content creation and storytelling and support services.

In a move to streamline and optimize NIL operations, the group will work to consolidate existing NIL collectives under a single marketing team. The founding members of THE Foundation and The 1870 Society, two existing NIL collectives, will remain engaged and serve in an advisory capacity to the new group.

The university also announced a new internal resource center that it says will be designed to enhance success across varsity sports.

To read more about the new group, click here.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Zakai Zeigler’s preliminary injunction challenging NCAA redshirt rule for fifth year of eligibility denied

Several weeks after Zakai Zeigler filed a lawsuit against the NCAA seeking a fifth year of eligibility, his preliminary injunction has been denied, according to Yahoo Sports’ Ross Dellenger. Zeigler had already played four seasons for Tennessee and didn’t begin his college career until 2021, one year after the 2020-21 class that was allowed one […]

Published

on


Several weeks after Zakai Zeigler filed a lawsuit against the NCAA seeking a fifth year of eligibility, his preliminary injunction has been denied, according to Yahoo Sports’ Ross Dellenger.

Zeigler had already played four seasons for Tennessee and didn’t begin his college career until 2021, one year after the 2020-21 class that was allowed one more year of eligibility lost during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Advertisement

In the lawsuit, filed in the Eastern District Court of Tennessee, Zeigler was looking to play the 2025-26 season, challenging the NCAA rule that an athlete has four years of eligibility within a five-year window.

Zeigler, 22, isn’t allowed an opportunity to earn NIL money for a fifth year because he used up all of his eligibility. As the lawsuit argues, that deprives him of a fifth year, “the most lucrative year of the eligibility window for the vast majority of athletes.”

How lucrative? The lawsuit argued that Zeigler could earn between $2 million and $4 million in a fifth year based on his record of success and visibility playing in the SEC. Those figures are projections from the Spyre Sports Group, which facilitates Tennessee’s NIL collective.

Advertisement

Athletes who receive a redshirt are allowed a fifth year of eligibility, which gives them one more year to earn NIL income. A freshman who was redshirted, for example, would still be able to earn NIL money even if he or she doesn’t play.

As the filing, the documents of which were posted online by Boise State professor Sam Ehrlich, reads:

“Many players, however, do compete in the fifth year of their eligibility window. And they can earn NIL compensation for all five of those years. Had Zeigler been withheld from competing in sports during one of those four years, perhaps by redshirting, the NCAA rules would permit him to participate again next year. And this is true even if he would have slowed his academic progress and taken five years to graduate.”

Zeigler graduated in May, majoring in retail and merchandising management.

This is different from the lawsuit Vanderbilt quarterback Diego Pavia filed against the NCAA, claiming that he should be allowed a fifth year of eligibility because he played his first two years for New Mexico Military Institute, a junior college. In December, Pavia was granted an injunction allowing him to play the 2025 college football season.

Advertisement

Last season with the Vols, the 5-foot-9 Zeigler averaged 13.6 points, 7.4 assists and 1.9 steals while shooting 32% on 122 3-point attempts. He was named a third-team All-American, and won first-team All-SEC and SEC defensive player of the year honors for two consecutive seasons. The Volunteers finished 30-8, 12-6 in the SEC, and advanced to the NCAA tournament’s Elite Eight before losing to Houston.

Zeigler holds the Tennessee single-season (275) and career (747) records for assists, and career steals with 251.





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

From the Boxing Ring to the Betting Arena

Canelo Álvarez When Saúl “Canelo” Álvarez signed on as 1win’s global brand ambassador in May 2025, the deal represented more than another celebrity endorsement in the rapidly evolving sports betting landscape. The partnership, announced shortly after Álvarez reclaimed the IBF super middleweight title, signals both the normalization of athlete-sportsbook relationships and the betting industry’s push […]

Published

on

From the Boxing Ring to the Betting Arena

Canelo Álvarez
Canelo Álvarez

When Saúl “Canelo” Álvarez signed on as 1win’s global brand ambassador in May 2025, the deal represented more than another celebrity endorsement in the rapidly evolving sports betting landscape. The partnership, announced shortly after Álvarez reclaimed the IBF super middleweight title, signals both the normalization of athlete-sportsbook relationships and the betting industry’s push to transform from transactional platforms into lifestyle brands.

The multi-year agreement positions Álvarez as the face of 1win’s expansion efforts, particularly in Latin American markets where the Mexican champion commands significant influence. For an industry increasingly dependent on star power to differentiate offerings, landing boxing’s biggest active draw marks a significant coup for the Cyprus-based operator.

The Partnership Structure

The collaboration extends beyond traditional sponsorship arrangements. 1win has integrated Álvarez into multiple touchpoints of its platform and marketing strategy. After announcing the partnership, the brand has accompanied Canelo during his historic super middleweight victory against William Scull on May 3, 2025, as well as launched with an exclusive meet-and-greet event on May 29, 2025, flying VIP members to Mexico for face-time with the champion. This approach, which focuses on offering experiences rather than just betting options, reflects broader industry trends toward enhanced fan engagement.

“The deal includes exclusive content creation, themed promotions during fight weeks, and branded merchandise opportunities, followed by a meet-and-greet,” according to partnership announcements. 1win secured rights to Álvarez-branded memorabilia for customer rewards and will sponsor the boxer’s annual “No Golf No Life” charity tournament, extending the relationship beyond pure betting activities.

The financial terms remain undisclosed, following industry standard practice for high-profile ambassador deals. However, the scope suggests significant investment from 1win, which has aggressively pursued celebrity partnerships and collaborations, including cricket’s David Warner and MMA fighter Conor McGregor.

Market Expansion Strategy

For 1win, the Álvarez partnership serves clear strategic objectives. The company, founded in 2016, has targeted emerging markets across Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Mexico represents a particularly attractive opportunity, with its passionate boxing fanbase and evolving regulatory framework for online betting.

“Álvarez provides instant credibility and local relevance in markets that might otherwise view 1win as another foreign operator,” notes the company’s positioning. The boxer’s journey from rural Guadalajara to global stardom resonates with 1win’s narrative of ambitious growth and success.

The timing aligns with broader industry movements into Latin America. Multiple operators have increased investments in the region, attracted by large populations of sports enthusiasts and gradually liberalizing gambling regulations. By securing Álvarez, 1win gains a competitive advantage in customer acquisition and brand recognition.

Fan Experience Evolution

The partnership exemplifies how betting operators are reimagining customer engagement. Rather than focusing solely on odds and betting markets, platforms increasingly position themselves as entertainment destinations. 1win’s promise of “exclusive content, exciting challenges, and big surprises” through the Álvarez partnership reflects this shift.

Planned initiatives include behind-the-scenes training footage, prediction contests, and interactive challenges tied to Álvarez’s fights. These features transform passive viewers into active participants, even if they never place a bet. The approach mirrors successful strategies from fantasy sports and social gaming, blurring lines between different forms of sports entertainment.

The VIP meet-and-greet events serve dual purposes: rewarding high-value customers while generating social media content that extends the partnership’s reach. When attendees share photos with Álvarez, they provide organic marketing that traditional advertising cannot replicate.

Industry Implications

Álvarez joining 1win continues the acceleration of athlete-sportsbook partnerships across global markets. Where such relationships once carried stigma, they now represent mainstream business decisions for athletes building personal brands. The shift reflects changing societal attitudes toward sports betting, particularly in markets where legalization has normalized the activity.

For athletes, these partnerships offer lucrative opportunities to monetize their fame while maintaining a connection with fans. Álvarez, who has built a business empire including restaurants, gas stations, and a fitness app, approaches the 1win deal as another entrepreneurial venture rather than a simple endorsement.

The arrangement also highlights evolving approaches to responsible gambling messaging. Notably, Álvarez’s public statements about the partnership avoid explicit betting references, instead emphasizing “gaming” and “entertainment.” This careful positioning allows both parties to promote their relationship while navigating varying regulatory environments and public sensitivities.

Competitive Landscape

1win’s investment in Álvarez must be viewed within the context of an increasingly competitive online betting market. Operators face pressure to differentiate beyond odds and betting options, leading to an arms race for exclusive content and celebrity associations.

The company’s previous partnerships with David Warner and Conor McGregor established a pattern of pursuing globally recognized athletes across different sports. This strategy aims to build a portfolio of ambassadors appealing to diverse demographics and geographic markets.

Competitors have pursued similar strategies, with major operators signing exclusive deals with leagues, teams, and individual athletes. The resulting saturation raises questions about the long-term effectiveness of celebrity partnerships and whether consumers ultimately choose platforms based on these associations versus practical factors like odds, user experience, and payment options.

Future Outlook

The Álvarez-1win partnership’s success will likely influence future athlete-operator relationships. Early indicators, including the sold-out VIP event and social media engagement, suggest a positive reception among target audiences. However, the true test lies in sustained customer acquisition and retention metrics.

For 1win, maximizing the partnership requires consistent activation beyond initial announcements. The company must deliver on promises of exclusive content and meaningful fan experiences while navigating the delicate balance between sports celebration and gambling promotion.

Álvarez’s involvement could also impact how other elite athletes approach betting partnerships. His careful brand management and entrepreneurial focus provide a template for athletes seeking to engage with the betting industry without compromising their public image.

As sports betting continues its global expansion, partnerships like Álvarez-1win will likely become more common and sophisticated. The challenge for operators lies in creating genuine value for fans beyond traditional gambling offerings. Those succeeding in this evolution may define the industry’s future relationship with sports and entertainment.

The partnership represents a calculated bet from both parties: 1win wagering on Álvarez’s enduring appeal to drive business growth, while the champion bets on the betting industry’s continued mainstream acceptance. In an industry built on calculating odds, both sides appear confident in their chances of winning together.

© 2025 Latin Post. All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.

Continue Reading

NIL

2 WSU football test cases paved way in hoops NIL, says Cougar Collective’s Tim Brandle

THE NIL COMPENSATION FRAMEWORK for international-born players is very different than those born in the United States. Cougar Collective chair Tim Brandle joined Cougfan.com recently on how the collective does NIL deals with foreign players. The other piece to the puzzle is how the international market can be a way for basketball programs with finite NIL resources to recruit European and […]

Published

on


THE NIL COMPENSATION FRAMEWORK for international-born players is very different than those born in the United States. Cougar Collective chair Tim Brandle joined Cougfan.com recently on how the collective does NIL deals with foreign players. The other piece to the puzzle is how the international market can be a way for basketball programs with finite NIL resources to recruit European and overseas players, and craft a winning formula.

David Riley has had a busy offseason replacing two graduates in Ethan Price and Dane Erikstrup, plus four departures in Cedric Coward (NBA); LeJuan Watts (Texas Tech); Nate Calmese (Wake Forest); and Isaiah Watts (Maryland). 

More than half the hoops roster — seven of 13 Cougar hoopers and still in progress — were born overseas.

And that requires some extra steps when it comes to NIL compensation.



Link

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending