Connect with us

NIL

Oregon NIL bill advances in state legislature; could conflict with House settlement

A bill that modifies existing Oregon law around student-athletes earning money from their Name, Image and Likeness (NIL) advanced in the state legislature last week. On April 10, House Bill 3694 passed in the Oregon House with 46 votes in favor, nine against, and five not voting. It moves to the Senate chamber, where a […]

Published

on

Oregon NIL bill advances in state legislature; could conflict with House settlement

A bill that modifies existing Oregon law around student-athletes earning money from their Name, Image and Likeness (NIL) advanced in the state legislature last week.

On April 10, House Bill 3694 passed in the Oregon House with 46 votes in favor, nine against, and five not voting. It moves to the Senate chamber, where a first reading is scheduled for Monday.

HB 3694 has the backing of the University of Oregon and a letter of support from Oregon State student-athlete and U.S. Olympian Jade Carey. But OSU athletic director Scott Barnes and some outside legal experts have expressed skepticism over the bill’s potential conflict with the forthcoming House settlement, which seeks to provide universal standards for NIL distribution among NCAA member institutions.

“We’re trying to build infrastructure to create consistency and standards at a national level,” Barnes, who is part of the committee that helped craft proposed NIL standards, said last month. “Any variation of those standards limits the effectiveness of what we’re building. It’s not unlike past years with NIL where there is a patchwork of different state legislation, and the standards aren’t consistent, so you have different opportunities for different student-athletes instead of the same access and same opportunities.”

Critics of HB 3694 point out it could prevent the NCAA and conferences from enforcing limits on NIL payments — a key component of the House settlement, which would include a roughly $20.5 million NIL “salary cap” per school. Defending national champion Ohio State’s athletic director once claimed it spent that much on its 2024 football roster alone.

Schools like Oregon State say they won’t come close to the proposed cap, with multiple sources telling The Oregonian/OregonLive that the Beavers’ men’s basketball NIL budget was roughly $800,000 last season, and their roster was soon decimated in the transfer portal. But powerhouse institutions like Ohio State, Georgia and the Phil Knight-backed Oregon conceivably have more than enough capital to go beyond the cap if there was a legal basis to do so.

While none of those schools have publicly expressed a desire to skirt the House settlement rules — nor will they say so, considering every major institution is expected to sign on to the agreement — legal experts question whether the rules are even enforceable without the additional backing of federal legislation. Particularly with potentially conflicting state legislation popping up around the country.

“A federal bill coming alongside the settlement in a constructive way that creates synergy around correcting this out of control marketplace, that is crucial,” Barnes, also among the power brokers pushing federal legislators for a comprehensive NIL bill, said in March.

Back to the details of HB 3694. While a sentence about preventing limits on “institutions’ support of student athletes’ economic rights” has been removed from the Oregon bill’s staff summary, the latest version of the bill includes language that critics say could still conflict with the House settlement standards.

“A post-secondary institution of education or an athletic association, conference or organization with authority over intercollegiate sports may not … prohibit, prevent or restrict a student athlete from exercising [the student’s] economic rights,” the bill reads.

“An athletic association, conference or organization with authority over intercollegiate sports may not prohibit a post-secondary institution of education from identifying, facilitating, enabling or supporting opportunities for a current student athlete to exercise the student athlete’s [student’s] economic rights at the student athlete’s post-secondary institution of education,” it later says.

If a school is running up against the cap, and a student-athlete wishes to pursue a NIL deal that might put the school over the $20.5 million limit, would stopping that deal be a violation of the athlete’s “economic rights,” as described in HB 3694? And what if a school “identifies, facilitates and enables” a NIL deal, but the NCAA says no, citing the cap?

Those questions, industry sources and some NIL legal experts say, put the cap and potentially the settlement itself on shaky legal ground in states with legislation similar to HB 3694. Unless, of course, federal legislation addresses that issue and renders the conflict between states and the NCAA moot.

HB 3694 would also prevent the NCAA and conferences from accepting “a complaint, open(ing) an investigation or tak(ing) any other adverse action against a post-secondary institution of education or a student athlete as a result of a violation, or an alleged violation, of the rules or regulations of the athletic association, conference or organization related to a student athlete exercising [the student’s] economic rights.”

Critics worry that could create a scenario where, even if a school in Oregon did violate NIL rules including but not limited to the $20.5 million cap, there would be no mechanism of enforcement. Not only could the NCAA and conferences not investigate or take action against that school for such an alleged violation, they couldn’t even accept a complaint about it in the first place.

The chief sponsor of HB 3694, Rep. John Lively (D-Springfield), previously said the bill was amended so it would not “prevent student-athletes from participating in the (House) settlement or create compliance issues for institutions.”

Whether that rings true remains to be seen, and the debate itself could eventually be silenced by a sweeping, federal NIL bill that matches the House terms.

Ryan Clarke covers college sports for The Oregonian/OregonLive. Reach him at RClarke@Oregonian.com or on Twitter/X: @RyanTClarke. Find him on Bluesky: @ryantclarke.bsky.social.

NIL

Tennessee basketball star Zakai Zeigler sues NCAA for 5th year of eligibility

Tennessee basketball star Zakai Zeigler is suing the NCAA for a fifth year of eligibility, arguing that the current four-year set-up “arbitrarily” cost him substantial NIL earnings. The 22-year-old Zeigler, a two-time SEC Defensive Player of the Year and a third-team All-American this past season, played in 138 games over four years with the Volunteers. […]

Published

on


Tennessee basketball star Zakai Zeigler is suing the NCAA for a fifth year of eligibility, arguing that the current four-year set-up “arbitrarily” cost him substantial NIL earnings.

The 22-year-old Zeigler, a two-time SEC Defensive Player of the Year and a third-team All-American this past season, played in 138 games over four years with the Volunteers. He never redshirted, which appears to form the crux of his argument.

According to the suit filed Tuesday in federal court in the Eastern District of Tennessee, Zeigler argues that had he redshirted, he’d have had a five-year eligibility window. Typically, the latter years of that window are the most-lucrative when it comes to NIL.

“Through the redshirt system, NCAA institutions — not athletes — largely control who gets access to the fifth year of eligibility, strategically ‘banking’ eligibility for some athletes while denying it to others, without consideration, based purely on institutional preference and benefit,” the complaint reads in part. “But, because Zeigler participated in athletics for four consecutive years, the NCAA bars him from representing his school in interscholastic competition in the fifth year of the competition window — and thereby excludes him from the market for NIL compensation.”

Zeigler’s suit is similar to one successfully levied by Vanderbilt quarterback Diego Pavia, at least in spirit. Pavia won an extra year of eligibility for himself — and other former junior-college and NAIA transfers — after suing the NCAA on the grounds that his time at a non-member school had cost him NIL earning opportunities.

You can read the full 31-page complaint HERE.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

FSU coach Mike Norvell is a proponent of NIL enforcement in proposed Salary Cap Era of college football

Mike Norvell views the proposed salary cap and subsequent enforcement that is supposed to go into effect if and/or when the House Settlement passes as a “good thing” for college athletics. Florida State’s head coach views the idea of “checks and balances” in terms of regulating the spending on college athletes as a healthy endeavor […]

Published

on


Mike Norvell views the proposed salary cap and subsequent enforcement that is supposed to go into effect if and/or when the House Settlement passes as a “good thing” for college athletics.

Florida State’s head coach views the idea of “checks and balances” in terms of regulating the spending on college athletes as a healthy endeavor as most major college programs seem to be in unison that extra compensation via NIL should be regulated if schools are going to exceed to $20.5 million to be spread around towards all sports.

“I say, checks and balances in a sense of what those deals are. And obviously guys have to go out there and earn whatever opportunities can be provided,” Norvell told the Tampa Bay Times and other outlets during a booster stop in Tampa over the weekend. “To be able to have a little bit of an understanding through Deloitte and what they can do, it’s going to be, I think it will still be up to each football, each athletic department to where they disperse those funds. 

“I think it will bring everything to a more comparable situation based off the university. Just big picture within college athletics, I think it’ll be a good thing.”

Norvell’s reference to Deloitte is about a clearinghouse, with the major accounting firm being tasked with moderating how much Name, Image, Likeness deals should be worth and then enforcing said deals. Currently, NIL has largely been used as a way of compensating college athletes beyond of off-field value (although the intent of NIL was initially for solely off-field value).

How enforceable that is, remains to be seen. The House settlement is still being finalized, and it was reported on Monday that a CEO and new enforcement agency (beyond the NCAA) will be in place if the settlement is passed this week. The CEO of the College Sports Commission will be tasked with aspects like doling out punishments for rules violations and enforcing the salary cap.

Per a Yahoo report, the P4 programs that do not agree to be a member under the CSC would risk “the loss of conference membership and participation against other power league programs.” The state of Tennessee signed a bill earlier this month that would allow schools and their NIL collectives to “break House settlement-related rules” and “prevents college sports’ new enforcement entity from penalizing those schools” per a Yahoo report.

FSU athletic director Michael Alford has consistently voiced his understanding and support of a cap as well as NIL regulation with the House settlement presumably on the horizon. It appears that Alford and his head football coach are in unison on the matter in this ever-changing landscape of college football.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

If Tennessee chooses state law over NIL pledge, it risks SEC expulsion

A new Tennessee law triggered the power conferences of college sports into demanding member schools like the University of Tennessee and Vanderbilt to sign a loyalty pledge over new player pay rules or face possible expulsion. Knox News confirmed the existence of the loyalty document through a source with direct knowledge of the situation. The […]

Published

on


A new Tennessee law triggered the power conferences of college sports into demanding member schools like the University of Tennessee and Vanderbilt to sign a loyalty pledge over new player pay rules or face possible expulsion.

Knox News confirmed the existence of the loyalty document through a source with direct knowledge of the situation. The source requested anonymity because those correspondence are between the conferences and member schools.

The document is being circulated by the ACC, Big 12, Big Ten and the SEC. It demands that member schools agree to follow new rules involving paying players despite state laws giving the freedom to circumvent the rules. And the pledge also requires schools to waive their right to sue the NCAA or conferences if they disagree with the implementation of those rules.

The document has not been finalized. But potential consequences of not signing it include expulsion from the conference or participation in playing games against other power conference schools.

The new Tennessee law applies to all four-year universities in the state, public and private. UT and Vanderbilt are in the SEC, one of four power conferences.

A clause in the law permits Vanderbilt and private universities to opt out of the protections of the state law in order to cooperate with the NCAA. Additionally, it appears that UT is guiding the approach of the law because of how it’s utilized lawmakers against the NCAA in the past.

University of Memphis (American Athletic Conference), Middle Tennessee State (Conference USA) and other state universities are in mid-major conferences that likely won’t require a pledge to follow the new college sports player pay rules.

For better or worse, this makes Tennessee the epicenter of another earthquake in college sports.

What University of Tennessee said about SEC threat

Expulsion from the SEC seems inconceivable for UT, a charter member since 1932. But whether it’s a legitimate threat or a negotiating tactic remains to be seen.

In a statement to Knox News, UT pledged to comply with the pending House settlement, which will create the new system for player pay, while acknowledging the need for the state law.

“The University of Tennessee has committed to following the House settlement if it is approved,” UT said in a statement. “That commitment has not changed. We appreciate the Tennessee General Assembly’s forethought in passing NIL legislation that provides future protections for student-athletes and institutions beyond the House settlement.”

Vanderbilt and the SEC did not immediately respond to a Knox News request for comment.

Threatening a loyalty pledge is a bold move by the NCAA and power conferences and, most certainly, in response to the new Tennessee law, which was signed by Gov. Bill Lee on May 1 and surfaced about two weeks later.

The law protects Tennessee universities from anticipated antitrust lawsuits by athletes and NIL collectives unhappy with the player-pay rules coming to college sports.

The new NCAA system will include a salary cap of direct school-to-player pay, roster limits, revenue sharing that challenges Title IX principles of publicly funded institutions and a clearinghouse that vets NIL contracts. It could help stabilize college sports, but lawsuits challenging those rules are expected.

If athletes, boosters or collectives sue, the new state law allows Tennessee universities to opt out of those college sports rules and shift liability toward the NCAA and conferences. It also prevents the NCAA from penalizing schools that circumvent those rules for purposes of following the law.

Only a federal law, a valid court order or antitrust exemption for college athletics can supersede Tennessee’s new law. That escape hatch for Tennessee schools sounded alarms across the college sports landscape.

How Tennessee could disrupt the new system in college sports

Opinions about Tennessee’s approach vary around college sports.

About a dozen states have enacted similar laws in the everchanging arms race of paying college athletes with few restrictions. But Tennessee’s law is believed to be the strongest and most evasive to NCAA rules and the conditions of the pending House settlement.

The timing of Tennessee’s new law is also problematic.

A new NCAA system for paying athletes could begin as early as July 1, pending the multi-billion-dollar House settlement, which resolves three federal antitrust lawsuits against the NCAA and four power conferences (ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, SEC).

That settlement could come any day now. There’s growing skepticism that it will solve the legal and structural problems in college sports, although some are cautiously optimistic that it’ll at least achieve some progress.

Opponents of the new state law believe Tennessee is nixing an effective agreement days before it’s signed by a federal judge. But proponents of the state law believe Tennessee is being proactive by keeping its legal options in anticipation of a system it believes will fail.

The most straightforward take of the situation is that Tennessee is protecting its own interests ahead of the SEC or college sports. Whether that’s a wise move or heavy handed is debatable, but it certainly got the attention of college sports leaders.

Here’s why UT wants state law for protection

Tennessee schools intend to comply with the system prescribed in the House settlement, but that plan remains hazy. UT, specifically, wants legal cover if the new rules violate antitrust law.

Here are examples of what UT fears if it’s not given liability protection by the state law.

  • A new clearinghouse will determine if NIL deals are legitimate and of fair market value. Legally, that appears to be a difficult standard to define. If an athlete or collective sues because an NIL deal is declined, UT wants the flexibility to approve the contract independent of NCAA rules or at least opt out of the system to avoid a lawsuit.
  • Lawsuits on numerous antitrust grounds are anticipated after the House settlement is approved. The NCAA, power conferences and schools could be sued. There’s no indication whether those suits would be successful. But UT doesn’t want to be among the defendants, and the state law says Tennessee schools don’t have to follow anticompetitive NCAA rules.
  • If damages are awarded in antitrust lawsuits, the state law says that Tennessee schools can’t be held responsible for paying them. Instead, the NCAA would be liable.
  • UT wants to avoid punishment from the NCAA if it opts out of rules that it finds to violate antitrust laws. If that occurs, the state law protects UT from NCAA sanctions. Notably, UT football is already on probation until July 13, 2028, as a result of the Jeremy Pruitt recruiting scandal.

Could Tennessee face another court battle?

Some college sports stakeholders believe Tennessee isn’t being a team player. But UT has reasons to distance itself from the NCAA in future lawsuits, and it has a good track record against the governing body.

They faced off in federal court in 2024 after the state of Tennessee, on behalf of UT, sued the NCAA to loosen its stringent rules over NIL benefits. UT won that battle.

On Jan. 31, 2025, the NCAA and a coalition of states led by Tennessee reached a settlement that protects student-athletes’ NIL rights during the recruiting process and prohibits the NCAA from bringing back its NIL recruiting ban.

And in 2023, Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti threatened to sue the NCAA if it gave the UT football team a postseason ban in the Pruitt recruiting scandal. UT also won that battle, as the NCAA relented from issuing a postseason ban.

The bad blood between UT and the NCAA can’t be ignored as a backdrop to this state law. And don’t be surprised if Skrmetti or Tennessee lawmakers get involved again if this situation escalates.

Adam Sparks is the Tennessee football beat reporter. Email adam.sparks@knoxnews.com. X, formerly known as Twitter@AdamSparks. Support strong local journalism by subscribing at knoxnews.com/subscribe.

Get the latest news and insight on SEC football by subscribing to the SEC Unfiltered newsletter, delivered straight to your inbox.





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Former Gonzaga star Brynna Maxwell joins Eastern Washington staff as assistant coach | Eastern Washington

CHENEY, Wash. — Former Gonzaga women’s basketball standout and WNBA draftee Brynna Maxwell is joining the Eastern Washington women’s basketball staff as an assistant coach. “We are excited to have Brynna Maxwell join our crew,” EWU head coach Joddie Gleason said on X. “Thrilled to have her start her coaching journey with the Eags.” Welcome […]

Published

on


CHENEY, Wash. — Former Gonzaga women’s basketball standout and WNBA draftee Brynna Maxwell is joining the Eastern Washington women’s basketball staff as an assistant coach.

“We are excited to have Brynna Maxwell join our crew,” EWU head coach Joddie Gleason said on X. “Thrilled to have her start her coaching journey with the Eags.”

Maxwell spent two seasons with the Zags after transferring from Utah ahead of the 2022-23 season. In her final year at Gonzaga, the Gig Harbor, Washington, native started all 36 games and helped guide GU to a historic 16-0 mark in West Coast Conference play, a 32-4 overall record and a berth to the Sweet 16 of the 2023-24 NCAA Tournament.

The 6-foot guard appeared in 69 games, starting 65, and totaled 955 career points, 72 steals, 64 assists and 228 rebounds. Her performance earned back-to-back All-WCC First Team honors.

Maxwell was selected with the first pick in the second round of the 2024 WNBA Draft by the Chicago Sky but did not make the final 12-player roster.

With her playing days now over, Maxwell embarks on her coaching career close to home. She joins a staff that includes head coach Joddie Gleason, associate head coach Skip Gleason and second-year assistant coach Jamie Loera, who had a record-breaking playing career with the Eagles from 2022-24.

Last season, with a roster full of new faces, Eastern Washington finished eighth in the Big Sky Conference standings with an 11-20 overall record and a 7-11 mark in conference play. The Eags lost to Sacramento State in the first round of the Big Sky Tournament and will look to keep improving in 2025-26 with a young but talented team.





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

5 Best Players in the NCAA Transfer Portal

The NCAA transfer portal continues to shake up college basketball as top talents find new homes ahead of the upcoming season. One of the biggest moves was Boogie Fland’s commitment to the Florida Gators, a major addition for the SEC program. But with Fland off the board, which high-impact players remain available for teams still […]

Published

on

5 Best Players in the NCAA Transfer Portal


https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=0eZbA1_11EsZiVB00

The NCAA transfer portal continues to shake up college basketball as top talents find new homes ahead of the upcoming season. One of the biggest moves was Boogie Fland’s commitment to the Florida Gators, a major addition for the SEC program.

But with Fland off the board, which high-impact players remain available for teams still hunting for game-changers?

We’ve tracked the latest portal activity via 247 Sports Transfer Portal Tracker, and here are the five best unsigned players who could still make a big splash this offseason.

https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=1m0vXa_11EsZiVB00
College Sports Network’s Men’s College Basketball Transfer Portal tracks the comings and goings of every athlete who has entered the transfer portal. Find out who’s entered and where they’re going now!

Uncommitted Stars: Top 5 Still in the Transfer Portal

PJ Haggerty (Memphis)

PJ Haggerty, formerly of Memphis, is one of the most sought-after guards in the transfer portal. Ranked as the No. 1 overall transfer portal prospect by On3, Haggerty was originally a three-star recruit, but his performance at Tulsa and Memphis significantly elevated his stock.

Last season, he showcased his scoring ability, averaging 21.7 points, 5.8 rebounds, and 3.7 assists per game.

Now, Haggerty is looking to take the next big step. He wants to play as a true point guard—and he’s also eyeing a major NIL deal, reportedly around $4 million. Schools like NC State, Ole Miss, and Texas are chasing him, but Texas stands out. Their strong NIL setup could give them the edge in this heated race.

RJ Luis Jr. (St. John’s)

Meanwhile, RJ Luis Jr. has made his decision. After St. John’s suffered a tough loss to Arkansas in the NCAA Tournament, the 2025 Big East Player of the Year entered the transfer portal. But he quickly shut the door on returning to college. Luis has fully committed to the NBA Draft and says he’s “all-in” on turning pro.

Luis had a big season—he averaged 18.2 points, 7.2 rebounds, and 2.0 assists. Before his draft decision, he was one of the most wanted wings in the portal. If he had returned to school, he was expected to land at least $1.5 million in NIL deals. Now, his focus is entirely on the next level.

Jamir Watkins (Florida State)

Jamir Watkins, another major portal name, is still weighing his future. The five-star transfer originally entered the NBA Draft but is now leaning toward returning to college. At Florida State, Watkins averaged 18.4 points, 5.7 rebounds, and 2.4 assists. He’s ranked as the No. 2 small forward in the portal.

While his draft stock has recently dipped, his value in college basketball is rising. He was one of the brightest stars in the ACC last season. If he withdraws from the draft, UNC is currently the frontrunner to land him. Other schools like Louisville, Kentucky, and Illinois are also making a strong push.

Desmond Claude (USC)

Fourth, Desmond Claude is the name to watch. The former USC guard had a strong season, putting up 15.8 points, 4.2 rebounds, and 3.1 assists. He’s not just looking for a good fit—he wants a strong backcourt partner and a real shot at a deep tournament run.

Zeke Mayo (Kansas)

Finally, Zeke Mayo is the last best available player in the transfer portal. He played last season at Kansas and recently entered the transfer portal. However, he added a “Do Not Contact” tag, which means he wants to stay in Kansas but is keeping his options open.

KEEP READING: 2025 Men’s College Basketball Transfer Portal Tracker

This is because his NCAA eligibility is still uncertain and is awaiting a decision. Last season, Mayo showed a strong performance, averaging 14.6 points, 4.8 rebounds, and 2.9 assists per game. We expect him to return to Kansas instead of transferring to another school if he receives the extra year of eligibility.

College Sports Network has you covered with the latest news, analysis, insights, and trending stories in college football, men’s college basketball, women’s college basketball, and college baseball!

Continue Reading

NIL

The Front Runner

“To give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift.” “It’s not who’s the best—it’s who can take the most pain.” “Somebody may beat me, but they are going to have to bleed to do it.” These are just three of many memorable quotes by Steve Prefontaine that encapsulate the long-distance runner’s relentless […]

Published

on

The Front Runner

“To give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift.”

“It’s not who’s the best—it’s who can take the most pain.”

“Somebody may beat me, but they are going to have to bleed to do it.”

These are just three of many memorable quotes by Steve Prefontaine that encapsulate the long-distance runner’s relentless spirit. Fierce, outspoken, and stubborn, Pre pushed the boundaries of the sport not with record-breaking times but also with his manner of winning, giving every race a maximal effort. He competed in the 5,000-meter event at the 1972 Summer Olympics in Munich and held the American record in every distance from 2,000 to 10,000 meters between 1973 and 1975. He was the first track athlete to sign with Nike, setting a precedent for brand deals. He played a significant role in popularizing the sport, his charismatic style and bravado drawing thousands of fans to the bleachers.

And then, on May 30, 1975, at only 24, Pre’s life was cut short in a car crash.

Five decades after the tragedy, his legacy still inspires runners all around the world. Brendan O’Meara’s new book, The Front Runner, offers a contemporary retelling of Pre’s meteoric rise to fame. Just ahead of the book’s launch, the author and host of The Creative Nonfiction podcast shared with Runner’s World why he decided to write the biography and why Pre remains one of America’s most iconic runners.

Mariner Books “The Front Runner: The Life of Steve Prefontaine” by Brendan O’Meara

“The Front Runner: The Life of Steve Prefontaine” by Brendan O’Meara

Now 11% Off

So much has been written about Pre already. How is your book different?

My book recasts him in a modern light. What’s going on with name, image, and likeness in college sports really reflects what he was dealing with in the early 70s, trying to be compensated. Pre was very forward-thinking and trying to fight for athlete empowerment and rights at a time when athletes had little power—or didn’t realize how much power they actually did have—because of the amateur establishment of the day. Mike O’Hara launched the International Track Association in 1973 as a real professional track, but if athletes signed with ITA, they were no longer amateurs and couldn’t run in the Olympics, and a lot of them felt very conflicted. So that’s kind of the world-building aspect that helped inform this particular Prefontaine story.

I was able to find a couple of hundred people who overlapped with him, and a lot of them never spoke on the record. I went digging into what made Pre tick, to get to the man behind the myth because he’s been so lionized and deified. I wanted to write something more intimate.

What surprised you while reporting the story?

Pre has been characterized as very confident and brash. It was great to get a sense of how insecure he was at times, how much pressure he put on himself, which hasn’t been articulated very well in the past. He wanted to break 4 minutes in the mile at the Coos County Meet during his senior year. The mile was his white whale for the longest time. Close to 2,000 people were jammed in to watch from Coos Bay. He ran 4:06:09, amazing time. But his friend, Ron Apling, found Steve behind the stands crying after the race. Ron asked, ‘What’s the matter, Steve?’ And Steve said: ‘They all came to watch me break 4 minutes, and I failed them.’ He realized he was such a draw and would come to see himself as an artist, a performer.

Something else that surprised me was Pre coaching women, Mary Decker, Debbie Roth, and Caroline Walker. Just on his own time because he wanted to help. He was just counseling people in the community, writing them workouts in the same vein that his high school coaches Walt McClure and Phil Persian wrote for him.

steve prefontaine

RW Archives

What are some timeless lessons from Pre’s approach to training?

In that era, it was to pound you to death with miles, and if you couldn’t withstand that mileage, you just weren’t cut out for it. But Bill Bowerman, head track coach at the University of Oregon, had a credo that it’s better to undertrain than overtrain an athlete. Bowerman and his assistant coach Bill Dellinger, both Steve’s college coaches, were very much ahead of the game in that regard, and I think that’s very applicable today.

Pre was on the vanguard of sports psychology, of goal setting. There’s a great image in Geoff Hollister’s book about him trying to get to the sub-4 in the mile and break 9 minutes in 2 miles. Writing it down was his way of trying to manifest it as best as possible. It gave him a better sense and a crystallized vision that if you thought about it and visualized it enough, you might be able to get there.

What part of the book was the hardest to write?

Pre’s final day on the planet, trying to track every step of the way and making sure it tracks with the police and other reports. I wanted to handle that scene with care and fairness, lay it out without judgment, just paint the scene. Pre always felt so alive to me, and then I’d think, ‘Oh my god, he’s gonna die.’ Through my rewriting and research, I’d go through a different archive, and he’d come alive to me again, feel so vibrant, and as I’d be getting closer to 1975, I’d think, ‘He’s gonna die again.’ It’d be a gut punch for me.

ncaa photos archive

NCAA Photos//Getty Images

Is there anything you wish had made it into the book but was cut?

One scene I was sad to see go was from the 1972 indoor season. The Los Angeles Times did a split prediction and split column with Harley Tinkham, their track and field writer. They had an astrologer, Burton Morse, predict the outcome of the races based on the runners’ birth signs and all that stuff. Morse said that the stars weren’t in Prefontaine’s favor. It was just so wild that in 1972, when track and field was so popular, and Pre was an ascendant Olympian, and Jim Ryun was trying to reclaim his fame, they’d take their track expert and pit him up against an astrologer. In the Sports Illustrated article, where I read about it, they cleaned up the language. But Pre pretty much said, ‘Fuck the stars.’


Have you speculated about what would happen if Pre lived and his career went on? Where would he end up?

I think he’d have just gone on to be a tremendous ambassador for track and field, especially being Nike’s firstborn and athlete. Some of his friends said he’d have gone into politics, born with the wild charisma he had. So many people said, ‘He just had it.’ He had magnetism about him. He would have been a tremendous leader and champion.

american runner steve prefontaine at olympic games trials

Bettmann//Getty Images

How is Pre still such a household name in running? Why does he matter in 2025?

It was something cosmic. A sport only has so many inflection points. Track and field was ready for a change. Pre had the look, the moxy, the talent. He had Bowerman and he had Nike. And it was just a moment. He was the catalyst, ready to ride that rocketship. There have been far more talented and charismatic people who shattered world records since, but they don’t inspire us or fire us up the way Steve did. That’s why he’ll probably forever tower over track and field.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Mariner Books “The Front Runner: The Life of Steve Prefontaine” by Brendan O’Meara

“The Front Runner: The Life of Steve Prefontaine” by Brendan O’Meara

Now 11% Off

Headshot of Pavlína Černá

Pavlína Černá, an RRCA-certified run coach and cycling enthusiast, has been with Runner’s World, Bicycling, and Popular Mechanics since August 2021. When she doesn’t edit, she writes; when she doesn’t write, she reads or translates. In whatever time she has left, you can find her outside running, riding, or roller-skating to the beat of one of the many audiobooks on her TBL list.

Continue Reading
College Sports4 minutes ago

Alex Chiasson graduates from Boston University shortly after retiring from the NHL

Sports10 minutes ago

CIF-SOUTHERN SECTION DIVISION 5 SOFTBALL PLAYOFFS – Ceron recovers from rocky start as Cerritos ends opening round jinx

NIL22 minutes ago

Tennessee basketball star Zakai Zeigler sues NCAA for 5th year of eligibility

Sports26 minutes ago

CCIW Stories: North Park’s Riana Hayes

Sports27 minutes ago

Boys volleyball wraps up inaugural season | North Vernon

Motorsports34 minutes ago

Pagenaud easing back into motorsports after serious injury in 2023. Finding a new career outside car

Rec Sports37 minutes ago

James J. “Jim” Ferraro Sr. Obituary

NIL40 minutes ago

FSU coach Mike Norvell is a proponent of NIL enforcement in proposed Salary Cap Era of college football

Sports45 minutes ago

Arizona Wildcats track and field/cross country coach Fred Harvey announces retirement

Sports46 minutes ago

LHS boys volleyball wins districts – St. Louis Call Newspapers

College Sports49 minutes ago

Obituary For Richard “Dick” Henry Kustin | State College, PA

Sports51 minutes ago

Guard Isaiah Lewis Joins Long Beach State As Division I Transfer

Motorsports52 minutes ago

Pagenaud easing back into motorsports after serious injury in 2023. Finding a new career outside car | National Sports

Motorsports53 minutes ago

NASCAR Hall of Fame inductees: Kurt Busch, Harry Gant, Ray Hendrick

Youtube55 minutes ago

Final 6:33 MUST-SEE GAME 5 ENDING Thunder vs Nuggets | May 13, 2025

Most Viewed Posts

Trending