Connect with us

NIL

Quinn Ewers Never Took NIL Money From Texas Longhorns

AUSTIN — As one of the catalysts of bringing the program back to national relevancy, it’s clear that Quinn Ewers left a legacy with the Texas Longhorns. But in the process, he apparently didn’t take a single dime from the university’s NlL fund. Texas head coach Steve Sarkisian told reporters Monday at the Houston Touchdown […]

Published

on


AUSTIN — As one of the catalysts of bringing the program back to national relevancy, it’s clear that Quinn Ewers left a legacy with the Texas Longhorns. But in the process, he apparently didn’t take a single dime from the university’s NlL fund.

Texas head coach Steve Sarkisian told reporters Monday at the Houston Touchdown Club that Ewers did not receive money from the Texas One Fund during his three years on the Forty Acres.

After a long wait Saturday during the 2025 NFL Draft, Ewers was a seventh-round draft selection by the Miami Dolphins.

Quinn Ewers

Jan 10, 2025; Arlington, TX, USA; Texas Longhorns quarterback Quinn Ewers (3) in action during the game between the Texas Longhorns and the Ohio State Buckeyes at AT&T Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jerome Miron-Imagn Images / Jerome Miron-Imagn Images

“I think he was one of the first guys through all this talk about collective and all the things that were going on in the world of NIL … he never took money from our collective,” Sarkisian said. “All of what he did through NIL was his true Name, Image, and Likeness.”

Ewers certainly got his fair share of earnings from multiple NIL deals, highlighted by being one of the three feature athletes on the cover of the highly-anticipated College Football 25 video game last summer along with an appearance in the Dr Pepper “Fansville” commercial series. Some of his other partnerships included those with Hulu, New Era, Panini America and more.

Sarkisian called out some of the negative narratives surrounding Ewers after he fell to the seventh round. Many have criticized Ewers for entering the draft instead of staying in college and entering the transfer portal where he likely would have had a seven-figure deal waiting for him.

Instead, he’s set to make much less as a third-string rookie in the NFL next season, but some things are more important than dollar signs.

Quinn Ewer

Feb 28, 2025; Indianapolis, IN, USA; Texas quarterback Quinn Ewers (QB04) answers questions at a press conference during the 2025 NFL Combine at Indiana Convention Center. Mandatory Credit: Stephanie Amador Blondet-Imagn Images / Stephanie Amador Blondet-Imagn Images

“I also think it’s ironic that so many things are written and talked about the players from the negative standpoint that transfer schools or stay in school to take more money like it’s a negative,” Sarkisian said. “All of a sudden, here’s a guy that said ‘I want to leave a legacy at Texas. I want to go play in the NFL.’ Now they’re knocking him for not taking the money in college.”

Sarkisian stuck with Ewers through the good times and the bad but ultimately looks at him as one of the faces of Texas’ turnaround from 5-7 in 2021 to national title contender.

“You think about the last two years, he leads us to back-to-back CFPs – we’re the only team to do that the last two years – we win a Big 12 Championship, and we compete for an SEC Championship,” Sarkisian said. “And he was a key guy in transforming a team coming off a 5-7 season into a championship-level program. He came in when we were building this thing, made an immediate impact, and his leadership was critical to the growth and success of our program over the last three years. He’s a tremendous player, even better person, and a great teammate. Miami got an outstanding quarterback who will be a great addition to their team.”

Ewers will now begin what he hopes is a long NFL career while the Longhorns head into the first full season with Arch Manning as the starter.



Link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NIL

Greg Sankey explains why he’s in favor of keeping College Football Playoff selection committee over computers

Greg Sankey is in favor of a College Football Playoff selection committee over utilizing computers to figure out who the top teams in the sport are. Some may find that controversial, some will wholeheartedly agree, but that’s where the SEC Commissioner stands. He stated his case Friday during an appearance on Golic and Golic. Evidently, […]

Published

on


Greg Sankey is in favor of a College Football Playoff selection committee over utilizing computers to figure out who the top teams in the sport are. Some may find that controversial, some will wholeheartedly agree, but that’s where the SEC Commissioner stands.

He stated his case Friday during an appearance on Golic and Golic. Evidently, Sankey expects the committee to rely on key data points, but the human eye is also invaluable when separating the best of the best in college football.

“My thought is there’s, like, always a pendulum swing. So you heard plenty last year and maybe the year before, about how we shouldn’t have a committee,” Sankey stated. “But if you return to, you know, 2008, ‘9, ’10, ’11, particularly, I think it was ’11 when LSU and Alabama played, there was plenty of opinion and commentary on, ‘We shouldn’t just have a computer decide this,’ because that was the non human factor. I think there’s a balance in this age of analytics. There’s a way for the data to be improved, in my opinion. I think there is a human factor involved.

“Now, one of the things to remember is, in a four-team playoff, the pressure was either in the four or out, right? And if you’re five and six, plenty of fewer — a lot of years, it was fairly clear, not all the time. Now, in a 12-team playoff, you have the first group of four who receive a bye. So, that’s a pressure point in decision making. You have the second group of four who receive home games. That’s a pressure point. You have the third group who’s in, and then you have the fourth group of four — 13-16 — who are out.

“The selection process really was put in place for that first four segment, the top four teams, when you’re dealing with often undefeated teams, maybe 11-1 regular season teams for the championship game, maybe 10-2, here and there. So it’s really narrow bend.”

Evidently, Sankey believes there needs to be a balance between computer-generated rankings and a human selection committee. Still, he recognizes that eliminating the human component could be extremely detrimental to the Playoff, and that’s not something he would advocate for.

“I think one of the justifications for an updated process is there are more pressure points that have to be contemplated and your evaluation of 12-0 and 11-1 has impact,” Sankey explained. “But wow, when you go to 10-2 and 9-3 evaluations, that has more meaning, and how we look at the nature of those schedules, results from those schedules, you know, losses have meaning, but should they have more meaning than maybe some quality wins? Those are really important aspects from our perspective with this discussion, where I think there is a balance between the computer and the human.”

It seems as if Greg Sankey is speaking for a ton of people with his opinion, and many will agree with his sentiment. The College Football Playoff selection committee is far from perfect, but it may be the best we can do when you consider the volatile nature of the sport in 2025.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

The Buzz Around College and Softball: Is It Tampering?

If you have been apart of the Twitter/X softball world over the past 48 hours you have probably seen the word tampering going around and viral. But what exactly does tampering refer to? Heard a lot about tampering during portal season in women’s basketball too. Here’s the thing: It’s not going to stop, and the […]

Published

on


If you have been apart of the Twitter/X softball world over the past 48 hours you have probably seen the word tampering going around and viral. But what exactly does tampering refer to?

Tampering according to the NCAA rules is outlined in 13.1.1.3, “An athletics staff member or other representative of the institution’s athletics interests shall not communicate or make contact with the student-athlete of another NCAA Division I institution, or any individual associated with the student-athlete (e.g., family member, scholastic or nonscholastic coach, advisor), directly or indirectly, without first obtaining authorization through the notification of transfer process.”

For example, in 2024, the NCAA ruled that Southern Utah violated 13.1.1.3 and communicated with two football players that were not yet in the portal. This was ruled and considered impermissible and tampering because both athletes had not yet entered the portal when the coach and the athletes had discussions. The athletes entered the portal the next day; thus, tampering.

Again, if you haven’t been living under a rock, then you have seen several tweets about tampering in softball and this is not a new claim in college sport. Sports Illustrated reported in February of this year that an anonymous survey revealed that Group of Five football coaches felt tampering was rampant in in their sport. Furthermore, they stated Power 4 coaches poached athletes away from their programs and talked to athletes before they entered the portal.

Earlier this week, mid-major coaches called out tampering within the sport of softball and claimed players were being poached off rosters to larger Power 4 school and institutions that could offer larger NIL incentives.

The conversation of tampering escalated through the week as Texas Tech snagged the No. 3, 4, 6, 7, and 29 ranked transfers out of the portal including Tennessee’s Taylor Pannell. Pannell entered the portal the morning of June 12 and by 9 pm had signed with the Red Raiders.

Tennessee’s head coach Karen Weekly took to Twitter/X and boasted that Pannell’s timeline was tampering and in violation of NCAA policy.

As this story progresses, we will see if Tennessee files a formal complaint with the NCAA against Texas Tech for tampering or if other schools and programs come forward with this claim.

More News: Tennessee Softball Coach Karen Weekly Issues Statement Amid Transfer Portal Departures

More News: How Will the NCAA House Settlement Affect the Future of College Softball?

More News: How an NIL Loophole is Transforming Texas Tech Into a Softball Powerhouse





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Tennessee softball coach Karen Weekly calls out tampering, transfer portal issues with NIL | National

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.Don’t Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.Be Truthful. Don’t knowingly lie about anyone or anything.Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.Be Proactive. Use the ‘Report’ link […]

Published

on


Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don’t Threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don’t knowingly lie about anyone
or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism
that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the ‘Report’ link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We’d love to hear eyewitness
accounts, the history behind an article.





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

UCLA vs. Murray State baseball College World Series preview and prediction

Here is a preview and prediction of UCLA’s game versus Murray State in the College World Series. Best victories this season: Iowa (9-3), @ USC (7-6), Cal Poly (18-2), @ Illinois (9-1), BYU (15-4), Penn State (9-1), Cal Poly (16-0), @ Oregon (14-4), Arizona State (8-4), USC (5-1), Michigan (22-5), UC Irvine (11-4), Indiana (6-3), […]

Published

on


Here is a preview and prediction of UCLA’s game versus Murray State in the College World Series.

Best victories this season: Iowa (9-3), @ USC (7-6), Cal Poly (18-2), @ Illinois (9-1), BYU (15-4), Penn State (9-1), Cal Poly (16-0), @ Oregon (14-4), Arizona State (8-4), USC (5-1), Michigan (22-5), UC Irvine (11-4), Indiana (6-3), Washington (13-9), Penn State (6-3), Michigan (7-5), UConn (8-6), Fresno State (19-4), Arizona State (11-5), UC Irvine (8-5), UTSA (5-2), and UTSA (7-0).

Defeats this season: Nebraska (0-5), Washington (2-5), Texas A&M-Corpus Christi (3-4), Oregon State (1-7), Arizona State (0-2), @ USC (5-7), @ Long Beach State (2-4), @ Oregon (1-2), Vanderbilt (3-8), @ Maryland (3-13), @ USC (5-11), UC Irvine (3-5), @ Oregon (6-10), Northwestern (4-9), San Diego (3-4), and Indiana (1-5).

NCAA Tournament record: 5-0
Strength of Schedule: 22
RPI: 9
Quad 1 record: 6-7
Quad 2 record: 15-2

Best victories this season: Western Kentucky (2-1), @ Kentucky (5-4), Southern Illinois (8-3), UIC (5-2), @ Ole Miss (9-6), Georgia Tech (13-11), @ Duke (19-9), @ Ole Miss (12-11), and @ Duke (5-4).

Defeats this season: @ Ole Miss (7-8), Western Illinois (3-5), Southern Indiana (7-8), Western Illinois (1-3), Evansville (5-6), @ Illinois State (10-13), Evansville (10-15), @ Illinois State (1-7), UIC (4-10), @ Indiana State (1-11), @ Southeast Missouri (3-11), Southern Illinois (0-11), @ Belmont (3-4), @ Ole Miss (8-19), and @ Duke (4-7).

NCAA Tournament record: 5-2
Strength of Schedule: 193
RPI: 53
Quad 1 record: 6-3
Quad 2 record: 1-0

This is a prediction for the upcoming game between UCLA and Murray State in the College World Series.

UCLA has the top-rated MLB prospect in Roch Cholowsky, while the Racers’ top player is Will Vierling. Every NCAA Tournament features a Cinderella team, and for the College World Series, that team is Murray State. However, most teams in the Racers’ position eventually have their tournament runs ended by teams like UCLA, and this appears to be the case for this game. UCLA wins by a final score of 7-3.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Texas Tech takes national spotlight for aggressive NIL approach, as critics cry foul

Texas Tech is making headlines across the college sports landscape thanks to its aggressive NIL approach. The Red Raiders are all-in on leveraging NIL to bring championships to Lubbock, and the numbers are staggering. According to various reports, Texas Tech has invested nearly $30 million into this year’s football roster. In men’s basketball, star forward […]

Published

on


Texas Tech is making headlines across the college sports landscape thanks to its aggressive NIL approach. The Red Raiders are all-in on leveraging NIL to bring championships to Lubbock, and the numbers are staggering.

According to various reports, Texas Tech has invested nearly $30 million into this year’s football roster. In men’s basketball, star forward JT Toppin is reportedly receiving a $4 million NIL deal to remain in Lubbock for one more season. And when it comes to the softball team, star pitcher NiJaree Canady has secured two separate $1 million NIL deals, while the team has also added three All-American transfers in recent days — a haul largely driven by NIL.

CBS Sports recently reported that Texas Tech is projected to spend around $55 million between NIL and revenue sharing across all athletic programs in 2025, a payout that is likely higher than any other college in the nation.

While Red Raider fans are celebrating this new era of NIL and the spending spree currently taking place in Lubbock, not everyone is enjoying it. Critics, particularly rival fans, have voiced concerns about the ethics of such an aggressive NIL approach. Reports of multi-million dollar payouts and exploiting “loopholes” have caused some to cry foul.

Yet, many point out that powerhouse programs have been spending big for years, albeit under the table. With NIL bringing everything out into the open, Texas Tech is simply playing by the new rules — and doing it better than anyone else in the country.

The social media buzz around Texas Tech’s spending has turned into a national debate, but the Red Raiders remain unfazed by that debate. Instead, the focus in Lubbock is squarely on building championship teams. And with financial resources that few schools around the country can compete with, Texas Tech is taking full advantage of its unique opportunity to rise to the top — whether you like it or not.

– Enjoy more Texas Tech coverage on Texas Tech On SI –

Texas Tech receives commitment from massive offensive lineman

Looking to make history at Texas Tech, GM James Blanchard turned down Notre Dame

Texas Tech football adds another commitment to 2026 recruiting class

Texas Tech working to flip elite wide receiver committed to rival Baylor





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

DL Kamdon Gillespie joins Virginia Tech’s 2026 recruiting class

Virginia Tech has added a versatile athlete as Kamdon Gillespie announces his commitment to the Hokies. A 6-foot-3, 245-pound defensive line prospect, the Mooresville (NC) product is a three-star recruit, rated as the No. 101 defensive line prospect in the country by 247Sports Composite methodology. The Hokies offered a scholarship more than two years ago, surviving […]

Published

on


Virginia Tech has added a versatile athlete as Kamdon Gillespie announces his commitment to the Hokies.

A 6-foot-3, 245-pound defensive line prospect, the Mooresville (NC) product is a three-star recruit, rated as the No. 101 defensive line prospect in the country by 247Sports Composite methodology.

The Hokies offered a scholarship more than two years ago, surviving multiple cuts to his list along the way. Three finalists – Georgia Tech, South Florida, and Virginia Tech – were announced in May. Official visits to all three were scheduled, but he opted to cancel the final visit to USF and become a Hokie.

With 20 offers to his name, other schools involved in his recruitment include Boston College, East Carolina, Kentucky, Vanderbilt, and West Virginia.

Gillespie recorded 61 total tackles, 25 tackles for loss, 10 quarterback hurries, 10 defended passes, eight sacks, three fumble recoveries (including one returned for a touchdown), and a safety in 13 games during his junior campaign according to MaxPreps.

He is the fourth commitment for head coach Brent Pry in the class of 2026 and the second on the defensive line.



Link

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending