Connect with us

NIL

Relevent Sports, U.S. Soccer settle antitrust lawsuit, ending years

Relevent Sports has settled its antitrust lawsuit with the U.S. Soccer Federation, likely clearing the way for the sports promoter to host foreign league matches on American soil. Attorneys for the sports promoter on Wednesday filed a motion in U.S. District Court in Manhattan to dismiss the suit against U.S. Soccer “with prejudice,” meaning Relevent […]

Published

on

Relevent Sports, U.S. Soccer settle antitrust lawsuit, ending years

Relevent Sports has settled its antitrust lawsuit with the U.S. Soccer Federation, likely clearing the way for the sports promoter to host foreign league matches on American soil.

Attorneys for the sports promoter on Wednesday filed a motion in U.S. District Court in Manhattan to dismiss the suit against U.S. Soccer “with prejudice,” meaning Relevent Sports gives up its right to refile the same claim or lawsuit against the federation in the future.

Advertisement

“We appreciate U.S. Soccer’s collaboration in reaching this settlement,” Relevent CEO Danny Sillman said in a statement Thursday. “Ultimately, we all share the same goal: growing the sport throughout America. We’re excited to continue supporting clubs from Europe and around the world to expand the sport’s reach and impact across the U.S.”

An attorney for Relevent Sports did not elaborate on any specifics of the agreement. Last year, Relevant also reached a separate agreement with FIFA, world soccer’s governing body, to drop it as a co-defendant in the matter.

The settlement puts an end to a years-long legal fight between the New York-based sports promoter and U.S. Soccer. Relevent, co-founded and owned by Miami Dolphins owner Stephen M. Ross, first filed its lawsuit against the federation in 2019.

Their suit alleged, in part, that the U.S. Soccer Federation (USSF) conspired with FIFA to keep Relevent from competing against Soccer United Marketing (SUM), the marketing arm of Major League Soccer with deep financial ties to USSF. Relevent competes with SUM in promoting similar events.

A USSF spokesperson said in a statement Thursday: “We are pleased to put this matter behind us as we remain focused on growing the game and harnessing the momentum of U.S. Soccer ahead of next year’s World Cup.”

The legal dispute dates to 2018, when Relevent first tried to organize a regular-season La Liga match in the United States. It would have been a historic first for international club soccer, as regular-season matches in the sport are only ever played within the borders of a league’s home country. In American professional sports, though, it’s far more common for domestic leagues, like the NFL, to host regular-season games in other countries.

In August 2018, Relevent said it would host a regular-season La Liga match between Barcelona and Girona in Miami. But, in October, global soccer’s governing body, FIFA, announced a policy barring domestic leagues from playing their regular-season games outside of their home territories. Barcelona then withdrew from its commitment.

Advertisement

Then, in March 2019, Relevent tried again by submitting an application to USSF, which is a member of FIFA, to sanction an official league match between two Ecuadorian teams in the United States. However, USSF denied the sanction, citing FIFA policy.

By September, Relevent sued USSF on antitrust grounds. Attorneys added FIFA as a co-defendant the following year. The dispute crawled through the courts, and through the pandemic, even reaching the Supreme Court in April 2024.

It seemed likely, though, that the lawsuit could be settled, especially after a FIFA attorney told a federal judge last year that the governing body was considering changing its rules that would allow domestic league matches to be played abroad.

This revelation came weeks after Relevent and FIFA reached their own settlement to drop FIFA as a co-defendant. The terms of their settlement were never disclosed. However, not long after that milestone, FIFA approved a working group that would look into rule changes, signaling it was reconsidering its long-held stance on the matter.

In the months since, foreign leagues have once again begun showing their interest in hosting official matches in the United States, including La Liga.

(Photo: Tim Nwachukwu / Getty Images)

NIL

Matt Rhule Discusses NIL Impact on College Football Recruiting

The transfer portal era has already changed college football in big ways. With NIL rules now changing rosters and entire seasons, coaches are scrambling to keep up. A proven quarterback no longer just costs a scholarship — it can run seven figures, depending on the bidding war. For Nebraska head coach Matt Rhule, this new […]

Published

on


The transfer portal era has already changed college football in big ways. With NIL rules now changing rosters and entire seasons, coaches are scrambling to keep up. A proven quarterback no longer just costs a scholarship — it can run seven figures, depending on the bidding war. For Nebraska head coach Matt Rhule, this new landscape has been equal parts frustrating and eye-opening. As he tried to build a winning team, he found that the NIL marketplace can be cutthroat. But in Lincoln, it’s not just about scouting talent — now, it’s about outlasting the chaos of a college football economy where loyalty can be bought. With College Sports Network’s Transfer Portal Tracker, you can stay ahead of the chaos. Follow every entrant, commitment, and decommitment as they happen. Matt Rhule Explains How Struggling Programs Are Outspending Contenders in the NIL Era Nebraska HC Matt Rhule is not afraid to say things that coaches tend to whisper behind closed doors. Recently, Rhule was on the “HuskerOnline” podcast, where the third-year Nebraska head coach shared a reality that’s reshaping how programs approach recruiting. “The desperate team sets the market,” Rhule said, referencing a conversation with personnel staffer Troy Vincent. As Rhule



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Cowboy Baseball Advances At Big 12 Tourney

ARLINGTON, Texas – Oklahoma State began defense of its Big 12 tourney title with a 4-3 win over Baylor in the opening round of the Big 12 Baseball Championship Wednesday at Globe Life Field.   With the win, the seventh-seeded Cowboys improved to 28-22 and moved into the quarterfinals to take on No. 2 seed Kansas […]

Published

on


ARLINGTON, Texas – Oklahoma State began defense of its Big 12 tourney title with a 4-3 win over Baylor in the opening round of the Big 12 Baseball Championship Wednesday at Globe Life Field.
 
With the win, the seventh-seeded Cowboys improved to 28-22 and moved into the quarterfinals to take on No. 2 seed Kansas Thursday at 4 p.m.
 
Mario Pesca was outstanding in relief of starter Sean Youngerman to earn the win out of the bullpen. The right-hander tossed 3 2/3 shutout innings, allowing just two hits and striking out a pair, to improve to 7-2 on the season.
 
Youngerman worked 4 1/3 innings, striking out five and allowing three runs, just one of those earned.
 
Gabe Davis retired all three batters he faced in the ninth for his third save of the season.
 
Offensively, the Cowboys had just five hits, with Kollin Ritchie and Colin Brueggemann picking up RBIs.
 
OSU jumped on top in the second when Ritchie deposited his 10th home run of the season into the seats in right-center field.
 
However, the Bears would take advantage of a throwing error in the third to plate a pair of runs and take a 2-1 lead.
 
BU added to its lead in the fifth, going up 3-1 on a sacrifice fly off the bat of Tyriq Kemp.
 
OSU trimmed its deficit in the sixth. Brayden Smith and Ian Daugherty led off the frame with singles before a deep fly out to center field by Nolan Schubart advanced both runners into scoring position. Brueggemann then picked up an RBI on a sac fly line out to left field to make the score 3-2.
 
The Cowboys would then take advantage of a BU error as, with two outs, third baseman Pearson Riebock uncorked a wild throw to first that allowed the tying run to score from second base.
 
With the game tied 3-3 in the seventh, another error proved pivotal. With Cowboys on first and second and two outs, Daugherty grounded a ball at Kemp, BU’s shortstop, who misplayed the ball. The miscue allowed the go-ahead run to score as OSU went back on top, 4-3.
 
Pesca kept the Bears off the scoreboard in the eighth, stranding the tying run at first with an inning-ending striking, before Davis came out of the pen and shut the door in the ninth.
 



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

College Football 26: Release Date, Cover Athletes & Payouts For This Year’s CFB Video Game

After years of anticipation, and only after college athletes were permitted to profit off of their NIL, “EA Sports College Football 25” was the highest-grossing sports video game ever. Now the question is, how does EA Sports follow that up? How much will the company try to change or improve from a model that was […]

Published

on


After years of anticipation, and only after college athletes were permitted to profit off of their NIL, “EA Sports College Football 25” was the highest-grossing sports video game ever.

Now the question is, how does EA Sports follow that up? How much will the company try to change or improve from a model that was already clearly successful?

I personally played it and loved it. It’s the only game I’ve played on my PlayStation 5 for more than 100 hours. I thoroughly enjoyed being the head coach of a Group of Five school and leading my team to a national championship – on All-American, granted, because I was about .500 on Heisman and barely made the College Football Playoff.

Anyway, here’s more about the upcoming version of the game.

College Football 26 will come out on July 10, 2025, according to EA Sports’ website. However, The MVP bundle and Deluxe Edition will be available on July 7, giving gamers three days of early access.

The money distributed to schools from the College Football 25 game reportedly depended on how those schools ranked in the AP Poll over the 10 seasons leading up to CFB25, from 2014-23. 

Based on a scoring system from those rankings, schools were put into one of four tiers. Schools from the top tier received nearly $100,000 while the bottom tier received just under $10,000.

No G5 schools were in the top tier. Boise State, Utah State, Liberty, Louisiana, Memphis, San Diego State, USF, Fresno State, and Navy were among the schools currently in the Group of Five that were in the second tier and received $59,925.09 each. 

Washington State, Marshall, Army, Troy, Coastal Carolina, Western Michigan, Air Force, App State, Tulane, Ball State, Buffalo, Oregon State, Western Kentucky, and San Jose State were among the G5 teams in the third tier and received $39,950.06. All other G5 schools would’ve been in the fourth and lowest tier.

betmgm-sportsbook-promo-bannerbetmgm-sportsbook-promo-banner

Players will reportedly receive $1,500 each for appearing in CFB26. That’s up from the $600 players received from College Football 25.

There was an 11-year span of no college football game due to complications related to EA Sports’ inability to use college athletes’ names, images, and likenesses. But that has since changed, and EA Sports is now paying players for appearing in the video game.

The cover of this year’s College Football game will feature several players, like Ohio State wideout Jeremiah Smith and defensive back Caleb Downs, Alabama wide receiver Ryan Williams, Florida quarterback DJ Lagway, and Penn State running back Nick Singleton, and coaches like Kirby Smart of Georgia, James Franklin of Penn State, and Kenny Dillingham of Arizona State.

Some of the other people on the cover are Heisman Trophy winners Tim Tebow and Reggie Bush.

Cover Team Year
Bill Walsh Stanford 1994
Bill Walsh Stanford 1995
Tommy the Trojan USC 1996
Tommie Frazer Nebraska 1997
Danny Wuerffel Florida 1998
Charles Woodson Michigan 1999
Ricky Williams Texas 2000
Shaun Alexander Alabama 2001
Chris Weinke Florida St. 2002
Joey Harrington Oregon 2003
Carson Palmer USC 2004
Larry Fitzgerald Pitt 2005
Desmond Howard Michigan 2006
Reggie Bush USC 2007
Jared Zabransky Boise St. 2008
DeSean Jackson, Matt Ryan, Owen Schmitt & Darren McFadden Cal, Boston College, W. Virginia & Arkansas 2009
Brian Orakpo, Brian Johnson, Mark Sanchez & Michael Crabtree Texas, Utah, USC & Texas Tech 2010
Tim Tebow Florida 2011
Mark Ingram II Alabama 2012
Robert Griffin III & Barry Sanders Baylor & Oklahoma St. 2013
Denard Robinson Michigan 2014
Quinn Ewers, Travis Hunter & Donovan Edwards Texas, Colorado & Michigan 2025



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

SINTEK NAMED WALLACE AWARD SEMIFINALIST

Story Links OVERLAND PARK, Kan.  — South Dakota State’s Carter Sintek was named Wednesday as one of 30 semifinalists for the Brooks Wallace Award, which is presented annually by the College Baseball Foundation to the top shortstop in college baseball. A sophomore from Bennington, Nebraska, Sintek ended the regular season with a […]

Published

on


OVERLAND PARK, Kan.  — South Dakota State’s Carter Sintek was named Wednesday as one of 30 semifinalists for the Brooks Wallace Award, which is presented annually by the College Baseball Foundation to the top shortstop in college baseball.

A sophomore from Bennington, Nebraska, Sintek ended the regular season with a team-best .352 batting average and 22 multi-hit games. His 74 hits and 45 runs scored also led the Jackrabbits, while adding three home runs, 29 runs batted in and 118 defensive assists en route to second-team all-Summit League recognition.

The award is named in honor of former Texas Tech shortstop Brooks Wallace, who played for the Red Raiders from 1977 to 1980. Wallace died of leukemia at the age of 27. The semifinalists were identified based on their combined offensive and defensive performances from this season. Finalists for the Brooks Wallace Player of the Year Award will be announced on June 4, with the 2025 winner to be announced later in the month. Griff O’Ferrall of the University of Virginia was the 2024 Brooks Wallace Player of the Year.

The full list of semifinalists is as follows (Name, School, Hometown, Conference):

  • Alex Alicea, Louisville, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, ACC
  • Wehiwa Aloy, Arkansas, Wailuku, Hawai’i , SEC
  • Aiva Arquette, Oregon State, Kailua, Hawai’i, Independent
  • Dillon Baker, Miami (Ohio), Tampa, Florida, MAC
  • Kolby Branch, Georgia, Lucas, Texas, SEC
  • Benny Casillas, Michigan, Los Ángeles, California, Big Ten
  • Roch Cholowsky, UCLA, Chandler, Arizona, Big Ten
  • Lukas Cook, Purdue, Knoxville, Tennessee, Big Ten
  • Dylan Grego, Ball State, Kansas City, Missouri, MAC
  • Cam Hassert, Loyola Marymount, Longmont, Colorado, West Coast
  • Core Jackson, Utah, Wyoming, Ontario, Big 12
  • Tyriq Kemp, Baylor, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Big 12
  • Matt King, Arizona State, Houston, Texas, Big 12
  • Maddox Latta, Cal State Fullerton, Granada Hills, California, Big West
  • Alex Lodise, Florida State, St. Augustine, Florida, ACC
  • Kyle Lodise, Georgia Tech, Brunswick, Georgia, ACC
  • Isaac Lopez, UTRGV, Edinburg, Texas, Southland
  • Alex Madera, North Carolina, Delran, New Jersey, ACC
  • Lorenzo Meola, Stetson, Green Brook, New Jersey, Atlantic Sun
  • Jake Ogden, Miami, Homestead, Florida, ACC
  • Ray Ortiz, NJIT, Bayonne, New Jersey, America East
  • T.J. Salvaggio, Southeastern Louisiana, Slidell, Louisiana, Southland
  • Blake Schaaf, Georgetown, Oakland, California, BIG EAST
  • Jake Schaffner, North Dakota State, Janesville, Wisconsin, Summit
  • Colby Shelton, Florida, Lexington, South Carolina, SEC
  • Ike Shirey, Tarleton State, Dale, Oklahoma, WAC
  • Brady Short, Central Connecticut, Huley, New York, Northeast
  • Carter Sintek, South Dakota State, Bennington, Nebraska, Summit
  • Drew Wyers, Bryant, Columbus, New Jersey, America East
  • Colin Yeaman, UC Irvine, Saugus, California, Big West

-GoJacks.com-

 
 
 
 
 
 



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Greg McElroy issues challenge to President Donald Trump’s college sports commission

While there’s still little known about President Donald Trump‘s commission on college sports — even co-chair Nick Saban remains in the dark — one of Saban’s former Alabama players has some interesting suggestions on how the still-yet-to-be-determined working group could address what’s currently ailing college football. ESPN analyst Greg McElroy recently addressed the presidentially-mandated commission […]

Published

on


While there’s still little known about President Donald Trump‘s commission on college sports — even co-chair Nick Saban remains in the dark — one of Saban’s former Alabama players has some interesting suggestions on how the still-yet-to-be-determined working group could address what’s currently ailing college football.

ESPN analyst Greg McElroy recently addressed the presidentially-mandated commission and proposed an array of fixes the commission could attempt to address both the NCAA Transfer Portal and NIL, as well as growing concern between the haves and have-nots within the sport. McElroy’s first fix is to reduce the time the transfer portal is open to a single month — May, specifically.

“I think if we were to limit the amount of time the portal was open, that’d calm things down quite a bit. … I think having the portal opened in the month of May is the best thing for the sport,” McElroy said on last week’s episode of his Always College Football podcast. “… But if we were to open it on May 1st and close it on May 31st, it would do a few different things for us. One, it’d keep college football in the news. … Think about how much traction we’d get in May if players were leaving one place and going to another. … Two, … I think if we move the portal window to May, there would be a renewed emphasis for programs across the country to put a higher priority on the high school talent that could join their roster in January, go through Spring, go through Winter workouts, go through Summer, and hopefully be ready to play come Fall. I want to see more focus on high school players getting opportunities as opposed to players on their fourth school in five years.”

McElroy also suggested the single, post-Spring portal window would limit the sheer number of portal entries and, as such, limit coaches from “poaching off other rosters” because by May, most coaches will likely have a better hold on what their roster will look like in the Fall. According to On3’s latest numbers, of the 4,000-plus players that have entered the portal since the end of the 2024 season, only a little more than 2,400 have committed to new homes — with roughly two out of every five transfers still in the portal.

According to McElroy, the later portal window would also limit emotional decisions being made immediately after the season, citing his own career as an example. Had the portal been around when he was at Alabama, McElroy admitted he would have entertained leaving following the late 2006 firing of former coach Mike Shula. Of course, had McElroy done that, he would have missed out on playing under Saban, who was hired away from the Miami Dolphins more than a month later in early January 2007.

“Had I jumped in the portal, would I have been able to play for Nick Saban and lead Alabama to a national championship as their starting quarterback in 2009? Probably not,” McElroy said. “I would have made an emotional decision that I would’ve regretted for the rest of my life. … I think moving the portal from May 1st to May 31st would be an amazing move for college football, and I think this commission could potentially do that.”

Greg McElroy proposes presidential commission address NIL inequities with universial contract language

With the portal problem potentially solved, McElroy turned his attention to NIL, suggesting the commission develop universal contract language in NIL deals that wouldn’t allow schools to take advantage of favorable state laws. If that’s not possible, McElroy is hopeful the commission could help establish buyout language that would let schools recoup money should a player opt to leave before fulfilling the full term of their NIL agreements.

“It doesn’t have to be a massive hurdle for these players to move from school to school, but there’s a little one,” McElroy explained.

Last but not least, McElroy also proposed creating subsidies for less lucrative programs, like those from the Group of Six or even lower levels, many of whom are contemplating whether or not they can still field a football program in the day and age of NIL.

“We need to figure out a way to subsidize those schools,” McElroy said. “And if that means taking just a sliver of the College Football Playoff revenue, then by all means let’s do it.”

Of course, based on the current state of college athletics, where Florida State and North Carolina sued the ACC because they weren’t receiving equitable revenue compared to that of similar Big Ten or SEC teams, it’s unlikely any of the Power Four leagues would agree to such financial giveaways.

Nevertheless, McElroy clearly had some potential game-changing ideas, many of which might even be given serious consideration by the commission. But whether or not the presidential commission has any power to actually implement any of McElroy’s proposals without facing the threat of anti-trust litigation is unclear, especially given the working group is still in its infancy.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Tennessee Football Players Rip Adidas To Shreds Amid Rumors Of Apparel Switch From Nike

© Calvin Mattheis/News Sentinel / USA TODAY NETWORK The Tennessee Volunteers’ apparel contract with Nike is set to end in the summer of next year. Recently, whispers of a move back to Adidas have been circulating social media. Players caught wind of the online rumors, prompting responses from a number of current roster members. The […]

Published

on

Tennessee Football Players Rip Adidas To Shreds Amid Rumors Of Apparel Switch From Nike

A Nike logo on a Tennessee football jersey.

© Calvin Mattheis/News Sentinel / USA TODAY NETWORK

The Tennessee Volunteers’ apparel contract with Nike is set to end in the summer of next year. Recently, whispers of a move back to Adidas have been circulating social media.

Players caught wind of the online rumors, prompting responses from a number of current roster members. The possibility of a switch has been met with overwhelming negativity.

The Knoxville News Sentinel broke down the discussion in a story last week. The Vols are exploring the possibility of a brand change.

The athletic program has been with Nike since 2015. Previously, they’d inked a brand deal with Adidas. Knox News says a return to the apparel partner is on the table.

Nike is scheduled to pay Tennessee $1.2 million in base compensation in 2025-26, with an annual product allotment of $4.5 million… Per the contract, UT and Nike began negotiations for extending the deal in late 2024. But that exclusive negotiating window ended March 30.

UT is now free to explore other options… If Adidas, for example, can offer UT a much higher payout, it would help fund a more talented roster [through NIL]…

UT also could be prioritized and promoted as a premier partner of another brand, and its athletes would benefit from it. That’s a new concept in the NIL era, where schools can facilitate corporate contracts for their athletes.

-Knox News

The argument for Nike is popularity. Seventeen of the preseason Top 25 teams from last year were sponsored by the brand, including SEC rivals Georgia, Alabama, LSU, and Ole Miss. It’s widely considered the top apparel company in the US.

The argument against Nike is an ability to spotlight the program as a new brand’s top client. Tennessee could benefit from team-specific campaigns, potentially benefitting players and the school.

At the moment, Texas A&M, Nebraska, and Miami are among Adidas’s most notable schools in college football. They’re received that individual attention in online ads.

Despite the pros of a switch to Adidas, Tennessee football players aren’t particularly fond of a change. A number of Vols took to social media to rip the idea this week.

Tennessee football players hate Adidas.

Three highly rated Tennessee players blasted a possible apparel deal with Adidas on Instagram. Those teammates were Travis Smith, Kaleb Beasley and Ethan Utley.

A fourth, Daevin Hobbs, also chimed in by posting a message that read, “Keep the check,” alongside a graphic showing athletic director Danny White with the headline, “Just Don’t Do It.”

Players aren’t thrilled with a potential change. It will be interesting to see if White takes those opinions into consideration.

It’s not the first time players and fanbases have expressed frustration with their school’s apparel partnership. SEC brethren South Carolina has been an Under Armour program for the last decade. The current deal, which was signed in 2016, was the conference’s second largest at the time.

Despite the payout, fans called for a switch to Nike with the contract set to expire in 2026. The debate only heated up after former star basketball player A’ja Wilson signed a shoe deal with the company last year.

Notre Dame is another top Under Armour brand. A portion of the fanbase pushed for a move away from the company in 2023, only to see the Irish extend that partnership another 10 years.

Tennessee football players aren’t happy with the idea of an Adidas deal. They’ve made that clear with their recent social media activity. In the end, it may not matter. The university will continue to weigh its options to make the decision it sees best.

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending