NIL
Rules Resulting from House Settlement Finalized and Enforced by College Sports Commission
WASHINGTON DC, October 30, 2025 – In the months since the House v. NCAA (“House”) settlement was approved by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on June 6, 2025, the NCAA Division I Board of Directors has adopted multiple sets of new and revised NCAA bylaws resulting from that agreement.
Among these changes are new NCAA bylaws requiring high school and junior college prospective student-athletes and prospective transfer student-athletes to comply with the rules around disclosure of third-party Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deals, including being prepared to disclose all NIL deals worth $600 or more to the College Sports Commission (CSC) upon enrollment at a Division I institution.
These rules are enforced by the College Sports Commission, and participating institutions and student-athletes are required to comply with all settlement-related rules or face penalties, including eligibility consequences for student-athletes.
A high-level summary of many of the rules can be found below, and more information is available on the College Sports Commission website, the NCAA Division I Manual and in the NCAA’s Legislative Services Database. The CSC has also developed comprehensive resources on NIL rules and reporting requirements specifically for high school and junior college prospective student-athletes and prospective transfer student-athletes. These materials are accessible through the CSC website, the NCAA Eligibility Center, and have been distributed to campuses nationwide.
Third-Party Name, Image and Likeness (NIL) Deals
1. Student-Athletes & Third Parties
a. Noninstitutional NIL activities: A student-athlete may permit the use of the student-athlete’s NIL in noninstitutional NIL activities and receive compensation for such activities subject to Bylaw 21.1.3. [NCAA Bylaw 22.1.2]
b. Associated entities: An entity or individual associated with a student-athlete’s institution (“Associated Entity or Individual”, as defined in the House settlement), shall not enter into an agreement with or provide payment to a prospective student-athlete or student-athlete unless the agreement or payment terms are for a valid business purpose and do not exceed a reasonable range of compensation, as determined by the CSC in connection with the NIL Go platform. [NCAA Bylaws 22.02.1, 22.02.2 and 22.1.3]
c. Defining “Valid Business Purpose” and “Range of Compensation”: NIL payments from an Associated Entity or Individual must serve a valid business purpose related to the promotion or endorsement of goods or services provided to the general public for profit, with compensation at rates and terms commensurate with compensation paid to similarly situated individuals. [NCAA Bylaws 22.1.3 and 22.2.4]
d. Documentation requirements: The CSC may require student-athletes and entities to provide information and documentation to establish compliance with the valid business purpose rule. [NCAA Bylaw 22.1.3.1]
e. Pay-for-play is not a Valid Business Purpose: Raising money to induce student-athletes to attend or participate in intercollegiate athletics at an institution does not satisfy the valid business purpose requirement. [NCAA Bylaw 22.1.3]
f. NIL activation required under Valid Business Purpose: An NIL agreement or payment with an Associated Entity or Individual, must include direct activation of the student-athlete’s NIL rights. In other words, the acquisition of such rights without reasonable specificity of the NIL activation (e.g., description of the specific group licensing categories, the student-athlete’s obligations related to the activation, timing and ultimate use of the student-athlete’s NIL) may not satisfy the requirements for payments by Associated Entities or Individuals. [NCAA Bylaw 22.1.3.3]
g. Nonprofit standards: NIL deals involving a noninstitutional nonprofit or charitable organization may be considered to have a valid business purpose only if the contract or payment terms:
i. Originate with funding from the nonprofit or charitable organization; and
ii. Involve the student-athlete participating in an activity for which the primary purpose is to raise funds to support the organization’s bona fide charitable mission. [NCAA Bylaw 22.1.3.2]
h. Agents permitted: Student-athletes may use agent representation for NIL activities. [NCAA Bylaw 12.02.8]
i. Assistance by professional service providers: A professional service provider (e.g., agent, multimedia rights holder acting as a marketing agent, marketing agency) may assist in facilitating payments for NIL contracts or payment terms to a student-athlete, provided the entity that will use the student-athlete’s NIL is the originating source of the compensation and not the professional service provider. [NCAA Bylaw 22.3.2]
2. Reporting Requirements
a. NIL clearinghouse: Establishes a clearinghouse called NIL Go to evaluate noninstitutional NIL agreements to determine rules compliance. [NCAA Bylaw 22.2.2]
b. NIL reporting: All NCAA Division I student-athletes are required to report all noninstitutional NIL contracts or payment terms, including those involving Associated Entities or Individuals, as defined in the House settlement, with a total value of $600 in the aggregate or more to the designated name, image and likeness clearinghouse (NIL Go) for review. [NCAA Bylaw 22.2.2]
c. Reporting timeline: Student-athletes must submit written documentation of deal terms to NIL Go within five business days of execution or agreement to payment terms. The penalty for failure to report an NIL deal is ineligibility for the student-athlete. [NCAA Bylaw 22.2.2.2]
d. High school prospective student-athletes: Prospective student-athletes enrolling at Division I institutions must report all third-party NIL deals worth $600 or more that were executed, agreed upon, or that include payments made any time after July 1, 2025, or a prospect’s first day of junior year in high school, whichever occurs later. [NCAA Bylaw 22.2.2.5.1]
i. These deals must be reported within 14 days after initial enrollment at a Division I institution or before their first game as a Division I student-athlete—whichever comes first. [NCAA Bylaw 22.2.2.5.3]
e. Junior college prospective student-athletes: Prospective student-athletes enrolling at Division I institutions must report all third-party NIL deals worth $600 or more that were executed, agreed upon, or that include payments made any time after July 1, 2025, or starting from a prospect’s initial enrollment at a two-year college, whichever occurs later. [NCAA Bylaw 22.2.2.5.1]
i. These deals must be reported within 14 days after initial enrollment at a Division I institution, or before their first game as a Division I student-athlete—whichever comes first. [NCAA Bylaw 22.2.2.5.3]
f. Prospective transfer student-athletes: Student-athletes transferring from Division II or Division III to a Division I institution must report all third-party NIL worth $600 or more that were executed, agreed upon, or that include payments made from the date their name is officially entered into the NCAA Transfer Portal. [NCAA Bylaw 22.2.2.5.2]
i. NIL deals involving student-athletes transferring from one Division I institution to another will be evaluated based on the company’s or individual’s association with the student-athlete’s new school from the time their name is officially entered into the NCAA Transfer Portal. [NCAA Bylaw 22.2.2.5.2]
Institutional Revenue Sharing & NIL Agreements
1. Institution revenue sharing and NIL: Institutions may provide additional payments, benefits and expenses to their student-athletes subject to the House settlement-related rules. [NCAA Bylaw 16.13.1]
2. Benefits cap: The amount of revenue share and benefits any institution can provide is capped by the House settlement. The cap amount is 22% of the average total revenue in certain categories as set forth in the House settlement. The value of these additional payments and/or benefits provided by the institution or on the institution’s behalf cannot exceed the cap amount during an academic year. The benefits cap amount for the 2025-26 academic year is $20.5 million. [NCAA Bylaw 16.02.2]
3. Eligibility for institutional benefits: An institution may not enter into an NIL agreement with a student-athlete that extends beyond the student-athlete’s period of eligibility to participate in intercollegiate athletics. [NCAA Bylaw 16.13.1.1]
4. Institutional NIL: Institutions may enter into exclusive/nonexclusive licenses with student-athletes for NIL use. [NCAA Bylaw 22.1.1]
5. Reporting requirements: All additional payments and/or benefits provided by an institution or on an institution’s behalf to a student-athlete shall be specified in writing in signed agreements between the institution and the student-athlete. Such agreements shall be entered and uploaded into CAPS within five business days from final signatures. [NCAA Bylaw 16.13.2]
6. No guaranteed third-party NIL: As of July 1, 2025, schools can not promise or guarantee a student-athlete – either verbally or in writing – a third-party NIL contract or payment. Deals guaranteed before July 1 for the 2025-26 academic year are allowed and count toward the school’s benefits cap, unless the student-athlete receives payments from a third party up to that amount. [NCAA Bylaw 22.1.1.1]
7. Institutions as marketing agents: Institutions may serve as marketing agents for student-athletes in third-party NIL agreements. [NCAA Bylaw 22.1.1]
8. Excess benefits rollover: In addition to any penalties that may be assessed by the CSC, if an institution exceeds the value of an applicable period’s benefits cap, the excess amount shall be counted against the institution’s benefits cap in the immediately following annual period. [NCAA Bylaw 16.13.1.8]
9. Benefits Cap Attestation: Institutions must attest on a yearly basis that all information in CAPS is complete, accurate and compliant with the benefits cap rules and polices, that all countable benefits provided to student-athletes were uploaded into CAPS, and student-athletes were not guaranteed payments or benefits not in a written agreement entered into CAPS. [NCAA Bylaw 16.13.3]
Roster Limits
1. Roster limits: Scholarship limits are eliminated and sport-specific roster limits for institutions providing settlement-related benefits are established. [NCAA Bylaws 17.2 and 16.13.1.5]
2. Roster submission deadlines: Rosters must be submitted by the day before the first contest of the season or December 1, whichever is earlier. [NCAA Bylaw 17.2.1]
3. Roster additions: Institutions may add student-athletes only if roster limits haven’t been reached, with changes required to be reported before the next contest. [NCAA Bylaw 17.2.1.1]
4. Mandatory roster inclusion: With limited exceptions, an institution must include any student-athlete who receives athletically related financial aid or settlement-related payments on a sport’s submitted roster during the academic year in which they receive such payments. [NCAA Bylaw 17.2.2]
5. Designated student-athlete rule: Institutions must have reported “designated student-athletes” who would have been removed due to roster limit implementation by July 6, 2025. Upon being designated, such a student-athlete may continue to participate in practice and competition without counting towards the institution’s roster limit. [NCAA Bylaw 17.02.8 and 17.2.2]
Enforcement
1. College Sports Commission (CSC): The CSC is designated as the enforcement entity responsible for enforcement of NCAA bylaws adopted based on the House settlement, including investigating alleged violations, assessing penalties for violation determinations, and serving as the party seeking enforcement of any penalties contested through neutral arbitration. [NCAA Bylaw 23.02.1]
2. Investigations: Participating institutions agree that the CSC has the authority to investigate an alleged violation of an NCAA bylaw developed as a part of the House settlement. [NCAA Bylaw 23.01.1]
3. Penalties: If the CSC concludes that a violation of settlement-related rules occurred, the CEO of the CSC has sole authority to prescribe penalties for those violations. [NCAA Bylaw 23.2.1]
4. Arbitration: Student-athletes have access to a neutral arbitration process to contest any decision made by the CSC. A neutral arbitrator shall reach a final written decision within 45 days from commencement of the proceedings and the written decision shall be considered final and binding. [NCAA Bylaw 23.3]
a. During the pendency of arbitration, any prescribed penalties are stayed. The presiding arbitrator, if good cause is shown, may lift a stay. [NCAA Bylaw 23.3.1.1]
b. A student-athlete who elects to use the neural arbitration process has the right to be represented by counsel of the student-athlete’s choice. [NCAA Bylaw 23.3.1.2]
About the College Sports Commission
The College Sports Commission (CSC) is an independent body established in 2025 to oversee and enforce compliance with rules governing student-athlete compensation in college sports, including institutional revenue sharing and third-party Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) agreements. Dedicated to the principles of fairness, integrity and opportunity, the College Sports Commission provides structure and accountability to ensure that student-athletes and institutions benefit from a transparent and equitable collegiate athletics system.
Media Contact
collegesportscommission@fgsglobal.com
NIL
Minnesota Football: Kerry Brown and three other Gophers to return for 2026
Safety Kerry Brown, cornerback John Nestor, and offensive linemen Greg Johnson and Nathan Roy all announced their return to Minnesota next season through the NIL collective Dinkytown Athletes on Tuesday. All four were starters this season and represent key returnees for the Gophers next season.
The announcements are part of Cub Foods’ contribution to Dinkytown Athletes.
These types of announcements have become commonplace in college football today, driven by the introduction of NIL and revenue-sharing agreements, as well as the transfer portal.
More announcements are expected in the coming days and weeks, so stay tuned.
NIL
Unexpected college football program among favorites for $2 million transfer QB
Florida quarterback DJ Lagway, a former five-star recruit and two-year starter, is now in the transfer portal after a 2025 season defined by inconsistency and organizational change in Gainesville.
In 2025, Lagway completed 213 of 337 passes (63.2%) for 2,264 yards, 16 touchdowns, and 14 interceptions, while adding 136 rushing yards and a rushing score.
However, the turnovers and a string of uneven performances contributed to a 4–8 season (2-6 SEC) for Florida and intensified scrutiny on the program’s direction.
Florida dismissed fourth-year head coach Billy Napier on October 19 following a 3–4 start and later hired Tulane’s Jon Sumrall to lead the program forward, a change that has prompted several top players to explore fresh starts.
Several Power Five programs have emerged as early fits for Lagway, with Baylor, LSU, and Miami frequently mentioned by national outlets.
Recently, On3’s Pete Nakos singled out Baylor, noting that home-state proximity and family ties to Waco could make the Bears an appealing landing spot.

A five-star dual-threat quarterback from Willis, Texas, Lagway entered college as one of the top prospects in the 2024 class, ranking as 247Sports’ No. 1 quarterback before signing with Florida in December 2022.
Lagway threw for 4,605 yards and 59 touchdowns as a senior, adding 953 rushing yards and 16 scores on the ground to earn Gatorade National Player of the Year honors.
He drew more than 30 offers from several Power Five programs, including Baylor, Alabama, Georgia, LSU, and Clemson, before committing to the Gators.
From a marketplace standpoint, Lagway arrives in January’s portal with considerable commercial value.
On3’s NIL tracker lists Lagway with an estimated valuation near $2.0 million, and the quarterback already has multiple reported brand partnerships, including Hollister, Red Bull, and Mercedes-Benz of Gainesville.
For Baylor, Lagway would offer a marketable, high-upside option who can start right away, with 2025 starter Sawyer Robertson expected to enter the 2026 NFL Draft.
Read More at College Football HQ
- Major college football team reportedly does not have ‘any interest’ in $2.4 million QB
- No. 1 college football team predicted to sign $2.1 million transfer QB
- Major college football program loses 15 players to transfer portal
- College Football Playoff team has ‘significant interest’ in 4,000-yard QB
NIL
$2.4 million transfer QB reportedly down to three college football programs
Bevies of college football players have made the decision to enter the NCAA transfer portal in the 2026 offseason.
In the weeks leading up to the portal’s opening, quarterbacks have dominated the headlines surrounding the entrants in the 2026 offseason. DJ Lagway, Brendan Sorsby, Dylan Raiola and Josh Hoover are among the most recent entries into the portal at quarterback.
The first well-known entry into the portal at quarterback was Sam Leavitt of Arizona State. Leavitt is entering the portal with two seasons of eligibility left.
The next school Leavitt transfers to will be his third in his college football journey. The 6-foot-3, 225-pounder began his collegiate career at Michigan State for his redshirt freshman season in 2023.
He has passed for 4,652 yards, 36 touchdowns and 11 interceptions while rushing for 810 yards and 10 touchdowns in three seasons. He earned Second Team All-Big 12 distinction and Big 12 Offensive Freshman of the Year in 2024.
While the portal has not officially opened, three schools have begun to separate themselves in the race for Sam Leavitt. Below is a look at the three schools that appear to be the final choices for Leavitt in the coming weeks.
LSU

Only two of the four quarterbacks to start for Lane Kiffin at Ole Miss were recruited by the Rebels out of high school. Both Jaxson Dart (USC) and Trinidad Chambliss (Ferris State) arrived in Oxford via the transfer portal.
LSU also has a strong track record with quarterbacks transferring in over the last decade, as both Joe Burrow and Jayden Daniels won Heisman Trophies two years after transferring in. As it relates to Leavitt, Daniels came to Baton Rouge by way of Arizona State in the 2022 offseason.
Oregon
Oregon has established itself as a destination for quarterbacks out of the transfer portal. Anthony Brown (Boston College), Bo Nix (Auburn), Dillon Gabriel (Oklahoma), and Dante Moore (UCLA) have all transferred to the Ducks and have each won 10 or more games in each season.
Adding to Leavitt’s interest in Oregon is its proximity to his hometown. He is from West Linn, Oregon, a suburb located just south of Portland.
Indiana

Indiana is the final school Leavitt is eyeing. The transfer portal has been crucial to Indiana fielding successful quarterbacks under Curt Cignetti.
The Hoosiers grabbed Kurtis Rourke from Ohio in the 2024 offseason and immediately went to a College Football Playoff the following season. California transfer Fernando Mendoza immediately won a Big Ten Championship and a Heisman Trophy and clinched the No. 1 seed in the 2025 College Football Playoff.
NIL
Missouri DE Damon Wilson II countersues Georgia, setting up a potentially major NIL legal battle
A messy player-school NIL dispute just got messier.
Less than a month after Georgia sued Damon Wilson II for transfer damages, Missouri’s star pass rusher filed a countersuit against Georgia, setting up a potentially precedent-setting NIL legal battle between an athlete and school.
“Recent court decisions have changed the landscape of college football and paved the way for NIL payments,” Bogdan Susan, one of Wilson’s attorneys, told PowerMizzou.com. “What has not changed is that college football players still have only four years of competition to realize their potential and try to achieve their dreams of playing in the NFL. A lot of trust is put into the colleges and coaching staffs. Coaches are not limited to four years of competition. The University of Georgia has been playing football for over 133 years. Damon has four years to play and he spent half of that time at Georgia. Decisions to transfer are not always about money. Stopping a young man from pursuing his dreams by forcing him to pay money that he has not received is just wrong.”
Wilson filed a 42-page complaint in Boone County, Mo. on Tuesday morning, an action first reported by The Athletic, alleging a civil conspiracy involving Georgia and its collective for trying to “penalize Wilson for his decision to transfer.” The defendants named in the suit are the University of Georgia Athletic Association, the Classic City Collective and former Classic City CEO’s Matt Hibbs and Taylor Potts.
The suit alleges Georgia didn’t immediately put Wilson’s name in the transfer portal last January and also lied about his buyout, telling multiple unnamed Power 4 programs that they’d owe Georgia $1.2 million if Wilson transferred to their school.
“UGAA’s actions signal that it is stuck in its old ways. The era of universities exerting total control over the career trajectories and rights of their student-athletes has been dead for nearly half a decade. Nonetheless, UGAA has demonstrated that, left to its own devices, it will attempt to exploit every loophole to deprive student-athletes like Wilson of the ability to reap the benefits of full and fair competition for their NIL rights. 23. No longer willing to endure UGAA’s harassment campaign and ready to hold UGAA and CCC accountable for their tortious interference with his business expectations when he entered the portal and chose to transfer, their breach of the Term Sheet’s Confidentiality Agreement, and UGAA’s efforts to tarnish his reputation as he pursues his lifelong dream of playing in the NFL, Wilson brings this action.”
Wilson’s claim hinges largely on the document signed by the player, the Classic City Collective and Hibbs and Potts. The involved parties signed a term sheet. Wilson’s suit claims the term sheet is not binding.
“The Term Sheet stated that it ‘preced[es]’ a ‘full License and Option Agreement,’ and specifically provided: ‘In the event the parties agree to this Term Sheet, then they shall work cooperatively to set forth these terms in a full legal contract including all the standard provisions of NIL licensing agreements.’ The Term Sheet further stated that Wilson ‘should seek legal counsel before finalizing the full License and Option Agreement.'”
The suit claims that Wilson, as part of a group of Georgia players, “without counsel present and with UGAA employees telling him that time was of the essence.” The suit alleges not only that Wilson signed the term sheet under pressure, but that the full binding contract was never presented, much less signed.
“The parties thus never executed a legally binding agreement containing any of the provisions in the Term Sheet,” the suit states.
The suit further claims that UGAA and the Classic City Collective violated the term sheet’s confidentiality agreement “by disclosing one or more of the Term Sheet’s provisions to sympathetic news outlets and affiliates to tarnish Wilson’s reputation.”
This is believed to be the first time a school and an athlete have taken each other to court over an NIL issue. The resolution could depend on whether or not Wilson’s NIL agreement with Georgia’s collective was a binding contract.
The UGAA lawsuit against Wilson recently filed seeks liquidated damages of $390,000. Wilson’s countersuit claims those funds are not liquidated damages, but instead penalties for transferring from Georgia.
“A penalty provision masquerading as a “liquidated damages” provision is unenforceable,” the filing reads. “It makes no effort to reasonably quantify damages that are difficult to ascertain, and it serves only to penalize Wilson for his decision to enter the transfer portal.”
Wilson’s suit also alleges defamation against UGAA, referencing a statement from Chief Marketing Officer Steven Drummond made to ESPN: “When the University of Georgia Athletic Association enters binding agreements with student-athletes, we honor our commitments and expect student-athletes to do the same.”
The suit clams “UGAA’s statement implies that Wilson is dishonest in his business dealings and his profession, impairing his ability to enter into future NIL agreements, and harms his reputation.”
Wilson was one of the top edge defenders in the SEC in 2025, recording 9 sacks, tied for third-most in the SEC, and 49 total pressures, second-most in the SEC. He is currently expected to play for Missouri in the Taxslayer Gator Bowl on Saturday. He has not declared his intent for next season. He has until January 14 to enter his name into the NFL Draft as an underclassman.
This story will be updated as more information becomes available.
Cody Goodwin covers the Missouri Tigers for PowerMizzou and 247Sports. Follow him on Twitter/X at @codygoodwin.
PowerMizzou.com publisher Gabe DeArmond contributed to this report.
NIL
Georgia, Ex-Football Player Suing Each Other in NIL Dispute
NIL
Georgia football: Missouri LB Damon Wilson II sues Bulldogs
Missouri linebacker Damon Wilson II is suing the University of Georgia’s athletic association and its Classic City Collective, which he says is attempting to “punish” him through a “coordinated campaign” for his decision to transfer. Earlier this month, Georgia sought $390,000 in damages citing a clause in Wilson’s NIL contract after his departure to another SEC program.
The lawsuit initiated what appears to be a landmark case in college football, which now includes the plaintiff fighting back with his own legal documents. Highlighting a 42-page complaint filed Dec. 23 in Boone County, Missouri, Wilson’s attorneys claim Georgia tried to sabotage their client’s potential destinations after employees “falsely” told “at least three programs that — if Wilson left Georgia and joined their programs — Wilson would be subject to a $1.2 million buyout.”
The complaint claims Georgia “continued to assert similar demands in an effort to harass Wilson and impair his on-field performance for a conference rival” throughout the 2025 regular season.
Wilson signed a new deal with Georgia’s NIL collective in December 2024 during the College Football Playoff, but entered the transfer portal and moved to Missouri weeks later. While documents show Georgia paid Wilson $30,000 under the terms of the new deal before his departure, the athletic department states Wilson owed a $390,000 lump sum within 30 days of his exit.
The contract was a 14-month agreement worth $500,000, which was set to be paid in monthly $30,000 increments. Georgia would have also paid Wilson two $40,000 retention bonuses at the end of the NCAA transfer portal windows. The exit clause states that Wilson would owe a lump-sum payment worth the total he would have received if he remained with the program through the duration of the contract.
“The era of universities exerting total control over the career trajectories and rights of their student-athletes has been dead for nearly half a decade,” Wilson’s complaint said. “Nonetheless, UGAA has demonstrated that, left to its own devices, it will attempt to exploit every loophole to deprive student-athletes like Wilson of the ability to reap the benefits of full and fair competition for their NIL rights.”
The previous term sheet signed by Wilson, his representation argues, was not a “legally binding document” as Georgia states.
“CCC failed even to present Wilson what it promised in the Term Sheet — a “full License and Option Agreement,” the lawsuit said. “The parties thus never executed a legally binding agreement containing any of the provisions in the Term Sheet.”
Wilson appeared in 26 games at Georgia from during the 2023 and 2024 seasons and projected to be an impact starter prior to his decision to leave the program.
Georgia’s NIL collective’s two now-former CEOs — Matt Hibbs and Tanner Potts — were named in the lawsuit. Wilson seeks a “fair and reasonable amount of damages” for “financial and reputational harm he has suffered” in the aftermath of playing at Missouri this season.
-
Motorsports2 weeks agoSoundGear Named Entitlement Sponsor of Spears CARS Tour Southwest Opener
-
Rec Sports3 weeks agoBlack Bear Revises Recording Policies After Rulebook Language Surfaces via Lever
-
Motorsports2 weeks agoDonny Schatz finds new home for 2026, inks full-time deal with CJB Motorsports – InForum
-
Rec Sports3 weeks agoHow Donald Trump became FIFA’s ‘soccer president’ long before World Cup draw
-
Rec Sports2 weeks agoDavid Blitzer, Harris Blitzer Sports & Entertainment
-
Motorsports2 weeks agoJR Motorsports Confirms Death Of NASCAR Veteran Michael Annett At Age 39
-
Sports2 weeks ago
Elliot and Thuotte Highlight Men’s Indoor Track and Field Season Opener
-
Sports2 weeks ago
West Fargo volleyball coach Kelsey Titus resigns after four seasons – InForum
-
Motorsports2 weeks agoRick Ware Racing switching to Chevrolet for 2026
-
Sports2 weeks agoTemple Begins Indoor Track & Field Season at UPenn This Weekend





