Connect with us
https://yoursportsnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/call-to-1.png

NIL

SCOTUS Injunction Ruling in Trump Case Boosts Class Action Suits

Published

on

SCOTUS Injunction Ruling in Trump Case Boosts Class Action Suits

In a 6-3 decision issued on Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court limited the use of nationwide injunctions going forward—a move that will likely mean more lawsuits and class actions, including in sports and other industries.

Trump v. Casa involves three separate lawsuits brought by parties challenging President Donald Trump’s executive order that purports to end birthright citizenship. The order would prevent federal agencies from recognizing the citizenship of babies born after Feb. 19 if the parents are not legally in the U.S. The plaintiffs, who include individuals, groups and states, argue the order violates the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause, which states, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” The order also allegedly violates the National Act of 1940, which captures the same basic point: people born in the U.S. are eligible for citizenship by birth.

The Supreme Court’s ruling on Friday did not resolve whether the executive order complies with or violates the law. Instead, the Court took aim at district court judges issuing universal injunctions—meaning an injunction that has nationwide reach—that barred the order from going into effect. 

The relevant question is thus whether a district court judge should be able to issue injunctions that reach into other federal districts.

That question has far-reaching implications for the country.  

Recall how in 2022, U.S. District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle of Florida struck down the Biden administration’s national mask mandate on airplanes and mass transit. Mizelle’s jurisdiction is limited to part of Florida, but the ruling had nationwide effect. As a result, airplane passengers, including those with jobs in the sports industry, across the country no longer had to wear masks while flying. 

Or take a more sports-specific example. 

Last year, U.S. District Judge Clifton Corker of Tennessee issued a preliminary injunction barring the NCAA from enforcing any and all rules prohibiting college athletes and recruits from negotiating compensation for NIL with collectives and boosters. The ruling stemmed from an antitrust lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Tennessee and Virginia. Had the ruling lacked nationwide impact, the NCAA might have weighed the benefits and drawbacks of trying to litigate the topic in other federal districts. But that wasn’t an option since the ruling was viewed as national.

The ruling had profound consequences for the NCAA and, more broadly, amateurism in college sports. A week later, NCAA president Charlie Baker announced the NCAA would “pause” NIL investigations. The ruling likely made the NCAA more willing to settle the House litigation, which involved antitrust and NIL issues with overlapping interests in the Tennessee case. 

Attorney Tom Mars, who has represented college athletes and NIL collectives in enforcement and litigation matters, reflected on the Friday’s Supreme Court ruling in relationship to last year’s NIL case in Tennessee and the NCAA’s legal strategy thereafter. “The nationwide scope of the Tennessee injunction,” Mars told Sportico, “is clearly what brought the NCAA to its knees on NIL, which just goes to show that, even in the law, timing can be a game changer.”

Writing for the majority in Trump v. Casa, Justice Amy Coney Barrett held that at least some types of universal injunctions exceed the authority Congress has vested in federal courts. She wrote that district court judges should limit injunctions to address claims raised by the actual party or parties.

“Here,” Barrett wrote, “prohibiting enforcement of the Executive Order against the child of an individual pregnant plaintiff will give that plaintiff complete relief: Her child will not be denied citizenship. Extending the injunction to cover all other similarly situated individuals would not render her relief any more complete.”

Barrett added that in some cases, “complete relief” could mean many parties. To that end, she acknowledged “the complete-relief inquiry is more complicated” when state governments are the parties and need broader relief. Barrett urged further review on that question by lower courts. 

Barrett also explained that injunctions can have far-reaching effects in class actions, which courts must certify under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and where numerous people are represented. She suggested that class actions are a more appropriate vehicle for pursuing expansive relief on behalf of numerous people with the same basic claim. “Why bother” pursuing a class action, Barrett rhetorically asked, “when the quick fix of a universal injunction is on the table?

Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson disagreed. In her dissent, Sotomayor argued the majority’s reasoning fails to protect important rights particularly given the pragmatic hurdles and often high costs involved in pursuing class actions.

“No right is safe in the new legal regime the court creates,” Sotomayor wrote. “Today, the threat is to birthright citizenship. Tomorrow, a different administration may try to seize firearms from law-abiding citizens or prevent people of certain faiths from gathering to worship. The majority holds that, absent cumbersome class-action litigation, courts cannot completely enjoin even such plainly unlawful policies unless doing so is necessary to afford the formal parties complete relief. That holding renders constitutional guarantees meaningful in name only for any individuals who are not parties to a lawsuit. Because I will not be complicit in so grave an attack on our system of law, I dissent.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NIL

Charles Barkley sends strong message after historic college football program’s CFP snub

Published

on


Hall of Famer and ESPN basketball analyst Charles Barkley has an opinion on most everything, and that includes the College Football Playoff committee’s decision to leave 10-2 Notre Dame off of the 12-team bracket.

Barkley and ESPN college basketball analyst Dick Vitale discussed the Fighting Irish’s CFP snub while calling the Indiana-Kentucky game on Saturday night.

“I was disappointed, but you could see it coming in the last couple polls,” Barkley said. “They were creeping up on Miami. And my biggest problem with the whole thing, everybody’s talked about head-to-head. First of all, that was in August.

“They were very close games [against] A&M and at Miami, but your team is not the same in August as it is in December. Notre Dame is playing as well as anybody in the country other than Indiana and probably Ohio State. And I don’t want to leave out the [Georgia] Bulldogs. Kirby Smart, that man can really coach.”

Notre Dame Fighting Irish running back Aneyas Williams

Notre Dame Fighting Irish running back Aneyas Williams (22) celebrates with Notre Dame Fighting Irish tight end Ty Washington (7) | Stan Szeto-Imagn Images

Notre Dame’s exclusion from the bracket after winning its final 10 games all by double-digit margins and being ranked ahead of Miami (10-2) in every CFP poll until the final one, even though neither the Irish nor Hurricanes played in that final week before the bracket was set, will go down as one of the biggest playoff controversies.

Ultimately, it came down to Miami’s 27-24 home win over Notre Dame in Week 1, a field goal with 1:04 remaining.

Miami supporters clamored and complained all along that the Hurricanes should have been ranked ahead of the Irish, given the same record, well before the final bracket was set. But the teams’ seasons went very different directions after that Week 1 meeting.

Notre Dame lost its first two games by a combined four points, including a 41-40 Week 2 loss to Texas A&M (another CFP team), before reeling off those 10 straight wins, most in dominant fashion.

Miami lost twice in a three-game span to unranked Louisville and SMU before regrouping and finishing strong.

The first CFP rankings came out after that second loss, with Miami landing at No. 18 and Notre Dame at No. 10. Because the teams weren’t close in their overall ranking, the head-to-head result didn’t factor in at the time, and that remained the CFP committee’s explanation even as the teams moved closer and closer in the rankings.

Ultimately, they were two spots apart at No. 10/12, separated by BYU, entering last weekend, when the Cougars got blown out by Texas Tech, essentially forcing the committee to consider Notre Dame and Miami side by side. Others have suggested that both teams deserved to be in over 10-3 Alabama, which lost 28-7 to Georgia in the SEC championship game.

Notre Dame has not taken the snub well and declined to participate in a bowl game as a result.

No. 10-seed Miami will play at No. 7 Texas A&M in the first round of the playoffs on Dec. 20.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

President Donald Trump calls NIL a ‘disaster’ for college athletics, Olympics

Published

on


President Trump this weekend noted the “current state of NIL is simply not sustainable and could cause serious damage to college athletics, and even the Olympics.” Trump during an event hosting members of the 1980 Miracle on Ice team said, “I think that it’s a disaster for college sports. I think it’s a disaster for the Olympics.” Trump: “The colleges are cutting a lot of their — they would call them sort of the ‘lesser’ sports, and they’re losing them like at numbers nobody can believe. They were really training grounds, beautiful training grounds, hard-working, wonderful young people.” Trump added, “A lot of these sports that were training so well would win gold medals because of it. Those sports don’t exist, because they’re putting all their money into football.” Trump: “Colleges cannot afford to be paying the kind of salaries that you’re hearing about” (OUTKICK, 12/13). Trump said of overhauling NIL in college sports, “Something ought to be done, and I’m willing to put the federal government behind it. And if it’s not done fast, you’re going to wipe out colleges” (USA TODAY, 12/12).



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

ESPN FPI has 2 teams tied as College Football Playoff favorites

Published

on


If you can’t pick one favorite, maybe it’s wise to pick two. That certainly seems to be the logical play with ESPN, as their FPI rankings give two teams an even chance to win the national title– even beyond the tenth of a percent. FPI is a slightly controversial prediction index that ties past performance into a mathematical attempt to predict future results.

Throughout the 2025 season, ESPN not only ranked the teams, but forecast their chance to win their respectives leagues, to earn a CFP berth, and even to win the CFP title. But heading into the opening week of CFP play, two teams are in exactly the same shape on top of ESPN’s ranking of most likely teams to win the national title.

FPI’s title favorites

Both Ohio State and Indiana are given a 25.9% chance to win the CFP title. Interestingly, Ohio State is slightly more likely to reach the title game, in ESPN’s reckoning (a 45% chance for the Buckeyes against a 43.1% chance for Indiana). The two are massive co-favorites, as ESPN’s third team in terms of title likelihood is Georgia, with an 11.6% shot at winning the title.

The Remainder of the CFP field

The only other teams with a better than 10% chance at the championship are Texas Tech and Oregon. The Red Raiders are rated at a 10.9% chance to win the title. The Ducks are rated with a 10.3% chance to grab the title.

No team outside of those five has a greater than 4.8% chance at winning the title– with that particular figure being linked to Ole Miss’s title chances. ESPN’s computers certainly don’t think well of the two Group of Five teams, as ESPN gives both Tulane and James Madison a 0.1% chance at winning the CFP crown. James Madison is rated with an 0.5% chance of reaching the title game, while Tulane’s chance is 0.4%.

Confusion reigns about FPI’s ratings

The math-related details behind the CFP can be complicated. 6-6 Penn State is still FPI’s No. 17 team in the nation, while 5-7 Auburn is No. 26. FPI also greatly appreciated Notre Dame, ranking the Irish third nationally. That’s comfortably ahead of the Miami and Alabama teams that grabbed the last CFP spots instead of the Irish (Miami ranks seventh and Notre Dame eighth at all. But when it comes to title chances, the FPI is all in on two teams in an exactly equal measure.

Indiana/OSU

Indiana and Ohio State are favored in exactly equal measures by ESPN’s FPI ratings. | Rich Janzaruk/Herald-Times / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Charles Barkley on NIL, transfer portal: ‘You should not have the ability to get a better offer every year’

Published

on


NBA legend Charles Barkley has not been shy about his thoughts on NIL and the transfer portal. During Saturday’s Kentucky vs. Indiana broadcast, he candidly discussed the landscape again.

Barkley called the game on ESPN alongside Dick Vitale, the first of two games they will work together. Vitale called for “stability” in college basketball – and college sports as a whole – because of the amount of player movement via the portal. He used Indiana as an example since new coach Darian DeVries virtually built the program from scratch.

SUBSCRIBE to the On3 NIL and Sports Business Newsletter

While Barkley acknowledged he’s in favor of athletes making money through NIL, he also called out players staying more than their four years of eligibility. In addition, he disagreed with the idea of athletes being allowed to seek better offers after every season.

“No. 1, I’m not opposed to players getting paid,” Barkley said on the broadcast. “I always want my players to get treated fairly. But I can’t remember the last time I heard the word, COVID. Some of these guys have been in college for six or seven years. If you’re in college for six or seven years, your name better be, ‘Dr. Somebody.’ You should not still be playing college basketball after six or seven years.

“But you should not have the ability to get a better offer every year. That’s not fair to any school that you are affiliated with because I can’t even do that. None of us can do that, take a better – Amazon, anybody or FOX Sports can come and say, ‘Well, we’ll give you more money and you can leave after every year.’ That’s not fair. … We’ve got to put some guardrails on these sports.”

One of the other new parts of the college basketball landscape is G-League players seeking eligibility. The NCAA has changed its approach regarding players who played in the G-League, arguing they were not professional athletes in a way the old rule said. Instead, if those players are within five years of their high school graduation, they could become eligible unless they went through the NBA Draft process or signed an NBA contract.

To Charles Barkley, that’s another area that needs fixing. He does not think former G-League players should be able to play college basketball.

“We’ve got guys playing in the G-League coming back to college sports now,” he said. “I don’t think that’s fair.”



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

$29 million college football coach surges as favorite to replace Sherrone Moore at Michigan

Published

on


Michigan began the week coming off a 9–3 regular season, with a Citrus Bowl matchup against No. 13 Texas on December 31 looming.

Instead, an internal investigation and a subsequent arrest that led to criminal charges left the Wolverines without head coach Sherrone Moore, forcing the athletic department into a high-stakes national search for his successor.

Moore, hired Jan. 26, 2024, and elevated from Michigan’s staff, completed two seasons as Michigan’s head coach with a record of 18-8.

Several names have circulated in the wake of Moore’s dismissal, but few have drawn more immediate attention than Arizona State head coach Kenny Dillingham, who, according to Kalshi, emerged as the market favorite with a 58% implied probability to land the Michigan job. 

This puts him well ahead of Alabama’s Kalen DeBoer (19%), Washington’s Jedd Fisch (13%), and Los Angeles Chargers defensive coordinator Jesse Minter (3%).

Dillingham’s Sun Devils rose from a 3-9 debut season to an 11-3, Big 12-championship campaign in 2024, then followed it with another solid 8-4 finish in 2025 despite losing former four-star quarterback Sam Leavitt midway through the year.

At just 34, the Arizona State alumnus has already rebuilt his alma mater into a conference champion and College Football Playoff participant, helping explain why his name has emerged as a focal point in both media coverage and prediction markets.

After that breakout 2024 season, Arizona State extended Dillingham through 2029, raising his 2025 base salary to $5.8 million as part of a $29 million agreement.

Arizona State Sun Devils head coach Kenny Dillingham.

Tempe, Arizona, USA; Arizona State Sun Devils head coach Kenny Dillingham reacts against the Arizona Wildcats in the second half during the 99th Territorial Cup at Mountain America Stadium. | Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images

NCAA transfer portal rule changes moved the primary window to Jan. 2-16 and limited the special window after coaching changes to 15 days, beginning five days after a new hire is announced, giving Michigan a clear incentive to move quickly to retain players and recruits.

That timetable, combined with the expectation to uphold the championship standard Moore inherited, has accelerated Michigan’s process, with a decision expected within the coming weeks.

Read More at College Football HQ

  • $1.3 million college football coach reportedly accepts head coaching job

  • First-team All-Conference WR enters college football transfer portal

  • College football program loses 11 players to transfer portal

  • $2.5 college football coach reportedly accepts new head coaching job after winning season





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

With Florida’s top assistant gone to Texas, one portal domino hangs in the air

Published

on


If there had been one assistant coach most Gator fans would have liked to stick around on Jon Sumrall’s new staff, it would have been running back coach Jabbar Juluke. During his time with the Gators, the running back room was deep and felt like one of the biggest strengths of the team. It didn’t seem to matter who Juluke trotted out there; all of Florida’s running backs seemed ready and capable of rushing for 100 yards at a moment’s notice. 

But alas, Juluke didn’t stick around on Florida’s new staff, and it is his new home he just got hired at that also opens up question marks about whether Florida’s best player is going to follow him to that new home.

Jabbar Juluke hired at Texas

Texas has hired Juluke to be its running backs coach and as its associate head coach for the 2026 season. Juluke had been a target to land at Kentucky before opting for Texas.

Given how Sumrall has been assembling his staff, Gator fans should feel confident that someone notable is going to come in and fill his shoes. But given that the modern era is what it is, the immediate fear among Gator fans is whether or not running back Jadan Baugh is going to follow Juluke to Austin.

Sumrall made sure to highlight Baugh during his introductory press conference, and for good reason. After Baugh’s monster game against FSU, he ended the 2025 season as the first Florida running back since 2015 to eclipse 1,000 yards in a season. He also became the first Florida running back since Emmitt Smith to eclipse 1,000 yards in under 200 carries as an underclassman. Baugh’s 266 yards against FSU were also the 2nd most in a single game in Florida history, only behind Smith’s 316-yard performance in 1989 against New Mexico.

There is no official indication of which way Baugh might be leaning or if going to Texas has even crossed his mind. But this is the modern era of college football, where NIL and the transfer portal mean nothing can be taken for granted. 

And so, until we get an update on Baugh’s plans, Gator fans will be taking notice of their former running backs coach’s new home.



Link

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending