Connect with us
https://yoursportsnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/call-to-1.png

NIL

The 10 Highest Paid Quarterbacks In College Football

Published

on


Darian Mensah Duke NIL $4 Million

Getty Image / iStockphoto

Carbonatix Pre-Player Loader

Audio By Carbonatix

In the NIL Era of college football, you’d better be willing to spend big if you’re a program looking to have a star quarterback calling the shots.

But just how much does it cost to acquire and keep one of those big-time QBs these days? Pete Nakos of On3 Sports has been ahead of the curve throughout the offseason, tracking down the answer to that question.

The result is a list of the highest-paid signal callers in college football, highlighted by some of the sport’s biggest stars, as well as some names you may not have expected.

10 Highest-Paid Quarterbacks In College Football

By now, everyone has heard about the massive NIL deal the Michigan Wolverines handed five-star freshman quarterback Bryce Underwood, backed by billionaire Larry Ellison

But Underwood doesn’t top the list of highest-paid signal callers. In fact, this average annual value falls right in line with some of the other top quarterbacks in the country.

In this list, we take a look at Underwood as well as nine other field generals who make up the 10 highest-paid QBs in the nation.

10) Josh Hoover – TCU

Josh Hoover, TCU

© Tim Heitman-Imagn Images

The first quarterback on our list is perhaps the least well-known. But don’t sleep on TCU redshirt junior Josh Hoover.

According to Nakos, Hoover is in line to make $1.75 million this year after the Horned Frogs fended off inquiries from Tennessee to get Hoover into the transfer portal.

That’s money well-earned, too. Last season, Hoover completed 66.5 percent of his passes for 3,949 yards, 27 touchdowns, and 11 interceptions. If Hoover can cut down on the turnovers in his third year as a starter for head coach Sonny Dykes, the Horned Frogs could well be a contender to win the Big 12 and make the College Football Playoff.

9) LaNorris Sellers – South Carolina

South Carolina QB LaNorris Sellers runs with the ball

© Jeff Blake-Imagn Images

South Carolina quarterback LaNorris Sellers is everything that NFL scouts dream of. He’s big, strong, athletic, and intelligent. Which is exactly why Sellers is set to make around $1.8 million this year in hopes of leading the Gamecocks to the College Football Playoff.

Sellers was inconsistent as a redshirt freshman in 2024, but his good was very good. The Florence, South Carolina native threw for 2,534 yards, 18 touchdowns, and just seven interceptions while adding a further 674 yards and seven scores on the ground.

There’s a feeling around some in the college football world that he may not have even scratched the surface of his potential. If that’s true, Sellers could well more than repay the sizable payday he’s getting from the Gamecocks and their boosters.

8) Avery Johnson – Kansas State

Avery Johnson Kansas State

© Mark J. Rebilas/Imagn

Much like Sellers, Avery Johnson is an elite athlete who is still learning to use all of his tools. He came into Kansas State as a highly touted recruit and immediately saw the field as a true freshman.

Last year, Johnson took the starting job after Will Howard left Manhattan for Ohio State. He proceeded to throw for 2,712 yards, 25 touchdowns, and 10 interceptions with a further 605 yards and seven touchdowns on the ground.

There’s an expectation that he could be due for a big breakout in 2025, which is why the Wildcats are reportedly paying the star quarterback north of $2 million.

7) Diego Pavia – Vanderbilt

Vanderbilt Commodores quarterback Diego Pavia

© Vasha Hunt/Imagn

Diego Pavia became the breakout star of the college football world a year ago when he led the Vanderbilt Commodores to their first win over Alabama in four decades.

Now, after winning a court battle with the NCAA, Pavia returns for what is, presumably, his final year of college football.

Like Johnson, the former JuCo product is set to make just north of $2 million this year, and the Commodores are hoping he can build upon a strong 2024 season, where he threw for 2,293 yards, 20 touchdowns, and four interceptions in addition to 801 rushing yards and eight scores.

6) John Mateer – Oklahoma

John Mateer, Oklahoma Sooners

© DOUG HOKE/THE OKLAHOMAN / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

According to Nakos, the Oklahoma Sooners are set to pay Mateer anywhere from $2.5 million to $3 million in 2025 after prying him away from Washington State.

Mateer, like offensive coordinator Ben Arbuckle, comes over from Pullman after lighting it up for 3,139 yards, 29 touchdowns, and seven interceptions a year ago.

The Texas native is now tasked with saving a Sooner program that has floundered a bit since Lincoln Riley left for USC. If he can have a big year, it may just keep head coach Brent Venables in a job and keep Oklahoma among the elites in college football.

5) Drew Allar – Penn State

Drew Allar, Penn State

© Sam Navarro-Imagn Images

The lasting memory of Drew Allar for many fans nationally is the late interception he threw in a College Football Playoff semifinal loss to Notre Dame. But in two seasons at the helm for Penn State, Allar has thrown for 5,958 yards, 49 touchdowns, and just 10 interceptions.

Had he entered the NFL Draft earlier this year, there’s a good chance the former five-star would’ve been selected in the top 10.

Instead, he returned to the Nittany Lions and received at least a $3 million payday to do so. Allar and Penn State, who welcomed three transfer wide receivers to the fold in the offseason in hopes of fixing a previously broken position group, begin the season ranked No. 2 in the AP Poll and with serious national title aspirations.

4) Dylan Raiola – Nebraska

Dylan Raiola Patrick Mahomes Haircut Cosplay Identical Look

© Vincent Carchietta-Imagn Images

By now, every college football fan knows the name Dylan Raiola. The former five-star recruit was committed to Ohio State, then Georgia, before eventually signing with the Nebraska Cornhuskers on a deal that will see him make north of $3 million this season.

Raiola flashed at times as a true freshman starter for the Huskers. He threw for 2,819 yards, 13 touchdowns and 11 interceptions. But head coach Matt Rhule and the Nebraska faithful will be hoping for much more from him in year two, especially when he’s paid like one of the best quarterbacks in the nation.

Maybe the fact that Raiola stopped trying to look like Patrick Mahomes in the offseason will help him play more like Mahomes on the field.

3) Carson Beck – Miami

Carson Beck, Miami Hurricanes

© Dale Zanine-Imagn Images

This time last year, Carson Beck was the starting quarterback for the Georgia Bulldogs, a Heisman Trophy favorite, and the leader of a team that many felt would win the national championship.

Instead, Beck and the Bulldogs struggled, capped by the quarterback tearing the UCL in his throwing arm in the SEC Championship Game. Gunnar Stockton then took over, and one month later, Beck was in the transfer portal.

The Miami Hurricanes then stepped in and over Beck a deal worth in the range of $3-3.2 million in 2025, with incentives that could reportedly take that number far higher. Will Beck live up to that investment? Only time will tell.

2) Bryce Underwood – Michigan

Michigan quarterback Bryce Underwood

© Junfu Han/Imagn

The aforementioned prince who was promised, Bryce Underwood, is set to earn upwards of $3 million this season as part of a four-year deal he signed with the Michigan Wolverines.

The five-star recruit and Michigan native is currently locked in a battle with Fresno State transfer Mikey Keene to determine the Wolverines’ week one starter.

Underwood is as highly touted as they come at the quarterback position despite being extremely young for his class. If he comes anywhere close to living up to expectations in Ann Arbor, it will be money well spent.

1) Darian Mensah – Duke

Darian Mensah, Duke Blue Devils

© Matthew Hinton-Imagn Images

Of course, as everybody expected, the highest-paid quarterback in college football in 2025 goes to…Duke?

That’s right. Mensah joins the Blue Devils and head coach Manny Diaz after a breakout redshirt freshman campaign for Tulane. The California native threw for 2,723 yards, 22 touchdowns, and six interceptions for a Green Wave team that spent most of the season on the fringes of the Top 25.

Mensah then signed one of the highest-paying NIL deals in the sport, which will pay him a minimum of $4 million over the next two seasons and up to $5 million per year with incentives.

By comparison, Oregon State is set to pay Maalik Murphy, whom Mensah is replacing, $1.5 million to be their starting quarterback in 2025. Murphy threw for 2,933 yards, 26 touchdowns, and 12 interceptions for the Blue Devils last season.





Link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NIL

Texas Tech Lands Cincinnati Transfer QB Brendan Sorsby in Portal

Published

on


Texas Tech is quickly re-tooling as it looks to makes another College Football Playoff run in 2026. After falling in the quarterfinals too Oregon, the Red Raiders have already locked down a big win in the transfer portal, receiving a commitment from arguably the best available quarterback in the nation.

According to multiple reports, Texas Tech is expected to land Cincinnati transfer quarterback Brendan Sorsby in the portal. Sorsby was reportedly mulling between LSU and Texas Tech, and in the end it seems he was lured to Lubbock, opting to join Joey McGuire over the new-look, Lane Kiffin-led Tigers.

Related: Transfer Portal Tracker: Where Top Players in College Football Are Heading This Winter

Sorsby has been the Bearcats’ starting quarterback for the last two seasons. In 2025, he threw for 27 touchdowns and five interceptions while completing 61.6% of his passes for 2,800 yards. He also rushed for 580 yards and nine touchdowns this year.

Prior to his two-year stint at Cincinnati, Sorsby was at Indiana, where he started as a redshirt freshman in 2023. That year, he had 1,587 yards, 15 touchdowns and five interceptions.

With Behren Morton set to graduate, the Red Raiders had an immediate need at quarterback as they look to make a push for a national championship, thanks to a bevy of NIL funding. Morton’s departure opened the door for Sorsby to join one of college football’s most complete teams. With Sorsby under center, Texas Tech will likely be favorites to win the Big 12 again next season.

More College Football on Sports Illustrated



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

NIL Changed The Transfer Portal — Now Taxes May Decide Where Stars Go

Published

on


The college football transfer portal is in its winter 15-day window, and over 3,700 players – roughly one third of all college football players – have indicated that they might be on the move. While players will consider many aspects when deciding on their new team, expect taxes to be one of those considerations. This article discusses the tax treatment for NIL and how state income tax law is already becoming a factor.

NIL Tax Treatment

Section 61 of the Internal Revenue Code states that “gross income means all income from whatever source derived.” This income definition stretches all the way from baristas making coffee at their shop to small business owners producing goods and services to corporate executives making millions of dollars each year in salaries, bonuses, and equity compensation.

Section 61 also applies to college athletes earning income from their NIL. This income can span anywhere from actual cash payments received for NIL, all the way to payment in kind. For instance, an athlete who receives a free car lease will recognize the value of that car lease as income, even though no money was exchanged.

While all athletes will be required to pay taxes at the Federal level with a tax rate of up to 37%, athletes will face varying tax effects at the state level. Nine states in total – Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington, Wyoming – do not impose a tax on income. Furthermore, as I discuss in a Forbes contributor article, Arkansas taxes income but provides a statutory exemption from state income taxation on NIL earnings, a policy designed to attract athletes to its state.

ForbesArkansas Makes NIL Income Tax-Exempt. Will Other States Follow?

Importantly, NIL income is generally taxed based on where the income was earned, rather than where the player plays their games or practices. This notion differs from pro sports athletes, who are subject to the jock tax, which taxes the athletes based on the location of their duty days. While some college athletes will be subject to tax in varying jurisdictions because of their home domicile or where specific income was earned (i.e., a player who shoots a commercial in a different state), the vast majority of college athletes will primarily pay state income taxes in their school state jurisdiction.

College athletes face differing tax consequences if they were to play for a team in a low or no-tax jurisdiction versus a high-tax jurisdiction. As I detail in a Forbes contributor article, two highly touted players from the 2025 football season – Carson Beck of Miami and Jeremiah Smith of Ohio State – had an NIL valuation of $4.3 million and $4.2 million, respectively. Despite being only $100 thousand difference in compensation, Beck, the higher compensated player, actually pays less in taxes than Smith because Beck is not subject to state income taxes in Florida. Meanwhile, Smith must pay an estimated $145,534 in state income taxes for his NIL income.

ForbesBreaking Down The Top 20 College Football Stars’ 2025 NIL Tax Bills

Because of these nuances in the way states tax income, now that players can be compensated for their NIL, there are clear advantages to players choosing to play for a school in a low or no-income tax state versus a high-income tax state. This tax liability is even more impactful for players like Arch Manning, who, as I discuss in a Forbes contributor article, is the highest compensated college athlete as estimated by On3 NIL valuation and has tremendous tax benefits for playing for the University of Texas, since they are making millions of dollars. Thus, a few percentage points of their income going to pay for state income taxes can represent hundreds of thousands of dollars of tax liabilities.

ForbesArch Manning’s $6.5 Million NIL Valuation Includes A Big Tax Advantage

Taxes Are Already Impacting The Transfer Portal Via NIL

As reported by Yahoo!Sports, over 3,700 college football players are in the transfer portal. Given that there are only about 10,000 college football players, this movement means that approximately one in three players will continue their college football careers for a different team.

Taxes are unlikely to be the primary reason why a player chooses a specific school. Furthermore, there are not enough roster spots on teams in the ten states that do not tax income for every single college football player to transfer to a team in a no-state income tax jurisdiction. Lastly, if donors in a high-state income tax jurisdiction want better players, they could simply donate more to compensate the players for having additional tax costs.

However, several key decisions have already unfolded that suggest that taxes could already be playing a role. For instance, the number one player in the transfer portal, according to ESPN, Brendan Sorsby, has chosen to take his talents to Texas Tech University, which is located in a state that does not tax income. Quarterback Josh Hoover and wide receiver Nick Marsh are transferring to Indiana University. While Indiana taxes income at the state level, the top rate is only 3%, which is among the lowest among states that tax income. Similarly, Rocco Becht, a quarterback who previously played for Iowa State, will now be playing for Penn State. Like Indiana, Pennsylvania imposes a very low state income tax rate of 3.07%.

These three examples are illustrative and do not necessarily imply that taxes were the reason why they chose those locations. Furthermore, other top players are transferring to states that are not low or no-income-tax-rate jurisdictions, such as Oklahoma State University. What is seemingly absent from this list are players who are choosing to go to high-tax rate jurisdictions like California, New York, or New Jersey.


As this record-breaking transfer portal continues to unfold, the era of NIL appears to have made its mark. Assuming taxes continue to be a significant factor in determining players’ locational decisions, we can expect to see many of the top NIL earners flock to these low or no-income tax rate jurisdictions. On the flip side, players who are still quality players but not earning the same amount of NIL income might end up at schools that were not previously available to them. Regardless of the outcome, the NIL-era appears to have dramatically reshaped college football, and it is unfolding right in front of us during this January transfer portal window.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

What can we learn from 2025 Indiana football?

Published

on


Good morning, and thanks for spending part of your day with Extra Points. I hope you all had a wonderful and restful winter holiday season!

We’ve got several announcements of our own to make over the next few weeks, but there’s one I’d like to quickly mention now. We will be at this year’s NCAA convention! Both I and my colleague at NIL Wire, Kyle Rowland, will be in D.C. from Jan. 13-15. I’ve already made a few commitments to speak to graduate classes while I’m there, but if you’ll be in town and would like to catch up, drop me an email! We’ll see you there!

There will be plenty of time to talk about bylaw changes, collective bargaining, revenue generation and a whole bunch of administrative stuff. But today, I’d like to quickly talk about the Indiana Hoosiers.

Made in Chicago: Custom, Licensed Luggage Tags for Your Student Athletes

Elevate your team’s travel gear with a partner you can trust. Desert Cactus is an officially licensed licensee for over 625 colleges and universities, meaning we already know your brand standards. We produce high-quality, durable acrylic luggage tags right here in the Chicagoland area.

Perfect for student-athlete backpacks and travel bags, our tags are fully customizable with athlete names, jersey numbers, and specific sport designations. Get the professional look your program deserves from a proven industry partner.

For more information on bulk-order discounts, please contact Brad Schweitzer.

Because this isn’t supposed to be happening.

A theory from my pal Bud Elliott over at CBS could almost completely predict success in the four-team playoff era. It’s called the Blue Chip Theory, and it states that teams that win championships must have signed more four- and five-star recruits out of high school than three-star guys.

Almost every team to even make the four-team playoff field over the past decade recruited at that level, and every champion did.

And in the first year of the expanded College Football Playoff, the theory mostly held up. Ohio State (an elite recruiting program) defeated Notre Dame (another elite recruiting program), and late-round playoff spots went to teams like Oregon, Texas, Penn State and Georgia. A few teams that didn’t recruit at that level — like Indiana, SMU and Boise State — made the field, but they didn’t make it far.

But this year? The bracket looks different.

Before the season, CBS identified the 18 teams that recruited at an elite enough clip to have a Blue Chip Ratio over 50 percent. Those teams? Alabama, Ohio State, Georgia, Texas A&M, Oregon, Texas, LSU, Notre Dame, Oklahoma, Penn State, Miami, Florida, Auburn, Michigan, USC, Clemson, Tennessee and Florida State. Just short of that bar were South Carolina and Ole Miss.

At the time (July of 2025), here’s what Bud said about a team potentially beating that model:

Will someone eventually bust the model?

At some point … probably?. A team with a high-40s BCR, a transcendent quarterback and a lot of health luck will probably win it all. It almost happened with Oregon and Marcus Mariota in 2014. 

But who might it be this season? Ole Miss? South Carolina? Louisville? Utah? See, this is getting a little silly. The top 13 teams in the Vegas odds to win the national title are all BCR members.

Now, there were a lot of elite teams on that BCR list. Seven of them made the playoff, and two, Oregon and Miami, are in the quarterfinals. Ole Miss is just outside that range.

But Indiana is nowhere close. The Hoosiers signed just one blue-chip high school player in 2025, and just one more in 2024, well behind programs like Purdue, Minnesota and Rutgers. In terms of team talent composite, which adds up the recruiting ranking of everybody on the roster (including transfers), Indiana has just seven blue-chip players. Its roster rating is 72, behind teams including Boston College, Tulane, UTSA, Oregon State and Purdue.

Teams with those sorts of rosters, historically, battle for spots in the Little Caesar’s Bowl, not the College Football Playoff.

And Indiana didn’t just sneak into its spot in the Peach Bowl. It flat-out kicked the shit out of Alabama in the Rose Bowl after earning the top seed in the field. The Hoosiers are undefeated, with wins over Oregon and Ohio State.

So how is this possible? I freely admit I am not enough of a Certified Ball Knower to offer a completely conclusive answer, and I don’t think we have quite enough data to totally throw out the Blue Chip Ratio as a predictive tool. But I do have a few theories.

Indiana is old.

The Hoosiers have just one underclassman in their starting offensive 11 (a redshirt freshman) and two sophomores on defense. Many of the team’s most important players are redshirt juniors and seniors … dudes who have been in college weight programs and training systems for four or five years.

That last point is significant. I don’t think having a bunch of dudes who are 21, 22, 23, etc. on the roster matters as much as it does to have a team whose players have played a lot of college football. BYU never enjoyed much of bonus for having one of the oldest rosters in the country over the 2000s, because spending two years dodging Malaria in northern Brazil as a missionary doesn’t actually make you a better football player. But spending two years in the weight room, in the film room and on the training table can.

The concept of getting a roster “old” has been a college basketball buzzword for several years. If you’re a mid-major, the thinking went that it would be better to have five guys who aren’t as athletically gifted but are smart, disciplined and experienced than to have five guys who can jump out of the gym but have only been actually coached for, like, two months. When major upsets happened in March, the Cinderella often followed that profile: a scrappy team full of seniors.

Historically, that’s been more difficult to assemble in college football. But there may be some real truth to it. I wrote last year that the engine of Ohio State’s 2024 national title wasn’t so much transfers or elite underclassmen (although those both helped) as it was spending NIL money to bring back a lot of experienced players. It’s why Penn State was such a trendy national title pick this year too.

Indiana’s coaching staff really is just that much better than everybody else.

College football coaches have come out of nowhere to quickly bring lousy teams into contention. Bill Snyder at Kansas State, LaVell Edwards at BYU, Barry Alvarez at Wisconsin and Randy Walker at Northwestern have all done variations of this before …but what Curt Cignetti has done at Indiana is arguably the most impressive turnaround job in college football history.

How is he pulling this off? Well, for one, he’s been doing it a while. Cignetti isn’t a hotshot offensive wizard who looks like he’s barely old enough to buy a beer. He’s 64 years old. He’s coached QBs at NC State (including some dude named Phillip Rivers) and wideouts at Alabama under Nick Saban. Then, he’s won everywhere he’s been a head coach, from Division II IUP to Elon to James Madison.

To the extent there’s a Cignetti blueprint? It appears to be based on a relentless focus on the fundamentals, dramatically improving existing players and being elite at scouting and identifying potential. Via the Athletic:

Cignetti chose experienced, productive transfers to join his James Madison players, and many adopted Cignetti’s mindset. Of the Hoosiers’ 34 core players on offense and defense, 23 are former transfers. The holdovers, long tired of Indiana’s losing history, happily bought in.

“There’s a certain kind of guy that I just won’t take,” Cignetti said. “A guy’s gotta love ball and have some ankle, knee, hip flexibility, and a certain level of athleticism. And then habits are important. How bad does he want it? … You’ve got a role in helping him develop. He’s got to be coachable, too.”

On the field, my read of what has made Indiana so dang good is that the players just don’t make mistakes. The Hoosiers are top in FBS in turnover margin, top in third down conversion percentage, third in penalty yards and seventh in yards per play. If you have experienced guys who are capable of making good decisions again and again and again … you’re going to always be in a position to win.

Or, as my pal Richard Johnson described it over at CBS:

Indiana’s success is boring by design and, like all teams, a reflection of its head coach. It’s deliberate. It’s competent. The Hoosiers block, tackle and execute. They are vegetables in a society obsessed with the fast-food version of success

I think it’s a little bit of a misnomer to just say Indiana is the product of Cignetti taking all of his old James Madison players, as there are key contributors who came from other programs, like Maryland, Notre Dame and Cal. And the idea of “having an advantage by taking a bunch of Sun Belt dudes” only works if you’re really good at identifying and developing guys at a Sun Belt school.

I think two other factors are at play here: money and transfer portal evaluations.

Without public data, we can’t really say for sure, but I have yet to hear from an athletic director, reporter or industry person I trust that Indiana is rocking a team payroll anywhere near those of Ohio State, Oregon, Texas, Texas Tech or any other top spender. In On3’s preseason survey about team payrolls, Indiana didn’t get a single vote.

But Indiana has made meaningful investments elsewhere. According to FY24’s MFRS reports (obtained and organized by the Extra Points Library), Indiana reported over $61 million in total operational expenses for football. That’s 13th in the country among public schools, more than Auburn, Oklahoma and Oregon.

Indiana spent big to keep Cignetti and his assistants, and it’s about to do it again. When the dust settles after this season, Cignetti and his staff will be among the very highest paid in the entire country. Couple that with what Indiana has invested in operations and staff, and you have a school that is just as committed to football success as the others on that top-15 list … even if it might not have a $30 million payroll.

I also suspect there is something to the idea that recruiting out of the transfer portal is really hard.

High school recruiting rankings are not perfect, but they’ve been highly predictive for the past 15 years, especially on the aggregate. High school recruiting rankings are a great way to see if a particular athlete has the physical measurables of a potential NFL draft pick and a good projection of how strong a college player he might become.

But transfer rankings? They’re a bit different.

If you have a kid who had high four-star measurables as a 17-year-old, but he hasn’t demonstrated those at the college level in two seasons, how do you evaluate his potential? Is he still a four-star? How much do you “ding” him for not meeting his previous development curve? And how do you project a very productive player at a lower level who is a few inches shorter and a few steps slower than the guys at the all-American camps?

Here’s an example. Let’s take last year’s transfer rankings. The No. 1 recruit, a “five star” on the 247 top transfer board, was Nico Iamaleava, who went from Tennessee to UCLA, and was … fine. (UCLA was not.) Fernando Mendoza, the guy who just won the dang Heisman Trophy, was fourth. But you could also find very productive Power 4 starters in the low 20s … and lots of guys who didn’t play much in between. That’s true at nearly every position group.

My hunch is that over time, the transfer rankings will become predictive. But if you have a coach who really is better at talent evaluation than his peers, it’ll show up in the portal compared to high school recruiting, where everybody has more data and more time. My gut is Indiana has that.

And also, Homefield Apparel.

That was probably worth at least three wins a season, right?

Who's That Football Team?

Play the Daily Challenge

CLUE #1

Despite being one of the most successful teams in FBS history, this program has a historical losing record against Duke, Indiana, Minnesota, Washington State and the Carlisle Indian School

Get your next clue…or solve the puzzle!



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

College football transfer portal tracker: Trinidad Chambliss returning to Ole Miss if granted waiver

Published

on


After a year at Wisconsin, Billy Edwards is heading back east.

The former Badger and Maryland Terrapin is signing with North Carolina. Edwards was Wisconsin’s Week 1 starter in 2025 but suffered a knee injury in the opener and made just one more appearance the rest of the season.

In 2024, Edwards was 273-of-420 passing for 2,881 yards, 15 TDs and nine interceptions.

Belichick and UNC added former South Alabama QB Gio Lopez via the transfer portal in the spring and, with Lopez expected to stay in Chapel Hill, he’ll compete with Edwards for the starting job.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Florida football transfer tracker as UF builds roster under Jon Sumrall

Published

on


Updated Jan. 4, 2026, 8:04 p.m. ET



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

DawgNation newsletter: Turning the page

Published

on


Georgia’s premature exit from the College Football Playoff wasn’t the conclusion any of us wanted for the 2025 season. For a third straight year, the Bulldogs will miss the national semifinals.

That qualifies as a bit of a slide for a program that previously won back-to-back national championships.

How does UGA prevent further regression? I think the remaining teams in the College Football Playoff provide clues.

Ole Miss, which beat UGA in the Sugar Bowl, is arguably the SEC’s most aggressive team when it comes to the transfer portal. It’s also been a prodigious NIL fundraiser. Given those facts, it’s probably not a coincidence the Rebels are having their best season in modern history.

Same goes for two of the other remaining CFP teams — Miami and Oregon, each of whom have become well-known in the NIL era for outbidding the competition for top players. Some say they’re trying to buy their way to a championship, but whatever they’re doing is working.

And when it comes to winning national championships, which is always the goal at Georgia, whatever the Bulldogs are doing isn’t working as well as it used to.

Would Kirby Smart consider marshaling the forces around UGA to be as aggressive with NIL and the transfer portal as some of the teams still alive for a national championship? We may be about to find out.

Check out the rest of our coverage below.


Trivia time

How many times has Georgia basketball scored at least 100 points this season?

Answer is at the bottom of the newsletter.


Georgia lands first transfer portal commitment

Georgia has made an addition to the 2026 roster, adding safety Khalil Barnes via the transfer portal.

Barnes took a visit to Georgia on Saturday. He will have one year of eligibility remaining.

The Clemson transfer was a multiyear starter for the Tigers. What’s more, Barnes played at North Oconee High School in Bogart. The Bulldogs have signed wide receiver Landon Roldan and outside linebacker Khamari Brooks in recent classes.

In three seasons at Clemson, Barnes notched 139 tackles, 7 interceptions and 6.5 tackles for loss. Ole Miss was the other program vying to sign Barnes in the transfer portal.

Georgia will see safety JaCorey Thomas move on to the NFL after this season. The Bulldogs also saw safety Kyron Jones miss the final eight games of the 2025 season because of a foot injury.

The Bulldogs bring back sophomore safety KJ Bolden. Georgia signed six defensive backs as a part of the 2026 recruiting cycle, with Jordan Smith, Zech Fort and Blake Stewart projecting as safeties.


Georgia football 2026 roster tracker

Committed from transfer portal

Entered transfer portal

Declared for NFL Draft


Season-long strengths play key role in ending Georgia’s season

From a statistical standpoint, the two things Georgia did best were convert on fourth down and score touchdowns in the red zone. Entering the Ole Miss game, the Bulldogs ranked first nationally in the former category and second in the latter.

But those two areas would go on to play a large role in ending Georgia’s season in the 39-34 loss to the Rebels.

The decision to go for it when facing a fourth-and-2 from its own 33-yard line in the fourth quarter was a disaster.

Center Malachi Toliver snapped the ball after the offense had rushed on the field to replace the Georgia punt team. It was a play that Georgia had run multiple times this season, including successfully against Mississippi State and Texas.

One key difference, though, was that Drew Bobo was the center in those wins. Toliver was starting in place of Bobo after the All-SEC center suffered a foot injury against Georgia Tech.

“The ball was not supposed to be snapped in that situation,” Smart said. “But that was on us as coaches. It was on me and our guys. It’s not on the players. And Gunner (Stockton) and those guys did a nice job executing it. But we did feel like we had lost momentum at that point, and the book says we needed to go for it.


Photo of the day

Georgia quarterback Gunner Stockton (center) passes under pressure from Ole Miss linebacker Princewill Umanmielen. (Mathew Hinton/Associated Press Photo Stream)


Quote of the day

Smart on the Sugar Bowl:

“It was an incredible college football game. It’s what the CFP was built for, to have battles like that.”


Georgia basketball validates hot start with SEC-opening OT win over Auburn

Georgia basketball dunked on its doubters by taking down Auburn 104-100 in overtime Saturday.

The No. 23-ranked Bulldogs improved to 13-1 overall with the win in the SEC opener against a battle-tested Auburn team.

But even more, Georgia validated the up-tempo style coach Mike White has shifted to this season, and the transfer players he brought in to run it.

White, in his fourth season as UGA’s head coach, said as much about a game he said he’ll “remember forever.”

Georgia won’t have to wait long to have a shot at topping it and earning more validation, as a trip to play defending national champion Florida (7 p.m., Tuesday) is on deck.

The Bulldogs will travel to Gainesville with an edge; winning the SEC opener against an Auburn program that had beaten UGA five times in a row and eight of the past 10 carries weight.


Trivia answer

Seven



Link

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending