Connect with us

NIL

Utah’s Kyle Whittingham, BYU’s Kalani Sitake, USU’s Bronco Mendenhall

If you’re troubled by the amounts of money some college football players are pulling down by way of NIL payments, get a load of how much college coaches are making. It is a load. Let’s start — and end — with Utah, BYU, and Utah State, with a few others mixed in. Warning: If you’re […]

Published

on


If you’re troubled by the amounts of money some college football players are pulling down by way of NIL payments, get a load of how much college coaches are making.

It is a load.

Let’s start — and end — with Utah, BYU, and Utah State, with a few others mixed in.

Warning: If you’re a hardworking individual who is out there busting your hump to keep a roof over your family’s heads and food on the table, saving up for your kids’ college funds, trying to be a responsible and productive citizen, living paycheck to paycheck, reading some of these numbers is going to hurt a little or a lot. Maybe you’ve grown numb to the salary and contract mathematics of modern-day sports, but what you see here might slap you around a bit. Please carefully press forward and carry on.

According to a list of head football coaches’ salaries — which likely do not include bonuses and extra goodies hauled in by these guys — recently released by collegefootballnetwork.com, Utah coach Kyle Whittingham in 2025 will make just shy of $7 million.

By comparison, BYU’s Kalani Sitake is a bargain at $3 million.

Utah State’s Bronco Mendenhall will get $2 million.

And if those numbers toss your good sense and your ability to wrap your mind around middle-class economics into a blender, we’re just getting started here.

Atop the list is Georgia coach Kirby Smart, who will make in his base salary $13.2 million.

After him, in the top 10, are Ohio State’s Ryan Day at $12.5 million, Clemson’s Dabo Swinney at $11.5 million, Oregon’s Dan Lanning at $11 million, Colorado’s Deion Sanders at $10.8 million, Texas’ Steve Sarkisian at $10.6 million, Alabama’s Kalen DeBoer at $10.25 million, USC’s Lincoln Riley at $10.04 million, Florida State’s Mike Norvell at $10 million (Norvell will reportedly give back $4.5 mill of that in 2025), and North Carolina’s Bill Belichick at $10 million.

The cost of higher education — the big-time football part of it — is definitely on the rise.

(Eli Lucero | Herald Journal) Bronco Mendenhall speaks at a press conference where he was introduced as the new football coach at Utah State University, Monday Dec. 9, 2024, in Logan.

The next batch of 10 coaches starts with LSU’s Brian Kelly getting $9.5 million and ends with South Carolina’s Shane Beamer at $8.15 million.

The next group of 10 begins with Miami’s Mario Cristobal at $8 million and ends with Whittingham (ranked 30th on the list) with his base salary of $6.92 million.

Sitake comes in at 64th on the list and Mendenhall at 75th.

Sanders is tops in the Big 12, followed by Oklahoma State’s Mike Gundy ($7.06 million), Whittingham, Kansas’ Lance Leipold ($6.15 million), Arizona State’s Kenny Dillingham ($5.8 million), Kansas State’s Chris Klieman ($5.5 million), TCU’s Sonny Dykes ($5 million), UCF’s Scott Frost ($5 million, yet to be announced, but approximated off the last year of his deal at Nebraska), Baylor’s Dave Aranda ($4.5 million), Houston’s Willie Fritz ($4.5 million), Texas Tech’s Joey McGuire ($4.3 million), Iowa State’s Matt Campbell ($4 million), Cincinnati’s Scott Satterfield ($3.7 million), West Virginia’s Rich Rodriguez ($3.5 million), Sitake, Arizona’s Brent Brennan ($2.4 million).

That all speaks for itself.

The question that remains is this: How do you — college football fans and those who are not — feel about those base salaries, especially for the three coaches inside the state?

Is Whittingham overpaid or underpaid, relative to the going rates? Based on what he’s accomplished in the past — OK, so 2024 was something of an anomaly — is he a bargain or a burden? It’s pretty clear that Sitake, if the list is accurate (private schools are not required to make public or confirm their numbers), is an absolute steal. And what about Mendenhall, who was paid more at Virginia than what BYU paid him prior to and New Mexico paid him after and what USU is offering him now?

Being a head football coach at a lot of programs is a big deal with a whole lot to keep track of, a whole lot of responsibility. At major universities, where the pressure is heavy, running a program is quite literally like being the CEO of a large company. And we know the huge amounts men and women filling those roles are paid.

Is it more pressure than you feel in your job, more pressure than a father of five kids who mixes cement for a living feels?

Does it make you wish that you had paid closer attention when you were playing high school or college football, that you had taken your college degree in business or pre-law and been willing to go off to some place like Southwest Presbyterian State as an assistant coach, making just enough to not starve to death at the start of your career and then work your way up, possibly to an out-a-sight perch where the salary numbers launch into the ionosphere?

To each his or her own.

But to those who do go into coaching, there really is a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow, if you’re ambitious enough, good enough, smart enough, lucky enough to rise to a top or even some midlevel position. The image of a football coach wearing a sloppy gray sweatshirt and baggy, stretchable, adjustable-waist shorts with a whistle around his neck has certainly morphed into a completely different image. One of a dude with a Rolex on his wrist, a rack of $5,000 Italian suits in the closet, a mansion for a home and a Porsche parked out in front of it in the driveway.

The old ball coach may not own any of those things. But he certainly could if he wanted to.



Link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NIL

Brown, Milam drive in 4 runs each, LSU beats West Virginia 12-5 to clinch 20th CWS berth

Associated Press BATON ROUGE, La. (AP) — Jake Brown hit a home run and had four RBIs, Steven Milam had two doubles and also drove in four runs and LSU beat West Virginia 12-5 on Sunday night to sweep the best-of-three Baton Rouge Super Regional. No. 6 seed LSU (48-15) clinched the program’s 20th berth […]

Published

on


Associated Press

BATON ROUGE, La. (AP) — Jake Brown hit a home run and had four RBIs, Steven Milam had two doubles and also drove in four runs and LSU beat West Virginia 12-5 on Sunday night to sweep the best-of-three Baton Rouge Super Regional.

No. 6 seed LSU (48-15) clinched the program’s 20th berth in the College World Series, where the Tigers will try to win their eighth national championship — all since 1991, the most recent in 2023.

Derek Curiel led off the game with a double and scored to make it 1-0 when Brown reached on a fielder’s choice in the first inning and the Tigers led the rest of the way.

Anthony Eyanson (11-2) gave up four runs on five hits with three walks and seven strikeouts in five innings.

Chris Stanfield, Curiel and Ethan Frey each drew a two-out walk to load the bases before Milam cleared the bases with a double off starter Jack Kartsonas (6-4) to spark a five-run second that made it 6-0.

After Jace Rinehart hit a two-out solo shot and pinch-hitter Chase Swain drew a walk, Chase Shores came on a struck out Brodie Kresser swinging to end the eighth and the pitched a 1-2-3 ninth.

Sam White hit a leadoff homer and Ben Lumsden added a two-run shot in the fourth before White added an RBI single in the fifth to cut the deficit to 6-4.

Stanfield hit a two-RBI single to spark a six-run seventh, capped when Brown’s two-run home run gave LSU an eight-run lead.

Milam and Josh Pearson each hit a grand slam as LSU beat the Mountaineers 16-9 in Game 1 on Saturday.

West Virginia (44-16) set the program’s single-season record for wins under first-year coach Steve Sabins. The Mountains advanced to their first-ever super regional last season.

The game had originally been scheduled for 5:06 p.m. local time but was delayed approximately three hours due to inclement weather in the area.

___

AP college sports: https://apnews.com/hub/college-sports




Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Ohio State launches new group to support NIL opportunities

The university’s Department of Athletics and Learfield’s Ohio State Sports Properties have formed the Buckeye Sports Group. COLUMBUS, Ohio — The Ohio State University announced it’s launching a new strategic group that’s designed to support, streamline and enhance Name, Image and Likeness opportunities for student-athletes. The university’s Department of Athletics and Learfield’s Ohio State Sports […]

Published

on

Ohio State launches new group to support NIL opportunities

The university’s Department of Athletics and Learfield’s Ohio State Sports Properties have formed the Buckeye Sports Group.

COLUMBUS, Ohio — The Ohio State University announced it’s launching a new strategic group that’s designed to support, streamline and enhance Name, Image and Likeness opportunities for student-athletes.

The university’s Department of Athletics and Learfield’s Ohio State Sports Properties have formed the Buckeye Sports Group, according to a release.

“By creating a dedicated team of NIL leaders, this strategic partnership will empower Buckeye student-athletes to maximize their brand value while competing at the highest level,” the university says.

The announcement comes after a federal judge approved the terms of a $2.8 billion antitrust settlement last week, which will allow schools to directly pay players through licensing deals.

Ohio State says a key part of the settlement is the implementation of a Fair Mark Evaluation process and a “range of compensation” designed to establish standardized benchmarks for NIL deals across sports and institutions. The Buckeye Sports Group intends to serve as a centralized hub for NIL brand deal facilitation, corporate partnerships, student-athlete storytelling and NIL support.

The Buckeye Sports Group will have access to Learfield’s Compass NIL technology to facilitate deal transactions and gain insights into student-athlete interests.

The group will support Ohio State student-athletes with a focus on three areas: deal facilitation and management, content creation and storytelling and support services.

“Ohio State has always been a leader in college athletics, and this initiative is another step forward to build upon our strong NIL foundation,” said Ohio State’s Deputy Director of Athletics Carey Hoyt. “By combining the power of our athletic brand with Learfield’s expansive network, we are creating an innovative, full-service approach to NIL that directly benefits our student-athletes.”

In a move to streamline and optimize NIL operations, the group will work to consolidate existing NIL collectives under a single marketing team. The founding members of THE Foundation and The 1870 Society, two existing NIL collectives, will remain engaged and serve in an advisory capacity to the new group.

“We’re incredibly thankful for everything our NIL collective’s leadership, businesses and donors have done to support our student-athletes,” Senior Vice President and Wolfe Foundation-Eugene Smith Endowed Athletics Director Ross Bjork said. “Their commitment has helped shape the landscape in powerful ways. As we move forward with a more unified approach, we’re excited to combine efforts and further strengthen the NIL success of our student-athletes.”

To read more about the new group, click here.

Continue Reading

NIL

OSU announces creation of in-house NIL entity

This story was updated with new information. Ohio State has announced the formation of a new in-house entity to handle the bulk of name, image and likeness opportunities for its athletes. Buckeye Sports Group will become the primary NIL group serving Ohio State athletes. It will be run jointly by the school’s athletic department and […]

Published

on


This story was updated with new information.

Ohio State has announced the formation of a new in-house entity to handle the bulk of name, image and likeness opportunities for its athletes.

Buckeye Sports Group will become the primary NIL group serving Ohio State athletes. It will be run jointly by the school’s athletic department and Learfield’s Ohio State Sports Properties and help to facilitate endorsement deals on behalf of athletes.

Buckeye Sports Group will replace THE Foundation and The 1870 Society collectives as Ohio State’s major fundraising entity for NIL. According to an OSU press release, founding members of those donor-funded collectives will serve in an advisory capacity to Buckeye Sports Group. OSU said that recurring donations and subscriptions made to The Foundation will continue in a fundraising role to support OSU athletics.

“What we want from folks who have been involved in our collectives is their support and connections in the business community,” athletic director Ross Bjork told The Dispatch. “Even though the mechanism of a collective will not exist, the relationships will, and the people who have been involved in those will connect us with businesses, either directly or indirectly, through introductions.

“We’ll have an advisory board of people who have been involved in the past, and we’ll tap into their resources and relationships to make sure that we stay at the forefront of all of this.”

“We’re still going to be involved, and donations to us will still help the new group,” a board member from THE Foundation told The Dispatch.

A representative with The 1870 Society could not be immediately reached for comment.

The formation of Buckeye Sports Group comes three days after a federal judge approved a settlement of three federal antitrust lawsuits against the NCAA. Member schools will be allowed to distribute $20.5 million to their athletes in the upcoming academic year.

Bjork said the Buckeyes will reserve $18 million for direct payment to players for the use of their NIL. The remainder will be used to fund 91 new scholarships across OSU’s 36 varsity sports.

Buy Ohio State posters, books, gear from CFP title win

In a statement announcing the new entity, Bjork said Ohio State was “incredibly thankful for everything our NIL collective’s leadership, businesses and donors have done to support our student-athletes.”

The collectives have been a critical part of the school’s NIL infrastructure in previous years, contributing funds for athletes. During the 2023-24 academic year, football players earned around $20 million in NIL deals, which included arrangements with the collectives, according to Bjork.

But it’s expected that collectives across the landscape will see greater scrutiny in the aftermath of the settlement as third-party deals exceeding $600 are subject to approval through a clearinghouse established by an enforcement arm known as the College Sports Commission.

“The collective model of just paying an athlete, because they have a contract without any quid-pro quo, without any obligations, that model cannot go forward because you have to have a valid business purpose,” Bjork said. “It has to meet a range of compensation through the system, and based on current analysis, current collective deals don’t have a valid business purpose, and they may not meet a range of compensation. That’s why the system is being built.”

Get more Ohio State football news by listening to our podcasts.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Jacksonville State football’s Brock Rechsteiner announced as part of WWE’s NIL class

A Jacksonville State football standout will be a member of the fifth WWE Next In Line Program. The WWE announced that Brock Rechsteiner, a wide receiver with the Gamecocks, will be a part of the 12 athlete class. USA TODAY Sports first reported the news and WWE posted the news on social media June 7. […]

Published

on


A Jacksonville State football standout will be a member of the fifth WWE Next In Line Program.

The WWE announced that Brock Rechsteiner, a wide receiver with the Gamecocks, will be a part of the 12 athlete class. USA TODAY Sports first reported the news and WWE posted the news on social media June 7.

Advertisement

Rechsteiner is the son of former WWE champion Scott Steiner. Scott wrestled alongside his brother Rick Steiner, with Rick’s son and Brock’s cousin currently wrestling in the WWE under the name Bron Breakker.

The WWE Next In Line program helps identify future stars and can prepare them for a career in wrestling, something that Rechsteiner has told the Gadsden Times that he is interested in doing once football ends.

“Right now I’m one hundred percent focused on football. Once I’m done football I’m going to get in to it,” Brock said in October of 2024.

FAMILY BUSINESS: Jacksonville State’s Brock Rechsteiner focused on football but ready to continue family legacy

Advertisement

INSTATE PITCH: Inside Jacksonville State football, new coach Charles Kelly’s recruiting pitch to in-state players

Rechsteiner broke out on to the scene with an 85-yard touchdown catch against Southern Miss, which saw Jax State coaches and teammates start posting photos of Rechsteiner with WWE belts and chainmail armor. He finished the year with 16 catches for 241 yards and two touchdowns.

The full class includes the son of another WWE legend, Oklahoma football player and wrestler Jacob Henry. He is the son of former World Heavyweight Champion Mark Henry.

This article originally appeared on The Gadsden Times: Jax State, WWE legacy Brock Rechsteiner announced as NIL class member



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Ohio State Athletics Brings NIL Under One Roof With Formation of Buckeye Sports Group

The Buckeyes are bringing their NIL in-House. In the wake of the NCAA’s $2.78 billion House Settlement, which made new provisions for athletic departments and conferences to oversee their student-athletes’ NIL earnings, the Ohio State athletic department and Learfield have announced the formation of Buckeye Sports Group. BSG will consolidate the Buckeyes’ existing NIL collectives, namely […]

Published

on


The Buckeyes are bringing their NIL in-House.

In the wake of the NCAA’s $2.78 billion House Settlement, which made new provisions for athletic departments and conferences to oversee their student-athletes’ NIL earnings, the Ohio State athletic department and Learfield have announced the formation of Buckeye Sports Group.

BSG will consolidate the Buckeyes’ existing NIL collectives, namely The 1870 Society and The Foundation, into one NIL management team within the athletics department. Founding members of both collectives will serve in advisory roles under BSG.

By creating a dedicated team of NIL leaders to serve under the athletics department, the Ohio State athletics department intends to help its student-athletes “maximize their brand value” and “support, streamline and enhance” NIL opportunities, per a release from OSU athletics and Learfield.

“Ohio State has always been a leader in college athletics, and this initiative is another step forward to build upon our strong NIL foundation,” Ohio State deputy athletic director Carey Hoyt said in the release. “By combining the power of our athletic brand with Learfield’s expansive network, we are creating an innovative, full-service approach to NIL that directly benefits our student-athletes.”

BSG will have access to Learfield’s Compass NIL technology through their partnership, which is used to connect players to brand deals that suit their interests. The partnership is centered on a comprehensive strategy that will also provide student-athletes with financial literacy resources to help with money management and taxes.

BSG will serve all 36 varsity sports at Ohio State.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Is the House settlement good for IU basketball, IU football, both or neither? – The Daily Hoosier

Leave it to Curt Cignetti to lay bare the new reality in college sports:  Now more than ever, programs within athletic departments are competing for money. Entering his second year as head football coach at IU, Cignetti was asked recently what he thought of the spring additions to his roster. Enter tongue into cheek. “I’d […]

Published

on


Leave it to Curt Cignetti to lay bare the new reality in college sports:  Now more than ever, programs within athletic departments are competing for money.

Entering his second year as head football coach at IU, Cignetti was asked recently what he thought of the spring additions to his roster.

Enter tongue into cheek.

“I’d like to have signed a few more, but when we hired Darian (DeVries) and he lost his whole roster, money got a little tight because he had to put a team together, and I felt the pinch,” Cignetti said.

Cignetti managed to crack a smile after his joke drew laughter, but there is at least some basis in reality in those words.

There’s always been some degree of tension between the programs in power conference athletics.  How schools invested in things like facilities and coaching salaries across their various sports signaled how competitive they wanted to be in those endeavors.

But still, there have been plenty of examples over the last quarter century of power conference schools competing at a relatively high level in both football and men’s basketball.  Big Ten programs like Wisconsin, Michigan, Michigan State and Ohio State come to mind.

But with the introduction of NIL four years ago came a massive sea change, as schools were suddenly in a position to start influencing which athletes in various sports received money.

And with the approval of the House settlement last week, every school will have more than $20 million to directly share with athletes.  So now more than ever we’ll see just how much athletic departments want to be football schools or basketball schools, and how they’ll go about striking that balance.

IU AD Scott Dolson came up as a manager with the basketball program, but he’s stated publicly on multiple occasions he thinks football is the economic engine of his department.  In the years to come, Indiana might try as hard as any school to thread the needle and find the sweet spot for both good football and basketball.

“Football is important. Football drives so much revenue,” Dolson said last September.

“That’s why Coach Cignetti is here. We need to be relevant in football. We need to make sure we get that momentum because it drives the engine for the whole department. Certainly men’s basketball speaks for itself as well, particularly here at Indiana, but football is really, really critical.”

So what impact might the recently approved House settlement have on Indiana?

On the whole, it looks better for football than basketball when it comes to the national landscape.

Schools are allowed to allocate $20.4 million of revenue to athletes as they see fit.  Most will likely give $2-4 million to men’s basketball players, and almost all of the rest to football players.

It won’t come as a surprise if IU gives more $5 million to basketball players, but there will still be a significant amount allocated to football players.  And that should help level the playing field for Indiana in a sport where they haven’t been competitive financially.  Really good football players should be able to come to IU and make really good money.  In general, IU should have enough money that the players they want can evaluate IU on the football opportunity as much as the financial opportunity.

Also coming with the House settlement is oversight for booster/collective payments to athletes.  This is the form of “NIL” we’ve seen over the last four years, where the schools with the richest and most motivated boosters can buy the best rosters.  Those payments will continue, but all of those deals will now be reviewed by Deloitte, and the sham element of payments will be disallowed.  Again, this should level the playing field for IU football, which has had collective cash, but not the silly money we’ve seen elsewhere.

To be determined is how Deloitte views the big brand programs across college football.  In other words, does the starting QB at Ohio State have a higher NIL value than the starter at Northwestern?  You can see the potential logic why that would be the case, along with the potential to permanently reinforce the hierarchy in college football.  That would be a scenario that would not help Indiana football, but continued high-level success by Curt Cignetti could help mitigate any concerns there.

Of course these very same considerations will help level a men’s basketball playing field where IU has had a financial advantage in recent years, along with one of the best national brands.

Now most high major men’s basketball programs should have at least a few million in their war chest, which will help them compete with IU.  And Indiana’s healthy amount of booster/collective money earmarked for men’s basketball will receive more scrutiny.

Another competitive layer in men’s basketball is the Big East Conference, as most of the schools in that league don’t have FBS football.  That could leave the vast majority of their revenue sharing resources to be directed almost exclusively to men’s basketball, giving them a significant advantage.  Of course without FBS football, there isn’t nearly as much revenue to share, so just how great the advantage is remains to be seen.  But we’ve already seen one coach — Kevin Willard — leave Maryland for Villanova in part due to greater financial promises.

The Big Ten does have the benefit of a massive television rights deal which should help at least offset some of the pain within the athletic department of the new $20 million expense.  It’s good to be in the Big Ten or SEC in this brave new world.

The Daily Hoosier –“Where Indiana fans assemble when they’re not at Assembly”



Link

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending