Connect with us
https://yoursportsnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/call-to-1.png

NIL

When it comes to college football recruiting, Black mothers might just determine the future of the sport

Published

on


It’s early December and ‘tis the season for college recruiters to lay their football mack all the way down. 

The NCAA early signing period, when many high school athletes commit to where they’ll play at the next level, ends today, and it’ll soon be followed by a contact period. That’s when college coaches and staff can reach out directly to athletes and their families urging, cajoling, perhaps even promising riches to young prospects, trying to convince them to bring their ball-playing talents to their college or university.

And to win at that game, recruiters often single one person out for concentrated attention: Black mothers.

It’s a tacitly understood feature of student-athlete recruitment that’s crucial to the process but rarely acknowledged, studied or celebrated publicly. While the role of every mom in recruitment decisions is intuitively important, it’s Black mothers specifically who the entire game of football might just hinge on, said Tracie Canada, whose book Tackling the Everyday: Race and Nation in Big-Time College Football has a chapter that examines the centrality of Black mothers to the sport.

“I think plenty of people write about coaches. I think plenty of people write about fathers. I think plenty of people write about the men that surround football because that is the expectation,” said Canada, a professor of cultural anthropology, gender and sexuality, and feminist studies at Duke University.

“And so I also think that it is important to say that it is not only men that are allowing this sport to continue. Mothers not only give bodies to the sport, they’re giving birth to these players. They are also caring for them in a way that is different from the other people around them.”

Black mothers perform a type of specialized labor when it comes to their football-playing sons, giving them outsized influence on decisions about football and life. That labor involves care and kinship around “their holistic lives rather than just their lives as football players,” Canada said. It includes helping them navigate a world beyond the football field in large Black and brown bodies that are often reflexively feared and historically politicized.

Upwards of 40 percent of all NCAA college football players are Black, so the numbers alone make Black women at least partial gatekeepers of the sport. And from concerns about CTE (chronic traumatic encephalopathy) to NIL (name, image, and likeness) to the backlashes over DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion), Black moms are taking notes.

For the third installment of our Recruiting While Black series, Canada spoke with Andscape about the centrality of Black mothers in football recruitment and their broader impact on the sport. 

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.


In Tackling the Everyday, you’ve said your chapter on Black mothers has really found an audience and resonated deeply with people. Talk about what led you to that chapter and that line of inquiry. 

The fact that this is the chapter in my book that people ask me about the most, to me, is a sign I’m picking up on something that people are so aware of, but they don’t often see it. It’s not in literature. It’s not usually given space. I’m specifically interested in Black football players, and the players themselves are consistently referencing their moms, when there’s no reason to talk about them. This is referencing how outsized they are in their lives, just how big these figures are to them in the decisions that they’re making in their daily behaviors, in their interactions with people around them, and it has always been clear to me that mothers are an important part of this story.

Because I’m a Black woman anthropologist, and an ethnographer doing this work, and because I am a Black feminist, I’m attuned to particular relationships. I’m attuned thinking about Black women and how their care and kinship align in a particular space, and these aren’t usually the analytics that we think about in football.

So in what specific or outsized ways did you notice that care showing up?

If you go to a football game, you can always tell whose kid belongs to who because the moms are very loud, they’re supportive of their son in a particular way, even if they’re supportive of the entire team. There might be a nickname that they yell out. They might be saying, “That’s my son!” They’re the ones that are wearing the T-shirts that might have his face on it, that might have his number on it. They bring the signs, they have the cowbells in college. They’re the ones who organize who’s going to the game this week. They’re the ones doing that labor.

Then as I’m spending time with these Black players, their moms were always brought up, and this was not something that I was asking about. There were players who called their mom every day. There was a player who was super proud that his mom bought all of his clothes because she knew what he liked to wear, but also knew where she could shop for him, given his size. In my book, the chapter title, “The Year My Mom Was Born,” came from an offhand comment that somebody made about his jersey number making him feel close to his mom. So I’m seeing this physical presence in their son’s lives alongside a constant reference from players.

The other thing that I think is relevant is that people assume that the players I was spending time with were from single-parent homes. These are mothers who have been married for a long time, often to the fathers of their children and I always have to say, “These are not single moms that have to do everything on their own.” These sons have very present fathers in their lives, too. But I was noticing there’s a different relationship that comes from moms of football players than fathers of football players. Fathers seemed to be very invested in the football player himself — of how well he did, of how he can improve, of what’s physically going on during a game. Players will often reference their dads as the reason that they started playing in the first place.

The relationship to football often comes through their dads, but I think that they are sustained by their moms. The moms are the ones who are doing a certain type of labor so that the player feels supported. And the moms also seem to be invested in them as people. There’s something in how they are asking about their holistic lives rather than just their lives as football players.

I think that that’s important across the board. But the reason why the focus is specifically on Black moms is because demographically Black players are overrepresented in football. Especially if we look at a college campus versus a college football team, Black men are severely overrepresented. So for a lot of these guys, the women that are around are going to be Black women.

You referenced the quote,”If 10 percent of mothers in this country would begin to perceive football as a dangerous sport, that is the end of football,” attributed to an unnamed NFL doctor in response to the work of Dr. Bennet Omalu (a forensic pathologist whose discovery of Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy caused wholesale changes in concussion protocols).

How should we think of that quote in terms of the ways Black women guide and care for their football-playing sons?

The way that I write about it, if I’m taking that quote seriously, is that if moms didn’t buy into the sport, the sport would go away. So that means Black women are playing a significant and really important role here. 

There are the ones who say, “I will not allow my son to play at this school, to play for this coach, to be in this division if I don’t feel OK with where he is. Even if he wants to. If I don’t feel it, you cannot go there. I will not allow that to happen.” And I think that these moms recognize something about how important it is that these are young Black men who live in particular bodies. It’s a body that’s usually big and strong, visibly so, in a way that is transgressive and is often outside of the norm. And so these moms are also [thinking]: My son is in danger on this field, but my son is also in danger in the real world outside of it because of the body that he lives in, given this anti-Black world that we exist in.

The way that I analyze it is that moms are the ones that clock all of these angles for their Black sons in a way that doesn’t seem to be taken into account as obviously by other people. 

Have football programs, institutions and administrations responded to or shown that they recognize the role of mothers and Black mothers, specifically? And if so, what are some examples of that?

I remember one of the first, very early on conversations I had with one of the coaches. It was camp time, the semester hadn’t started yet, and one of the things he said was about how they recruit moms, and how if they recruit a player, the mom can be a great spokesperson for the program. She can attract other moms to get on board, and they can use networks of moms to attract players.

At the time I was doing research, all of these NFL safety clinics were also happening, and these were different NFL teams inviting moms of young players. Not college, high school and lower. It wasn’t a parents’ clinic, it wasn’t even just an NFL clinic, it was specifically the NFL Moms Safety Clinic. What happens in football, but probably across sports, is that the professional league is making certain decisions and things usually trickle down to the lower levels. The NFL affects college, which is going to affect high school, which is going to affect Pee Wee, so I thought it was really interesting that the NFL was specifically marketing to moms and kind of putting its brand name behind the importance of this particular group of people.

These weren’t small events. For the two that I went to, you’ve got like 200 moms there and most of them are Black women.

So my question is, with all the structural changes going on in college football, like NIL and divisive political issues facing the nation, do you think we’ll see a significant recruiting impact from Black mothers’ advice and influence and if so, when?

Sports as an arena is notorious for attempting to claim that it is not political. Fans come from all different backgrounds and all different walks of life, but they come together to support a team. The assumption is the same for the players and the coaches. It’s this idea that the team, and what we’re doing here, is the most important thing right now, and we don’t care about all the other stuff that’s going on. That the playing field is completely divorced from the real world outside of it. As I’m sure you can tell, I don’t agree with that. I’m someone who talks about how race actually matters in this space.

One part of me would say 2025 is actually not all that different because these concerns have always been there for Black people. We are seeing things that are familiar because these things happen over and over again. What does it mean to walk through the world in a particular body? What does it mean to be an athlete who is stereotyped as someone who is only useful for what their body can do. These things are happening now, but they have also happened before, and will probably happen in the future.

If you’re talking about recruiting, what I imagine might be going on in this particular moment is probably part of the conversation that families are having. When you’re playing the sport of football, there is always calculus, an algorithm that is not specified, but there are a lot of factors at play here and how am I going to make the best educated, safe, hope-for-success decision, right? Football is already a dangerous sport, so part of the risk assessment is like should I play or should I not? What is my risk if I do it and what is my risk if I don’t? Do I play in this state? Do I play for this coach? Do I push for this position?

Part of that conversation could be that this state as a whole is doing X, Y, and Z [politically], but I have a good chance of going pro if I’m with this coach, at this university, with these other people there. Or it might be that because of the state that this university is located in, is it actually riskier for me to be there because of who I am, and because my options outside of sport are much more limited?

I’m very curious about how this moment is going to play out over the next five years, given everything that has happened politically, socially, culturally in this country in the past five years. The landscape of college sports has changed dramatically in the last five years when coaches and institutions thought it was important to take [performative] stands on issues. Taking a stand is always a recruiting and retention tactic to convince players to stay, to convince players to come.

What are Black mothers talking about in terms of their sons’ safety, on and off the field, and how do you think the impact of these conversations will be felt, especially on the rosters of schools in states where college football is most revered?

I’m spending time with high school moms right now, so it is interesting to see that what they are saying is not much different than all the things college moms had top of mind. It is about injuries. It’s about is my kid going to be taken care of? It’s about what kind of man is that coach and what kind of man is he going to encourage my son to be, right?

Black mothers are still going to be central to those decisions. Black moms are still paying attention. They’re taking notes. They are remembering these offhand comments that were made. They’re watching the news. They’re aware, but they’re also aware of what’s happening at their kids’ high school. They’re aware of what’s happening at the colleges that they’re looking at. They’re aware of what’s happening with the coaches at both of these places and what’s happening in the states where these schools are located, and how far away their kids are going to be away from them. These dynamics are always being taken into account by moms as they’re supporting their sons as they make these decisions about their future.

Lonnae O’Neal is a senior writer at Andscape. She’s an author, a former columnist, has a rack of kids and she writes bird by bird.



Link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NIL

Buddie Defends Dykes as TCU Fans Fume Over 8–4 Season

Published

on


TCU’s just-passed 8-4 regular season had many in the purple people masses as angry as a tourist who just paid $40 to park, and for many others as disappointed as when Junior brought home an F in civics.

Many have expressed themselves in much the same way of our old friend, the frontier prospector Gabby Johnson of “Blazing Saddles” fame: No sidewindin’, bushwackin’, hornswagglin’ cracker croaker is gonna rouin me bishen cutter!

TCU Athletic Director Mike Buddie gets it.

“I think there were 11 teams in our league this year whose fan bases wanted their coaches fired,” Buddie said on Friday morning at the FIFA World Cup Draw party at Billy Bob’s Texas, the world’s largest honky tonk. “That’s the culture that we live in. You can win [against a] ranked opponent, [next week against] ranked opponent, [a third straight win against a] ranked opponent, and then lose — they want you gone.

“It’s a new day and age.”

Like the mood of Paris in 1793 — cheers in the morning, pitchforks and the guillotine by dusk.

TCU finished in the middle of a congested Big 12 at 5-4. To put some perspective on its season, Texas finished 9-3. Of course, many UT fans think the Longhorns should win every game, too. No. 25 Missouri, like TCU, finished 8-4. So, too, did Tennessee and Iowa, two teams receiving votes in the AP poll. In the end, after 12 regular-season games, only two teams finished undefeated — Ohio State and Indiana. One of those teams will lose this weekend; they play each other.

North Carolina — guided by renowned football genius Bill Belichick — stumbled to 4–8, taking a season-opening black eye from TCU.

Just last year, Ohio State fans wanted coach Ryan Day on the nearest interstate out of town after the Buckeyes took the worst kind of a second loss of the season — to Michigan. That was on Nov. 30. By the end of January, they wanted to elect him governor after winning the national championship. 

The Horned Frogs will learn their postseason bowl destination on Sunday.

Dykes has gone 35-17 over four seasons at TCU, including 13-2 and a berth in the College Football Playoff championship game in his first season. That campaign included a victory over No. 2 Michigan in the Fiesta Bowl CFP semifinals.

TCU slipped to 5-7 in 2023 but went 9-4 last year and could do the same in 2025 with one last victory.

“We need to be better,” Buddie said. “We’re committed to getting better. I’m excited because nobody realizes that more than Sonny Dykes.

“He’s committed to addressing some needs that I think we have and more than ever before, what I do and how we strategically fundraise and approach people financially has a direct impact on your football program. I think Texas Tech showed us all that if you can build the most talented roster and develop them, really good things happen.”

Texas Tech, which is playing in the Big 12 Championship Game on Saturday against BYU, spent, according to reports and speculation, as much as $28 million on its football roster this season. The Red Raiders are No. 4 in the most recent CFP rankings.

Spending that kind of money is the result of a completely transformed landscape in college football. Colleges can now spend as much as $20.5 million on payroll for athletes in its various programs. That mostly impacts football and men’s basketball — those sports that generate the most revenue, the “revenue sports.”

Before that, each Division I school had an adjacent collective designed to allow athletes to cash in on their name, image, and likeness. That quickly evolved — devolved? — into merely paying athletes by writing checks out of the collective’s pool. Now completely legal after a U.S. Supreme Court case permitting athletes to receive compensation beyond traditional scholarships. The collectives simply became the mechanism to funnel those payments.

Most, if not all, of the collectives have now been merged with universities’ traditional athletics fundraising arm. NIL endorsement deals are now supposed to be just exactly that — an athlete endorsing a product, for example. I’m not exactly sure how all that sorts out.

“The landscape has changed, but we still have a ton of advantages in facilities and where we’re located and historical success,” said Buddie, who added that TCU also is “thoughtful and strategic in how we employ people.”

“We’re not in the business of paying $50 million buyouts for people to go away. And when you believe you’ve got the right person who’s already proven that he can win in the College Football Playoff, it’s incumbent on me to provide him every resource that he needs to be successful.”





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Penn State football AD Pat Kraft rips recruiting, NIL in audio leak

Published

on


Updated Dec. 5, 2025, 5:27 p.m. ET



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Wall Street Journal Article on NIL and Phillip Bell

Published

on


Article is about Phillip Bells High School experience and being shopped to different schools and 7 x 7 teams. Really sad situation.

A few quotes:

“Bell’s mother, who abused drugs, shopped him from school to school, demanding up to $72,000 a year, according to court filings, public records and interviews with relatives and others who knew the family. He also joined a club team that paid thousands of dollars a weekend.’

On his visit to OSU: “The hotel room where Bell’s mother and stepfather were staying was “trashed,” leaving an OSU coach with a bill for broken furniture, his high-school coach later told relatives. A Buckeyes coach subsequently informed Bell’s mother that the team wanted her son, but the “entourage” wasn’t welcome in Columbus, the high-school coach said.

OSU declined to comment.

Before they left Ohio, Barnes’ blood sugar spiked to life-threatening levels, she suffered a heart attack and was hospitalized for several days, according to public records.”

Hoping that with support from OSU that he can break the cycle and achieve great things!

This link is behind a paywall: https://www.wsj.com/us-news/football-high-school-nil-phillip-bell-81270bdf?mod=hp_lead_pos7

Definitely worth a read – there is definitely a downside to the money flowing to these athletes. Kinda makes me wonder about the Legend Bey situation.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Georgia sues Missouri edge rusher Damon Wilson for nearly $400K over NIL contract he signed with Bulldogs

Published

on


Georgia is attempting to get edge rusher Damon Wilson to pony up after his transfer to Missouri.

The school’s athletic association has filed a lawsuit against Wilson saying he owes $390,000 from the NIL contract he signed with the school’s collective in December 2024 ahead of Georgia’s College Football Playoff loss to Notre Dame. Wilson transferred after the 2024 season to Missouri and received one payment of $30,000.

Advertisement

Wilson, a junior, led Missouri with nine sacks and 9.5 tackles for loss this season. He had three sacks and 5.5 tackles for loss as a sophomore for the Bulldogs in 2024.

Georgia is claiming Wilson owes the balance of the base pay the contract stipulated he’d be paid via a liquidated damages claim. According to ESPN, Wilson’s deal with Classic City Collective was for $500,000 spread out over 14 monthly payments with two post-transfer portal bonuses of $40,000 and that he’d owe what was still set to be paid out to him if he left the team.

From ESPN:

“When the University of Georgia Athletic Association enters binding agreements with student-athletes, we honor our commitments and expect student-athletes to do the same,” athletics spokesperson Steven Drummond said in a statement to ESPN.

Georgia is not the first school to file a suit over NIL payments to a player who transferred. But the hard-line tactic is noteworthy, and may ultimately not work out in Georgia’s favor.

Advertisement

Schools typically do not ask coaches to pay out the balance of their contracts when leaving for another job. For example, Lane Kiffin did not have to pay Ole Miss what the school was scheduled to pay him over the rest of his deal with the school when he left for LSU. Instead, LSU paid Ole Miss $3 million for Kiffin to get out of his contract.

That situation happens all the time when coaches leave for new jobs. Their buyouts to get out of their contracts are far smaller than the buyouts schools owe when a coach is fired without cause.

And coaches are employees. Schools have long resisted that players be classified as employees and continue to do so even as the revenue-sharing era begins. The NCAA and its member schools have long clung to amateurism and that antiquated idea is why it took so long for players to get paid in the first place.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Georgia seeks $390K in NIL contract damages from Missouri football DE

Published

on


Dec. 5, 2025, 3:22 p.m. CT

Georgia athletics is taking Missouri football defensive end Damon Wilson II to court in a novel, nearly first-of-its-kind case over an NIL contract dispute. 

The news was first reported by ESPN’s Dan Wilson on Friday, Dec. 5. The Tribune confirmed the news through a university source and court documents filed in Georgia by the Bulldogs.

UGA is attempting to take Wilson into arbitration and is seeking $390,000 in liquidated damages from the star edge rusher, who transferred to the Tigers in January 2025, over what the university views as an unfulfilled contract in Athens. The lawsuit is not against the University of Missouri, only Wilson.

According to the ESPN report, Georgia is arguing that Wilson signed a contract — a common practice in the NIL era — with what was then UGA’s main NIL and marketing arm, Classic City Collective, in December 2024.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Fired $15.8 million college football coach blames QB’s performance for his dismissal

Published

on


Fired Auburn football coach Hugh Freeze isn’t going out quietly.

Freeze was outspoken in the weeks before his dismissal, saying he and his staff were still the right fit to lead Auburn into the future, despite going 15-19 over two-plus losing seasons. Auburn athletic director John Cohen disagreed, firing Freeze on Nov. 2, taking on his $15.8 million buyout, and hiring South Florida head coach Alex Golesh last week.

Despite that nice payday on his way out, Freeze is still venting about his dismissal and blames quarterback Jackson Arnold for why he’s no longer Auburn’s head coach.

During an interview this week with AuburnSports’ Justin Hokanson, Freeze said, “Certainly, it didn’t work out to the level that he or I both expected for him and our team. And that’s why I’m sitting here.”

Freeze recruited Arnold out of the transfer portal from Oklahoma, where he passed for 1,421 yards, 12 touchdowns and three interceptions and rushed for 444 yards and three TDs as the Sooners’ starter in 2024. It seemed to be a mutual parting of the ways between Arnold and Oklahoma, which brought in the highly coveted Washington State transfer, John Mateer, at quarterback.

Arnold, who was a five-star prospect and the No. 4-ranked QB recruit in the 2023 class by 247Sports, looked for a fresh start as a junior at Auburn, but it was more of the same for him this fall as he passed for just 1,309 yards, 6 TDs and 2 INTs with 311 rushing yards and 8 TDs before being benched Oct. 25 vs. Arkansas after throwing an interception that was returned 89 yards for a touchdown.

Ashton Daniels, a senior and transfer from Stanford, took over and led Auburn back from an 11-point halftime deficit to a 33-24 win over the Razorbacks and finished the season as the starter.

Freeze tempered his comments on Arnold a bit, saying, “Let’s be clear, this is not a beat-up Jackson deal. It’s never always the quarterback. There are other factors. I mean, he missed a touchdown throw here at Oklahoma to a wide-open Cam Coleman.

“Those plays you’ve got to make to win games. And he would say that too. And there’s also the Missouri game, where we have what, eight drops? Then there’s moments in the Georgia second half where he misses open guys, or the protection is not great, so it’s a combination of all those things.”

Maybe it’s also partly the coaching. Freeze was given a six-year, $49-million contract at Auburn after having previous success at Ole Miss (on the field, at least) and Liberty, but he went 6-7 and 5-7 in his first two seasons before starting 4-5 this year and getting fired. He was 6-16 in SEC play during his tenure.



Link

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending