Carter Bahns of CBS Sports named Miami cornerback Xavier Lucas as one of his “College Football Playoff X-factors: Players poised to make or break contenders’ 2025 postseason chances.” Lucas transferred to Miami in the winter portal window and could become the top CB for the Hurricanes in 2025.

Mario Cristobal made the secondary a point of emphasis during the transfer portal. In addition to Lucas, Miami added Charles Brantley and Ethan O’Connor during the winter transfer portal and Kalonte Scott this spring at CB. Zechariah Poyser transferred to Miami in the winter portal and Jakobe Thomas in the spring at safety.

Cornerback O.J. Frederique is the only returning defensive back for Miami projected to start in the secondary in 2025. Frederique and Lucas are projected to start for Miami at CB, Brantley as the nickel and Poyser and Thomas at safety for Miami in 2025.

In addition to the two pass breakups and one interception in 2024 with Wisconsin, Lucas had 18 tackles, two tackles for loss and one sack. playing 203 defensive snaps. Per David Lake of Inside the U, Pro Football Focus gave Lucas “an 80.5 coverage grade, a 76.8 tackling grade, and a 71.0 run defense grade for his efforts in 2024.”

“Xavier Lucas, CB

Xavier Lucas was the top-ranked corner in the portal and serves as the face of this new-look (secondary) unit, which looks deeper and more talented than the one that struggled last fall. Much of the excitement around Lucas is still rooted in projection considering he has just one year of experience under his belt and posted one interception and two pass breakups at Wisconsin, so a lot hinges on him taking the expected sophomore leap.”

Carter Bahns, CBS Sports

Lake also stated, “According to PFF, Lucas missed just one tackle in 2024. Lucas was targeted 19 times in coverage and allowed nine receptions for 127 yards and one touchdown.” At 6’2 and 198 pounds, Lucas provides Miami with excellent length at CB in 2025.

Miami was wildly inconsistent defending the pass in 2024. The Hurricanes allowed a combined 313 passing yards versus Florida State, Georgia tech and Wake Forest. Four opponents threw for over 300 yards versus Miami in 2024. Led by Lucas, Miami should have a significantly better secondary in 2025.

The Miami secondary will be tested throughout the 2025 season. Florida with D.J. Lagway and SMU with Kevin Jennings return two of the best QBs nationally in 2024. Louisville added Miller Moss from USC, who should elevate his performance under Jeff Brohm. Miami needs consistency from its secondary in 2025.

In an era of player movement, NIL dollars have flown once the transfer portal opens. That led to accusations of tampering, and John Calipari spoke candidly about the landscape.

Calipari specifically pointed out players’ ability to transfer each year. While he said he understands one or two transfers, he sees players leaving schools more than that – which has an impact both on the court and in the classroom.

If players were only able to transfer one or two times, Calipari argued, the NIL market could settle down as a result. While he noted legal concerns with implementing such rules, the Arkansas coach thinks those cases would be winnable.

“They should be able to go once, maybe twice, without penalty because the coach lied,” Calipari said Thursday on The Pat McAfee Show. “Told them you’re shooting every ball, I’m gonna play you this way, and he didn’t tell them the truth. Then, they should be able to leave. But four times, that means the first sign of trouble, I’m out. … If you’re a parent, wouldn’t you tell your son, you’re fighting this out? No, you’re staying, you’re going to do it.

“Now, I understand once or twice without penalty. But after that, don’t tell me, ‘Well, we’d get sued.’ A kid transferring four times – one, it’s not good for him. Two, he has no chance academically to do anything. And I think we’re still academic institutions. Take it to court. You can win that.”

Calipari also pointed out recent comments made by Vanderbilt quarterback Diego Pavia. He told Bussin’ with the Boys he could’ve had an NIL offer of more than $4 million if he opted to enter the portal for his final year of eligibility, which came after a judge’s order paved the way.

Because Pavia never entered the portal, John Calipari noted the tampering that took place. That, he said, is more of an issue than the influx of NIL money.

“But if we get that in order, I think the NIL stuff would be fine because right now, you’ve got the quarterback from Vanderbilt … that’s tampering,” Calipari said. “Put your name in the portal, $4.5 million. We have to get away from that more than the NIL.”

The NIL landscape is preparing for a big shift, though. Earlier this month, the landmark House v. NCAA settlement received final approval, meaning the NIL Go clearinghouse is going into effect. Deals worth more than $600 will be vetted by the service, managed by Deloitte, and the goal is to help determine fair market value.

Inside Rice University’s Revolutionary NIL Strategy originally appeared on Athlon Sports.

From the Podium to the Boardroom: Rice’s Olympic-Level NIL Playbook

When Rice University tapped an Olympic medalist and powerhouse attorney to lead its Name, Image and Likeness (NIL) efforts, it didn’t just make a hire, it made a statement.

Advertisement

As the House v. NCAA settlement redefines college athletics, Rice is stepping confidently into uncharted territory. The American Athletic Conference school, though outside the Power 4, has opted into the NCAA’s new revenue-sharing model. This means Rice will invest a minimum of $10 million over three years into its athletes, ushering in a new era of compensation, competition, and credibility.

At the heart of it all? Tasha Moser.

Moser, Rice’s new Associate Athletic Director of NIL and General Manager, isn’t your typical administrator. She’s a former U.S. Olympic gymnast and NCAA champion. She’s also a seasoned attorney who has built a legal practice around NIL strategy and athlete advocacy. Moser helped launch “WeAreNIL” at Munck, Wilson Mandala LLP, offering education and guidance to student-athletes, collectives, and brands. And now, she’s bringing that same expertise, and empathy to Rice.

“It was essential that we find a leader with both experience and passion to guide our NIL efforts,” said Rice Athletic Director Tommy McClelland. “Tasha’s journey, from excelling as a world-class gymnast to becoming a highly successful attorney, perfectly positions her for this moment.”

Advertisement

Innovation Meets Integrity

Rice isn’t throwing money at the problem. It’s crafting an NIL system built on education, transparency, and long-term support. Moser’s role isn’t just to sign deals. She’ll help manage revenue-sharing logistics, guide athletes through contract language, assist coaches with roster strategy, and serve as the bridge between student-athletes and third-party partners.

Her background offers another layer of credibility. As a survivor advocate who testified before Congress on athlete safety and a current board member for USA Gymnastics, Moser brings moral clarity to a space often criticized for blurred lines and missed opportunities.

“Rice has long been a national leader in academic excellence, and now it is leading the way in NIL innovation,” Moser said.

Economic Impact with Athletic Intent

Rice might not be in a Power 4 conference, but its economic and cultural influence is nothing short of elite. According to a recent Collegiate Consulting report, Rice Athletics generated a total impact of over $115 million in game day and event activity over the past three years. Now, with an NIL plan in place, it’s aiming to convert that impact into athlete value.

Advertisement

What’s happening in Houston is a blueprint for other non-Power 4 schools. While the spotlight often stays on blueblood programs, Rice is showing that smart, student-centered NIL execution can level the playing field.

What’s Next?

With the NCAA settlement set to take effect July 1, schools must adapt or fall behind. At Rice, NIL isn’t just a compliance checkbox, it’s a competitive advantage.

For fans, donors, and student-athletes watching from the sidelines, the message is clear: Rice is ready to win, on and off the field.

Related: NIL Struggles Far From Over After NCAA’s House Settlement

This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 19, 2025, where it first appeared.

The Big Ten boasts a boatload of talent at quarterback entering the 2025 campaign. However, ESPN’s Greg McElroy isn’t convinced the conference will have the best QBs in the country next season. Last week, McElroy explained his hesitation to name the Big Ten the conference of the QB in the upcoming season.

“I like the potential at a few places for sure,” McElroy said. “We’re kind of hinging our expectations on the potential of a handful of guys like Dante Moore at Oregon. Obviously, really highly-regarded, highly-touted player, but you don’t know for sure until they run out there and take the first snap.

“You don’t really know what you have until the guy goes out there and passes that test. The same can be said with Julian Sayin, assuming he gets the job at Ohio State. I think he’s probably the guy to beat, really highly-touted guy, clearly incredible skill set, great potential, but we don’t know just yet.”

Moore and Sayin are far from the only pieces in the Big Ten that McElroy isn’t all in on yet. While Michigan‘s Bryce Underwood was the No. 1 player in the 2025 recruiting cycle, there’s no way to know for sure how he will perform against collegiate competition until the season begins.

McElroy really likes pre-existing standouts like Penn State‘s Drew Allar and Illinois‘ Luke Altmyer, but he also needs to see them to continue to progress next season. McElroy is more than willing to admit the Big Ten could ultimately have the best quarterbacks, but he wouldn’t bet on it going into the season.

“I can’t, at this point, tell you that without a shadow of a doubt it’s the best group collectively,” McElroy said. “Are we going based on what they’ve done at the college level so far? Are we going based on upside? Because I gave you the three big names that could really alter the perception of the quarterback position in the Big Ten.

“That’s Dante Moore, Julian Sayin and Bryce Underwood. Those three guys all knock it out of the park, completely different conversation. But at this point, there’s a few more known commodities in other places.”

McElroy believes the Big 12 might have the best claim for quarterback talent ahead of the 2025 campaign. With Arizona State‘s Sam Leavitt, Baylor‘s Sawyer Robertson, TCU‘s Josh Hoover and other returning starters taking the stage, the Big 12 will have a loaded slate of talent behind center next season.

McElroy also mentioned the ACC and the SEC as potentially having better QB rosters than the Big Ten. Fans won’t have to wait long to see which quarterbacks step up this fall. College football kickoff is officially just over a month away, and McElroy can’t wait to see how the season pans out.

The newly approved NCAA vs. House settlement has created implications throughout college sports. Now, the state of Michigan is getting involved. Michigan has seen a bill introduced that could potentially target part of the agreement regarding NIL and reporting deals with the NCAA and investigate them.

Reps first introduced House Bill No. 4643. Tate, Herzberg, and Rheingans last week. This bill would completely ban reporting incoming deals to the NCAA. On top of that, it would also stop schools from assisting in any investigation and ban athletic associations from penalizing athletes or schools for non-compliance.

Michigan Goes Back At NCAA With New Bill To Block NIL Crackdown

While the settlement between the NCAA and the House was known for allowing revenue sharing, there’s so much more to it than just that. Among other agreements to try and shape the future of college athletics was that NIL deals above $600 will need third-party approval.

To make this happen, the deals will be sent to a new clearinghouse called “NIL Go.” Deloitte is set to oversee the fair compensation ranges in that regard. From there, the House settlement will also establish a new enforcement agency called the College Sports Commission. It’s going to be their job to handle investigations into improper deals done outside the system that the settlement is seeking to establish.

For the state of Michigan, they fired back at the NCAA with a new bill. In their proposed bill, the third-party approval and the latest enforcement agency would be directly affected if this bill were to be signed into law.

Michigan has five FBS programs, including its two Big Ten schools, Michigan and Michigan State. The Wolverines have been a powerhouse in college football and won a national championship as recently as the 2023 season.

A new Michigan bill introduced would ban schools from complying with NIL investigations and prohibit requiring the reporting of NIL deals to the College Sports Commission and Deloitte. https://t.co/ce5kXhS21j pic.twitter.com/fZ2UhySHD8

— On3 NIL (@On3NIL) June 19, 2025

Earlier in the year, the ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, and SEC each presented their member institutions with affiliation agreements. These agreements would prevent universities from using state laws to violate new enforcement rules. The price for not signing on to these agreements could also be very steep.

In layman’s terms, a school risks losing conference membership and participation against other power league programs. Conference administrators have used this tactic to, hopefully, enforce the House settlement regardless of the laws in place.
KEEP READING: Analysts Expose Harsh Truth About House v. NCAA’s Effect On NIL Deals and College Football Bluebloods
This is similar to a bill passed in Tennessee back in May. This was considered to be a very athlete-friendly law and shares some unique similarities with the one being brought forward by representatives in Michigan.

Tennessee law states that Tennessee schools can receive dollars from collectives unless told otherwise by federal law, a valid court order, or antitrust laws. This law also prevents the NCAA from creating anticompetitive restrictions and seeks to protect Tennessee schools from any potential further legal disputes.

Like the bill in Michigan, it was a pushback to the House settlement. In particular, they both appear to seek to stop all of the House settlement’s limits on NIL payments. They are both creating protections for schools from outside investigators.

What will come next from this proposed bill in Michigan remains to be seen. It must be passed and signed into law before the fallout begins to be felt. It should also be interesting to see if any other states follow Tennessee and Michigan’s lead.