Connect with us

NIL

David Pollack calls for rookie salary cap in NIL

Many criticisms about NIL are about how it’s handled throughout a player’s career. David Pollack has a solution that handles it, though, from the very start. Pollack shared that idea last week during an episode of ‘See Ball Get Ball’. He thinks the first thing that needs to be fixed about name, image, and likeness […]

Published

on

David Pollack calls for rookie salary cap in NIL

Many criticisms about NIL are about how it’s handled throughout a player’s career. David Pollack has a solution that handles it, though, from the very start.

Pollack shared that idea last week during an episode of ‘See Ball Get Ball’. He thinks the first thing that needs to be fixed about name, image, and likeness is the amounts going to incoming freshmen, leading him to suggest a cap on what they can profit in NIL.

“I have a proposal to start round one. Like, again, I’m seeing all this stuff and you see all these topics, like, how do I really fix NIL? I know the number one thing that needs to be changed,” said Pollack. “Like, if you want to start with something and change college football, and make it better and make it better for the athlete, the athlete’s future and everything about it? We need a rookie salary cap. A coming into a university salary cap. It cannot exceed X.”

This came during a conversation on the show about the commitment of OT Jackson Cantwell to Miami last week. Reporting, per On3’s Pete Nakos, had the Hurricanes offering $2-$2.5 million for Cantwell, the No. 1 overall recruit in 2026, to come to Coral Gables.

Pollack’s point is that recruits incoming as freshmen don’t have any name, image, or likeness to profit from, even if they’re top overall recruits in high school, with their new schools. It also, from the player’s perspective, makes it better for them as they can make an informed decision in their recruitments without it being just about the money.

“NIL – name, image, and likeness? What you did on the field should dictate how much money you get paid. It should not be what you did in high school. Like, it should’t be,” said Pollack. “Not everybody comes from the same background, same stuff. I mean, there’s a lot of factors that go into that.”

“Have a rookie cap. Now, you can choose the spot that’s best for you and it’s not just based on money,” Pollack said. “Here’s the thing. When you make a decision based on money and not looking towards the future, how many of those decisions have you made and you regretted? Like, a lot for me. If I’m making them just on money, I’m blinded, it’s harder. I can’t make a decision based on what’s really best for me.”

Getting something like this enacted would be difficult considering the precedent of the past few years of NIL. That said, the pros are there when it comes to Pollack’s case.

“You want to do something that’s really better for the players? Institute that and it immediately will get better,” said Pollack.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NIL

Transfers are common across college sports. Athletes see irony in being criticized as disloyal | Football

Hailey Van Lith was one year away from tying a bow on a traditional college career at Louisville and being cemented as one of the most decorated four-year starters in Cardinals history. She had just led her team to its third straight Elite Eight appearance and put up career-high numbers, including 19.7 points per game. […]

Published

on


Hailey Van Lith was one year away from tying a bow on a traditional college career at Louisville and being cemented as one of the most decorated four-year starters in Cardinals history. She had just led her team to its third straight Elite Eight appearance and put up career-high numbers, including 19.7 points per game.

But the rising senior from Wenatchee, Washington, had other plans. With WNBA aspirations on her mind, Van Lith swapped Louisville red for LSU purple and gold and embarked on a new journey in Baton Rouge. Her lone season included another run to the Elite Eight and it was back to the transfer portal.

Coach Mark Campbell’s pro-style offense caught her eye, and she decided her fifth and final year of eligibility would be spent at TCU.

College sports was once rooted in tradition, school pride and loyalty, but those expectations are changing if not fading in a landscape where athletes have won the ability to transfer season to season, year to year. Some are painted as disloyal or selfish but Van Lith and others don’t see it that way.

“Whenever you transfer, you always expect pushback,” Van Lith told The Associated Press. “I can’t tell you how many podcasts I’ve seen on people discussing my choices to go to this school and that school, and the theories that are thrown out there are all wrong. But it’s just, you learn to live in harmony with that, and at the end of the day, I just decided I’m no longer going to let false assumptions disrupt my peace.”

One of the biggest misconceptions, Van Lith said, is that her transfer decisions were guided by NIL compensation. She was able to look past accusations of being a “money chaser” or a “trophy chaser” and find solace knowing onlookers didn’t have the full picture.

“Multiple of the schools that I went to, I actually never got a check from,” she said. “I think that in transfer culture now, a lot of people automatically assume that it has to do with the collective money or now I guess it’s revenue share. But it just depends on the person, and for me, it was all basketball decisions.”

A level playing field

Ann Skeet, senior director of Leadership Ethics at Santa Clara’s Markkula Center for Applied Ethics, said all parties should be held to the same standards. Coaches and athletic directors take new jobs, navigating buyouts and ill will along the way.

“I do think one of the realities of sport in this day and age is that people are making changes more often than they used to,” Skeet said. “How they communicate what their decision is, how much time they give people, how frequently they’re changing teams, all of those things should be considered, and I think it’s fair to hold the coaches and players to equal standards.”

Skeet acknowledged the pressure on athletes navigating a new, professional-like industry at a young age. Millions of dollars in name, image and likeness compensation is already flowing even before schools start cutting checks after July 1 under the NCAA antitrust settlement.

“The reality is, NIL is bringing market pressures to college sports in a way that we haven’t experienced before, and so players are having to trade off and think about what serves their own personal interests vs. what serves the team interests in ways that they haven’t had to consider in the past,” she said.

Complicated decisions

While Van Lith was deciding her future, running back Ray Davis was awaiting his. In his sole season at Kentucky, Davis rushed for 1,129 yards on 199 carries and led the SEC with 21 touchdowns from scrimmage. His production was enough to garner interest from NFL scouts.

Similar to Van Lith, Davis’s winding road to the pros involved several stops. Before Kentucky, he had two-year stints at Temple (2019-2021) and Vanderbilt (2021-2023). Transferring to Kentucky meant Davis would suit up for his third team in five years, and he knew moving from one SEC school to the next could stir the pot. The decision wasn’t an easy one.

“It was super difficult,” Davis said. “It took days, literally almost weeks to just really make a decision. And when I made the decision, I just had to live with it. I couldn’t think twice about it. I had to be confident.”

The move paid off. Davis gained national attention and was selected by the Buffalo Bills in the fourth round of the 2024 draft. But while his draft stock soared, the backlash from transferring a second time took a toll.

“Mentally it sucks because, you know, as a kid when you’re 18, 19 or whatever, you’re being told, ‘Hey he’s leaving because he’s disloyal,’ and that’s not what it is,” Davis said.

He focused on what he could control.

“I think it’s really about how you handle it yourself, how you internalize it yourself, and how you go about walking in the building each and every day. If you be like, `Ah, people are looking at me like I’m not an honest and disloyal person,’ then that’s going to hurt you mentally. But if you walk into a place where you’re confident in who you are, then I think you’ll succeed,” Davis told AP.

The impacts

Transfer decisions, regardless of the underlying factor, can lead to unfavorable public perceptions — or worse. A 2024 study found a cross-section of abusive content directed toward college athletes on social media.

“It certainly is their right to transfer, but then they will also develop whatever reputation they develop as a result of the choices they make. So people who transfer multiple times are going to be identified in that way,” Skeet said. “It goes with the territory, as they say.”

Both Van Lith and Davis noted the irony in receiving blowback when team personnel can seek new ventures without repercussions.

“Coaches leave. Directors leave. Everybody has the opportunity to leave. So for players, we’ve got to have that opportunity too,” Davis said.

Added Van Lith: “A lot of times, the loyalty is placed on the responsibility of the players, but you see coaches leave all the time to better their financial situation, to make more money, to do better for their family. When people talk about loyalty, I really challenge them to put into perspective, if they would feel the same if a coach left.”


AP college sports: https://apnews.com/hub/college-sports



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Michigan House rep introduces bill to sidestep NCAA NIL ruling

MSU alum and Michigan House Representative D-9th District Joe Tate introduced a bill on June 12 to limit NCAA regulations on name, image and likeness payments to college athletes. Tate, a defensive lineman at MSU from 2000-2003 and former Michigan speaker of the house, presented HB 4643 to block the NCAA, athletic conferences and universities from interfering […]

Published

on


MSU alum and Michigan House Representative D-9th District Joe Tate introduced a bill on June 12 to limit NCAA regulations on name, image and likeness payments to college athletes.

Tate, a defensive lineman at MSU from 2000-2003 and former Michigan speaker of the house, presented HB 4643 to block the NCAA, athletic conferences and universities from interfering with athletes looking to collect on NIL funds.

“There are conflicts with the Michigan statute that we have on the books allowing student-athletes to take advantage of their name, image and likeness while they are at the university that they are participating in and as a student,” Tate said. “It prohibits any entity from limiting a student-athlete’s ability to take full advantage of their name, image and likeness.”

On June 5, a settlement in the House v. NCAA case made way for athletic departments to pay student-athletes directly from university funds, ushering in a new era of NIL in college athletics. The ruling limited the power of third parties and NIL collectives to pay student-athletes. 

The bill would circumvent this ruling, allowing athletes and third parties to determine a “fair market value” according to Tate. 

In congruence with the House settlement, the NCAA is asking power conferences, including the Big Ten, to comply with the NCAA rules even if it means breaking state laws like HB 4643. 

It is unclear how this will unfold between the NCAA and states in the coming months. Industry leaders have called on Congress to enact a law preventing student-athletes from becoming employees and provide the NCAA with antitrust exemptions. 

The president of Charitable Gift America and a prominent NIL collective, Dr. Tom Dieters, sponsoring MSU athletes like baseball’s Joseph Dzierwa, said the new bill would allow for athletes to earn compensation without the limits of the university or NCAA.

“The new NCAA rules, and they’re not laws, put a cap on compensation or can even prevent the student from getting an NIL contract altogether,” Dieters said.

MSU tennis standout Ozan Baris said there is an overwhelming amount of uncertainty in the NIL space and stated this bill would put an end to that.

“That’s where NIL is always so beneficial,” Baris said. “It gives me that place where I can play tennis and not have to worry about the financial stress of a financially burdening sport at times.”

Tate has experienced the difficulty of being a student-athlete and states they deserve the same rights that other students receive. “I know the dedication, sacrifices and challenges that come with balancing academics, athletics and personal growth,” he said.

Without the limits imposed by the House v. NCAA case, National College Players Association Executive Director Ramogi Huma said the bill could lead to increased recruiting at universities in the state.

“Student-athletes and their families look at a lot of factors whereas to decide where you go to school,” Tate said. “If Michigan is open for business, for student-athletes being able to take advantage of NIL, I would imagine that would be a tool to attract talent into our universities across the state.”

Support student media!
Please consider donating to The State News and help fund the future of journalism.

Discussion

Share and discuss “Michigan House rep introduces bill to sidestep NCAA NIL ruling” on social media.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Transfers are common across college sports. Athletes see irony in being criticized as disloyal | Football

Hailey Van Lith was one year away from tying a bow on a traditional college career at Louisville and being cemented as one of the most decorated four-year starters in Cardinals history. She had just led her team to its third straight Elite Eight appearance and put up career-high numbers, including 19.7 points per game. […]

Published

on


Hailey Van Lith was one year away from tying a bow on a traditional college career at Louisville and being cemented as one of the most decorated four-year starters in Cardinals history. She had just led her team to its third straight Elite Eight appearance and put up career-high numbers, including 19.7 points per game.

But the rising senior from Wenatchee, Washington, had other plans. With WNBA aspirations on her mind, Van Lith swapped Louisville red for LSU purple and gold and embarked on a new journey in Baton Rouge. Her lone season included another run to the Elite Eight and it was back to the transfer portal.

Coach Mark Campbell’s pro-style offense caught her eye, and she decided her fifth and final year of eligibility would be spent at TCU.

College sports was once rooted in tradition, school pride and loyalty, but those expectations are changing if not fading in a landscape where athletes have won the ability to transfer season to season, year to year. Some are painted as disloyal or selfish but Van Lith and others don’t see it that way.

“Whenever you transfer, you always expect pushback,” Van Lith told The Associated Press. “I can’t tell you how many podcasts I’ve seen on people discussing my choices to go to this school and that school, and the theories that are thrown out there are all wrong. But it’s just, you learn to live in harmony with that, and at the end of the day, I just decided I’m no longer going to let false assumptions disrupt my peace.”

One of the biggest misconceptions, Van Lith said, is that her transfer decisions were guided by NIL compensation. She was able to look past accusations of being a “money chaser” or a “trophy chaser” and find solace knowing onlookers didn’t have the full picture.

“Multiple of the schools that I went to, I actually never got a check from,” she said. “I think that in transfer culture now, a lot of people automatically assume that it has to do with the collective money or now I guess it’s revenue share. But it just depends on the person, and for me, it was all basketball decisions.”

A level playing field

Ann Skeet, senior director of Leadership Ethics at Santa Clara’s Markkula Center for Applied Ethics, said all parties should be held to the same standards. Coaches and athletic directors take new jobs, navigating buyouts and ill will along the way.

“I do think one of the realities of sport in this day and age is that people are making changes more often than they used to,” Skeet said. “How they communicate what their decision is, how much time they give people, how frequently they’re changing teams, all of those things should be considered, and I think it’s fair to hold the coaches and players to equal standards.”

Skeet acknowledged the pressure on athletes navigating a new, professional-like industry at a young age. Millions of dollars in name, image and likeness compensation is already flowing even before schools start cutting checks after July 1 under the NCAA antitrust settlement.

“The reality is, NIL is bringing market pressures to college sports in a way that we haven’t experienced before, and so players are having to trade off and think about what serves their own personal interests vs. what serves the team interests in ways that they haven’t had to consider in the past,” she said.

Complicated decisions

While Van Lith was deciding her future, running back Ray Davis was awaiting his. In his sole season at Kentucky, Davis rushed for 1,129 yards on 199 carries and led the SEC with 21 touchdowns from scrimmage. His production was enough to garner interest from NFL scouts.

Similar to Van Lith, Davis’s winding road to the pros involved several stops. Before Kentucky, he had two-year stints at Temple (2019-2021) and Vanderbilt (2021-2023). Transferring to Kentucky meant Davis would suit up for his third team in five years, and he knew moving from one SEC school to the next could stir the pot. The decision wasn’t an easy one.

“It was super difficult,” Davis said. “It took days, literally almost weeks to just really make a decision. And when I made the decision, I just had to live with it. I couldn’t think twice about it. I had to be confident.”

The move paid off. Davis gained national attention and was selected by the Buffalo Bills in the fourth round of the 2024 draft. But while his draft stock soared, the backlash from transferring a second time took a toll.

“Mentally it sucks because, you know, as a kid when you’re 18, 19 or whatever, you’re being told, ‘Hey he’s leaving because he’s disloyal,’ and that’s not what it is,” Davis said.

He focused on what he could control.

“I think it’s really about how you handle it yourself, how you internalize it yourself, and how you go about walking in the building each and every day. If you be like, `Ah, people are looking at me like I’m not an honest and disloyal person,’ then that’s going to hurt you mentally. But if you walk into a place where you’re confident in who you are, then I think you’ll succeed,” Davis told AP.

The impacts

Transfer decisions, regardless of the underlying factor, can lead to unfavorable public perceptions — or worse. A 2024 study found a cross-section of abusive content directed toward college athletes on social media.

“It certainly is their right to transfer, but then they will also develop whatever reputation they develop as a result of the choices they make. So people who transfer multiple times are going to be identified in that way,” Skeet said. “It goes with the territory, as they say.”

Both Van Lith and Davis noted the irony in receiving blowback when team personnel can seek new ventures without repercussions.

“Coaches leave. Directors leave. Everybody has the opportunity to leave. So for players, we’ve got to have that opportunity too,” Davis said.

Added Van Lith: “A lot of times, the loyalty is placed on the responsibility of the players, but you see coaches leave all the time to better their financial situation, to make more money, to do better for their family. When people talk about loyalty, I really challenge them to put into perspective, if they would feel the same if a coach left.”


AP college sports: https://apnews.com/hub/college-sports



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

How Does the House v. NCAA Settlement Affect NIL for Collegiate Athletes? What to Know – Eagle Media

After years of buildup and legal arguments, the House v. NCAA reached a settlement on revenue share for collegiate athletes on June 6. The $2.8 billion, ten-year settlement will pay current and past players for missed name, image and likeness opportunities. Still, it most notably will allow colleges to pay current players directly starting July […]

Published

on


After years of buildup and legal arguments, the House v. NCAA reached a settlement on revenue share for collegiate athletes on June 6. The $2.8 billion, ten-year settlement will pay current and past players for missed name, image and likeness opportunities. Still, it most notably will allow colleges to pay current players directly starting July 1. 

U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken gave final approval of the landmark settlement. This comes after five years of litigation, followed by another year of discussions and edits, following the NCAA and power conferences’ initial decision to settle the suit in 2024. 

This ruling ends the amateurism status of the NCAA and provides a new framework of rules and regulations to help tame what some have called the “Wild West” era of NIL. Currently, NIL collectives operate virtually free from any sort of regulation, which results in widespread tampering across college sports and multiple lawsuits every time a player leaves a school for another after receiving a payment from the school they left. 

This most notable incident took place recently, when quarterback Madden Iamaleava transferred from Arkansas to UCLA during the spring transfer portal window. Iamaleava was an early-enrollee member of the Razorbacks’ 2025 high school recruiting class. He transferred after just spending a few weeks with the program. 

Story continues below advertisement

The school’s collective, Arkansas EDGE, is still pursuing its legal dispute against Iamaleava. According to CBS Sports, they’re seeking $200,000 in repayment following his decision to leave before he touched the field. This case marks a new and aggressive approach to NIL contract enforcement, which is likely to become a more common occurrence as NIL contracts become a requirement for players to enroll at a new school. 

According to the Associated Press, universities will share up to $20.5 million with student-athletes directly across all sports. That cap will increase by at least four percent each year throughout the ten-year agreement. As far as the current planned distribution model goes, most schools are expected to allocate roughly 75 percent of future revenue to football players, 15 percent to men’s basketball, five percent to women’s basketball and the rest to all remaining sports. However, other schools plan to mirror the gross revenue each sport averages, which would likely result in more than 85 percent of the money earned being allocated to football players.

One of the main arguments against the settlement was that the new roster limits could result in thousands of student-athletes losing their spots due to imposed limitations across all 43 NCAA-sponsored sports. 

This counterargument led to a delay in the final ruling until a compromise was reached. While the judge asked for a plan to be proposed that would “grandfather in” current athletes, the power conferences instead proposed a compromise that would allow schools the option to temporarily exceed the roster limits until the players exhausted their eligibility. 

Once the roster limits are enforced, some sports will gain spots that they didn’t have in previous years, but most will be shrunk down despite being able to offer unlimited scholarships within those thresholds. 

 



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Tarleton State Softball set to host 3 camps at Tarleton State Softball Complex

Story Links STEPHENVILLE, Texas – Following a run to the WAC Tournament title game in the Texans’ first season of postseason eligibility, Tarleton State Softball announced three camps on Wednesday.   With the most successful season in the Purple and White’s Division I era behind the Texans, Tarleton State will […]

Published

on


STEPHENVILLE, Texas – Following a run to the WAC Tournament title game in the Texans’ first season of postseason eligibility, Tarleton State Softball announced three camps on Wednesday.
 
With the most successful season in the Purple and White’s Division I era behind the Texans, Tarleton State will offer three different camps this summer. The two types of camps offered will be a pair of prospect camps that bookend the kids camp in mid-July.
 
Tarleton State will offer their prospect camps on July 15 and Aug. 16. Both camps are open to those entering 8th-12th grade. All positions are welcome but are limited to the following: nine pitchers, nine catchers, 12 outfielders and 20 infielders per camp. Check in will take place at the Tarleton State Softball locker room from 8:15 a.m. to 9 a.m. Participants are expected to bring the following items: glove, bat, helmet, batting gloves, water bottle (water will be provided to fill up), hat/glasses (if needed) and catching gear (if catcher). The full camp schedule is listed below.
 
July 15
8:15 A.M.  Check in
9:00 A.M.  Introductions
9:15 A.M.  Stretch
9:30 A.M. Defense
11:15 A.M. Offense

1:15 P.M. Meet/Q&A
1:30 P.M. Check out
 
Aug. 16
8:15 A.M.  Check in
9:00 A.M.  Introductions
9:15 A.M.  Stretch
9:30 A.M. Defense
11:15 A.M. Offense

1:15 P.M. Meet/Q&A
1:30 P.M. Check out
 
The kids camp will take place on July 16-17. All kids entering kindergarten through 7th grade are welcome to attend. Check in will take place at the Tarleton State Softball locker room from 8:30 a.m. to 9 a.m. Participants are expected to bring the following items: glove, bat, helmet, batting gloves, water bottle (water will be provided to fill up), hat/glasses (if needed) and catching gear (if catcher). The full camp schedule is listed below.
 
8:30 A.M.  Check in
9 A.M.  Stretch
9:15 A.M. Defense
10:25 A.M. Offense

11:35 A.M. Meet/Q&A
 
For full information and to register, visit https://www.tarletonsoftballcamp.com
 
For the latest news on the Texans, follow Tarleton Softball on Facebook, Instagram and X @tarletonsoftball.
 





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

As Briggs Cherry's stock soars, Louisville faces new challenges to keep him

When Briggs Cherry committed to Louisville in January, he was a relatively under-the-radar addition in the 2026 quarterback class. Now, after an impressive performance at the Elite 11 Regional in Ohio, the four-star from Chattanooga, Tennessee, is one of 20 QBs in the 2026 class at the Elite 11 Finals in Los Angeles, and a […]

Published

on

As Briggs Cherry's stock soars, Louisville faces new challenges to keep him

When Briggs Cherry committed to Louisville in January, he was a relatively under-the-radar addition in the 2026 quarterback class. Now, after an impressive performance at the Elite 11 Regional in Ohio, the four-star from Chattanooga, Tennessee, is one of 20 QBs in the 2026 class at the Elite 11 Finals in Los Angeles, and a major offseason riser. 

Cherry’s ascent is good news for Jeff Brohm, but it could also make the task of holding onto Cherry through the Early Signing Period a bit more difficult. 

Louisville faces increased pressure to retain Cherry amid NIL shifts

In a conversation with On3’s Pete Nakos, Cherry spoke about his recruiting efforts for Louisville’s 2026 class, which just added his right tackle from the Baylor School, Charlie Edgeworth. While that may seem like Cherry is fully locked in with the Cardinals, he also revealed that he’s recently been in talks with the coaching staff at Ohio State, saying, “I’m pretty locked in with Louisville,” before adding, “I was in contact with Ohio State for a couple of weeks – they’re the national champions. You never know, there.” 

With the Buckeyes supposedly sniffing around and Cherry’s surprise ascent to the Elite 11 Finals, the price could be going up to secure the services of the 26th-ranked QB in the 2026 class by 247Sports Composite – and just in time for NIL negotiations. 

“I get to talk NIL when I get to my official visit on June 20th,” Cherry told Nakos, admitting that he doesn’t quite know his exact value yet. “But I know it’s coming, and my worth right now is rising, especially with all the Elite 11 stuff. I’ll probably just start with a one-year deal and work up.” 

NIL is changing with the House Settlement going into effect on July 1, allowing programs to directly pay athletes out of the 20.5 million dollar pool of revenue sharing money. It is yet to be seen how the settlement will impact recruiting payments, but with a more finite amount of resources to work with this cycle, Cherry’s rise could mean a bigger piece of the pie. 

Despite landing a quarterback in each of his recruiting classes since arriving at Louisville, Brohm has gone with a transfer portal starter every year. This time around, it will be USC transfer Miller Moss. Still, recruiting high school quarterbacks appears to be an integral part of his roster construction, so expect Louisville to do what it can to hold onto Cherry even if that becomes more difficult when negotiations begin during his visit this weekend. 

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending